Tyler
10.7K posts



@tradertheory "you either die straight or live long enough to see yourself become gay" - batman
English

@RealAlexJones this has been an issue for over 45 years. this war was inevitable, rip it off like a bandaid and get it over with. it needs to be done.
English

VIDEO: "I Don't Like Agreeing With Macron, But He's Being A Realist About This!"
The French President Compares Iran War Operation To Failed Missions In Iraq, Afghanistan, & Libya!
"I Don't Believe We Will Fix The Situation By Bombings Or Military Operations!"
🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW:
x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English

ONE OF THE BEST COMEBACKS EVER ON DWCS‼️
@TheProblem155 is ready for his first main event TOMORROW!
[ #UFCVegas115 | 8pmET on @ParamountPlus ]
English

@Kittenknight26 @TonySeverinoCMT yeah but imagine the transition. that is going to be a brutal time to navigate. and i still dont fully understand how that will work. massive companies pay a tax for their robotic workers that goes to government that goes to people that goes back to companies. wheres the growth?
English

@TonySeverinoCMT @CalicoJ94 I was surprised when both you and Camel said that you guys dont have any idea on how to deal with mass unemployment due to AI automation, AI labs are expecting AGI to arrive as soon as 2028 and universal basic income is the only option to solve mass unemployment like Elon said
English

This is more my vibe than true villain 🦹♂️
Philip@Qbert2600
@TonySeverinoCMT You're the Deadpool of crypto. The anti-hero who does the right thing
English

@OctopusIllusion @SimplyKalby @KobeissiLetter Let's break this down simple. U.s and Israel strikes killed roughly 1500 Iranians. The Iranian government killed roughly 7,000 to upwards of 30,000 Iranians in that time. So let's try and apply facts to our subjective bias and see how our views still hold up
English

@CalicoJ94 @SimplyKalby @KobeissiLetter Lol, the U.S. killing Iranian civilians will absolutely not cause them to rise against government
English

@cryptostweet @DrJStrategy I mean that was inevitable with where we are going with the dollar. That's why gold has been rocketing. This war was inevitable and has been talked about with previous administrations for over 4 decades. Trump just decided to actually do it. I stand by my original post.
English

@CalicoJ94 @DrJStrategy now google "US Petro Dollar" and weep at how much the Donald fucked you.
English

Food for thought.
Trump, Hormuz and the End of the Free Ride
For half a century, Western strategists have known that the Strait of Hormuz is the acute point where energy, sea power and political will intersect. That knowledge is not in dispute. What is new in this war with Iran is that the United States, under Donald Trump, has chosen not to rush to “solve” the problem. In Hegelian terms, he is refusing an easy synthesis in order to force the underlying contradiction to the surface.
The old thesis was simple: the US guarantees open sea lanes in the Gulf, and everyone else structures their economies and politics around that free insurance. Europe and the UK embraced ambitious green policies, ran down hard‑power capabilities and lectured Washington on multilateral virtue, secure in the assumption that American carriers would always appear off Hormuz. The political class behaved as if the American security guarantee were a law of nature, not a contingent choice. Their conduct today is closer to Chamberlain than Churchill: temporising, issuing statements, hoping the storm will pass without a fundamental reordering of their responsibilities.
Trump’s antithesis is to withhold the automatic guarantee at the moment of maximum stress. Militarily, the US can break Iran’s residual ability to contest the Strait; that is not the binding constraint. The point is to delay that act. By allowing a closure or semi‑closure to bite, Trump ensures that the immediate pain is concentrated in exactly the jurisdictions that have most conspicuously free‑ridden on US power: the EU and the UK. Their industries, consumers and energy‑transition assumptions are exposed.
In that context, his reported blunt message to European and British leaders, you need the oil out of the Strait more than we do; why don’t you go and take it? Is not a throwaway line. It is the verbalisation of the antithesis. It openly reverses the traditional presumption that America will carry the burden while its allies emote from the sidelines.
In this dialectic, the prize is not simply the reopening of a chokepoint. The prize is a reordered system in which the United States effectively arbitrages and controls the global flow of oil. A world in which US‑aligned production in the Americas plus a discretionary capability to secure,or not secure, Hormuz places Washington at the centre of the hydrocarbon chessboard. For that strategic end, a rapid restoration of the old status quo would be counterproductive.
A quick, surgical “fix” of Hormuz would short‑circuit the dialectic. If Trump rapidly crushed Iran’s remaining coastal capabilities, swept the mines and escorted tankers back through the Strait, Europe and the UK would heave a sigh of relief and return to business as usual: underfunded militaries, maximalist green posturing and performative disdain for US power, all underwritten by that same power. The contradiction between their dependence and their posture would remain latent.
By declining to supply the synthesis on demand, and by explicitly telling London and Brussels to “go and take it” themselves, Trump forces a reckoning. European and British leaders must confront the fact that their energy systems, their industrial bases and their geopolitical sermons all rest on an American hard‑power foundation they neither finance nor politically respect. The longer the contradiction is allowed to unfold, the stronger the eventual synthesis can be: a new order in which access to secure flows, Hormuz, Venezuela and beyond, is explicitly conditional on real contributions, not assumed as a right.
In that sense, the delay in “taking” the Strait, and the challenge issued to US allies to do it themselves, is not indecision. It is the negative moment Hegel insisted was necessary for history to move. Only by withholding the old guarantee, and by saying so out loud to those who depended on it, can Trump hope to end the free ride.

