BB5 🛸 ✨ รีทวีตแล้ว
Não vejo razão para alarmismos
Amb. Yacov Livne 🇮🇱@YacovLivne
This is how dangerous the Iranian regime is.
Português
BB5 🛸 ✨
5.2K posts
It would make sense. Governance alone isn’t enough, it needs an execution layer.
Keeping voting rights while introducing accountable leadership is a natural evolution.
IRL, I’ve seen this first-hand in small groups trying to self-manage everything , nothing moves l, decisions stall. Once an external operator takes over execution while the group keeps oversight, things actually start working.
From personal experience, I can confirm this is a model that works, versus one that doesn’t
English
@BullBoss5 Getting back to proven hybrid model, that made Terra great in first place (TFL = management board / executive team + PoS blockchain)
English
Dear #TerraClassic investors: while validators are once again flooding the ecosystem with arguments about the latest USTC staking concept, here is something more useful - actual data on who has been governing this chain for years, and what the results of that model have been.
Terra Classic’s core problem is not a shortage of discussion, proposals, or internal political noise. It is the absence of a competent ecosystem management model.
New validator cohort data adds an important layer of accountability:
- it shows that a meaningful share of today’s active validator set overlaps with the same validator-governed leadership class that has been influential throughout most of the post-crash period.
- Of the 130 validators in the Jan 2023 baseline, 44 are still active today. From the May 2022 baseline, 29 are still active. That does not prove every individual validator is incompetent.
- It proves something more important: a substantial part of the validator-governed leadership class has remained influential throughout a 4-year period in which revitalization did not occur.
And the broader results are clear: demand collapsed to around 17k MAW (Monthly On-Chain Active Wallets), the weakest demand regime is now, not right after the crash, and the report’s diagnosis is that Terra Classic suffers from selection failure in PoS governance plus an institutional vacuum.
Validators are selected mainly for stake and node operations. Rebuilding an L1 requires a much broader skill set: strategy, product, partnerships, communications, legal/compliance, capital allocation, and execution ownership. Running a validator is not evidence of ecosystem management competence.
So the conclusion is straightforward: Terra Classic should stop treating validator governance as a substitute for professional ecosystem management. Four years of continuity plus four years of poor outcomes is enough to judge the model. The chain does not just need more proposals, more narratives, or more internal coordination. It needs an external, competent, accountable operating/management layer with the skills and mandate to actually rebuild the ecosystem.
Same structure, same class of decision-makers, same failed outcome. Terra Classic will not revitalize itself by asking the same governance model to magically become something it was never designed to be.
#LUNC #TerraClassic #USTC #Crypto #Blockchain #Cosmos #Web3 #Governance #Validators #ProofOfStake
English
@CryptoGeezerMM Not much hope in Ceramic's plan. In theory it seems to work but I just don't see who would use it.
I believe it will remain anecdotal.
English
@BullBoss5 Not at all. Are you aware of Ceramic’s plan for #USTR locking #USTC as collateral? Things are happening, I just don’t support using CP funds for rewards and minting unbacked #USTC 🤦♂️
English
Here’s a great explanation of why minting USTC would be economic suicide for the chain.
Ask yourself why anyone would suggest this after four years of pushing the burn narrative 🤔
Leonardo@LeonardoLUNC
LUNC/USTC has a serious problem, and it’s not the market. It’s people STILL pushing minting with a massive oversupply. ⚠️ Minting is not a strategy. 💀 Minting is how you kill USTC again. Everything @Currency365 laid out is facts: - Over-minting - CEX rejection - Years wasted - And a brain-dead obsession with $1 without fixing the supply x.com/i/status/20347… The facts are simple: Minting + Oversupply = Price Suppression Every. Single. Time. No minting for USTC or LUNC until: • 📉 Oversupply is actually reduced • ✅ OR MM2.0 is LIVE and PROVEN to reduce total supply Anything else = repeating 2022 with extra steps, this time making sure dead means dead. ❓ So why is this STILL being pushed? Because from the outside… 👀 It doesn’t look like ignorance anymore ⚠️ It looks like sabotage Meanwhile… 🛠️ Some of us are actually building 🧠 Not getting baited into distractions/noise 🌐 ust1cmm.com 🌉 bridge.cl8y.com Everything being built here is 100% open source, 100% transparent. 🔗 gitlab.com/users/PlasticD… #USTC #LUNC #TerraClassic #Crypto #DeFi #USTCRepeg #LUNCCommunity #CryptoTruth #BuildNotTalk #Web3
English
@cryptaxpt To be frank, this aligns with the spirit of the 365-day rule. Swapping into stablecoins or fiat is conceptually the same.
