Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈

11.6K posts

Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈 banner
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈

Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈

@BridgetWhearty

Queer. Feminist. Medievalist. she/they. Author: Digital Codicology. Co-PI: ‘Always Here: a Queer+Trans Global Medieval Sourcebook.' Coiner of the #CaswellTest.

เข้าร่วม Ağustos 2013
2.6K กำลังติดตาม2.2K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈@BridgetWhearty·
Digital Codicology's price in hardcover is steep ($80) I'm sorry about that, and wish there were a cheaper paperback available! (Maybe in a few years, if sales are strong enough?) In the meantime, you can get 20% off ($64) when you buy from SUP & use my author code: WHEARTY20
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈 tweet media
English
0
4
8
1.5K
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈 รีทวีตแล้ว
Medieval Manuscripts
Medieval Manuscripts@BLMedieval·
Something very, very exciting is happening @britishlibrary Medieval Women: In Their Own Words, our new major exhibition, opens on 25 October Get your tickets now, they're cheaper than #Oasis and more chance of encountering Margery Kempe 😉 blogs.bl.uk/digitisedmanus…
Medieval Manuscripts tweet media
English
0
262
1.2K
81.6K
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈 รีทวีตแล้ว
Library Path
Library Path@LibraryPath·
11.
Library Path tweet media
1
118
1.3K
41K
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈 รีทวีตแล้ว
George M Johnson Garçon
George M Johnson Garçon@IamGMJohnson·
My book All Boys Aren’t Blue has had 7 criminal charges, and is virtually banned in all high school libraries in Texas, Florida, Georgia and Iowa (where an educator can go to jail for a year with a 1500 fine to give it to a “minor”) Fight for the right to read
English
1
463
778
38.3K
Louvain Rees ⚰️
Louvain Rees ⚰️@hellohistoria·
I spotted this interesting-looking manicule while looking through workhouse records 👉🏻 #Wales #History
Louvain Rees ⚰️ tweet media
English
5
2
28
1.5K
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈@BridgetWhearty·
Got my first ‘that’s a very important manuscript, please make a detailed case for why you need to work with it and not the digital copy’ email back And it’s throwing me for a loop! 1/
English
8
2
29
6.8K
C. E. M. Henderson
C. E. M. Henderson@cemhend·
@BridgetWhearty I won’t even mention the “wait… am *I* wrong about history??” that goes through my head every time I mark a stack of undergrad papers lol
English
1
0
1
54
C. E. M. Henderson
C. E. M. Henderson@cemhend·
@BridgetWhearty Tell them you have important codicological questions and/or need to recheck the collation. It won’t be a lie!
English
1
1
2
205
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈@BridgetWhearty·
@cemhend You’re right… but isn’t it funny how quickly we can forget our own good reasons in the face of even minor and totally reasonable questioning?!
English
1
0
1
107
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈@BridgetWhearty·
@pykelets @malcolmjnoble Reading was interrupted by tornado warning, but I finished it up after — and it’s absolutely glorious! Definitely useful for my research, and will play a central role in a new grad course I’m creating for spring
English
1
0
1
62
Sarah Pyke
Sarah Pyke@pykelets·
would love to read a collection of people's 'how it moves / feels / I just want to touch this thing / mystical reasons I can barely articulate / aura desire materiality' justifications like a long prose poem, w glimpses of gold & parchment & binding & ink flickering in and out
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈@BridgetWhearty

It’s funny to have written a wholeass book about digitization — and be asked ‘can’t you just use the digital object’ and be like ‘well… maybe? But I also just want to touch this thing 🤷🏻 because mystical reasons I can barely articulate? Because aura, desire, materiality?’ 4/4

English
3
1
6
734
Spycrafty
Spycrafty@elegantfowl·
@BridgetWhearty @GabbyStorey Indeed - sometimes digital images are easier to read than originals (though I remember facsimiles of microfiche ... eek!). It's having both available that counts.
English
1
1
1
119
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈@BridgetWhearty·
@elegantfowl @GabbyStorey Yes, precisely! They’re different objects with different accordances. They each make different things more or less visible. They are not precise surrogates or replacements.
English
0
0
0
19
Cathy Hume
Cathy Hume@cathyhume·
@BridgetWhearty Is this the Huntington? I am having the same issue... they are never keen to let me see this one MS I'm working on and repeatedly tell me 1) it's precious and 2) it's digitised. I have written a tactful plea and am waiting with fingers crossed.
English
1
0
1
126
Spycrafty
Spycrafty@elegantfowl·
@BridgetWhearty @GabbyStorey Materiality - letterlocking, water damage, uninked writing, seal quality, digital flattening ... the list goes on ... it's not just about bookfondling (though that is part of it ...)
English
1
1
2
118
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈@BridgetWhearty·
@elegantfowl @GabbyStorey Yes to damage and uninked writing! Re digital flattening, absolutely true. I think there’s something to be said about the kindle-ization of rare books and mss—but in some good as well as bad materiality-flattening ways.
English
1
0
0
26
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈@BridgetWhearty·
@heathertweed @GabbyStorey Mmm, it’s parchment — so no watermarks. But the quality and thickness/pliableness is definitely part of what I’m curious about. And the ink quality is key! (I hear you about surreptitious eye-dabbing!)
English
1
0
1
26
Bridget Whearty 🏳️‍🌈 รีทวีตแล้ว
Heather Tweed
Heather Tweed@heathertweed·
@BridgetWhearty @GabbyStorey Would suggest you need to examine the paper stock, ink qualities etc? Clues to watermarks? I’ll never forget my tactile connection with the past when unfolding a pack of previously unread ordination papers & letters. Had to surreptitiously dab my eyes! 🥲😃
English
1
1
1
119