ThinkOnIt

@JonnyAtTheShore @Trenchlighter @mandaconda__ @JamieBonkiewicz @PrincessBravato @grok It doesn’t matter. It’s still murder. Grok asked me to step in, it’s getting another woke programing update.

@Trenchlighter @mandaconda__ @JamieBonkiewicz @PrincessBravato Hey @grok has Donald Trump ever paid for an abortion?

78% of abortions occur before 9 weeks 92% of abortions occur before 13 weeks 6% of abortions occur between 14–20 weeks 100% are none of your fucking business

@LRhodes768 @SallyMayweather Pretty much. The democrats love their slaves. First physical slaves, now mental slaves.

@SallyMayweather You always going to be a plantation lackey, holmes?

Economically speaking, Donald Trump is the worst President of my lifetime.

@JoshuaTCharles Yet the Catholic Church is filled with false doctrine. Things the “church fathers” (uninspired men) got wrong and/or added to the NT church. So your whole diatribe was a waste of time. Just say: the church fathers got stuff wrong, the CC bound it anyway and Catholics don’t care.

There is much to say about each of these points, which either proceed from protestant assumptions nowhere in Church history, and/or misrepresent the Catholic position. But one thing that is absolutely false is the first point. As someone blessed to be in their writings almost every day for almost 9 years now, I have found astounding unanimity among the Fathers on many different subjects, and even small details of Scriptural interpretation (to say nothing of their unanimity on the Church—more below). But even on this, when one Father observes something different than another in Scripture, virtually every time, this isn’t a contradiction, but equally Catholic, and in accordance with the “Rule of Faith.” Protestants often automatically present this as a contradiction, but Catholics don’t, and have never seen it that way. For example, our answer to the question “Was the Rock Christ, St. Peter, or Peter’s Confession?” is simply “Yes,” because each aspect symphonically reinforces the others. And beyond even that, all the Fathers agreed that the Catholic Church had authority from God to issue binding definitions on the faith, and that such definitions could only issue from the successors of the Apostles, the bishops (with virtual unanimity about a superior authority of some kind in the bishop of Rome). They believed this because they knew they were not inspired, or infallible, as individual men. But they knew the Church was indeed infallible, and had authority from Christ to teach the whole world ONE and the SAME faith. They always and everywhere speak of the Church as having ONE teaching, ONE government, ONE worship, ONE canon law, ONE faith, etc. Protestants cannot make this claim for themselves, and have never been able to. So even if they got things wrong—which many of them admitted they could—the Fathers knew the Church would not. They knew that when a theological issue was resolved, it would ONLY be resolved within THAT Church. Not by a heretical sect who had long since left it; or by a schismatic group that stood aloof from it. I hope this shows why attempts such as those below by this protestant fellow are superficial at best, if not outright false.

@aqualung74 @shani_3 @poperespecter1 This is exactly what they do when you ask them about scripture. Duck, dodge and weave. But never a straight answer. If you continue, they will try to turn it around on you and demand an answer to their question. Then insult and run. Catholic defense mechanism.

@shani_3 @poperespecter1 I don’t want to have to figure it out. I want him to speak boldly about who are the real culprits of violence. Not some wishy-washy non-commital comment as if there is any equivalency between Christians and violent Islamic extemists.

Pope Haters: "Why doesn't Pope Leo ever condemn Muslim violence?" Pope Leo: Already did bros.

@EcciusMaximus @redeemed_zoomer Maximus shows minimal understanding of scripture.

