Miggraf

122 posts

Miggraf banner
Miggraf

Miggraf

@Beyond_miggraf

Helping you build wealth & freedom. Simple advice. Real results. A system that works. Working on escaping my 9-5

US เข้าร่วม Şubat 2025
105 กำลังติดตาม54 ผู้ติดตาม
Miggraf
Miggraf@Beyond_miggraf·
STRC is a free market instrument. That's the gist of it.
Jesse Myers@Croesus_BTC

This post was seen by ~1M people yesterday. A few more thoughts on the topic... A. "Steady lads, deploying more capital" This is the infamous meme that comes from the Terra/Luna implosion. Crypto people have scar tissue from the May 2022 implosion of this algorithmic stablecoin. Terra was designed to maintain a $1 peg by using a BTC treasury (Luna) to bid if the price went below $1, and sell if it went above $1. This works great, except in a panic. 4 years ago, panic happened. People wanted out of Terra, so the Luna treasury was automatically drawn down to protect the peg. But this depleted the system's resources and deteriorated its capacity to keep defending the peg, which stoked more fear and exacerbated the exit pressure. Eventually the BTC treasury was depleted, the defense system was exhausted, the peg broke and Terra went to zero. People who lived through that are wary of STRC and other Digital Credit instruments. But, STRC is the opposite fundamental design of this. B. Architected systems vs. free markets Terra/Luna was an architected system that actively used its treasury resources to defend a peg. STRC relies on free-market price discovery to find price equilibrium, and does not promise to maintain a peg. And that is at the heart of why Strategy will be fine, and STRC along with it. Strategy will not expend resources to try to maintain anything. Instead, the free market will find equilibrium on its own. C. How to kill STRC The health of STRC depends on the health of Strategy's balance sheet, because that determines whether STRC holders continue to receive dividends. STRC's market price can depeg and trade at a serious discount... but Strategy's balance sheet is completely unaffected. To attack Terra/Luna, you just needed to create a confidence wobble that forced the system to expend BTC treasury resources to defend the price of Terra. To attack STRC, you need to deplete Strategy's balance sheet. Since they're not actively expending it to defend anything, you would need to send Bitcoin's price to ~$0 and keep it there. Good luck! D. How STRC heals itself STRC trades down in this leverage wipeout to $82. Strategy does nothing; expends no resources. Strategy keeps paying STRC dividends with its unaffected balance sheet strength. Now, investors are getting ~14% effective yield w/ the potential for a ~20% capital gain. STRC is more attractive than it previously was! This attracts more investors. Price is bid up. Strategy will likely increase dividend rate on June 30 to 11.75% or 12%. This makes STRC more attractive still. Price is bid up. STRC dividends keep being paid. Market realizes that Strategy is unimpacted, it was just a leverage wipeout. Confidence in STRC dividends returns. Price is bid up. Back to $100 par. It will take weeks or maybe months, but that is how the free market (and the variable rate dividend mechanic) will restore STRC to $100. And that's why this is the opposite of Terra/Luna's design.

English
0
0
2
13
Miggraf รีทวีตแล้ว
Jesse Myers
Jesse Myers@Croesus_BTC·
This post was seen by ~1M people yesterday. A few more thoughts on the topic... A. "Steady lads, deploying more capital" This is the infamous meme that comes from the Terra/Luna implosion. Crypto people have scar tissue from the May 2022 implosion of this algorithmic stablecoin. Terra was designed to maintain a $1 peg by using a BTC treasury (Luna) to bid if the price went below $1, and sell if it went above $1. This works great, except in a panic. 4 years ago, panic happened. People wanted out of Terra, so the Luna treasury was automatically drawn down to protect the peg. But this depleted the system's resources and deteriorated its capacity to keep defending the peg, which stoked more fear and exacerbated the exit pressure. Eventually the BTC treasury was depleted, the defense system was exhausted, the peg broke and Terra went to zero. People who lived through that are wary of STRC and other Digital Credit instruments. But, STRC is the opposite fundamental design of this. B. Architected systems vs. free markets Terra/Luna was an architected system that actively used its treasury resources to defend a peg. STRC relies on free-market price discovery to find price equilibrium, and does not promise to maintain a peg. And that is at the heart of why Strategy will be fine, and STRC along with it. Strategy will not expend resources to try to maintain anything. Instead, the free market will find equilibrium on its own. C. How to kill STRC The health of STRC depends on the health of Strategy's balance sheet, because that determines whether STRC holders continue to receive dividends. STRC's market price can depeg and trade at a serious discount... but Strategy's balance sheet is completely unaffected. To attack Terra/Luna, you just needed to create a confidence wobble that forced the system to expend BTC treasury resources to defend the price of Terra. To attack STRC, you need to deplete Strategy's balance sheet. Since they're not actively expending it to defend anything, you would need to send Bitcoin's price to ~$0 and keep it there. Good luck! D. How STRC heals itself STRC trades down in this leverage wipeout to $82. Strategy does nothing; expends no resources. Strategy keeps paying STRC dividends with its unaffected balance sheet strength. Now, investors are getting ~14% effective yield w/ the potential for a ~20% capital gain. STRC is more attractive than it previously was! This attracts more investors. Price is bid up. Strategy will likely increase dividend rate on June 30 to 11.75% or 12%. This makes STRC more attractive still. Price is bid up. STRC dividends keep being paid. Market realizes that Strategy is unimpacted, it was just a leverage wipeout. Confidence in STRC dividends returns. Price is bid up. Back to $100 par. It will take weeks or maybe months, but that is how the free market (and the variable rate dividend mechanic) will restore STRC to $100. And that's why this is the opposite of Terra/Luna's design.
Jesse Myers@Croesus_BTC

