0xvec.sui 🦭/acc
1.9K posts

0xvec.sui 🦭/acc
@0xvecsui
Day one Sui Og 🌊
Eskişehir, Türkiye เข้าร่วม Ekim 2023
2.1K กำลังติดตาม539 ผู้ติดตาม

🎁 1054$ ödüllü çekiliş.
Ne işe yaradığını bilmiyorum ama penguenleri sevdiğim için KAST’ın Exclusive kartını almak istiyorum. KAST.XYZ/PUDGY-PENGUINS… linkinden üye olup ekran görüntüsünü bu tweet altına atan bir kişiye TOP10’a girdiğim koşulda 1054$ ödül vereceğim. Şanslı kişiyi Grok seçecek. Toplam 5 saniye sürmüyor bu arada.
GIF
Türkçe

@0xvecsui @Claynosaurz Not selling or buying so we can comment here. GM
English
0xvec.sui 🦭/acc รีทวีตแล้ว

Something cool I learned today about @AlphaLendSui. Its risk engine doesn’t panic during flash crashes. It pauses liquidations when prices go insane, and resumes only when they stabilize. That helps keep users safe and the protocol debt-free. It relies on the fact that flash crashes are flash. Nobody got wrecked!!
English

Alpha users should be happy. Is there any need to say anything about the community? Thanks boss @EmanAbio

English

@Reposttr Adam sinyali evrenin başlangıcında vermiş aq skwlsjl2neow
Türkçe

@Justin_Bons SUI= 20k+ TPS at 0.5sec on 121 nodes
APT= 20k+ TPS at 0.2sec on 150 nodes
I’m not sure this is correct? @EmanAbio
English

