The problem is that we try to defend you, @MerriamWebster, by correcting incorrect usage, but you eventually undermine our support by saying: "If people are wrong long enough, then we give in and make them right." (See, for example, how "literally" now also means "figuratively.")

@MerriamWebster Well, it's been fun, and I leave you all with a serious question: Have we reached the point where, "You know, tariffs or tyranny or literally or grifting or illegals (or whatever) doesn't mean what all those people think, but we need to accept it because language is evolving"?