ratiolus

783 posts

ratiolus banner
ratiolus

ratiolus

@Ratiolus

noise attracts attention

Присоединился Şubat 2026
11 Подписки17 Подписчики
Закреплённый твит
ratiolus
ratiolus@Ratiolus·
Every idea sounds stronger in an echo.
English
0
0
0
2K
Atheist Girl
Atheist Girl@iamAtheistGirl·
yeah it couldn’t possibly have anything to do with the fact that no one is forcing zeus down anyone’s throat the lack of critical thinking 🤦‍♀️
Atheist Girl tweet media
English
93
86
932
8.8K
Trysque
Trysque@Mandabob1·
@Ratiolus @LokiLusts4u @Googlei25779262 @RoomHelper @iamAtheistGirl What a delightful strawman. Your realise that for centuries religion WAS politics right? Oh no, ofc not. Blind nationalists like yourself are incapable of grasping the historical reality of how religious institutions stiffled science and oppressed thought.
English
1
0
0
14
ratiolus
ratiolus@Ratiolus·
@SKolls @iamAtheistGirl Im sure you think that somehow proves some superior point about religion, Christianity or whatever. Let me tell you something. It doesn’t.
English
0
0
0
1
Atheist Girl
Atheist Girl@iamAtheistGirl·
*sigh* atheism is a lack of belief in gods the same way you lack belief in unicorns no faith required faith in the context of religion means belief without evidence atheism isn’t a belief it’s a lack of a belief 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️
Atheist Girl tweet media
English
205
68
578
10.1K
Trysque
Trysque@Mandabob1·
@Ratiolus @LokiLusts4u @Googlei25779262 @RoomHelper @iamAtheistGirl Ah yes, weakness is when one is capable of recognising the flaws in their own belief system and the reality of its institutions and history. It is sticking your head in the sand and ignoring that reality that is strength. What a joke you are
English
1
0
0
14
ratiolus
ratiolus@Ratiolus·
So i guess from all that studying it somehow escaped your attention that parables, symbolism and metaphor was the way people used to learn and teach in ancient times? That a lot of those stories were actually trying to pass down teachings about revenge, guilt, love, responsability and community. Those texts weren’t trying to be scientific treaties. Life was too brutal, too hard and too immediate back then. They were trying to understand the moral order. But no sure, you already understand all of this.
English
1
0
0
6
SMSkulls (She/Her)
SMSkulls (She/Her)@SKolls·
Really. I’ve read it multiple times, along with parts of the Quran and the Talmud. I’ve read some of Eastern religions and have visited some Buddhist Peace Pagodas in the US. I’ve studied the gods of ancient Rome and Greece. I’ve studied the Hindu gods. I know your God, the Muslim god, and the Jewish god are all the same - the god of Abraham. Just different books. Good a god I heard the bible in my house every night when I was growing up as my mom proofread bibles for a living. The bible is simply NOT history. The earth did not flood and all animals were not saved in an ark. The Red Sea did not part. Ever. SO many more examples. Some articles of dress are accurate. Some rulers are correctly identified. There are some foundational buildings mentioned. But historically accurate? No. No more than Zeus pulling a baby out of his forehead.
English
1
0
0
12
ratiolus
ratiolus@Ratiolus·
You are nothing, buddy. You are just a weak, poorly formed mind that built an entire false picture of the world it lives in. I did not come to you. You chose to engage in this with dumb, poorly constructed arguments. I am not a supremacist. I do not think religion is some saintly, perfect thing, nor any other stupid fantasy you may have invented in your own head. But I am someone who cannot stand people like you. People who do not even take the time to understand the world they live in, and then dump all their ignorance and shit into it while pretending to be some deep thinker interested in improving humanity. People like you are not enlightened. You are exactly the kind of corrosion that makes society worse.
English
3
0
0
14
Trysque
Trysque@Mandabob1·
@Ratiolus @LokiLusts4u @Googlei25779262 @RoomHelper @iamAtheistGirl I am not an atheist by the way. I am actually a Christian. I am just not an ignorant ideologue and supremecist like you who thinks religion is some sort of saintly thing that has always worked towards progress, in reality the opposite has been true.
