Brian Burtner

Reproductive coercion should be illegal. This requires that expectant fathers should have roughly one week from discovery to notify their partner that an abortion/termination is requested and required. If that happens, the expectant mother should be compelled to either: -abort the child sometimes within the first 24 weeks of gestation -carry and birth the child whereby it may be euthanized painlessly via barbiturate injection, ASAP or within 4 weeks of birth. Obviously, codifying these rights/responsibilities into law will also require mandatory paternity verification for, and notification to, expectant fathers - which is something our governments should be ensuring anyway. The vast legions of the so-called "pro-choice" orthodoxy will not support these improvements to public health and safety for one simple reason: they are not truly pro-choice. They are pro-woman and pro women's privileges, no matter the cost. The minute that one begins to talk about improving things for expectant fathers - rectifying the information asymmetry inherent to sexual reproduction, providing any post-coital window of veto power for men, or simply pointing out the hypocrisy of wailing about "bodily autonomy" in a world where male foreskin is medically harvested shortly after birth - their true gynocentric (and, in many cases, explicitly misandrist) nature is revealed.

a serious republic would hang people for this

There has to be some evil secret hand at play when so many governments tax their own people so much that they cannot afford to have large families & then implement policies to bring in immigrants.

South Korea already has much more than that. It has longer parental leave, universal early childcare, monthly child allowances, infant cash payments, paternity leave, maternity leave, and child tax credits. And here’s what’s happened to the county’s birthrate. The idea that birth rates are cratering because we don’t have enough welfare/redistribution programs is absurd. People don’t want kids because they constitute an imposition on one’s life, and we live in an age where all “impositions on life” are treated like a type of tyranny to escape from, not something to celebrate and cherish. The collapsing birth rate is better understood as a spiritual crisis, not an economic one. If money was the thing holding back people from having kids, the US and South Korea would have Niger’s birth rate and Niger would be recording 0 births per woman.

If a fictional depiction of crime can get you arrested, it makes sense that a fictional accomplishment should be rewarded. Will pay my taxes with hand drawn bills, the IRS will love it.

The rule of thumb is that anything you see pushed by the media is a thing that isn't happening. So you see a lot of race mixing on TV. That just means people aren't nearly mixing as often as required to create a truly mixed race population. What you see in the media are expressions of elite desires, of how they wish to play God, and often for undecipherable reasons. Apparently, the Google search for "white mother" is modulated by the algorithm to add "with black child". One day the people doing this will be jailed.

@GeoH3x I may have been mugged but at least I mogged

Hey You Come Here!

This is a crucial point. Red button pushers grasp that society functions because people are self-reliant, engaging in trillions of individual acts that make for a better world. Blue button pushers justify to themselves that they’re cooperative and altruistic, but they’re actually ignorant and lazy, and a drain on society, a cancer at worst.

If race is skin deep, why are: •Skull shapes/sizes different •Skeletal structures different •Brain size/anatomy different •Eye color different •Hair color/texture different •IQ level different •Temperament/behavior different Race is way deeper than just skin color.

This radicalized me insanely. It's one thing to take it down, and put it in a museum. It's a completely different thing to take it down, and melt it for scrap. This, as far as I care, was an Act of War.

Re-imagining Villains 140

Childless people who are anti-homeschool are just mind raped proxy warriors of the state. Their entire universe is moulded by trusting the official narrative. They are deeply underdeveloped as a result of never becoming parents and prefer to exist in a childlike state allowing daddy gov to guide them faithfully. This allows them the comfort of never having to truly figure anything out for themselves. It shields them from the horror of realizing the people in charge have lied about everything they know to be true. They are spared the unavoidable pains and turmoil of personal development required for true coming of age. They fear the red pill experience where everything comes crashing down. Anyone who challenges this mode of “anti-thinking consensus respecter” makes them feel terribly uncomfy. It’s as if the mere existence of a person who openly rejects state indoctrination is in practice rejecting them, their identity, their whole world and how dare they! That’s why they must delegitimize homeschoolers. The thought of people walking around society without the same programming as them signifies chaos, unpredictability and is terrifying to them.

If I'm wrong about Erika Kirk (I'm not), the worst I'll be guilty of is defending a woman from being tried without evidence. If you're wrong about Erika Kirk, you'll be guilty of making a widow's life a living hell after an unspeakably horrific tragedy.

i get called hateful a lot for wanting people to leave britain and go back to where they are originally from. Its not hateful to be a believer in human biology. We as people have different races and phenotypes to suit our climates and primal instincts. By moving away from your ancestral homeland or racemixxing you are not only denying yourself happiness around people that are like you but are endangering others.

