Jeff Galecke

373 posts

Jeff Galecke banner
Jeff Galecke

Jeff Galecke

@CSI4LifeSci

Sales Executive | Coach | Strategy | Leadership Leverage innate curiosity to develop simple and impactful solutions for Life Sciences and Clinical Diagnostics.

Boston, MA เข้าร่วม Nisan 2009
261 กำลังติดตาม69 ผู้ติดตาม
Jeff Galecke
Jeff Galecke@CSI4LifeSci·
I’m attending the World Orphan Drug Congress Europe on 27-29 October 2025! Join me at the largest rare disease event worldwide 🌟 Book before 04 April saving €900. #WODC i.snoball.it/p/7tU9d/t
English
0
0
0
16
Jeff Galecke
Jeff Galecke@CSI4LifeSci·
@chris9lives @zachkruse2 @RobDemovsky I disagree. Good coverage skills but in decline. A liability in the run game. Defense is about all 11 performing at one time. You can hide a deva on offense.
English
0
0
0
39
Chris
Chris@chris9lives·
@zachkruse2 @RobDemovsky The front office should swallow their pride and work something out with him. Trading/cutting him doesn’t make the team better.
English
10
3
124
5.7K
Zach Kruse
Zach Kruse@zachkruse2·
In here, @RobDemovsky says the Packers are still actively trying to trade CB Jaire Alexander. Also, a pay cut hasn't been offered, and Alexander wouldn't accept one anyway. espn.com/nfl/story/_/id…
English
30
12
254
233.5K
Jeff Galecke
Jeff Galecke@CSI4LifeSci·
@CatharineAquino I think it may have been your comments about Illumina after the last AGBT. What was it you called them? Was it cereal or dried toast? Something basic without any real innovation.
English
1
0
0
55
Jeff Galecke
Jeff Galecke@CSI4LifeSci·
@zachkruse2 I don't know why this is even a question. Jaire doesn't fit what they want. He will not be a Packer next year
English
0
0
0
17
Zach Kruse
Zach Kruse@zachkruse2·
Packers were clear about their frustration with Jaire Alexander's injury history in season-ending pressers. GM Brian Gutekunst on Jan. 16:
Zach Kruse tweet media
English
9
8
195
39.5K
George
George@geocmurray·
@GenomicsCow Can you explain the huge dip in stock price Illumina and others took in 2021?
English
1
0
1
82
Jeff Galecke
Jeff Galecke@CSI4LifeSci·
Most think of constraints as being a negative for their business. However, when you apply constraints to your most precious resources they can amplify your results. Connect with us to audit your most precious resources: Time, Budgets and AI
Jeff Galecke tweet mediaJeff Galecke tweet mediaJeff Galecke tweet mediaJeff Galecke tweet media
English
0
0
0
26
Jeff Galecke
Jeff Galecke@CSI4LifeSci·
@GenomicsCow It is just a partnership, Element is not buying the technology to try and sell it.
English
1
0
0
41
Genomics Cow
Genomics Cow@GenomicsCow·
Element Biosciences - smart with the Dx direction given half of NextSeqs probably in clinical settings - weird with Alamar given their box costs more than aviti - no announcement about lower reads kit? - go on, do spatial for tissue! genomeweb.com/business-news/…
English
1
0
1
573
Jeff Galecke
Jeff Galecke@CSI4LifeSci·
@OmicsOmicsBlog Are we sure it wasn't an AI Bot asking the questions? Seems about on par with what I see from the majority of AI bots at this point.
English
1
0
1
35
Keith Robison
Keith Robison@OmicsOmicsBlog·
When any garden variety LLM can do your job less embarrassingly than you, consider changing careers.
English
1
0
1
432
Keith Robison
Keith Robison@OmicsOmicsBlog·
H/t to @new299 for spotting this & posting audio to ASeq discord First question posted to @nanopore CEO Gordon Sanghera at #JPM25 had 2 parts: 1. Do they have long read technology? 2. Do they see value in long reads?
English
1
2
13
2.3K
Luciano Martelotto 🛠🧬💻🇦🇺
What if single-cell analysis of 1,000 samples wasn’t just imaginable—but affordable? Imagine analyzing 1,000 samples at the single-cell level, each containing ~25,000 cells or nuclei. That’s ~25 million cells in one experiment!. Until now, the costs of such an experiment were staggering, making it seem like a dream only billion-dollar projects could afford. But the game has changed and this is no longer science fiction. Let’s break it down. For this, let’s choose the RNA Flex family of kits from 10x Genomics. In my unsolicited opinion the best single cell RNA kits out there yet. To estimate the total cost for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of 1,000 samples, each containing 25,000 cells or nuclei, we'll consider both library preparation and sequencing expenses, and calculate the cost per cell. For this case, let’s consider we have a large cohort (n=1000) of post vaccine PBMC samples. Library Preparation Costs: The average cost of an RNA Flex reaction at core facilities in the USA is $4,492 for four samples, using a four-barcode pooling strategy. This amounts to $1,123 per sample. Since each reaction accommodates ~10,000 cells