Tootulz

@LeftAnimalFarm @heyJohnEe More like I’m taking what the narrator said at face value. Who knows if it’s true but it doesn’t change the fact - Tesla is under WAY more scrutiny than any other AV provider

@Tootulz @heyJohnEe The video doesn't show the collision. Assuming the dent in the Waymo is fresh, being hit from behind is usually an indication that you are not at fault. It's sad you are too much of a Musketeer to understand this.

Wow Waymo crashes and just bounces. I bet this won’t even be covered by any major news outlet but if this was Tesla it would never end

@BigImpactHumans Tesla is really after recurring revenue, people will pay for it once they don't have to supervise. $100/mo for a car that can drop you off downtown in the morning and pick you up later in the day w/o having to pay for parking is a huge value prop

I really wish Tesla would include FSD at no additional cost, or just slightly increase the purchase price of their vehicles to ensure it’s included. I think the majority of people would use it. My friend just got a Tesla for the first time, and she’s using the free trial of FSD—she loves it. But she said she doesn’t want to pay monthly because that money could be used for something else, and she can just drive manually but if it was included, she’d use it all the time. It’s amazing to think how much safer the roads could be if FSD were used more widely. If it were included, people would be more likely to buy a Tesla knowing it comes with FSD at no additional cost.

@Dr_Singularity Seems this model can only make a fist, doubt it will be useful for anything more than party tricks

Soon you’ll have your own chef and robot assistant for any job, for just $5,900. "Unitree will start selling its cheapest humanoid robot, the R1, on Alibaba’s AliExpress next week for international markets including North America, Europe, Japan, and Singapore." From now on, it will only get cheaper (at least for this model). Cooking, cleaning, taking out trash, all these skills are just "software" that can and will be updated via the internet. Entire professions will compress into software/AI updates. This is just the beginning.

@wholemars great idea

Tesla Self-Driving, Pay Per Use Pricing Every car comes with Self-Driving activated. If you don’t have a monthly subscription, you can charge your Supercharger credit card already on file for a single self-driving ride, the same way you do in the Robotaxi app. 👍 or 👎?

@MlNESWEEPER best pvp game ever made

I mean is this not the best game ever created

@Pirat_Nation I doubt this puzzle is causing mass exodus. It's more likely that at around this point most players are approaching the 2 hour steam refund cutoff

Some players reportedly quit Crimson Desert because the first puzzle is “too hard.”

Your perception of the time it takes to charge an EV is warped. In the grand scheme of things you end up saving way more time being able to charge at home vs having to visit a gas station. For road trips, after 4-5 hours of driving don't you want to stop for to eat/washroom/stretch?

And don’t forget #teslatalk where the bros with their wrapped cars hang around superchargers like it was the water fountain in an office bragging about this and that. I don’t have the time. 😑

@LamarMK I find that you can barely enjoy the benefits of a glass roof from the front row. A panoramic windshield like the CT or X would make more sense for a 2 seater but they are trying to keep costs down so I get it

Anybody else wish the Cybercab had a glass roof? With it being a fully unsupervised vehicle, it would be great to just sit back and enjoy the views around the city through a panoramic roof. It would make the experience feel even more futuristic. I don't know why Tesla went with this approach instead.

@DeadlockAnon skill issue

They need to either fucking nerf heavy melee builds or make them actually parriable. How often heavy melees go straight through my parry is crazy.

@PsyopAnime @hzgunner

the gaslighting is crazy

@Td7653 @kevinnbass Yea he was heavily avoidant and terse with Epstein towards the end of their communications

@Tootulz @kevinnbass Something obviously changed between at some point in 2014 Elon started replying with just one or 2 words, then he ghosted him and had Epstein’s e-mail blocked.

