Ruth Barringham

6.8K posts

Ruth Barringham

Ruth Barringham

@RuthIsWriting

Writer & Author of many books. I earn all my income from my writing, and help others do it too. Lover of animals & laughing a lot.

Sunshine Coast QLD Australia Присоединился Aralık 2012
242 Подписки337 Подписчики
Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙‍♀️🦉🐈‍⬛ 🦖
Lest anyone who thinks my pink gloves of petting are silly with Bruiser, wait for it…. I’m so GLAD I was wearing them!! He’s been letting me pet him while he was lying down for quite a while now. See yesterday’s post. After this he was surly all day. Two steps forward..
English
121
38
1.1K
20.5K
Ruth Barringham
Ruth Barringham@RuthIsWriting·
@AunySillyMe Why do we need to WATCH music? Why can’t it just be an audio?
English
0
0
0
183
Auny 🧡
Auny 🧡@AunySillyMe·
If you listen to lo-fi focus music on YouTube; Here's 30mins of calm, melancholic music that keeps your brain “still” while you get things done 11:11 → Album Out Now Let me know if you like it Put it on loop and work, study ... or sleep 😂
English
31
54
736
1.4M
Ruth Barringham ретвитнул
Mark Manson
Mark Manson@Markmanson·
It will always take longer than you want it to… even when you account for the fact that it will always take longer than you want it to.
English
80
81
880
29.7K
Ruth Barringham ретвитнул
The People's Friend
The People's Friend@TheFriendMag·
(!/2) Get writing! We're looking for stories from July onwards for 'People's Friend' weekly, and from September onwards for our Specials. We're always looking for stories for our little annual! And Christmas stories can be accepted from April onwards...
English
2
17
40
1.5K
Ruth Barringham
Ruth Barringham@RuthIsWriting·
@jakonrath No one can predict the future. No one. Who says AI will get better and better? Some say it will implode on itself one day. I still see people reading books in the park, on trains, etc.
English
1
0
0
18
J.A. Konrath
J.A. Konrath@jakonrath·
THE NOVEL IS DEAD. FICTION WRITERS FACE EXTINCTION. Get ready. This is going to hurt. Making up words for a living faces three challenges that it will not be able to overcome, and anyone calling themselves a fulltime author might need a side gig very soon. This isn't exaggeration, and I am pretty upset. Here are three points that prove we're charging downhill (and maybe what authors can do to hang on...) 1. READERSHIP IS DWINDLING In the US, fiction reading has steadily declined 3% per year since 2003 despite a population increase of more than 60 million people. The older generation--who are the largest percentage of the population that read for leisure--is dying at a rate of three million people per year. The younger generation isn't reading as much fiction as their parents, who aren't reading as much fiction as their parents. The number of bookstores that sell new fiction is declining, and the number of big box stores that sell fiction are seeing their paperback racks get smaller, or disappear completely. This trend cannot be reversed, unless a zombie virus hits and we can resurrect 25 million Boomers. And Borders. I miss Borders and Waldenbooks a lot. 2. AI BOOKS ARE JUST GETTING STARTED A week ago, the buzz was about an author who allegedly used AI to write her horror novel, which was acquired by a large publisher, Hachette. Hachette later cancelled the book release after an internal investigation. Everyone is talking about the ethics of using AI to write, but they are missing the elephant in the room: AI wrote well enough to land a major publishing deal. LLMs illegally trained on over 500k professionally written books (including 80 of mine), and now AI can is so good it can fool publishers. Anyone can now use AI to write books and pump out dozens a year in the style of bestselling authors. Between 2023 and 2024 there was a 3.5% increase in the number of self-published books according to Bowker ISBNs, with the overall total being 2,545,885. Between 2024 and 2025 there was a 38.7% increase, raising the total to 3,529,980. Do ya think maybe that's AI-related? And ya think that number will get higher or lower? Ya scared yet? 3. NEW TECHNOLOGY IS MONOPOLIZING LEISURE TIME You're reading this post on X. Why isn't your nose buried in a novel right now? Sure, maybe you have a Kindle app on your cell. Or maybe you curl up at night with a paperback. But you surely know people are using their free time differently than they were in 2005. I used to go to the park, or go on public transportation, and see people reading. Now I see cell phones everywhere. Maybe some are reading fiction, but most are on social media, texting, streaming, shopping, surfing. Less than 5% are reading fiction. Beyond cell phones we have PC and console gaming, streaming professional and amateur media, being online; all things that take up leisure time that used to be spent devouring novels. Attention spans since 2004 have more than halved. It is difficult to get people to read a five minute X post. Getting them to read a 10 hour novel is becoming impossible. In 2012, 64% of parents read to their children. That number is now 41%. I could keep spouting more statistics, but I am officially freaking out. How about you? WHO WILL SURVIVE? We're in a shrinking market that is about to be annihilated by AI. The demand is going way down, and the supply is going way up. You don't have to be an economist to know what this means. Authors with large book releases by big publishers, authors who have huge followings, and authors who have movie/TV tie-ins will be able to make a living. Occasional "Next Big Thing" authors will go viral and sell tons of books. You can try to become one of those, but it won't be easy. Getting enough sales to pay a few bills is very hard and rare. Selling a million books in a year is becoming next to impossible. WHAT CAN WRITERS DO? Let me preface this part by saying: I don't like any of the points I'm going to make. But I'm trying to be as realistic as possible, even though it kills me. DIVERSIFY You can make money as a writer in other ways, not just