
BitKeepWallet
3K posts







































You did not solve privacy without privileged actors. You just wrapped trust in a more complex scheme of roles and terminology that makes the trust assumptions harder to see. No problem. We will explain them publicly, ELI5 style. On Canton, each domain is a trust island. Your transactions are validated by a small committee of stakeholder operators you choose to trust. You are trusting this committee with both your data and the integrity of your transfers. If that selected group is compromised, it can approve invalid state changes (e.g. steal funds). Prividium starts from the same baseline: you pick operators you trust to run your environment. Just like there can be many Canton domains, there can be many different Prividium constellations. There is no fundamental difference between Canton and Prividium on this level. The difference is that in addition, Prividium has an independent ZK enforcement layer that cryptographically blocks invalid state transitions. So my metaphore is accurate: Both have brakes. Prividium adds airbags. If you disagree, I challenge you to a public debate.


