Trent

#Flatearth’ers. I’m looking for one of you that won’t run from this. So far, ALL flat earthers end up running from it. ALWAYS. Show the path the sun takes over/around your flat earth over the course of the day. It has to match what we observe in reality, from all locations.

@benwehrman @TherionWare @AntiDisinfo86 Except for the fact that all observation points to us living on a rotating sphere. Regardless of observations being converted to Shane’s flat model that doesn’t match observable reality.

@TherionWare @AntiDisinfo86 damn that's a lot of words. we don't live on a spinning ball bro, i'm sorry

This new Flat Earth Conceptual Model is a GAME-CHANGER. It allows you to toggle between viewing Earth's full celestial system from above, and as an observer on the ground with perspective restrictions. Bravo, @AntiDisinfo86 👏

@KAunkwn @jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman Your ridiculous option about that is completely irrelevant. But I appreciate your commitment to saying random stuff to pretend you have a point.

@LogicalReterg @jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman Your poor children are being taught how to be slaves in their “education” system.. yikes

If Mercury and Venus were orbiting the Sun at a tighter radius than Earth, we would never see them on the "night side" of our spinning ball planet (facing away from the Sun) Yet we do. All the time. Reason number (idk i've lost count) that heliocentrism is a fictional fantasy.

@KAunkwn @jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman You think you can’t see the surface on a clear day of flying? 😂 And your claim of only getting to see what someone else gives permission to is not only nonsense, but completely irrelevant and doesn’t change the point in the slightest. You’re grasping at straws. Desperation.

@LogicalReterg @jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman Are you illiterate or just plain stupid? You cant clearly photograph or record the ground when you get that high with a plane. And the planes have specific flight paths so you only get to “see” based on someone else’s permission unlike with the blimps

@KAunkwn @manteo44 @jacuzzi_toaster @Claymore729 @benwehrman So what if you can’t wreck the place? You can go there. Your pathetic straw grasping won’t change that. The model that requires your need to not go there is thoroughly debunked anyway. So you’re just clinging to a fantasy.

@manteo44 @jacuzzi_toaster @Claymore729 @benwehrman Ehh fun fact 🤓, you cant touch, take interact with basically anything. Whatever you think is your own doing but beg you just stfu, spewing your indoctrinated propaganda

@KAunkwn @Claymore729 @jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman Yes we can free travel there. Nothing in the agreement between nations says you can’t. And it still has nothing to do with blimps.

@Claymore729 @jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman Doesnt it? We cant freely travel there, and its the one thing that every nation can agree on despite other conflicts

@KAunkwn @jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman We can get much higher than blimps. And you’re trying to pretend that we are the ignorant ones? 😂

@jacuzzi_toaster @benwehrman Im ignorant yet you believe that we can send people to space apparently, but cant explore the entire ocean.. or the fact that blimps were put out of use so that we couldn’t discover that the earth is flat… yikes

@benwehrman This is how flat earthers prove that they don’t have spatial reasoning skills.

@ChristCert @NotEvolution1 Too bad none of you fools can find something like that.

@NotEvolution1 Darwin refuted himself when he said the following: “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down."

Darwin and friends weren’t even close

@TrueYesterVue @LPJonesy1986 @benwehrman Whether he did or not, Ben’s argument was about it never having moved in recorded history, which is blatantly false. But you’ll take the word of a charlatan like Ben, because it plays to your bias, rather than recorded history.

@LPJonesy1986 @benwehrman Really now? And what modern navigational and charting tools coordinates did they leave us to compare it with today and validate that speculative presumption?

No star in the night sky has ever gotten dimmer or brighter. No new constellations have ever appeared, and none have disappeared. The EXACT same stars have turned over our Earth for over 6,000 years of recorded history. Polaris has NEVER moved. (No matter how much they lie and say "there was a different north star thousands of years ago"...that's BS they made up to prop up the "Earth is moving" lie). The Earth is NOT flying through space at millions and millions of miles per hour as the Science™ tells us. We are completely still & stationary, just how it feels, and the sun, moon and stars are rotating in circles above US. God's perfect timepiece, cycling ad infinitum above our heads.

@benwehrman The images you showed in that video don’t depict the sun, moon and stars moving in a circle above us though. So why do you blatantly lie? Also, when you actually track the sun and moon, they don’t move in a circle above us. They move in a circle AROUND us.

@Mat_Hunt @SqSehrish Yes

@LogicalReterg @SqSehrish The sentence structure is such that it's 142.

The answer is definitely Not 70" So what is it..?

@Mat_Hunt @SqSehrish Could be 58 if written out as a sum, rather than a sentence, doing the division first.

@LogicalReterg @SqSehrish It's 142.

@MrMadness101 @ApoloJedi_ @philobrossuckdi He’s “special” because of his worldview. Or some such. 🤷‍♂️

@ApoloJedi_ @LogicalReterg @philobrossuckdi Can you not apply your own thinking to your own comments? 🤣

Because they have denied the Creator, evolutionists are left only with the belief that this functional coherent interrelated interdependent system just made itself from an accumulation of random mutations 🤪

@its_mizuko_ 18

Most people rush and fail… don’t be one What's your answer?

@Mesocortical @ApoloJedi_ @philobrossuckdi Coz apparently only Christian’s can know stuff for certain. Coz worldview and stuff.

@ApoloJedi_ @LogicalReterg @philobrossuckdi Sorry, how do you know that you're asking a question again? You never answered that.

@AntiDisinfo86 When the model uses an earth layout that is completely impossible, it doesn’t matter whether or not you can get celestial observations, that work on a globe, converted to work on that model.

Still zero rebuttals to this model. No one has shown any globe anything to be present in the code... meaning... its properly displaying celestial observations without it? How is that possible globies...? Here it is: github.com/stpierrs/conce…

@ApoloJedi_ @philobrossuckdi @Mesocortical You know how I know? Because I have “the only worldview that can sufficiently account for reasoning and knowledge”

@ApoloJedi_ @philobrossuckdi @Mesocortical I know right? It’s 100% certain knowledge that you’re clueless.

@Anna_xb2 2

Only for mathematician 0.00001% will be successed..