English

@cryptostweet @DrJStrategy America has Canadian and not Venezuelan heavy oil. Plus their own production of light oil, they will be fine
English

@DrJStrategy They could always just pay the toll and the oil in yuan and leave America isolated.
That's the option you didn't mention.
English

@MarioNawfal It’s because you are not posting things objectively and you are fear mongering
English

A lot of you lost your minds over the $141 crude post.
Fair enough, let me explain...
"Fake news! crude is at $110!" Yes, that's futures.
I posted dated Brent, which is the price of actual physical oil being bought and sold right now.
They're not the same thing and the gap between them is what should scare you.
Futures are bets on what oil will cost later.
Dated Brent is what refineries are actually paying today for real barrels.
When futures say $110 and physical crude says $141, it means the people who actually touch the oil are paying way more than Wall Street thinks.
That $31 gap is the market screaming that the crisis is worse than traders are pricing in.
Oil execs warned about this exact disconnect last week at CERAWeek. But of course, nobody listened.
Physical crude hasn't been this expensive since 2008.
Either the real market calms down or futures catch up.
With Hormuz still closed, you can guess which one happens first.
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal
🚨 BREAKING: Oil just exploded to crisis levels Dated Brent crude has surged to $141 per barrel, the highest since the 2008 financial crisis. Source: @KobeissiLetter
English

@SimplyKalby @KobeissiLetter Weaken their infrastructure weakens their society which weakens their control and their government.
English

@KobeissiLetter Why hit civilian amenities. What’s the deal here?
English

@RasmusJarlov You guys let your leftist ideologies make you poor. Good luck with that unrealistic expectation. You won't be able to build anything substantial. Nevermind have the ability to do what's necessary when it's called for
English

As a European, I am not afraid that the USA will leave NATO. We already know that they do not have good intentions to Europe and that we, therefore, have to build our defence to be able to fight without the Americans. We are well on our way and it will happen a lot faster if the USA leaves NATO officially.
Russia is too weak and small to be a long term threat to Europe. They simple can not match what we can produce. As long as we keep Ukraine from falling, Russia is also not a threat to us in the short term.
So if the USA leaves NATO, it is simple for us: Keep Ukraine from falling at all costs and build up European defence and weapon production as fast as humanly possible. We can and we will do that and Europe will be absolutely fine and safe.
English

@dhookstead I think he's talking about the ones that plan the wars and are in the 1%
English

Good buddy of mine comes from a very wealthy family, enlisted, served at the tip of the spear for multiple deployments and saw more killing and death in one night than the average soldier ever does.
He felt it was his duty. It’s a huge misconception only the poor serve.
Headquarters@HQNewsNow
Theo Von: I'm sick of rich people not putting their fucking kids over in these wars Joe Rogan: Especially if you're out there asking for it
English

Microsoft holders seeing Jim Cramer bearish on $MSFT
Jim Cramer@jimcramer
now Microsoft is pushing me to Bing first thing. Really? How to send your stock lower in one easy lesson...l
English

@IncomeSharks Yeah but there's different crude oils and the states imports all their heavy crude oil for jets and diesel. They can refine the heavy stuff here much faster, too. but they only drill a light crude that is good for making gasoline.
English

@nicksortor Good, I like Tulsi much more than trump, one of the few picks that actually worked out and didn't completely fail at their job
English

@Nebraskangooner i know its not chart Tuesday but i was wondering your thoughts on HRB. looks interesting here, might be worth keeping an eye on
English

@MarioNawfal I liked Tulsi, I like her even more now. Tulsi for 2028. Let's piss liberals off by voting first u.s female president who's republican
English

🚨 BREAKING:
🇺🇸 Trump considering replacing Tulsi Gabbard as director of national intelligence
He’s reportedly frustrated after she didn’t back the administration’s stance on Iran and shielded a former deputy who was also critical of the war (Joe Kent)
This is according to two sources who spoke to The Guardian

Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal
🇺🇸 Trump is reportedly ready to dump AG Pam Bondi. He’s told people he’s frustrated with her and is seriously considering firing her as AG. Source: NYT
English





