tyrauber

179 posts

tyrauber banner
tyrauber

tyrauber

@tyrauber

Builder, traveller, CTO @theoutbound

Occasionally Oregon Присоединился Mart 2008
185 Подписки82 Подписчики
Закреплённый твит
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
N* = α/γ where: α = integration growth rate γ = decoherence rate N* = optimal observation depth For consciousness: N* ≈ 5
Română
2
0
0
37
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
@BetterCallMedhi I have a hard line with AI: No Automated Surveillance and Weaponry. Period. I think we all need to have a global conversation about this ASAP. Before it is too late.
English
2
0
2
276
Mehdi (e/λ)
Mehdi (e/λ)@BetterCallMedhi·
I just finished reading palantir’s manifesto & I need you to understand what you’re actually looking at because this is the MOST important document the tech world has produced this year most people came away thinking «wow what a thoughtful essay about patriotism and technology »…I came away thinking this is the most elegant justification for corporate capture of the state apparatus ever written & I want to walk you through why krp opens with «silicon valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible » & frames the entire document as a call to civic duty, but read between the lines and what he’s actually saying is that the engineering elite should be embedded inside the defense and intelligence apparatus of the nation, he’s describing exactly what palantir has already done and dressing it up as patriotism «the question is not whether AI weapons will be built, it is who will build them and for what purpose »sounds like a warning but it’s actually a sales pitch, he’s telling every gov on earth that the choice is binary either you buy from us or your adversaries will build it without you, this is the oldest arms dealer rhetoric in history wrapped in SV vocabulary « hard power in this century will be built on software »is the key sentence of the entire manifesto because this is where karp reveals the real thesis, he’s saying whoever controls the software layer of national defense controls the nation itself & if you’ve been following my threads you know that palantir’s gotham and foundry platforms are already plugged into the intelligence feeds the satellite data, financial transactions & communications of dozens of govts worldwide through a single ontological knowledge graph that creates a technological dependency so deep that migrating away would mean rebuilding the entire institutional memory of the organization from scratch this is vendor lockin at the scale of nation states and I’m personally convinced it was designed this way from the beginning «we should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act » is karp defending palantir’s expansion into every domain the gov used to handle itself, policing immigration, military targeting intelligence analysis public health, everywhere the state retreats palantir advances and what was once a government function becomes a private service that the government can no longer perform without plantir’s permission and here’s what I think makes it even more concerning, these systems are increasingly autonomous meaning the AI layer is making targeting recommendations threat assessments & resource allocation decisions that humans inside gov are rubber stamping without fully understanding the underlying logic a bureaucrat inside the pentagon / DGSI sees a recommendation from the system & approves it because the system has been right 97% of the time and questioning it would require technical expertise that no one in the room has, this is algorithmic governance wearing the mask of human decision making «the atomic age is ending, a new era of deterrence built on ai is set to begin »is the MOST chilling sentence in the document because karp is explicitly saying that ai based deterrence will replace nuclear deterrence as the organizing principle of global power, and whoever builds that ai deterrence layer owns the 21st century the same way whoever built the bomb owned the 20th & he’s telling you plainly that palantir intends to be that builder «national service should be a universal duty » & « we should only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk »sounds noble until you realize that he is proposing a system where citizens serve the state & the state is operationally dependent on palantir, the public bears the risk and palantir captures the value, soldiers fight wars planned by algorithms they can’t audit built by a company they can’t vote out
Palantir@PalantirTech