English
2
0
0
29
ratiolus
ratiolus@Ratiolus·
Are you having a tantrum you little ignorant monkey? Sorry if too much truth destroyed your unverified dumb world vision. This is what happens when you build your identity around what others tell you to believe. Like i said early, Atheism is nothing more than identity politics for weak pathetic people like you.
English
2
0
0
25
ratiolus
ratiolus@Ratiolus·
If you had actually studied history, you would understand that everything gets politicized. Always. It happened with socialism, capitalism, religion, nationalism, and every major framework in human history. It even happened with science through eugenics, technocracy, and the industrial machinery of war. Were there political agendas that resisted scientific progress? Yes. But religious traditions were also a major component in the advancement of science, through priests, monks, scholars, universities, and institutions. Is the Soviet Union the same thing as socialism itself? No. Do Hiroshima and Nagasaki represent science as a whole? No. Then stop using religion as the only framework you are too lazy to analyze with the same nuance. This is how thinking works. Grow up. Read. Study. Use your head.
English
1
0
0
21
Trysque
Trysque@Mandabob1·
@Ratiolus @LokiLusts4u @Googlei25779262 @RoomHelper @iamAtheistGirl The institutions they built were preserving the works of pagan Greeks, secular Romans, and diverse global cultures who developed geometry, engineering, and medicine without their theology. Your "history" is cherrypicked to suit your religious fundamentalism.
English
1
0
0
35
Saynara
Saynara@Nejetztnicht69·
@Ratiolus @iamAtheistGirl It started the second people made up the Jesus story. Yes. Story. The church commited so MANY Crimes in the Name of the Bible, you cant seperate it.
English
1
0
0
18
ratiolus
ratiolus@Ratiolus·
Says the “enlightened” one who spends his day tweeting dogmatic propaganda against an entire group of people. This is how public discourse works, little donkey. You post dumb shit, you get responses. I cannot believe you are pathetic enough to post this kind of stuff just to get some weird validation for being supposedly intellectually brave. Nice cult-like echo chamber you people have built here.
English
1
0
0
16
Atheist Girl
Atheist Girl@iamAtheistGirl·
these believers are absolutely insufferable
Atheist Girl tweet media
English
28
15
268
2.8K
ratiolus
ratiolus@Ratiolus·
@iamAtheistGirl These is how public discourse works Einstein. If you post dumb dogmatic stupidity against an entire group of people you will get responds.
English
0
0
0
10
Atheist Girl
Atheist Girl@iamAtheistGirl·
so what if i post anti religious stuff are your beliefs so fragile that my posting opinions and facts about religion make you poop your pants? no one is forcing you to read anything i post and i certainly don’t go to your posts and comment all over them.
English
20
5
203
1.3K
ratiolus
ratiolus@Ratiolus·
This does not refute my point. It proves you do not understand the distinction. AD 33 is a theological claim about Jesus and the apostles. AD 110 is the appearance of the word “catholic” as “universal.” The 4th–5th century is the development of the Church as a structured imperial institution. Those are not the same thing. A spiritual movement, a universal label, and a political-religious institution are different categories. The point is that the Catholic Church, as an institution, eventually became a political structure with hierarchy, law, territory, diplomacy, courts, property, money, doctrine, bureaucracy, and power. This is not even unique to Christianity. In the ancient world, power always organized itself around religion. Egyptian pharaohs, Mesopotamian kings, Roman emperors, Persian rulers, temples, priesthoods, sacred law, divine legitimacy. Christian or non-Christian, political authority constantly dressed itself in sacred language. So if your argument is “the Church has religious origins,” congratulations. Nobody denied that. But everything in ancient times had religious origins. To understand this well you need to study human history.
English
1
0
0
14