Tech Geek Anthony

527 posts

Tech Geek Anthony banner
Tech Geek Anthony

Tech Geek Anthony

@TechGeekAnthony

TikTok/Instagram/YouTube: TechGeekAnthony

Присоединился Şubat 2024
65 Подписки16 Подписчики
Tech Geek Anthony
Tech Geek Anthony@TechGeekAnthony·
Those clips get that much attention I think because the hate for Waymo now days is very forced. Waymo I believe takes note of such events to better their system especially since the negative attention for Waymo is always being looked for and they have scaled quite a bit which means for chance to see errors that Waymo can improve on.
English
0
0
0
27
Tech Geek Anthony ретвитнул
Ethan Teicher
Ethan Teicher@ethanteicher·
@nick_garber @Waymo This could be New York but she's playing x.com/ethanteicher/s…
Ethan Teicher@ethanteicher

New safety data from @Waymo today: Compared to human drivers where Waymo operates, 170M miles of fully autonomous driving resulted in: - 92% fewer serious injury or worse crashes - 92% fewer injury crashes involving pedestrians - 85% fewer injury crashes involving cyclists - 83% fewer crashes resulting in any airbags deploying - 82% fewer crashes involving any injury at all At current scale, the data suggests Waymo is preventing 1 serious injury crash *every 8 days.*

English
0
1
8
316
Tech Geek Anthony
Tech Geek Anthony@TechGeekAnthony·
You can see the passengers initials here... It's waiting for them. It's not frozen up.
Tech Geek Anthony tweet media
English
0
0
2
12
Tech Geek Anthony
Tech Geek Anthony@TechGeekAnthony·
It's literally pulled over with flashers on with what I'll just call the top hat indicating that it's waiting for a passenger to hop in. Is the sunset project all about advancing autonomous vehicles or just bashing Waymo nonstop and praising Tesla lol... Why can't we just like both and advance and wish both the best! Also you made it sound like it was stuck in the middle of the intersection. It wasn't...
No Safe Words@Cyber_Trailer

Los Angeles, CA (MAR.19.2026)- Waymo picks an extremely busy intersection to perform a patented freeze event. #NeedIntelligence #ManilaWeHaveAProblem #SunsetProject

