BTCDavid

Five years ago, telling your mortgage lender you owned Bitcoin was a red flag. Today, Fannie Mae is backing home loans where Bitcoin IS the down payment. That's not a crypto startup. That's the U.S. government's mortgage backbone treating Bitcoin as collateral with the same protections as a conventional 30-year home loan. Here's what changed: 41% of American families fail to buy a home because they can't scrape together the cash for a down payment. Not because they're broke. Because their wealth is locked in assets they'd have to sell, triggering capital gains, paperwork, and a tax bill that eats the down payment itself. Bitcoiners know this trap better than anyone. You're sitting on life-changing wealth and the system punishes you for trying to use it. This product eliminates that wall. Pledge BTC or USDC as collateral, receive a loan for the down payment, keep your Bitcoin, pay no capital gains. Rate is 0.5 to 1.5 points above standard depending on borrower profile. The key detail: no margin calls. No collateral top-ups. If Bitcoin drops in value, the mortgage terms remain unchanged and no additional collateral is required. Market movements alone never trigger liquidation. The only liquidation risk is a 60-day payment delinquency, same as any conventional mortgage. This is how billionaires have operated for decades. Borrow against assets, never sell. Private banks built empires on this model for the ultra-wealthy. The difference now: it's available to anyone holding Bitcoin on an exchange. The real story isn't the product. It's what Fannie Mae's involvement signals. A government-sponsored enterprise formally underwriting Bitcoin-collateralized debt means the U.S. housing system no longer views Bitcoin as speculation. It views it as wealth. That's a classification shift that took 15 years to happen and will be impossible to reverse.

Barely anyone listened to me about... $ASTS at $28.61 and it ran 354% $AXTI at $19.40 and it flew 230% $CIFR at $3.15 and it went up 694% $IREN at $7.52 and it ran 911% $ONDS at $0.71 and it flew 2013% $OPEN at $0.90 and it went up 1100% $PL at $12.94 and it ran 178% $RDW at $7.67 and it flew 239% $WULF at $3.53 and it went up 424% And now, nobody's paying attention... $SATL at $4.26 Watch us cook again! 🫡📈

They're lying about inflation rates and they're lying about population numbers I fear it is all much worse than we could imagine

$SATL taking off yet again. Third Blue Diamond has appeared. Can be invalidated until we close. Weekly running into resistance at these levels - if we breach and close above, we'll rocket.

This is a mall in Virginia. Every day I am more radicalized, I’m a foreigner in my own country.

What’s your best multi-generational (50-100 yr) “obvious in hindsight” investment thesis? Mine: land in the Great Lakes region (within proximity of tier 1 & 2 population centers) 2 reasons why: 1) land is scarce 2) fresh water is the most important natural resource for human survival and civilization Pretty simple. The Great Lakes contain 84% of North America’s (surface) fresh water. Humans are incredibly resourceful, so places w/o fresh water will continue to find innovative solutions. However, as decades pass, these solutions will feel the increasing weight of constraint as population and consumption continually grow. Then at some point, growth will become easier in places w near unlimited access to fresh water. To be clear, I’m NOT saying everyone will leave places w/o easy access to fresh water. I just think we’ll eventually hit a point where growth slowly shifts to areas w less constraints. Not to mention the Great Lakes region doesn’t have wildfires, hurricanes, etc. Insuring areas w significant natural disaster risk will be another multi-generational thing to watch. Land in some other regions will end up being a great investment too, but I think the Great Lakes will be the ultimate winner (esp given how low prices are today). Some circles on the map will do better than others of course, but that’s a separate debate. Think I’m wrong? We’ll all be dead so it won’t matter. Our Great Grandkids can dunk on each other.

🔹S&J Portfolio Update 3/14/26🔹 Total: $1.41M * Excludes $700k cash I banked 1. $AMPX 2. $TE 3. $OSS 4. $IBRX 5. $BE 6. $OUST $. $LPTH 7. $Cash 🔹Key Takeaways🔹 🔹+ $200k this week 🎉 🔹+ New ATH hit this week 🎉🎉 🔹 Officially took $700k off table 🎉🎉🎉 This was a big week personally as I took action on a decision that has been on my mind since October. When is enough… enough? I am proud i made the move, I essentially just wiped out one of my accounts to rip the band-aid off and not punt it, so I spent a lot of yesterday re-shuffling my portfolio to balance back out. It’s not perfect yet but not bad. 🔹Position by Position Breakdown🔹 $AMPX: 28% What’s not to like here? Earnings were perfect, the broader macro situation continues to lean heavily in their favor, CEO is out in front on linkedin promoting NDAA compliance. Valuation is not quite as compelling as it was when I first entered but they put up a huge quarter and we know guidance was exceptionally conservative. I have unloaded a lot of calls (only holding Jan 2027 now) here and it’s actually much LESS of my portfolio than before, but I am actually quite comfortable at 28%. You know how I feel about momentum, I am not fighting the ocean. I very much see this ending the year over $30. $TE: 15% I guess at some point they do have to report earnings…. Right? I am going to be honest, this delay is starting to bother me. Of course they are still within their timing per SEC so nothing is wrong but if I have a CAO issue and concern about my filings I want to get it out of the way and clear the deck fast, not wait until the last possible second. I reduced my options exposure here and ate a bad loss on some July calls, which is on me obviously. All of my calls are January and assuming any issues are re: previous revenue recognition I feel good about them rebounding by January (my calls are not aggressive strike prices, $7s and 10s). But I am going to be examining this very very closely. I need full clarify on revenue recognition, forward guidance and deals. If they put up +$400m as previously stated, I’ll shut up. $OSS: 13% I believe I originally recommended this around $8 in Jan. We just closed over $10 I’ve added here into strength as this chart is flipping bullish as earnings approaches. This is going to be a very interesting report as we finally get to see the business metrics of the pure play USA defense company without the Bressner business they sold. I have a feeling the street is going to be very excited about this once the smoke clears. Reminds me of $oust recent earnings. $IBRX 12%: Some good news Friday around their tech capabilities. Allows faster and more efficient scale of production. FDA approval is still the white whale here. I am staying here all year. New tech development raises the floor. Revenue still aggressively ramping. I can afford to take this moonshot. $BE: 9% Not an asymmetric investment. I just think this is the best AI energy company by a lot. I will add on weakness. My options here are Jan 2028. Just giving myself some leverage but no time pressure. Might reduce leverage here. $OUST: 8% My new position. I made a long post about it. Sector, revenue, valuation are all perfect. We are likely close to floor valuation here when you comp to peers. I’ll likely write a report on this in the coming days but for my own learning. $LPTH: 8% Been a bit slow here, still unsure why. They are coming off a massive year so probably still digesting the move. Earnings was great. Environment tells me that won’t slow down given their domestic need and military increased spending. 🔹Final Thoughts🔹 I still have too much leverage. Right now I am 2:1 options to commons across my portfolio. That should really be reversed. I loved my play swapping commons to cheap options on pullback. I want to be able to do that again, but I need to continue unwinding these positions. Let’s keep winning. 🔹

Lawyer: "My client is remorseful" Camera cuts to the 12-year-old r*pist on the side, grinning