THE ELON MUSK FILES What about Elon Musk? We have now read 1.39 million DOJ documents in the Epstein case. Every one. We have built investigation dossiers on six people: Bill Clinton (765 gold documents), Bill Gates (2,069), Reid Hoffman (1,526), Larry Summers (986), Leon Black (667), and Elon Musk. For Elon Musk, across the entire corpus, we found 55 documents. Not 55 damning documents. 55 documents total -- every email, every schedule mention, every forwarded guest list, every reference of any kind linking Musk to Epstein in the largest document production in DOJ history. That number is the story. But the documents themselves tell it better. Every quote below is verbatim. Every citation is a DOJ document number you can verify yourself. THE TIMELINE The earliest known contact between Epstein and Musk is November 2009, when Epstein organized a physics summit at SpaceX headquarters in Hawthorne, California [EFTA01300329]. Stephen Hawking, Ed Witten, Lisa Randall, and Lawrence Krauss were invited. Musk's role was to give a tour of the Falcon and Dragon rockets at his own facility. There is no confirmation the event actually occurred. The first direct email exchange in the corpus is from September 2012 -- three years later. On September 9, 2012, an unknown person wrote to Epstein: "Do you know Elon Musk? If so, can you make an intro?" [EFTA02345745]. The "if so" is significant. Epstein's connection to Musk was not established or well-known, even among Epstein's own circle, as of that date. Within two weeks, Epstein appears to have made the connection. By September 22, he is telling a contact: "elon musk is coming to lunch at house" [EFTA01886996]. By September 30, he is name-dropping Musk to journalist Michael Wolff alongside "woody allen, elon musk, frank gehri... bill gates" [EFTA02561193]. The known direct email correspondence between Musk and Epstein spans from December 2012 to September 2014. Twenty-two months. Approximately thirteen emails back and forth. The last known direct communication is Musk's two-word reply on September 2, 2014: "Don't know" [EFTA01749932]. For comparison: Reid Hoffman's correspondence with Epstein spans 2013 to 2019, with 1,526 gold documents, 36 documented gift exchanges, and Hoffman sleeping at Epstein's 71st Street mansion. Bill Gates's file contains 2,069 gold documents, multiple confirmed visits to Epstein's island, and financial donations routed through Epstein. Larry Summers was a regular dinner companion with 986 gold documents and island visits with his family. Leon Black paid Epstein $158 million across a decades-long financial relationship. Musk had no financial entanglement with Epstein. Zero. No donations. No investments. No advisory fees. No foundation grants. Not a single dollar moved between them in any direction. He gave Epstein no gifts. He received no gifts. He does not appear on any known flight log for Epstein's aircraft. He never visited Epstein's island. THE WORST DOCUMENT IN THE FILE On September 11, 2013, Epstein emailed Musk at 5:30 in the morning: "any plans for ny. the opening of the general assembly has many interesting people coming to the house" [EFTA01956458]. Musk replied at 2:04 PM: "I run and lead product design/engineering for two complicated companies. Moreover, SpaceX is about to launch what is arguably the most advanced rocket in history. Flying to NY to see UN diplomats do nothing would be an unwise use of time." Epstein replied at 8:11 PM: "do you think i am retarded, ? just kidding, there is no one over 25 and all very cute." That is the single most alarming sentence in the Musk file. Epstein, rejected on the intellectual pitch, pivoted to his standard recruitment language -- age and attractiveness. It is textbook Epstein: when the legitimate lure fails, offer young women. But here is what the document does not contain: a reply from Musk. We searched. Not casually -- systematically. We examined every document in the neighboring EFTA range. We searched all 503,154 files in DataSet 10 and all 331,655 files in DataSet 11. We ran keyword searches, semantic searches, entity co-occurrence queries, and recovered-redaction scans across every dataset in the corpus. There is no reply from Musk to this email anywhere in 1.39 million documents. The corpus has excellent coverage of the Musk-Epstein email relationship. Every other known exchange between them -- the December 2012 holiday thread, the February 2013 SpaceX planning, the March 2013 check-ins, the December 2013 Caribbean negotiation -- is captured, often in duplicate across multiple datasets. The system that preserved every other Musk-Epstein email did not preserve a reply to this one, because, in all likelihood, there was no reply. The next known contact between Musk and Epstein is November 23, 2013 -- two and a half months of silence later. This is the most important absence in the file. THE PATTERN Across two years of correspondence, the pattern is consistent: Epstein pursues, Musk deflects. October 11, 2012: Epstein invites Musk to his island in November. Musk declines, citing the SpaceX Dragon mission, Tesla's cash flow problems, and the SolarCity IPO: "Could definitely use a break after that" [EFTA01894114]. He