Someone once observed that in any conflict, leftists will always side with whichever demographic causes the most social harm. This creates a hierarchy, with White men (the primary civilization-builders) at the bottom, and third-world Muslims at the top. Here's why how this works. In a healthy society, people who build civilization are revered, and people who cause social harm are despised. And there is a hierarchy that runs in the opposite order, with respect and resources going to those who serve civilization. This creates a natural opportunity for power-hungry subversives. They can recruit each layer of this hierarchy by exploiting their resentment against those above them. All they must do is frame their merit-based status as unearned "privilege". White women were recruited to leftism by stoking their resentment of White men, and promising elevation above them. What the White women were not told is that they would be placed beneath everyone else. Often literally. Black people were recruited by exploiting their resentment of Whites... but they weren't told that every benefit they received would eventually be taken away and given to third world immigrants. Homosexuals were promised elevation above the "breeders" (because children are needed for civilization, and sodomy is not), but no one told them that the trannies would rule over them. And no one told the trannies that Muslim community would be allowed to segregate and oppress them far more brutally than the most ardent of White bigots. The most brutal irony of all is that all of these groups who are recruited to fight for leftism end up far more brutally oppressed that they ever were by mainstream prosocial White society. Because natural civilizational hierarchies are based on contribution. There's a certain amount of prejudice which exists because people can reason inductively, but if you are a mixed race lesbian engineer who can actually who build useful shit, then it's at least possible for people to eventually overcome their surprise, and break you off a nice house in the suburbs and some forbearance wherein people don't really talk about the real relationship between you and your "roommate". Under leftism inverted hierarchies, you have no such chance. Sure, during the transitional phase you'll be elevated for being a mixed-race lesbian, regardless of whether you can do anything useful or not. But then, the Muslims will be allowed to throw you off a roof when it's time to pander to them, in turn. This White (or White-passing) woman probably voted straight democrat and cheered for "MeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeToo", to avenge her resentment against White men in general. She probably never dreamed that she would, in turn, not only be thrown under the bus, but that she would be targeted by the precise same weapons her sisters were given to unseat White men with. And @jk_rowling found out in vivid, larger-than-life detail what happens to White feminists when the left has a new darling to cater to, who can be used to unravel some still-intact piece of civilization. You see, by the early 21st century, the left had no more use for White feminists, because everything the left wanted to use them to destroy was already destroyed. Women were already spending their twenties and thirties on cubicle jobs and abortions, instead of marriages and children. The workforce was already doubled, and the price of labor had already crashed. Fertility rates were already dropping, and people were already marrying late, or never. It was time to recruit a new wrecking ball, to turn against some other corner of the edifice of order, and the price of that was easy to pay... just confiscate everything you once gave them, and give it to the trannies instead. The actual bodies of the White feminists (as well as all other women, and their daughters), could be used again, sold out to third world men who want to rape them, all by simply turning a blind eye. And the best perk of all of this is that they'll still vote for you. Because reversing course requires admitting a mistake.

funny enough, to hold the line, you actually need like ~95% compliance. the formation falls apart with even a small deviation from cooperation. but note that cooperation here, holding the line, involves actively killing other humans let the reader understand

If you're going to assume babies are included, you may as well assume animals are too. Also, if you don't know what words mean (words like "cynicism", "narcissism", and "psychopathy"), you shouldn't use them. You are not acting like a person. Just an LLM regurgitating bad sounds to see what sticks. Typical blue-presser behavior.

Every Pro-red argument: (1) Cynicism: "It's impossible for blue to win. Don't be suicidal." (2) Narcissism: "There is no downside to pressing red." (3) Changing the hypo: "Babies don't count. That'd be stupid! So there's a blender..." (4) Psychopathy: "Blue pressers deserve to die." (5) General poor analytic reasoning: "If everyone just pressed red!"

@BroJoeChiRho slamming red here obv

You have two buttons in front of you. If you hit blue nothing happens. If you hit red, the wars between Israel & Palestine and Russia & Ukraine immediately cease, but Hitler is ressurected in a random European country with twice the power he had in 1941. Which do you hit?

@NickJFuentes @Antunes1 relatively sane response for a high-profile actor, ngl

@Antunes1 If you don’t know who I am, then maybe your best course would be to tread lightly…

Dean Norris from Breaking Bad attacks Nick Fuentes 💀😂 “I think Nick Fuentes is a big problem. He’s a Nazi and a racist.”

On brick-and-mortar activism, Europe shows the way.