through book sales. You can build your social media following and monetize it. You can try to gain the attention of Hollywood. I haven't tried Wattpad, Substack, or Patreon, but other authors seem to be using these with some degree of success. You can invent some new way for fiction to become relevant in an increasingly indifferent world. I know that you didn't become a fiction writer to devote your time to any of the above. And let's be brutally honest; doing any of these things is just as difficult as succeeding as a novelist. But I'm spitballing here because we are screwed. FIGURE OUT ADVERTISING I've posted and blogged about my experience with ads, and how my noble and expensive efforts have at best broke even. But many authors claim they have used ads to make money, and ads are ubiquitous, so maybe there is something there. It's a gamble, and a time suck, but it may help bail out a sinking ship. I know you probably dreamed of being a novelist, but had no aspirations to become an advertiser. I hear you, and I agree. But this leads me to the uncomfortable realization that survival may depend on going to the Dark Side and... EMBRACING AI If you are a pro writer, you have huge advantages over some newbie AI prompter. You should already understand story, characterization, rising action, conflict, and good writing. You can let some kids flood the market with AI slop, or you can start putting out work that is AI-assisted and less sloppy. I don't do this. I can't see myself doing this. I hate this. But it makes sense, doesn't it? Does anyone else see an alternative? CONCLUSION I don't want to think of myself as a buggy whip manufacturer in 1908, the year Henry Ford rolled out the Model T. But the parallel exists. Fiction writing could go the way of the horse and buggy. This is scary. And I have no good answers. It was a pretty good run, though...
J.A. Konrath tweet media
English
139
16
129
41.7K
Ruth Barringham
Ruth Barringham@RuthIsWriting·
@ABC You mean MEN can't compete in women's events. MEN MEN MEN. They are men.
English
0
0
0
2
ABC News
ABC News@ABC·
Transgender women athletes cannot participate in female Olympic events, the International Olympic Committee said on Thursday, as the committee announced a new policy limiting eligibility for female events to people assigned female at birth. The policy will begin for the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles. abcnews.visitlink.me/Swxq9I
English
1.1K
85
1.2K
73.6K
Ruth Barringham
Ruth Barringham@RuthIsWriting·
@washingtonpost They are not banned at all. Liar! These men are eligible to play in the men's competitions just as biological women are eligible to play in the women's comps. It's called fairness. You are spreading misinformation.
English
0
0
0
4
The Washington Post
The Washington Post@washingtonpost·
Transgender women athletes are now excluded from the Olympics after the IOC agreed to a new eligibility policy on Thursday, which aligns with President Trump’s executive order on women’s sports ahead of the 2028 Los Angeles Games. wapo.st/3PwYp7u
English
1.2K
105
1.1K
79.2K
Ruth Barringham
Ruth Barringham@RuthIsWriting·
@jk_rowling @SkyNews No such thing as a "transgender woman." Men Men Men. That is what they are. There are women, and there are men (some with mental health issues who wear women's clothing and cry when we say they still look like men).
English
0
0
0
68
MINIMALIST BAKER
MINIMALIST BAKER@minimalistbaker·
🍽 Brunch is served: Mediterranean-inspired QUICHE 💛 with vibrant veggies, kalamata olives & an easy potato crust! Dairy-free, gluten-free & just 10 ingredients required. Perfect for Easter, meal prep & beyond! ⁠Tap the link for the recipe: minimalistbaker.com/mediterranean-…
MINIMALIST BAKER tweet media
English
3
0
8
2K
Katherine Deves Morgan 🇦🇺🚺
Want to know why our societies are self-destructing? Albanese, Starmer & Khan All Fabian Society wolves in sheep’s clothing Communism by stealth - not bloodshed & revolution, but slow, systematic capture of all the institutions & mass control of the people #AustraliaFirst
English
125
664
1.9K
22.3K
Page Six
Page Six@PageSix·
Royal photographer lifts lid on Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s behind-the-scenes behavior trib.al/1kcS0Ku
Page Six tweet media
English
21
4
39
36.4K
Ruth Barringham
Ruth Barringham@RuthIsWriting·
@Katherine_deves @SkyNewsAust Everyone needs to stop saying "transgender women." They are NOT women, never were women, and never will be women. The day they stop calling them women, it will put a stop to all this nonsense about men in frocks.
English
1
1
3
38
Katherine Deves Morgan 🇦🇺🚺
🚨BREAKING🚨 Join me at 10.40am on @SkyNewsAust Men should never have been allowed to compete in the female sports category IOC, after years of lobbying by brave women advocates, FINALLY ban males
Katherine Deves Morgan 🇦🇺🚺 tweet mediaKatherine Deves Morgan 🇦🇺🚺 tweet media
English
14
26
177
1.7K
Ruth Barringham
Ruth Barringham@RuthIsWriting·
@SkyNews Stop calling h them girls. They never were and never will be female. They are male
English
0
0
0
4
Sky News
Sky News@SkyNews·
Transgender girls given until September to leave Guides trib.al/Jvg28D5
English
192
8
163
88.3K
Nadia Whittome MP
Nadia Whittome MP@NadiaWhittomeMP·
It’s devastating that Girlguiding has announced plans to exclude existing trans girl guides from September. The Supreme Court ruling is being weaponised to bully previously inclusive organisations into abandoning members of their own community. The government must ensure that the statutory guidance enables organisations to be inclusive and protects them from expensive anti-trans lawfare.
English
2.8K
191
1.4K
357.5K
MA & PA FARMERS 2.0
MA & PA FARMERS 2.0@lutajobe·
@FairAusADV This is what @BrienLlew did to me. Instead of debating me. He chose to call me a criminal, get @TonyPerrettMP to be involved in collecting my road safety signs. He hates poor people having a voice. PS,And I am not a criminal. @gympie_times x.com/lutajobe/statu…
MA & PA FARMERS 2.0 tweet media
MA & PA FARMERS 2.0@lutajobe