STRC down to $82.6 today. Here's my read: 1. Strategy is fine. If everything stays as is, they can pay STRC dividends for 32 years. If BTC appreciates at ~2% CAGR, they can pay dividends indefinitely. 2. Why the sell-off? This appears to be a liquidation cascade. Over the last 6 months, the narrative became that STRC volatility was reducing, and price began to spend all its time in $99-100 range. This invites leverage. If you expect the price to always be north of $95, you can take on 20x leverage with your portfolio to buy more STRC and dramatically increase the yield on your portfolio. This works great, until it doesn't. STRC is designed as a free-market asset. When attention shifted to SATA and STRC price flagged, it may have raised the attention of opportunistic short-selling hedge funds. By shorting aggressively, they could push the price down and start triggering margin calls and liquidations from folks who aggressively levered up their STRC positions. The price action today is a clear liquidation cascade, rapidly pushing prices lower, in turn triggering additional liquidations. 3. What happens now? The market will heal itself. Opportunistic hedge funds will recognize that this is a firesale and the fundamentals are unchanged for STRC and step in as buyers. Shorts will close, becoming buyers. Individuals are getting a tremendous entry price for long-term holding STRC shares. Buyers at this level will get ~13.7% effective yield. If STRC trades back to $100 and they sell, they get an easy +18% return. 4. What will Strategy do? Strategy will likely increase the dividend rate on June 30 - maybe to 11.75% but possibly to 12%. Buyers at the current price level then would get 14.2% effective yield from that point forward. Strategy may also step in to buy STRC shares back. They could do this by issuing new shares of MSTR (currently at 1.14 mNAV) or by taking on traditional debt and deploying those funds to buy discounted STRC shares on the market. If/when STRC trades back to $100, Strategy could then re-issue those STRC shares. The ~$15 delta per share could be used to buy BTC as pure accretion to MSTR holders, with no net change to amplification. No doubt that Saylor has already at least considered this, and it wouldn't surprise me if they're currently doing this. 5. In summary... The market is freaked out that this depeg is like Terra/Luna... but this is not an asset like that. Strategy's balance sheet determines whether STRC continues to receive dividend payments... and Strategy's balance sheet is completely unchanged. This is a leverage wipeout. From this, the market will learn that Digital Credit is mostly very low volatility. But because it is a free market asset, the longer that a Digital Credit instrument trades within a tight range to par... the more leverage will inevitably pile up as people get greedy. And that creates the conditions for a leverage wipeout depeg. Following that, the instrument will make its way back to par value as the market heals itself and recognizes that the dividend payments will continue uninterrupted because the issuer's balance sheet is unaffected.

