BakeThePie

Who taught you to hate yourself ? - Malcolm X

Phil Spencer didn’t sell us a vision of XBOX as a de facto third‑party publisher. He sold us a future where “great exclusive games… ship on platforms where Game Pass exists” - his words, not ours. Outside of contractual or legacy obligations, that was the expectation he set. You can’t market hardware on the strength of exclusives, then pivot to platform‑agnostic publishing, and act confused when the people who bought into the ecosystem feel misled. And before anyone tries to cite his 2018 comments about the future of the brand, those remarks were about Microsoft’s cloud ambitions, not a signal that they planned to release their games everywhere. He was talking about expanding access through streaming, not abandoning hardware, dissolving platform identity, or repositioning the division as a third‑party publisher. The subsequent One X, Scarlett, and Series X campaigns made it abundantly clear that hardware remained central to the strategy. Analysts, press, and even Bethesda leadership expected games to be exclusive, including The Elder Scrolls VI. The internal emails revealed during the 2023 FTC v. Microsoft trial revealed that Pete Hines expressed frustration that Bethesda was told to make its games exclusive to console and PC while Microsoft simultaneously reassured regulators that Call of Duty would remain multiplatform. This wasn’t invented by fans - it was documented inside Microsoft’s own communications. So if the company is now promoting every platform its games appear on, how does this benefit XBOX users specifically? Because when every major game goes everywhere, the hardware’s value proposition collapses. When the platform’s relevance in the hardware space dwindles, the people who actually bought the console are left with a weaker offering. When Microsoft treats the console as optional, media outlets follow suit and stop prioritising it in comparisons. When the install base shrinks and confidence erodes, third‑party publishers begin skipping the platform entirely. And at that point, it becomes reasonable to ask whether those of us who bought into the original vision are going to be compensated for a strategic reversal that leaves us at a disadvantage.

Why doesnt Ryan tell this to Sony ? Why doesnt he tell Sony they should show all logos at their presentations instead of pretending multiplats are exclusive?