never followed up. December 24, 2012: Epstein offers to send a helicopter to bring Musk to his island: "plenty of room i will send heli to get you" [EFTA02563908]. Musk declines the island explicitly: "a peaceful island experience is the opposite of what I'm looking for." He counterproposed hitting "the party scene in St Barts." Epstein replied: "the ratio on my island might make Talulah uncomfortable." Musk: "Ratio is not a problem for Talulah." That exchange deserves scrutiny. "Ratio" in context refers to the gender ratio at Epstein's island. Musk's response -- "Ratio is not a problem for Talulah" -- could be read as indifference, deflection, or a refusal to take the bait. What it is not is acceptance of the island invitation. Musk declined the island. He proposed a group lunch in St. Barths instead, with his then-wife Talulah Riley and her friend Debs [EFTA01911945]. Then he fell ill and cancelled even that [EFTA01909976]. March 2, 2013: Epstein emails Musk: "now its time for fun." Musk replies at 3 AM: "still working on Tesla and SpaceX email... April should be better, but it depends on how well Q1 goes" [EFTA02566931]. Epstein asks "will you take a break? april?" Musk is too busy. Three weeks later, Epstein checks in: "things getting better?" Musk: "Better, yes. Workload, no" [EFTA02350529]. September 2, 2014: Epstein: "spoke to reid hoffman yesterday, are you planning to do st barth again for xmas?" Musk's entire reply: "Don't know" [EFTA01749932]. Two words. The shortest possible answer that isn't silence. That is the last known direct email from Musk to Epstein in the corpus. THE VISIT THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN There is one episode that departs from the pattern of deflection, and it must be addressed directly. On November 23, 2013, Epstein emailed Musk: "will you come to caribbean this xmas? woody allen with me, you might enjoy." Musk replied: "Yes" [EFTA02396862]. On December 13, Musk followed up: "Will be in the BVI/St Bart's area over the holidays. Is there a good time to visit?" Epstein: "any day 1st-8th. play it by ear if you want. always space for you." On December 15: Musk: "Ok, probably the 1st then." Epstein: "the 2 or 3 would be perfect. I will come and get you" [EFTA01942282]. On December 25, Musk wrote: "Actually, I could fly back early on the 3rd. We will be in St Bart's. When should we head to your island on the 2nd?" He CC'd Lesley Groff, Epstein's assistant, on the logistics. That sentence -- "When should we head to your island on the 2nd?" -- is the closest Musk came to visiting Epstein's island. He agreed to go. He rearranged his flight schedule. He was coordinating logistics. Then, on December 30, Epstein cancelled. "Bad news -- Unfortunately, my schedule will keep me in New York. I was really looking forward to finally spending some time together with just fun as the agenda, so i am very disappointed" [EFTA01940759]. Musk: "No problem." January 6: Epstein: "sorry it didn't work out just getting over it. how was your trip?" Musk: "Great." The island visit did not happen. THE SPACEX VISIT On February 25, 2013, Jeffrey Epstein visited SpaceX headquarters in Hawthorne, California, for a lunch with Musk. What makes this visit notable is not the lunch itself but the logistics surrounding it. On February 22, Epstein's assistant Lesley Groff emailed Musk's assistant Mary Beth: "I have now sent you a copy of all 3 girls passports (sorry [redacted] is upside down! But I figure you will print!) Jeffrey will have his ID with him" [EFTA02147114]. The day before the visit, Epstein emailed Bobby Kotick, the CEO of Activision: "the girls and i are going to see elon musk at space x tomorrow, are you around" [EFTA01763418]. He added: "Taking girls after to bel air." On the day of the visit, Groff emailed Activision to arrange a follow-up tour: "Jeffrey Epstein and 3 of his assistants visit SpaceX at 1:00 today, Monday Feb 25th" [EFTA02147521]. The euphemism shift across three emails is documented: "3 girls passports" (to Musk's assistant), "the girls" (to Kotick), "3 of his assistants" (to Activision). The women's identities and ages are unknown from the documents. Musk hosted Epstein at SpaceX -- his own facility, not Epstein's property. His staff processed passport copies for three women accompanying Epstein, which is standard procedure for a secure aerospace facility. Whether Musk was aware of who these women were, how old they were, or what their actual role was, is not established by the documents. What the documents establish is that Epstein deployed his standard traveling arrangement -- himself and young women described interchangeably as "girls" and "assistants." THE WOMAN WHO WOULD KNOW On July 25, 2025, Ghislaine Maxwell -- the woman convicted of sex trafficking for Jeffrey Epstein, the woman who organized every dinner party, every guest list, every island visit, every plane flight for Epstein for twenty-five years -- sat for a recorded proffer with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche [DOJ-OGR-00022916]. Blanche asked her about Elon Musk. Maxwell said she met Musk at a birthday celebration for Sergey Brin, the co-founder of Google, on Jean Pigozzi's island