English
🚨Important update for crypto users and investors in Portugal: Selling or swapping to stablecoins could trigger taxation as early as 2027 (especially as MiCA fully reshapes the landscape).
Portugal has long been attractive for crypto, but with MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) implementation advancing and broader EU transparency rules (like DAC8 reporting starting in 2026, with exchanges in 2027), the treatment of stablecoins, particularly Electronic Money Tokens (EMTs), is coming into sharper focus.
✅Not all stablecoins are considered EMTs
Here's what you need to know about Electronic Money tokens(EMTs) under MiCA:
Definition & Purpose:
EMTs are digital representations of a single fiat currency (e.g., € or $), using DLT to store value and enable fast, low-cost payments. They're essentially regulated digital cash.
Stability Mechanism:
Pegged 1:1 to one official legal tender currency, minimizing volatility unlike volatile assets (Bitcoin) or multi-asset referenced tokens.
Key Safeguards (via MiCA):
- Issued only by authorized credit institutions (banks) or electronic money institutions (EMIs).
- Holders enjoy direct redemption rights at par value (full face value) anytime.
- Issuers must maintain 100% reserves, with strict liquidity rules (e.g., at least 30% in segregated accounts).
- Mandatory authorized white papers and strong consumer protections for transparency and financial stability.
EMTs stand apart from other crypto:
They're built for reliability as a medium of exchange in the EEA, not speculation.
Why this matters in Portugal now??
As MiCA aligns national rules (with full effects rolling out), and enhanced reporting/transparency kicks in, transactions involving EMTs/stablecoins may increasingly be treated as taxable events, especially redemptions or fiat off-ramps. Long-term holdings (>365 days) often remain exempt from capital gains tax under current rules, but short-term or frequent use could change the calculus.
⚠️Stay informed, review your holdings, and consider professional advice as the regulatory environment evolves.
Tax guy 🇵🇹@cryptaxpt
🚨Selling for Stablecoin might trigger a taxable event in the near future!🇵🇹 Understanding SEMP and what it means to your taxes! As we hit Q1 2026, the EU's DAC8 (implementing the OECD's Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework - CARF) is fully live, requiring crypto platforms to collect and report user data on transactions. Not all digital assets are treated the same Enter SEMP, Specified Electronic Money Product, a crucial carve-out that's changing how certain stablecoins and digital fiat representations are handled for tax reporting: What qualifies as a SEMP? A digital product representing a single fiat currency (e.g., USD or EUR), issued against received funds, redeemable at any time and at par value (1:1) due to regulatory requirements on the issuer. Think regulated e-money tokens or certain fiat-backed stablecoins that behave like traditional electronic money (with strong redemption rights, no substantive barriers). Why it matters now: True SEMPs are excluded from CARF scope (no mandatory crypto-specific transaction reporting under DAC8). Instead, they fall under the amended CRS (Common Reporting Standard 2.0), treating them more like bank/e-money accounts for automatic exchange of information. Non-SEMP crypto (Bitcoin, most utility tokens, algorithmic stablecoins, etc.) → full CARF reporting kicks in. Mid-year status changes? Recent OECD FAQs clarify: report under CARF until the product qualifies as SEMP, then switch to CRS (jurisdictions may allow full-year treatment for simplicity). For investors in Portugal, this distinction is huge: ✅Holding a qualifying SEMP could align better with traditional financial account treatment → potentially smoother compliance and lower evasion risks. ❌But misclassifying a stablecoin as SEMP when it doesn't meet strict redemption/regulatory criteria? That could trigger unexpected CARF obligations and audits. For tax optimization (especially in favorable jurisdictions), early planning around SEMP vs. Relevant Crypto-Asset makes all the difference. My view: Stablecoins like USDC become less and less riskier from the depeggin point and therefore I see they become more and more of a fiat currency. I still think there is lots of stablecoins that do not fall under SEMP and therefore lots of opportunities to hold you capital gains in crypto. The income tax report (Modelo 3) in Portugal is already prepared for this reporting as it clearly differentiates between crypto assets which are considered securities and crypto assets which are not considered securities. If you have any questions, drop them below⬇️
English
@shine_gomiseifu High-trust societies can’t admit everyone. If they do, they stop being high-trust societies.
