Sander

109 posts

Sander banner
Sander

Sander

@SanderOnChain

Adopted early. Still here.

Web3 Присоединился Haziran 2026
103 Подписки23 Подписчики
Sander
Sander@SanderOnChain·
@CBullRun13 @l_shoes @Craig_J_85 Precisely the problem. Previously they where actually for the players in extremely hot conditions and very rare. Now theyre stopping games in airco’d stadiums and waiting for the afs to complete before resuming. Completely different things
English
1
0
1
5
CBolli
CBolli@CBullRun13·
@SanderOnChain @l_shoes @Craig_J_85 They came from UEFA. Both EPL and La Liga use them. Whether it was players bc heat or the leagues for ad revenue, idk, but this wasnt created for the US WC, been around for over a decade, just never universal for every game.
English
1
0
0
11
Craig Jones
Craig Jones@Craig_J_85·
What I want after this world cup is over. 1. USA to NEVER host a World Cup. 2. Infantino to be booted out. 3. Hydration Breaks to never occur when temperatures are at a certain level. 4. Ticket prices to be capped at a reasonable amount. 5. USA to NEVER host a World Cup.
English
1K
4.7K
36.8K
518.2K
Laura
Laura@l_shoes·
@CBullRun13 @SanderOnChain @Craig_J_85 My understanding is that water breaks for FIFA tourneys in general started mostly from European players who complained that they couldn't handle the heat.
English
1
0
1
16
Kieran Edmunds 🇬🇧
Kieran Edmunds 🇬🇧@ESCKieran03·
I am going to say this bluntly You are a FAILURE as parents if you can't keep you child off social media yourself YOU bought them the phone YOU can confiscate it during homework YOU are the parent, NOT Keir Starmer Authoritarian ban for your "convenience" is not the answer
English
163
998
6.4K
67.1K
Sander ретвитнул
freya woods
freya woods@FreyaWoods8·
Weird how to seems to be old white guys who have the issue with the social media ban. Upset you can’t talk to 15 year olds anymore lads?
English
184
10
148
12.3K
Degentralizd(🌎☮️🏴‍☠️)
@SanderOnChain @ESCKieran03 you seem like one of those parents who reluctantly had kids and cant be assed to do the job maybe let the state do it for you, youre already on the path anyways or anyone else, you are just going to ruin the kids life they will grow up to hate you lmfao
English
1
0
6
148
Sander
Sander@SanderOnChain·
@4tytoo @ESCKieran03 😂😂 keep role playing a parent bud. I feel bad for ya
English
1
0
0
33
Ammi Pierce
Ammi Pierce@4tytoo·
@SanderOnChain @ESCKieran03 Yeah... About that... Says the guy who can't take away devices from their children and blames others for their own kids being raised wrong. You're a loser. A waste. You're a pathetic parent.
English
1
0
1
39
Sander
Sander@SanderOnChain·
@4tytoo @ESCKieran03 Lol tell me youre not a parent without telling me youre not a parent 😂
English
1
0
0
31
Ammi Pierce
Ammi Pierce@4tytoo·
@SanderOnChain @ESCKieran03 Who gives a fuck what meta, x, Reddit, google want? You're in control when you're a parent. A good parent watches the content with their kids, gets invested, is present. Your mom checked your closet when you were younger. Check their browsing history. You're the big brother.
English
1
0
1
37
Sander
Sander@SanderOnChain·
"You decide where they look" assumes a fair fight: one parent against thousands of engineers and a recommendation engine A/B-tested to hold a child's attention. It isn't a fair fight, and that's the whole point. "Just parent better" is the same line tobacco ran for decades. Meta's own employees compared what they were building to tobacco companies, in writing. And the tell: the people building these products tend to keep their own kids off them. A former Meta executive testified that leadership restricted their own children while internally treating 13 to 17 year olds as a "vulnerable but very valuable" demographic. If the fix were just better parenting, the builders wouldn't be quietly protecting their own kids from the product they sell. Personal responsibility matters. It just doesn't absolve a product engineered to defeat it. Also: Fuck you very much
English
1
0
0
14
Ammi Pierce
Ammi Pierce@4tytoo·
@SanderOnChain @ESCKieran03 Why are you leaving kids along with tech? Why are you letting kids explore content online without being present? Of course they want eyes. As a parent you decide where they look. Again... It shows me that you don't know how to parent kids and I hope you don't have any.
English
2
0
6
39
Sander
Sander@SanderOnChain·