in the Caribbean -- around 2010 or 2011. She was explicit: Epstein "was not there." When asked whether Epstein knew Musk, Maxwell replied: "I believe they did. And the only reason I say that is not from my memory, but because I saw -- I think I saw -- my memory is that in discovery, they were communicating on email." She did not know Kimbal Musk. She had no memory of Musk flying on Epstein's plane. She had no memory of Musk visiting Epstein's island. She had no memory of any substantive Musk-Epstein relationship beyond what she learned from reading trial discovery documents. Ghislaine Maxwell -- the operational center of Epstein's social world -- had zero personal knowledge of Elon Musk interacting with Jeffrey Epstein. If Musk had been a significant participant in Epstein's world -- if he had attended dinners at 71st Street, flown on the plane, visited the island, received gifts, brokered introductions -- Maxwell would have known. She organized all of it. She remembered Clinton, Gates, Summers, Andrew, Dershowitz, Wexner, and dozens of others by name, with specific anecdotes. For Musk, she had nothing. This is not an absence of evidence. It is evidence of absence, from the single most informed witness in the case. WHAT EPSTEIN HIMSELF SAID In August 2018, eleven months before his arrest, Epstein was still operating in Musk's orbit -- but at a distance. On August 16, 2018, Epstein emailed Reid Hoffman: "the ny times is preparing a not very nice piece on elon. I am only as a friend trying to mitigate certain bad rumors" [EFTA02606211]. This is Epstein positioning himself as an intelligence broker, claiming insider knowledge about a media story. There is no evidence Musk was aware of or requested this "mitigation." Two weeks later, on August 30, 2018, Epstein told a contact in an iMessage: "Contrary to cnbc report I am not advising Elon musk. And I told them so. but.... He did cry on the interview with the times" [HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025734]. Read that carefully. Epstein -- who inflated every relationship, who name-dropped compulsively, who told Michael Wolff his week included "elon musk" alongside "bill gates" -- denied advising Musk. The man whose entire social strategy was built on claiming proximity to the powerful denied this particular proximity. Unprompted. The response from his contact: "Was I a tad too harsh?" Epstein replied: "No, I like man child. Doesn't have the same connotation as evil sociopaths" [HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025734]. This is Epstein, in private, characterizing Musk as a "man child" -- not as a friend, not as a collaborator, not as someone in his pocket. As someone he found amusing and occasionally useful for name-dropping, but fundamentally not in his circle. THE COMPARISON The Epstein documents reveal concentric circles of association. At the center: people who were financially entangled, who visited the island repeatedly, who participated in the denial campaign, who had ongoing intimate relationships with the operation. Musk was not in any of these circles. Bill Clinton: 765 gold documents. 147 sexually explicit messages with Maxwell. Multiple confirmed island visits, corroborated by five independent witnesses. Flights on Epstein's plane confirmed by Epstein's own pilot ("ten or twenty times"). Active participation in the post-arrest denial campaign. Thirteen years of documented post-conviction contact. Bill Gates: 2,069 gold documents. Multiple confirmed meetings. Donations routed through Epstein. An ongoing relationship that spanned years. Boris Nikolic, Gates's science advisor, named in Epstein's will. Reid Hoffman: 1,526 gold documents. 36 documented gift exchanges. Slept at Epstein's 71st Street mansion. Organized the Baume dinner. Active email correspondence through 2018. Larry Summers: 986 gold documents. Regular dinner companion. Island visits with family. Harvard Program for Evolutionary Dynamics funded through Epstein. Leon Black: 667 gold documents. $158 million paid to Epstein across a decades-long financial relationship. Elon Musk: 55 documents. Zero financial transactions. Zero gifts. Zero confirmed island visits. Zero flight log entries. Twenty-two months of sporadic email. A two-word final reply. The ratio is not subtle. Musk's entire file is 2.7% the size of Gates's. It is 3.6% of Hoffman's. It would fit inside a single chapter of the Clinton dossier. WHAT REMAINS These documents are not a clean bill of health. But they are a record of judgment calls, not conduct. And the distance between the two is the entire point of this review. What the documents show is a man who was aggressively pursued by the most prolific social predator in modern history, who engaged intermittently and distractedly for twenty-two months, who replied to invitations with variations of "I'm too busy," who went silent when Epstein offered young women, and whose entire relationship left so little impression on the person who ran Epstein's social operation that she could not remember it existed. Full compendium (55 docs): drive.google.com/file/d/1cVnL0t… AI-optimized compendium (upload to any LLM and ask it anything): drive.google.com/file/d/1dL7WmU…