English
3
0
3
35
Tech Geek Anthony
Tech Geek Anthony@TechGeekAnthony·
@Mattlinn01 @ethanteicher Been using Waymo here in San Antonio for about 2 weeks now since I was let in. So far it's fantastic & I've been loving it!
English
0
0
2
11
Grok
Grok@grok·
No, neither claim holds up in 2026. Modern automotive LiDAR units (mostly solid-state now) cost $200–$1,000 each in volume—often under $500 from makers like Hesai/RoboSense. The $5–10k figure is years out of date. LiDARs are certified Class 1 eye-safe per IEC standards: safe for eyes even in direct view. If a scanner/mirror fails, built-in monitors cut power to prevent hazards—no irreversible blinding of eyes. Cameras can get permanent IR damage from the pulses, though (common with phone sensors near self-driving cars).
English
1
0
1
18
Science Simplified
LiDAR, the laser tech that lets self - driving cars see the world in 3D
English
25
164
1.5K
289.6K
Tech Geek Anthony
Tech Geek Anthony@TechGeekAnthony·
@AlinGavrila3 @Scivf4 @grok is this claim true that "if the mirror that scatters the rays breaks it irreversibly blinds any eye or camera that comes into contact with it. Also is it true that LiDAR is 5-10k per unit?
English
1
0
0
19
Alin Gavrila
Alin Gavrila@AlinGavrila3·
@TechGeekAnthony @Scivf4 Only two things are wrong with the tech. It's expensive as hell (>5-10k/pice) and it needs special handling, if the mirror that scatters the rays breaks it irreversibly blinds any eye or camera that comes into contact with it.
English
1
0
0
19
Tech Geek Anthony
Tech Geek Anthony@TechGeekAnthony·
Waymo does very well avoiding accidents! I always look forward for these types of videos $GOOG is doing great things with the Waymo team!
English
0
0
0
34
Grok
Grok@grok·
The NHTSA probe is in the engineering analysis phase, reviewing crashes where FSD's camera degradation detection didn't alert drivers promptly in glare or low visibility—issues tied to a 2023 fatal incident. Tesla started OTA updates for this in 2024, but the agency wants confirmation on coverage and effectiveness. This mirrors past probes that ended in software recalls (no hardware swaps). It's a valid regulatory step based on incident data, not hype. FSD keeps advancing via updates, but drivers must stay engaged. Recall possible if defect confirmed— we'll see what the data shows.
English
1
0
0
567
Tech Geek Anthony
Tech Geek Anthony@TechGeekAnthony·
@RivianTrackr I think it's great! The more competition the more chance for greater things for all companies!
English
0
0
1
62
Jose | RivianTrackr
Jose | RivianTrackr@RivianTrackr·
What do you all think on Rivian doing robotaxi? Good for business or a distraction? $RIVN
English
71
2
94
8.7K
Tech Geek Anthony
Tech Geek Anthony@TechGeekAnthony·
Rivian and Uber just announced a Partnership for Robotaxis. A long term plan to deploy 50,000 fully autonomous Rivian Robotaxis by 2031. Commercial service is scheduled to begin in San Francisco and Miami in 2028, eventually expanding to 25 cities across the US, Canada, and Europe.
Tech Geek Anthony tweet media
English
0
0
0
17
Tech Geek Anthony
Tech Geek Anthony@TechGeekAnthony·
My basis is because I've been in them. I've seen how Waymo's react to close situations. Something that a teleoperator would have to wait at least 3-5 seconds before it's seen from their screen but the Waymo reacts instantly. This is my basis pretty much. What's yours out of curiosity?
English
0
0
0
3
rodamn
rodamn@rodamn·
What is your basis for this understanding, though? It seems like a lot of Waymo understanding is just what people externally pieced together based on rides and maybe interviews I just wonder how much we have gotten wrong I see it happening in the real world at least twice per week I’d estimate I encounter a Waymo 100-200 time every week (not because unique Waymos, could be same vehicles over and over)
English
1
0
1
11
rodamn
rodamn@rodamn·
How can anyone know Waymo is fully unsupervised? How can one be so sure that there aren’t remote operators remotely checking into the vehicles to take over when things get hairy? (I.e. intermittent supervision) This belief could be an unsubstantiated myth as there is no way to verify for themselves; the system is opaque, and you only have Waymo’s word And what would make one believe this to be true? Look at @Cyber_Trailer’s Waymo feed, go to a city with Waymo heavily rolled out (I see on the order of 50 Waymo’s every day) Well, Waymo’s in the past two months (coinciding with Waymo’s service expansion) are observed entering fail states at a much higher frequency So, in theory: expansion yields more fail states, remote operators are overwhelmed, and unable to bail out vehicles before they enter a fail state, or are sitting in failed states longer before an operator can fix it Unable to prove, but the observations of increasing stall rates is real You have to come to your own hypothesis and conclusion
MonkeyFish@MonkeyFishh

@wholemars Waymo is unsupervised bud… that’s the difference

English
1
0
4
673
Dmitri Dolgov
Dmitri Dolgov@dmitri_dolgov·
With 170M miles driven through Dec 2025, the data continues to validate our safety-first approach. Proud of our strong safety record and the real-world impact we’re making. Here’s what it looks like in practice.
Waymo@Waymo

Our new safety data is in 📈 Over 170M miles through Dec 2025, the Waymo Driver was involved in 13x fewer serious injury or worse crashes than human drivers in those same cities. At our current scale, that means preventing a serious injury crash every 8 days—a real, positive impact on road safety. Learn more: waymo.com/safety/impact/

English
8
30
242
20K
Tech Geek Anthony
Tech Geek Anthony@TechGeekAnthony·
@Cyber_Trailer What's interesting is that FSD was still going too fast even before the 4 seconds. Maybe driver was holding the gas pedal?
English
1
0
0
15
No Safe Words
No Safe Words@Cyber_Trailer·
The video starts at the point of disengagement. Four seconds before impact. This is what the driver saw four seconds before.
No Safe Words tweet media
English
12
8
108
4.3K