Hey so I know you were just engagement farming but here are the Doctrines they all unanimously agreed on @redeemed_zoomer: 🇻🇦 PAPAL SUPREMACY 🇻🇦 INFANT BAPTISM 🇻🇦 EUCHARIST 🇻🇦 PURGATORY 🇻🇦 INFANT BAPTISM 🇻🇦 PURGATORY 🇻🇦 THEOTOKOS 🇻🇦 CONFESSION 🇻🇦 NO SALVATION OUTSIDE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

@thoughtsarefree @rickbrennanjr @EcciusMaximus @redeemed_zoomer lol

@rickbrennanjr @EcciusMaximus @redeemed_zoomer The Church already had recognizable Catholic DNA that developed over time.The theology exists or core idea was present early, but sharpened later into dogma.Eucharist,however,was already clearly affirmed. It's clear the church wasn't Protestant (symbolic Eucharist,sola scriptura)

@_RyanIndustries @thattradgal Exactly. I’m not so sure it was a mistranslation. It may have been done on purpose.

@thattradgal A whole theology built on a mistranslation in the Vulgate

Demons hate the woman who crushes the head of the serpent. If Mary is on your side, you cannot fail.

@Sachinettiyil Why are all Catholic miracles such parlor tricks? What miracles do we read about in the Bible that are so inane and ridiculous? Jesus turns a loaf of bread into a loaf with sesame seeds? He turns the blind man’s eyes a different shade of brown but doesn’t cure blindness?

The blood of third-century Saint Januarius miraculously liquefied in Naples today. Video: Vatican Media

@dishgirl4 @hell_line0 @flyingtigermd Someone is telling us her fantasies!

@hell_line0 @flyingtigermd After birth control, the final move is to fully turn women into brood mares, forcing all women to be barefoot and pregnant 24/7, cranking out Aryan boys like Muskrat's fantasy and if women can't survive, women won't. Handmaid's Tale ain't got shit on this!

2022: “Stop overreacting, they won’t overturn Roe.” They did. 2023: “Stop overreacting, they won’t let women die rather than get an abortion.” They did. 2024: “Stop overreacting, they won’t arrest women for miscarriages.” They did. 2025: “Stop overreacting, they won’t turn women into incubators.” They did. 2026: “Stop overreacting, they won’t attack mifepristone.” They did, today. Now: “Stop overreacting, they won’t go after birth control next.” They will.

@Train_Bum_ @RossKneeDeep What you do in your bedroom doesn’t need to be broadcasted over social media.

@RossKneeDeep I just had some cuck attacking me here because I said Trumps no tax on social security is meaningless due to him driving debt inflation and cost of goods tarrifs.

This is really what TDS looks like.

@alexlyle @MrCasey62 If you squint your eyes and read scripture that doesn’t mention them at all, you can kinda see some fuzzy words that can be interpreted as pope or maybe poop. You gotta concentrate really hard. Also the church fathers made them up so it’s good enough for Catholics.

@MrCasey62 More like “where are purgatory, the pope, and Marian dogmas”?

“‘Where were Lutherans before Luther’ is 100% the argument the Early Christians would have used against the Reformation, because it’s the argument they used against every other heretical movement that arose—particularly if it was named after some guy.”

@thrawnftw @GrandMosk @MrCasey62 Thrawn is just another Catholic coward full of BS. He runs away and blocks you when he doesn’t get his way. So many Catholics have done this. Scripture really tears them up. It’s like holy water to a vampire. Both of which are make believe, like most of Catholic doctrine!

@thrawnftw @GrandMosk @MrCasey62 Phil 1:1 literally says what I just did. Thats your kryptonite. You can talk philosophy , etc., but when it comes to scripture you show your total ignorance. You show you are a fool. My position is supported by the very scripture you just tried to use!

Ludicrous. The Catholic Church has produced Bible verses to support every one of these for 2000 years. Danny not seeing them is a personal choice that has nothing to do with the Bible.

@CrushnSerpents @emmaus_e This isn’t the flex you think it is. Catholics use any means to try and prove their points. Intellectualism, philosophy, etc. All that is needed to knock you off your high horse is a simple verse of scripture. You can’t understand it. The CC has conditioned you to be ignorant.

@emmaus_e Tell me you don't know what Pelagianism without telling me.

@Linkin1319 @fire_starter457 @Nancy62756620 Why are libtards so bad at making jokes?

