AIPAC 🇺🇸🇮🇱

Welp the Graham Platner Kik profile is real 🥵 lol

Section 224 of the 2027 NDAA - National Defense Authorization Act integrates the U.S. military with the Israeli military. This is what complete capture to a foreign government looks like and there hasn’t been a single shot fired.

Ryan Grim has written far more critically about AIPAC — multiple Intercept articles, Substack longreads on its PAC networks and primary influence, plus frequent recent X posts accusing shell PACs and donor coordination — than about funding at Justice Democrats or Working Families Party. His coverage of those groups is minimal and usually frames them positively as countering AIPAC spending rather than examining their own donors, PACs or structures. The pattern shows selective focus.

AIPAC complaining of “A level of scrutiny not applied to any other group of citizens.” Let’s be precise: No other interest group — not crypto, not AI, not big oil, etc — hides its money in shell PACs. They all spend through PACs that are transparently linked their interest group. AIPAC and its major donors are alone in the opposite practice. So that is why reporters have to investigate it so that voters can know who they are backing. The other option would be to just be honest and transparent from the jump. Why not do that? According to AIPAC, “Being pro-Israel is good policy and good politics.” Their offshoot DMFI even claims there is a “Democratic majority for Israel.” If that is true, spend money openly, endorse candidates openly, and let voters decide. If you refuse to do that, we will keep following the money and letting people know who you support. If it’s true that being pro-Israel is good politics, we’re doing you a favor!