
What is your beef? I've heard from dozens of others how I've hurt their feelings by commenting on this pool thing; but to save us time I've cover the three issues I inferred in my 153 character response.
1) The pool is not meant to be micro-managed by the US President, it is meant to be administrated by the Parks service, a division of the US Department of the Interior, isn't it?
2) The legal excuse that the Trump administration has cited for Trump to micro-manage the pool, is invalid. Invalid because Trump has not claimed the Pool is essential to a war (he has had Congress endorse), or is a national disaster (that he has directed FEMA to respond to), or was killing people or otherwise posing an injury that only he instead of the National Park Service or Dep't of the Interior could handle; has he?
Instead of implementing US law which is his job, he has exploited his title as President to stop a pipe replacement program, and had the pool emptied and painted instead of replacing said pipes; isn't that correct? He said this would be cheaper and a better solution, didn't he.
3) Trump did not undertake a DBB but gave a no-bid contract to his pool buddy that he said would cost 1.5 or maybe 2 million, but which has now cost more than ten $million; isn't that also correct?
Somehow my 153 character response has so injured you, that you too felt you have to add your two bits, that's fine, noone's stopping you, but seeming you're bending people's ear, be so kind as to at least explain what the f you're bitching about.
English































