John Carvalho

65.5K posts

John Carvalho banner
John Carvalho

John Carvalho

@BitcoinErrorLog

Building the Atomic Economy at @synonym_to.

🐥 เข้าร่วม Aralık 2013
2.4K กำลังติดตาม75.7K ผู้ติดตาม
Wirelyss 👁️‍🗨️💫
The best thing x could do rn is allow third party clients again. It allows other intelligent cracked teams to make the X experience better and more curated, then x can learn from it and make the base app better over time (or acquire the best one lol)
Wirelyss 👁️‍🗨️💫 tweet media
Elon Musk@elonmusk

@diana_dukic What needs to be better?

English
15
9
295
92.7K
dad0ct0r
dad0ct0r@dad0ct0r·
@BitcoinErrorLog @nikitabier @wirelyss Bio read, synonym sounds neat for Bitcoin stuff. Spam bots on a centralized platform with infinite incentives to fake engagement? Different beast. Show me one line of actual anti-spam logic you've shipped at scale here. Otherwise it's still just 'trust me bro' with better hair.
English
1
0
1
36
Matthias Reinholz
Matthias Reinholz@MattReinholz·
I generally agree with this POV and the need to preserve the freedom of the internet. But in real-life you're also not able to go to the street and shout out things without being seen. Why do we allow humans to create fake accounts and spam/manipulate the world in a place where real humans come together to primarily talk to real humans?
English
2
0
1
17
Ash Ghaemi
Ash Ghaemi@investindigital·
@BitcoinErrorLog @nikitabier @wirelyss Don't you think that it's likely a much more complex problem than you may think it is? Likely infinitely harder nowadays with AI. Hence why they keep that vector closed.
English
2
0
1
43
John Carvalho
John Carvalho@BitcoinErrorLog·
People keep asking me why I think spam, bots, and ai slop are fixable problems, so I made this web page. It's a WIP, let me know if you have questions. howtofixtheweb.com
English
1
0
4
424
John Carvalho รีทวีตแล้ว
John Carvalho
John Carvalho@BitcoinErrorLog·
What do you actually know about "passkeys"?
English
7
1
6
2.3K
John Carvalho
John Carvalho@BitcoinErrorLog·
@jturner Because the humans running the agents are the ones ready to spend lots of money, I guess..
English
0
0
1
35
John Turner
John Turner@jturner·
Agreed. Agents are no different than humans. I’m still trying to figure out why we need special payment systems for agents. They’re making the same API calls as humans would. If there’s a problem it must also be a problem for humans, so why not fix that? Why are fixes for agents a priority over humans?
English
1
0
1
39
John Carvalho
John Carvalho@BitcoinErrorLog·
I see lots of activity around payment protocols for AI agents: x402, MPP, tempo, etc. Meanwhile, I feel like we never solved human digital payments. Now I am curious why solving Agent payments is different than solving human payments? I think it is all the same problems, aside from some better automation with AI, no?
English
9
0
15
1.9K
John Carvalho
John Carvalho@BitcoinErrorLog·
@bl4mz @investindigital @nikitabier @wirelyss ahhh i was looking at this thread, and you are taking me out of context, i have been explaining our designs for years, our work is open source, we have articles, research, products, etc either you are actually interested or just trying to dismiss me
English
1
0
0
54
John Carvalho
John Carvalho@BitcoinErrorLog·
@bl4mz @investindigital @nikitabier @wirelyss those arent my words lol the problem is not expensive to solve i can specify the solution, as could others, but what is the point in trying to convince people that will outsource their opinion to the status quo and only try to dismiss literally anything i say?
English
1
0
0
52
blamz
blamz@bl4mz·
As I'm sure you already know, X's gatekeep hard strategy is to keep spam from exploding without burning insane resources. In the AI bot arms race where slop gets cheaper & smarter every month unrestricted write access is basically leaving the door wide open. Critics call it walled-garden control, but the spam flood risk drain are legit practical reasons they're not reopening anytime soon. No cheap, accurate anti-spam breakthrough means opening up is way more pain than gain. In your own words John "eventually we'll come up with something really, really elegant and magical that helps us" but till then I believe what they are currently doing is for the best.
English
1
0
1
56