English
冗談抜きで、
電車もそうだし、
公園のベンチもそうだし、
公衆トイレもそうだし、
みんなが使う共有場所が本当に汚い。
外国人が増える前まではこんなことなかった。
本当に汚い日本になったよ
ゆう@ゆるほわリプ@pupusan5
Diversity has arrived in Japan
日本語
BB5 🛸 ✨ รีทวีตแล้ว
Today I have to wear a safety vest because my life is under threat and the Met Police have failed to take action.
I’m not scared, but I’m taking precautions: a dead man can’t win wars.
In a free country, nobody should live in fear.
Let’s stand together against this aggression and the Establishment that’s helping these criminals.
English
BB5 🛸 ✨ รีทวีตแล้ว
BREAKING:
The Portuguese Parliament just passed the right-wing Chega party’s @PartidoCHEGA new law banning sex reassignment surgeries and puberty blockers for minors.
🇵🇹
English
BB5 🛸 ✨ รีทวีตแล้ว
El Gobierno de Portugal aprueba una ley para agilizar la deportación de inmigrantes ilegales y ampliar los plazos de prohibición de reingreso.
Español
Iran has kept the Straight of Hormuz toll-free for decades despite being vilified, sanctioned, and Isolated.
Egypt charges $300,000 – $700,000+ per transit through the Suez Canal. Ultra-large container ships or tankers can exceed $1 million.
Panama charges $150,000 – $450,000 per transit. Large Neopanamax ships cost up to $500,000+ to pass the Panama Canal.
Turkey charges fees for the Bosporus Strait.
Canada charges fees for the St Lawrence Seaway.
The United States charges for the St Lawrence Seaway.
But Iran is a bad country.
English
BB5 🛸 ✨ รีทวีตแล้ว
Paris, le club select des pédophiles : 75 violeurs sur 200 animateurs, et la mairie qui fait semblant de tomber des nues😡🚨
Chers parents du 7e, 15e, 14e et tous les autres, asseyez-vous.
Prenez un Xanax.
Ou un verre de kétamine pour vous mettre au niveau des « éducateurs » que Paris recrute en série.
🍸 Ce matin sur X : 75 des 200 agents périscolaires embauchés récemment sont devant la justice pour agressions sexuelles sur enfants.
37,5 %. Un sur trois.
Pas un incident isolé, pas une brebis galeuse.
Un cluster pédocriminel pur jus. 🤮
Ce n’est pas une fake news.
C’est la suite logique d’un scandale qui pourrit Paris depuis des mois :
France Inter, Le Parisien, Mediapart, Cash Investigation l’ont tous documenté.
Neuf animateurs suspendus d’un coup dans une maternelle du 7e.
Trois plaintes pour viol dans le 15e, trois dans le 14e.
128 suspensions en dix ans pour soupçons de violences sexuelles sur des gosses de 3 à 5 ans.
On déplace les prédateurs plutôt que de les virer.
Classique. 👶💔
Le clou : Emmanuel Grégoire.
En 2015 il fanfaronnait « Plan de sécurisation anti-pédophiles ! ».
Il y a quelques semaines il niait avoir été en charge du sujet.
Le socialiste chic promet maintenant un « big bang »…
On va le croire ?
La gauche parisienne prêche inclusion, diversité, quotas implicites pour ne pas « stigmatiser ».
Résultat : un vivier où les casiers judiciaires se remplissent plus vite que les piscines en été. 🏊♂️
Sur X les parents hurlent :
« Réseau organisé ? », « Qui fait le RH ? », « 1 sur 3, c’est pas du hasard ». Des mères alertent depuis des années et se font traiter de parano.
La mairie parle d’« omerta » ?
Non : c’est de la complicité par négligence.
Recrutement à la va-vite, signalements ignorés, monstres mutés d’école en école.
Et quand ça explose avant 2026, on joue les surpris. 😤🗳️
Paris, capitale du luxe et du progressisme qui pue le soufre : dealers, migrants en surnombre, wokisme scolaire…
tout est toléré.