English
72
79
674
47.9K
Miggraf รีทวีตแล้ว
The Wolf Of All Streets
The Wolf Of All Streets@scottmelker·
My best guess? Hedge funds got a hold of $STRC, shorted it down and caused a leverage cascade, will buy the lows, capture the upside and yield. Tale as old as time.
English
183
101
2.5K
109.6K
Flying Raven ⚡️🇺🇸
People are missing how much optionality Michael @Saylor actually has. At today’s depressed prices, $MSTR could theoretically sell enough Bitcoin to retire all of the preferreds and all of the converts. That would mean retiring roughly $14.5B of preferred obligations and ~$6.7B of converts. Even after doing that, Strategy would still own roughly 550,000 BTC - with no preferred dividend burden, no converts, and a massively simplified capital structure. Think about that. The market is acting like $MSTR is trapped by its liabilities. But the Bitcoin treasury is so large that Saylor could de-lever the entire structure and still be one of the largest Bitcoin holders on earth. That does not mean he should do it- just means he has options. The market is thinking linearly. Saylor is playing with a much bigger balance sheet.
English
36
16
257
15.1K
Miggraf
Miggraf@Beyond_miggraf·
@Croesus_BTC Best take so far on the STRC action. Aggressive leverage will hit you, no matter the asset.
English
0
0
5
67
Miggraf รีทวีตแล้ว
Jesse Myers
Jesse Myers@Croesus_BTC·
STRC down to $82.6 today. Here's my read: 1. Strategy is fine. If everything stays as is, they can pay STRC dividends for 32 years. If BTC appreciates at ~2% CAGR, they can pay dividends indefinitely. 2. Why the sell-off? This appears to be a liquidation cascade. Over the last 6 months, the narrative became that STRC volatility was reducing, and price began to spend all its time in $99-100 range. This invites leverage. If you expect the price to always be north of $95, you can take on 20x leverage with your portfolio to buy more STRC and dramatically increase the yield on your portfolio. This works great, until it doesn't. STRC is designed as a free-market asset. When attention shifted to SATA and STRC price flagged, it may have raised the attention of opportunistic short-selling hedge funds. By shorting aggressively, they could push the price down and start triggering margin calls and liquidations from folks who aggressively levered up their STRC positions. The price action today is a clear liquidation cascade, rapidly pushing prices lower, in turn triggering additional liquidations. 3. What happens now? The market will heal itself. Opportunistic hedge funds will recognize that this is a firesale and the fundamentals are unchanged for STRC and step in as buyers. Shorts will close, becoming buyers. Individuals are getting a tremendous entry price for long-term holding STRC shares. Buyers at this level will get ~13.7% effective yield. If STRC trades back to $100 and they sell, they get an easy +18% return. 4. What will Strategy do? Strategy will likely increase the dividend rate on June 30 - maybe to 11.75% but possibly to 12%. Buyers at the current price level then would get 14.2% effective yield from that point forward. Strategy may also step in to buy STRC shares back. They could do this by issuing new shares of MSTR (currently at 1.14 mNAV) or by taking on traditional debt and deploying those funds to buy discounted STRC shares on the market. If/when STRC trades back to $100, Strategy could then re-issue those STRC shares. The ~$15 delta per share could be used to buy BTC as pure accretion to MSTR holders, with no net change to amplification. No doubt that Saylor has already at least considered this, and it wouldn't surprise me if they're currently doing this. 5. In summary... The market is freaked out that this depeg is like Terra/Luna... but this is not an asset like that. Strategy's balance sheet determines whether STRC continues to receive dividend payments... and Strategy's balance sheet is completely unchanged. This is a leverage wipeout. From this, the market will learn that Digital Credit is mostly very low volatility. But because it is a free market asset, the longer that a Digital Credit instrument trades within a tight range to par... the more leverage will inevitably pile up as people get greedy. And that creates the conditions for a leverage wipeout depeg. Following that, the instrument will make its way back to par value as the market heals itself and recognizes that the dividend payments will continue uninterrupted because the issuer's balance sheet is unaffected.
Jesse Myers tweet media
English
535
639
4.7K
1M
Miggraf
Miggraf@Beyond_miggraf·
There's an interesting theme on here as to STRC being poorly designed because it's not at par. But people forget the market is still the market, so market instruments will perform based on market sentiment. For example, can anyone tell me if $SPCX can be priced according to any methodology at what it's trading for? Show me the math. One is going up based on sentiment, the other down.