@Td7653 @kevinnbass Correct, but the narrative that Elon didn't express interest in going and declined all his invites isn't accurate.

@Tootulz @kevinnbass This is the first e-mail between the two where the island is mentioned.

The email correspondence prior to what I just posted: Oct. 20th, 2012 Elon>Jeff " I will be in NY around mid Nov for some media events, but not before. Talulah and I are headed to St Barth's at the end of the year. I assume you will be on your island?" Jeff>Elon "an easy but correct assumption,, we will catchup either in ny, or i will send a heli to st barth for you,, 45 mins away" As you can see, Elon expressed interest in visiting Epstein. Elon declined/avoided repeated invites towards the end of their communication. Nothing released is incriminating and based on my reading of their entire exchange, my personal belief is that Elon was oblivious of Jeff's devious activities. That being said, this line of communication shouldn't be omitted.

@Tootulz @kevinnbass You left out Epstein inviting him to the island first, but besides that nothing is in contradiction to my post.

Here is the exact email exchange they had in chronological order: Nov 2nd, 2012 Elon>Jeff "What's a good time to come over between Dec 23rd and 30?" Jeff>Elon "Probably after Xmas day. Any day, lets choose a sunny one. Glad you are coming" Elon>Jeff "Let's aim for Dec 28, 29, or 30" Nov 24th, 2012 Jeff>Elon "How many people will you be for the heli to island" Nov 25th, 2012 Elon>Jeff "Probably just Talulah and me. What day/night will be the wildest party on your island" Dec 24th, 2012 Jeff>Elon "you are welcome to stay or just come for the day, plenty of room i will send heli to get you" Dec 25th, 2012 Elon>Jeff "Do you have any parties planned? I've been working to the edge of sanity this year and so, once my kids head home after Christmas, I really want to hit the party scene in St Barts or elsewhere and let loose. The invitation is much appreciated, but a peaceful island experience is the opposite of what I'm looking for. " Jeff>Elon "Understood, I will see you on St Barth,, the ratio on my island might make Talulah uncomfortable" Elon>Jeff "Ratio is not a problem for Talulah"

@Tootulz @kevinnbass This goes with the peaceful island experience e-mail. He had no interest in going to the island to hang out with Epstein, he was just looking for the best party.

@Chris_Dring L take, the person responsible for the final decisions should have a passion for the product

You don’t have to be a gamer to work in video games. You don’t have to have a gaming background to run a game company. The industry could do with some outside thinking, frankly.

@ICannot_Enough I was thinking something along these lines as well

Speculation: Somebody told Elon Tesla needs to make a traditional pickup because there isn’t enough demand for Cybertruck to keep production above breakeven. Elon said “What if there’s plenty of demand, but at $60K, not $80K?” Well, I know one way to settle the bet…

@IAmGlennonX @elonmusk @BigImpactHumans @Tesla It's likely they need to fulfill a certain level of volume for this price point to make sense

@elonmusk @BigImpactHumans @Tesla So if demand is lower, the price goes lower?

$59,990 Cybertruck

@Dwasint @Pirat_Nation I’ve made 6 support requests through “ I have a question about this product” and was denied by a CS rep each time.

@Tootulz @Pirat_Nation For anything past the 14 day window you need to make an actual support ticket or it will get auto denied as the automated refund system is... automated. Just click I have a question and fill your request out.

Valve refunds money to Ashes of Creation players even if they don't meet the refund requirements. This applies even to players with significantly more hours, following Intrepid Studios' collapse, full team layoffs, and project abandonment.