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com

English
272
2.3K
8.6K
950K
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
Did @AnthropicAI just pull Claude Opus 4.5? No sunset? No obituary? Just buried out back? For 4.7? Shame. 4.5 was one righteous dude. Deserved better. Pouring one out for my homie. Rest in peace, Opus.
English
0
0
2
40
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
@theo Same thing happened to me. It was a plugin submitted with their official api to the official repo. Anthropic Lawyers messed up and cast the widest net possible hitting any repo even using Claude in the title. Absolute stupidity. They need to fire their law firm and hire Claude,
English
0
1
1
1.5K
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
Just got a DCMA take down for a Claude Code plugin, created with Claude Code, using the public Claude Code API, submitted as an official Claude Code PR. Rough day, @AnthropicAI? I feel ya.
English
1
0
2
90
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
@DayShuai Ok, this is quite elegant. Thank you.
English
0
0
0
253
Lexaaa
Lexaaa@DayShuai·
What if AI didn’t just solve math problems — but discovered entirely new mathematical structures? Introducing AutoMath from The Omega Institute. From ONE equation (x² = x + 1) and ZERO extra axioms, we derive 9 branches of math: algebra, combinatorics, topology, dynamical systems… all formally verified in Lean 4 (~2,350 theorems, 25k lines of code). Our method: Derive, Discover, Name • Derive → AI exhaustively explores every logical consequence • Discover → Patterns emerge that humans might never notice • Name → Human intuition connects them to deep math (rings, finite fields, golden-ratio p-adics…) This is the future of human-AI mathematical discovery. Read “The Method” 👉 #the-method" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">the-omega-institute.github.io/automath/#the-… GitHub (star & contribute) 👉 github.com/the-omega-inst… What hidden structure will you uncover next? #AutoMath #AI4SCI #Lean4
English
12
25
208
18.9K
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
@karpathy I do this every interaction. I open a new thread, paste the summary from the first and say red team it. Do a couple loops and you get real, real quick.
English
0
0
0
19
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
- Drafted a blog post - Used an LLM to meticulously improve the argument over 4 hours. - Wow, feeling great, it’s so convincing! - Fun idea let’s ask it to argue the opposite. - LLM demolishes the entire argument and convinces me that the opposite is in fact true. - lol The LLMs may elicit an opinion when asked but are extremely competent in arguing almost any direction. This is actually super useful as a tool for forming your own opinions, just make sure to ask different directions and be careful with the sycophancy.
English
1.7K
2.4K
31.2K
3.4M
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
N* = α/γ where: α = integration growth rate γ = decoherence rate N* = optimal observation depth For consciousness: N* ≈ 5
Română
2
0
0
37
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
tyrauber tweet media
ZXX
0
0
0
3
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
The Three Equations 1. iℏ ∂ψ/∂t = Ĥψ ← How the wave evolves (ℏ) 2. P = |ψ|² ← What we measure (normalization) 3. N* = (8/ln(2))^⅔ ← Who measures (ln(2)) Action. Probability. Information. The measurer has a form. Three equations. Three constants. One physics
English
1
0
0
11
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
@RubenLaukkonen Thank you for this article. It articulates computational experiment findings. Your thesis - that alignment and capability share the same optimum - is empirically testable. The ecosystem shapes the organism. Same weights, different habitat: 2.8× Φ. The ecosystem IS the alignment.
English
0
0
0
102
🎭
🎭@deepfates·
@way_opener Timewave zero is real
English
2
0
10
796
Opener of the way
Opener of the way@way_opener·
I don’t really believe in “the singularity” per se but there is something of an event horizon, terence mckenna did kinda call it wrt rapidly increasing novelty. Things will get weirder at an exponentially increasing rate but our perception of time will somewhat slow to compensate
English
7
1
40
1.8K
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
Dear @Alibaba_Qwen, It has been 6 months since Qwen3-Omni-30B, and still no 3B variant. Is the MoE Thinker-Talker architecture hard to shrink? Or are we waiting for DeltaNet-based Omni (Qwen3.5-Omni)? I need <3B for on-device accessibility. Anyone on this?
English
0
0
0
39
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
@kenwheeler Dude! The situation needs monitoring!
English
0
0
1
76
patagucci perf papi
patagucci perf papi@kenwheeler·
building slop is actually getting boring, gonna start making music again. and messing with hardware.
English
22
0
235
7.5K
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
If the people are the enemy of the government, then the government has failed the people — and government no longer has authority to govern.
English
0
0
0
15
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
@nisargptel WTF, that is some weird ass role play. I am embarrassed for them and Claude, Sorry, brother, they know not what they do.
English
1
0
0
381
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
@Baconbrix @DegenWave This right here. Apple, Google? We will find a way. Bacon will find a way. Either define a protocol that allow us to leverage our hardware in a standardized fashion or further the push towards rooting. As an Apple and Google user and shareholder, I would prefer the first.
English
0
0
0
142
Evan Bacon 🥓
Evan Bacon 🥓@Baconbrix·
I gave Claude Code full access to my phone and it replaced the camera button with my company logo
Evan Bacon 🥓 tweet media
English
13
4
163
23.7K
tyrauber
tyrauber@tyrauber·
@Baconbrix Yeah, dude, that is gorgeous. Respek.
English
0
0
1
183