Sauf protéger les gosses.
Grégoire nie.
Pulvar se tait.
La recruteuse toxique fait encore la morale.
Et les enfants paient cash. 👀
75 sur 200.
Un chiffre qui devrait faire tomber des têtes.
Mais à Paris ça finit toujours pareil : commission, rapport, trois suspensions pour la forme.
Parents, gardez vos mômes loin des périscolaires municipaux.
Ou apprenez-leur tôt que la seule vraie sécurité, c’est de ne jamais faire confiance à ce système qui a transformé l’école en terrain de chasse pour prédateurs en CDD. 🏫🚫
Bienvenue en France 2026.
La gauche règne toujours.
Vos enfants servent de chair à canon morale. 🇫🇷🔥
Français
BB5 🛸 ✨ รีทวีตแล้ว
This proposal will pass - I already know it.
Now I’m seeing people say my ideas are “so dangerous they shouldn’t even be said out loud”… seriously? 😂 Congrats to the “free world” I guess - where proposing ideas is now a problem.
Last time I checked, we’re allowed to think, question, and build.
Now suddenly the argument is: “we can’t have staking on USTC because of regulations around stablecoins.”
Breaking news… USTC is not a stablecoin anymore. That was addressed a long time ago , including the report I put together last year to make sure we were clearly out of that category. Back then it was “good job mate”… now it’s selective memory? lol.
Let’s be real about what’s actually happening:
Some people are genuinely concerned , and that’s fine. Bring those concerns to the forum and let’s address them properly.
Others are just scared ,and that’s also fine.
But a few are clearly protecting their own private interests, and don’t realise this proposal would actually benefit their projects too.
At the end of the day, this isn’t about fear, politics, or noise.
It’s about building.
It’s about creating utility.
It’s about moving the ecosystem forward.
If you disagree , good. Let’s debate it properly.
If you’re worried ,bring your arguments.
But trying to shut down discussion? That’s not how this space works.
This proposal is coming ,and it’s coming because it makes sense. 🚀 #lunc $lunc $ustc #terraclassic #ustc #recovery #plan #stake
English
BB5 🛸 ✨ รีทวีตแล้ว
I am posting from inside Iran, bypassing several layers of blockage to post this. The Iranian people want this regime gone and are willing to pay the price, because the price of the regime staying in power is higher. That is all. That's the tweet.
English
@CryptoGeezerMM @JiwonMarco @LeonardoLUNC @11Junicchi11 I don’t care about LUNC. But doing nothing has been killing the chain for years. Stop rejecting everything. Try, iterate, adjust.
Minting isn’t automatically a problem, bad, unbacked minting is.
Done right, it can be part of the solution.
English
USTC isn’t dead.
A new framework is being built to restructure the economic foundation of USTC.
Instead of attempting a direct repeg, the system introduces a phased transition:
USTC → USTR → UST1
The model focuses on:
• locking supply through the CMM
• building collateral
• controlled issuance of UST1
Full breakdown on CoinMarketCap 👇
coinmarketcap.com/community/arti…
English
@dailybritainonx Army chief, yet still this dumb. Trump wasn’t asking to invoke NATO. He was asking for help from his allies.
English
“Nato was created as a defensive alliance and all of its articles are essentially oriented towards defence.
“It was not an alliance that was designed for one of the allies to go on a war of choice and then oblige everyone else to follow. It was not designed for that at all. I’m not sure that’s the sort of Nato that any of us wanted to belong to.”
English
BB5 🛸 ✨ รีทวีตแล้ว
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US President Trump says he is thinking about leaving NATO.
English
BB5 🛸 ✨ รีทวีตแล้ว
@JoeyMannarino He's been quite patient. Now is the time for USA to withdraw from NATO. Let Europe make its mistakes and learn the hard way. Keep your money for yourselves. And when Europe is in trouble, let them beg on their knees and take the opportunity to make them pay the bill.
English
If NATO won’t serve the interest of the USA, the USA should not allow NATO to rely on us for their defense.
NATO without America doesn’t exist. It’s a racket created so that Europe can rely on Americans to defend them if they get into some deep shit.
Trump should be the President to pull us out of NATO and spend the money we waste on defending Europe right here at home… in the form of TAX CUTS!
English