Apropro (💎,💎) รีทวีตแล้ว
Twitter loves bodycount talk, but it's been the same thing for ages now. This is possibly the one field in which incel technology has completely stagnated - they've developed theories of relativity relating to age gaps in relationships, coded AI wives and managed to reverse balding by now, but they're still doing the same bodycount thing.
I haven't seen Oppenheimer, but to my understanding it was about a guy who invented nuclear bombs and then irresponsibly gave them away. I find that beautiful and inspirational
My atomic bomb, gifted to whoever wants it: the Racially Adjusted Bodycount Index.
In the right hands, I think my Racially Adjusted Bodycount Index (RABI) could be the technological innovation bodycount discourse needs to start advancing again.
Normal people have always maintained: "Women are so much more than their bodycount! Reducing them down to a single number like this is evil!"
Intuitively, we all knew this to be true. But without proper experience around women (females?) we didn't understand what other elements might be missing from the equation. I spent 9 years pretending to be a woman online to fill that experience gap and I've used what I learned to flesh out the concept for my RABI.
It turns out men *do* care about more than just a woman's bodycount. Based on my 9 year of research, what men care about isn't just the number of men a woman's slept with - it's the RACES of the men she's slept with.
This matters far more than the absolute number of past partners, and explains why some women seem "blown out" (industry term) at thirty bodies while others can seem pure and virginal even at ten thousand.
I spent time building a platform of normal and well-adjusted followers to conduct research on. When their poll results started flowing in, the world around me immediately made more sense.
It explained why black women are the least swiped on dating apps - they predominantly sleep with black men, who my RABI says cause the most destruction
This also gets to the heart of why men may find Asian women desirable - they sleep with Asian men, who my RABI tells me barely count as half a person each
Knowing this, we can all finally agree that reducing a woman down to a single number *is* evil. To accurately reduce a woman, you must consult my RABI, which denominates in terms of white men:
Asian bodies count as .67
White bodies count as 1
Hispanic bodies count as 2
Arab bodies count at 6.67
Black bodies count as 15
These numbers were all determined by asking questions like below, and iterating the ratio till the poll results got close to 50/50. I'm not sure what their p-value is, but I have a lot of followers now, so it should be pretty high.
ADDENDUM
I've been asked a lot of questions about my research methods, and in the spirit of transparency I'd like to answer them here:
Q: Lukas, what if your Twitter followers aren't representative of the overall population?
A: Simply no way that could be true
Q: Wouldn't these results also depend on the race of the girl in question, and the person answering the poll? What did you do to control for those?
A: If those variables were truly as important as you say, they should know how to control for themselves
Q: Can't people just buy bots and destroy your polls?
A: Bot votes are just as valid as real votes. Think about it - someone willing to pay for 1000 votes clearly cares about the results 1000x more than you do, and my research should validate their feelings.
Lukas (computer) 🔺@SCHIZO_FREQ
Would you rather date a girl with: A) 30 bodies, all white guys B) 4 bodies, all black guys
English