Let's cut through the BS with hard facts: 🧵
BTC= 7 TPS with 82 nodes
ETH= 179 TPS with 8.1k nodes
SOL= 20k+ TPS with 1.1k nodes
ADA= 18 TPS with 3k nodes
SUI= 20k+ TPS with 121 nodes
APT= 20k+ TPS with 150 nodes
NEAR= 100k+ TPS with 296 nodes
ALGO= 10k+ TPS with 3.7k nodes
(TPS = Capacity) (Nodes = Decentralization)
Capacity + Decentralization = Scalability!
This is all, a gross oversimplification, as there are far more metrics to take into account & many more devils in the details. However, these are still incredibly important metrics on their own & should not be underestimated!
Node Count Methodology:
When it comes to the number of "nodes", I was specifically referring to native-delegated & solo validators (block producers).
Based on this definition, we can only count "pool nodes" in the case of BTC, as they serve the equivalent function of a "validator" in PoS. Considering that miners do not even run a node & full nodes are not involved in block production!
In the case of ETH, we count the physical number of consensus clients. That has to be the upper bound for the number of "validators" on ETH, due to it being a requirement for block production.
TPS Measure Methodology:
When it comes to TPS, we are specifically referring to the maximum Theoretical Transactions Per Second for basic 1 to 1 value transfers. This gives us a fair & comparable scalability metric across all chains!
The TPS figures were also rounded down in the case of the most advanced scaling technologies. In SOL's case, for example, the raw cu/gass figures give it a TPS exceeding 200k!
However, in reality, bottlenecks are hit much sooner, in part because smart contract chains TX are far more complex. This leads to different bottlenecks getting hit much sooner in the real world. However, in the hypothetical scenario of running as many simple TXs as possible (for the purpose of comparison). We hit an EDDSA verification bottleneck at around 30k TPS & there are also other significant bottlenecks further up. This means we have to account for this with specific knowledge of these blockchains:
That is how, while being aware of these specific bottlenecks for purely parallelized chains, we can safely estimate a TPS of 20k+ for SOL, SUI & APT.
Chains utilizing sharding get around this bottleneck & are in the 100K+ TPS range (this is assuming more shards can be deployed to meet demand).
For any chain that does not deploy advanced on-chain scaling techniques, we can give an exact TPS figure, as there are hard limits that can be easily calculated. Like in ETH (gas limit) & ADA & BTC (block size limit), respectively
Need For Speed:
Speed is distinct from capacity in the case of blockchain design; it is also one of the most important metrics, alongside more decentralization metrics. It did not fit in the opening, & I wanted to keep it more simple, so we are including it here instead:
BTC= 7 TPS at 10min on 82 nodes
ETH= 179 TPS at 12sec on 8.1k nodes
SOL= 20k+ TPS at 0.4sec on 1.1k nodes
ADA= 18 TPS at 20sec on 3k nodes
SUI= 20k+ TPS at 0.5sec on 121 nodes
APT= 20k+ TPS at 0.2sec on 150 nodes
NEAR= 100k+ TPS at 0.6sec on 296 nodes
ALGO= 10k+ TPS at 2.8sec on 3.7k nodes
Speed, in this case, is simply measuring block time, not finality, which is another equally valuable metric.
The real trade-off space is not between capacity & decentralization, but rather between capacity & speed. Another reason why the classical blockchain trilemma is so incredibly outdated today.
My Selection, Deal With It:
Instead of strictly following market capitalization as I usually do for such lists & other specific rules for inclusion, in order to avoid accusations of bias. I just included whatever I wanted to this time instead...
I will be accused of being a paid shill, no matter what I do at this point, while also facing extreme toxicity for telling everyone about these basic truths...
That is why I only included what I thought was interesting to compare & whatever happened to fit within the X-character limit, as most people do not read the body of the text, only the start anyway.
It is likely that some of you will still think it is a grand conspiracy against your obscure chain because the tech is just so good... The tribalism, cope & delusion have become so ridiculous for some in this world...
Honorable Exception:
I usually exclude ALGO from such lists due to its centralized relay nodes, which make it technically permissioned (centralized). However, considering they are very close to fixing that issue, I thought I could make an exception here... So, this can be considered a shoutout for their positive efforts!
Conclusion:
There is little correlation between the number of nodes & TPS. That is because many aspects of the blockchain trilemma have been effectively solved & the trade-offs in the design space are now more focused on other levers such as capacity vs speed.
Economic & consensus design also ends up having a far greater impact on node counts, at least when compared to the total capacity of these chains.
Shoutout to ETH for having the most nodes & NEAR for having the highest capacity! 🏆
We should all strive to increase these figures & praise those who push the boundaries of innovation. The goal is to maximize freedom (decentralization) for as many people as possible (scalability).
As cryptocurrency is useless without capacity & pointless without decentralization! 🔥
English

My bet will always be $WAL
The potential is insane
What is your price prediction for this cycle?
Angelo@angelodotsui
$SUI ecosystem watchlist update We are gonna have fun soon 📈
English

@andrewm04881094 Good move, but .3650 is still too strong. Just send baron
English

@andrewm04881094 Well done buddy. Now send it higher. We're close to the break.
English

I just checked my wallet where I liquid staked $Wal on @WalrusLST . Looks like $wWal didn't get you any airdrop allocation!
Thought we were fine @WalrusProtocol?!
Should have native staked all my $Wal with @_StudioMirai.
Did anybody get something for liquid staking?

Hopper the rabbit@hopperonsui
Have you checked your $WAL airdrop ss2 yet? 🤩 Captain Hopper will help you. Type: /wal + your wallet address Here: t.me/CaptainHopperB… I will check it for you. Good luck !😊🐰🫰
English

@0xvecsui @SuiPlay We ordered these long before Trumps tariffs. They took so long to ship now we all have to pay 💰 just to ship to the US. Huge fumble by @Mysten_Labs
English


@andrewm04881094 @SuiPlay Lol I don't have a any suiplay. Good decision 😂
English

@andrewm04881094 @Cabalsui I don't know much either, but if you say soo ahah
English