and the goal is ~25,000 cells per sample, 2.5 reactions are required per sample: •Cost per sample: $1,123 × 2.5 = $2,807.50 •Total library preparation cost for 1,000 samples: $2,807.50 × 1,000 = $2,807,500 Sequencing Costs: The ballpark read-pairs/cell most researchers I know are using is at least c 20,000 read-pairs/cell so for ~25,000 cells per sample, we'll need: •Total reads per sample: ~25,000 cells × 20,000 reads/cell = ~500 million reads •Total reads for 1,000 samples: ~500 million reads × 1,000 samples = ~500 billion reads Assuming a sequencing cost of $1.50 per million reads on the Illumina NovaSeq X platform: •Sequencing cost per sample: ~500 million reads × $1.50 per million reads = $750 •Total sequencing cost for 1,000 samples: ~500 billion reads × $1.50 per million reads = $750,000 Total Project Cost: •Library preparation: $2,807,500 •Sequencing: $750,000 •Total cost per sample: $2,807.50 (library preparation) + $750 (sequencing) = $3,557.50 •Total cost for 1,000 samples: $2,807,500 + $750,000 = $3,557,500 •Total cost per cell: $3,557,500 / 25,000,00 cells = $0.1423 per cell Yeah…scary! Ok…don’t panic, we got you. Recently, @DrJasPlummer @hoheyn and yours truly made an orthogonal approach to perform single cell analysis without sequencing: STAMP: Single-Cell Transcriptomics Analysis and Multimodal Profiling through Imaging (doi: doi.org/10.1101/2024.1…). Here, we repurposed various imaging platforms like Xenium and CosMx to perform Single Cell Imaging…no sequencing!   What do you think the costs of profiling 25 million cell would be? Let’s see… To estimate the total cost for STAMP of 1,000 samples, each containing 25,000 cells or nuclei. For this, let’s consider that we have 50 sub-STAMPs/slide, that’s 100 per run on a Xenium slide and even more in a standard superfrost slide for CosMx, but let’s stick to 50/slide. For the calculations, the costs per run for both Imaging Platforms costs per run are similar. Total Imaging Platform Runs Needed: •Number of samples: 1000 •Sub-STAMPs per slide: 50 •Slides per run: 2 •Total slides required = 20 slides. •Total Imaging Platform runs = 10 runs Total Cost: •Cost per Imaging Platform run (2 slides) = $7,500 (average across various cores in USA for 5k and 6k panels) •Cost per sample = $75 •Total cost for 1,000 samples = $75,000 •Cost per cell: $0.003/cell (0.3 cents per cell)   Now that you’ve seen this, do me a favor—step away for a bit. Take a walk, ride your bike, or do whatever inspires you while dreaming up crazy experiments. The only limit of what you can do now is your imagination. @mason_lab @JIWOONPARK_ @ACEpigenetics @cnag_eu @StJudeResearch @GESTALT_sp @ioavlachos @brukerspatial @10xGenomics @vizgen_inc @AkoyaBio @ElemBio
English
8
48
178
29.1K
Jeff Galecke
Jeff Galecke@CSI4LifeSci·
@itssRELAX Or get to the qb faster. The pass rush needs to step up
English
0
0
0
6
Relax
Relax@the1relax·
cover long enough to pressure hurts, force turnovers. I’ll say it again…we can beat these fuxks.
English
265
85
2.8K
596.6K
Jeff Galecke
Jeff Galecke@CSI4LifeSci·
@AndyHermanNFL Stop it with Jaire hurting the Packers. You need to stop the run and Jaire is a liability in the run defense
English
2
0
0
356
Jeff Galecke
Jeff Galecke@CSI4LifeSci·
@KurtBenkert Great, so we are all set for another playoff loss....when do we put the bar higher for this team?
English
0
0
0
7
Kurt Benkert
Kurt Benkert@KurtBenkert·
The Packers 3 losses are to the 11-1 Lions, the 10-2 Eagles, and the 10-2 Vikings. Not half bad.
English
179
201
7.9K
549.8K
Gute 🧀
Gute 🧀@Packers_szn3·
Lukas Van Ness is nothing more than a body out there. Dude does absolutely nothing.
English
38
15
467
17.2K
Jeff Galecke
Jeff Galecke@CSI4LifeSci·
@CatharineAquino The high input requirements were always our problem given what you see as far as variation in yields from clinical samples.
English
0
0
2
75
catharine.aquino
catharine.aquino@CatharineAquino·
The real issue with HiFi sequencing has never been capacity but rather the input requirements and the expertise needed for library prep. So, what do you think? Have you done your math?
English
4
0
1
890
catharine.aquino
catharine.aquino@CatharineAquino·
I'm not quite sure what to think of the @PacBio Vega. It follows a similar logic to the NovaSeqX-NextSeq/MiSeq combo: high CapEx-low price per Gb,low CapEx-high price per Gb. But it’s not quite that straightforward, because there's a major strategic difference here.
English
3
4
18
8.6K
Jeff Galecke
Jeff Galecke@CSI4LifeSci·
@NFL CB needs to fight through and get underneath Wilson. There is no way to defend from the sideline
English
0
0
0
25
NFL
NFL@NFL·
GARRETT WILSON OMG! IT'S BEEN RULED A TD! #HOUvsNYJ on Prime Video Also streaming on #NFLPlus
English
519
1.5K
11K
2.8M