The story of “ who took my signs” , During the federal election campaign? Our regional roads are deadly goat tracks,but sitting @The_Nationals who has been road safety advocate for his nine long yrs, had a direct line to the @TMRQld who are responsible for goat tracks

English
1
0
0
16
ADVANCE
ADVANCE@FairAusADV·
They’re calling debate “dangerous”. Australians asking questions about Net Zero are now a “threat”. This isn’t about truth. It’s about control.
ADVANCE tweet media
English
17
66
189
1.8K
Ruth Barringham
Ruth Barringham@RuthIsWriting·
@FairAusADV Are they going to call it Net Zero phobia? We already have transphobia and Islamophobia, which is what they call us when we question things that are not right. If the government had nothing to hide, they would welcome debate.
English
0
0
0
10
Ruth Barringham
Ruth Barringham@RuthIsWriting·
@GBNEWS If it's a private trip by private citizens, then why did they announce their plans to the whole world? They are such liars.
English
0
0
3
51
GB News
GB News@GBNEWS·
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's team hit out at petition calling for no taxpayer money to be spent on them gbnews.com/royal/meghan-m…
English
76
19
123
56.3K
Ruth Barringham ретвитнул
Mark Manson
Mark Manson@Markmanson·
Pain is what happens. Suffering is what you decide the pain means. ㅤ Pain is inevitable. Suffering is self-inflicted.
English
87
96
973
28.6K