@fire_starter457 @Nancy62756620 Unfortunately, MAGA knows they will see the inside of that ballroom before they’ll see the inside of a classroom.

Remember 2 years ago when Biden was doing everything he could to cancel student debt and Republicans were fighting him every step of the way? Those same Republicans are now fighting for a $400 million taxpayer funded ballroom. But yeah..both parties are the same.🤦‍♂️

@WarScopeGlobal @clashreport You would say the same about a turd he drops. “ a smooth, slightly cheeky log. Classical papal balance! Not too big, clearly not ashamed to show a little non-digested vegetable matter.” Wow, what a pope!

@clashreport Straight-up picking Peru over the United States in a hypothetical World Cup clash is a smooth, slightly cheeky answer. Classic papal balance — no big controversy, but clearly not afraid to show a little favoritism. The Holy Father has jokes. 😏

Q: The United States is playing Peru in the World Cup. Who do you cheer for? Pope Leo XIV: Probably Peru.

@Novellarese2 @poperespecter1 Use scripture to support that claim. Not Catholic talking points.

@poperespecter1 The Lord made St. Peter the visible foundation of his Church. He entrusted the keys of the Church to him. the bishop of the Church of Rome, successor to St. Peter, is "head of the college of bishops, the Vicar of Christ and Pastor of the universal Church on earth" (CIC, can. 331)

The anti-Catholic behavior of the current administration is really just a carryover from what we had in the last administration. Catholicism is a threat to the American/Israeli hegemony.

@thrawnftw @GrandMosk @MrCasey62 Are you really this stupid? I’m genuinely interested, not trying to be mean. You must live in an alternate reality. You are not really Thrawn . He is a fictional character. Kind of like your Catholic Church. It exists based on fictional doctrine.

@ThinkonitW @GrandMosk @MrCasey62 So far you’ve made zero arguments. Just tons of logical fallacies. Strawman, special pleading, tu quoque, and a no true scotsman.

@thrawnftw @steven18613 @AnsweringRCs @Rogue0572 I didn’t argue against my own position. My position is firmly in the scriptures. Yours is rooted in false doctrines made by men. When scripture is discussed you become a drooling moron. That’s how the CC liked it though. Easier to get you to accept BS.

@steven18613 @ThinkonitW @AnsweringRCs @Rogue0572 He’s not even worth engaging with I did an internal critique and made him argue against his own position.

I'm 10 minutes in and I'm already laughing. He's starting off by calling the reliability of the Church Fathers into question. A "glorious mess," he says. He praises St. Augustine "when he follows the Bible," but then says that once you turn the page, Augustine "face-plants." The cherry-picking is wild. Basically, "The Church Fathers are wonderful... when they agree with my theology." He doesn't realize that attacking the Fathers this way undercuts the foundational, "upstream" ideas he desperately wants to hold on to. If the Fathers are unreliable witnesses to authentic doctrine and practice, then they're also unreliable when it comes to the traditions that governed the formation of the canon. This is important because the canon of Scripture logically precedes (and governs) the doctrine of Sola Scriptura. After all, would you trust the accuracy and preservation of the Scriptures by people who have no idea what baptism is or does? Would you trust that you have precisely the correct number of books (accurately preserved) if it was compiled by people who have no idea what the eucharist is, or what salvation is, or how the church should be structured? Lord, give me patience as I continue with this video...

@thrawnftw @GrandMosk @MrCasey62 The Bible isn’t history? That’s a new one. Christs church is all over the world. Your Catholic Church is a bastardized version full of man-made fake teachings. There is nothing else other than scripture. That everything else is the false doctrine you hold.

@ThinkonitW @GrandMosk @MrCasey62 It’s in the NT isn’t history. Where is this church after the apostles, names, bishops, locations? You can’t point to it because it’s the same Church you reject. You keep the canon it gave you and ditch everything else. Special pleading.