English
0
0
1
58
Miggraf
Miggraf@Beyond_miggraf·
@GrafYves Love the daily dividend, though the email from my broker on a daily basis is annoying!
English
1
0
3
16
Yves-André Graf
Yves-André Graf@GrafYves·
$SATA stabilizing after the transition to daily dividends 👀 Bullish on $ASST
Yves-André Graf tweet media
English
1
0
16
341
Chris Millas
Chris Millas@ChrisMMillas·
To the $MSTR bulls that have never wavered for a single moment, I see you.
English
72
14
655
18.7K
Ragnar
Ragnar@RoaringRagnar·
$STRC at $89.00 is an excellent deal. I may need to buy some. 12% of capital gains, plus bi-weekly dividends.
Ragnar tweet media
English
23
5
196
6.2K
Miggraf
Miggraf@Beyond_miggraf·
@BTCoptioneer Just bought more STRC. 100% agree with the above. Market is crazy
English
0
0
3
71
BTC Optioneer
BTC Optioneer@BTCoptioneer·
$STRC effective yield is now 12.9%, almost on par with $SATA. STRC has 32 years of dividends. SATA has 12.5 years of dividends. STRC investors are panicking for no reason.
English
35
27
499
21.7K
Miggraf
Miggraf@Beyond_miggraf·
@IIICapital Comments are showing most people mistakenly correlation for causation
English
0
0
2
134
Joe Burnett, MSBA
Joe Burnett, MSBA@IIICapital·
Unpopular opinion: If Strategy misses an $STRC dividend payment, Bitcoin likely died.
English
86
15
330
50.2K
Miggraf
Miggraf@Beyond_miggraf·
For everyone freaking out about $STRC, why? What has changed? SpaceX? Bitcoin? AI? Legitimately curious!
English
0
0
4
135
Miggraf
Miggraf@Beyond_miggraf·
@PunterJeff Interesting how they can make up numbers and call it the same thing. Wish people were more literate on statistics.
English
0
0
1
169
Jeff Walton
Jeff Walton@PunterJeff·
The Fed: Our data on inflation is dated, and bad. Creates task force to get “better data” ____ If one wanted to lower rates, it would be in best interest to control the data that informs decision making. Wouldn’t be surprised to see an AI inflation adjustment in the future
English
11
15
246
11.8K
Miggraf
Miggraf@Beyond_miggraf·
@WealthMechanic1 Odds are you are late on that. If you rebalance now, you'll likely end up with bitcoin going up and index funds going down.
English
2
0
7
359
Wealth Mechanics
Wealth Mechanics@WealthMechanic1·
My Bitcoin position is down 28%. My index funds are up 40-57%. Should I sell the Bitcoin and go all in on index funds? Genuinely curious what you'd do.
English
309
2
127
37.5K
Miggraf
Miggraf@Beyond_miggraf·
@603_brown @PunterJeff Agree with the first part. Saylor is not a leader of Bitcoin. Whatever he does, whether you think it’s a good idea or a bad idea has no bearing on bitcoin as a store of value 🤷
English
0
0
1
29
1875
1875@603_brown·
@Beyond_miggraf @PunterJeff my reality is we live with the threat currencies worldwide collapsing when bond yields hit 6% due to the needless war but the only legit alternative currency has a leader with an x profile that has idiot laser eyes.
English
1
0
0
47
Jeff Walton
Jeff Walton@PunterJeff·
Publicly crusading against a capital structure strategy that is directionally aligned with your own stated long Bitcoin thesis represents asymmetric career risk
English
59
19
689
51.6K
Miggraf
Miggraf@Beyond_miggraf·
@603_brown @PunterJeff Interesting reality you live in. What I do you think musk deserves for smoking pot on a podcast?
English
1
0
0
40
1875
1875@603_brown·
@PunterJeff when one person can sell his underwater coins at x, move the market 20% by selling 32 btc, and then buy back at x-(x*0.2) it's manipulation, likely securities fraud,, a problem. and also a grown man using HODL in press releases is unserious and deserves liquidation.
English
5
0
1
1K
Miggraf
Miggraf@Beyond_miggraf·
@jimcramer Wut? A toddler knows more about “money” than you based on that statement
English
0
0
0
8
Jim Cramer
Jim Cramer@jimcramer·
Bitcoin and gold--bad money, being liquidated for SpaceX. Apple and Nvidia --good money--being liquidated
English
603
198
1.9K
654.3K
Miggraf
Miggraf@Beyond_miggraf·
@sweatystartup Your take on bitcoin is straight up bad. Stick to self storage or sweaty businesses
English
0
0
2
302
Nick Huber
Nick Huber@sweatystartup·
Yield is suddenly everywhere. Bonds and treasuries from 4-8%. Real estate at 10%+. Loans of all kinds in high demand. The opportunity cost of holding a non cashflowing, speculative asset like bitcoin is very high. Rough few years ahead for the diamond hands.
English
40
0
142
60K
Miggraf
Miggraf@Beyond_miggraf·
Common sense is not so common. A balance sheet, whether it's built on real estate, bitcoin or derivatives only has value to the extent that you can sell the assets. No asset's value could withstand a run. That's it.
English
1
0
3
26