Dipshit, go read the discovery in the Meta teen-addiction case (In re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction, N.D. Cal.). Straight from Meta's own internal chats about going after preteens, where a staffer compared it to Big Tobacco: "we have to hook them young" You can't toggle a parental control to fix a product their own employees compared to cigarettes. It's in their files, not my opinion. And Zuckerberg got cross-examined on these exact documents in court.
English
4
0
0
423
Sander
Sander@SanderOnChain·
Dipshit, go read the discovery in the Meta teen-addiction case (In re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction, N.D. Cal.). Straight from Meta's own internal chats about going after preteens, where a staffer compared it to Big Tobacco: "we have to hook them young" You can't toggle a parental control to fix a product their own employees compared to cigarettes. It's in their files, not my opinion. And Zuckerberg got cross-examined on these exact documents in court.
English
1
0
0
120
Sander
Sander@SanderOnChain·
@SteveOnSpeed Are u really this dumb or just pretending to be for clout?
English
0
0
0
28
Steve · Millionaire Habits
Steve · Millionaire Habits@SteveOnSpeed·
The fact that the U.K. government banned social media, but not Bluesky, for kids under 16 means this has nothing to do with protecting children and everything to do with censoring speech the government doesn't approve of. This should make British people outraged.
English
36
12
129
4.3K
Sander
Sander@SanderOnChain·
“Police state.” That’s the framing I keep seeing around banning under-16s from social media. It’s backwards. Australia’s ban took effect in December 2025, the first of its kind, and the loudest objection is that age checks mean mass surveillance and a government ID database. But the law explicitly bars platforms from forcing you to hand over a government ID to prove your age. The state is not building a record of who you are. The part nobody wants to sit with: the data already exists. As Australia’s eSafety Commissioner pointed out, platforms don’t really need to “verify” who’s under 16, because they already know. They have spent a decade building targeting systems precise enough to flag a 14-year-old from behaviour alone. The surveillance machine wasn’t built by the government. It was built by the platforms, and it is aimed at children. We know what it gets used for, because it is in the court record now, from unsealed documents and sworn testimony. A former senior Meta policy executive testified that the company flagged teens by emotional state. A girl deletes a selfie, that signal gets read as her feeling bad about her appearance, and it becomes a moment to serve her beauty and weight-loss ads. Internally, 13 to 17 year olds were described as a “vulnerable but very valuable” demographic. Meta’s own research found Instagram made body image worse for 1 in 3 teen girls. So the real question was never whether the data exists. It does. The question is who gets to use it, and on whom. Right now the answer is advertisers, on kids. You can argue about whether a ban is the right tool. You cannot pretend the surveillance is hypothetical. It is the business model.
Sander tweet media
English
3
0
5
137
Sander
Sander@SanderOnChain·
@JamesWynnReal Look its this uneducated clown again
English
1
0
1
16
James Wynn 🔱
James Wynn 🔱@JamesWynnReal·
Give up already. This isn’t about the happiness or safety of children of Great Britain. This is to take away what you cannot control. Freedom of speech. Banning it will never ever work anyway. You’re just self destructing zero credibility you even have left. You can’t ban it. Remove it from App Store? No problem. Use web app. Restrict IP address, no problem, use VPN. The more you suppress people the more the pendulum will come swinging right back. Whoever is calling the shots, are well well out of their reach at this point and are clutching at straws. It’s over. There isn’t a day in hell you will gain complete mind control, manipulation, brain washing, propaganda, lies, lies lies. People are waking up. But hey, I bet you have a billion in an offshore account. A man like Keir is loving this ‘power’ he knows he is hated. But he doesn’t care he will keep pushing the needle until it breaks. Pray for England. Pray for Great Britain. Pray for the United Kingdom. Massive change is COMING.
Keir Starmer@Keir_Starmer

I am simply not prepared to be a bystander when the safety and happiness of our children are at stake. We will ban social media access for under 16s, and give children their childhoods back. Read more about it here: keirstarmer.substack.com/p/giving-child…

English
24
5
45
13.5K
Sander
Sander@SanderOnChain·
@robj3d3 Are u dumb?
English
0
0
0
4