ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
@SaysSimulation SF, Berkeley has been nuts for decades.
Imagine the rot leading up to this movie.
youtube.com/watch?v=oJnW0D…
YouTube
English
America First Joe
23.8K posts
America First Joe
@Callous_Boomer
US Citizen, husband, grandfather, USN vet, constitutional conservative. Interested in HBD, psychology and history.
Illinois, USA เข้าร่วม Mayıs 2018
683 กำลังติดตาม769 ผู้ติดตาม
English
It’s crazy how brainwashed you’ve been by Zionist neocons. Iran has shown no sign of being a threat to us whatsoever. When was the last time they started a war or invaded a foreign country? Maybe if we stopped fucking with them over the last 5 decades they might not hate us anymore. But even still, they have shown no sign whatsoever of being an actual threat. All they’re doing is defending themselves from Zionist forces who seek to marginalize them as much as possible so Israel can rule the Middle East
English
I supported Trump in '24 as the only viable and legitimate candidate running. Maybe those, like me, who expected him to avoid war, simply got conned. But that's not the only valid hypothesis. The deep state appeared to vehemently oppose Trump. Presumably it had contingency plans
Glenn Greenwald@ggreenwald
You won't hear a better 55-second description of MAGA and Trump than this: in terms of the perspective of any minimally honest MAGA supporter:
English
@benham_venom @wasimullahkhn @BretWeinstein Your calling it a Zionist take over of Mideast and you want to police my speech. A Paki citing Israel's nukes as a threat? They are both nuclear weapons nations.
You think they did not have the capability of building nukes?
English
@Callous_Boomer @wasimullahkhn @BretWeinstein Can we please stop with the woke nonsense? Calling people bigots because they disagree with you is supposed to be a lefty thing. We have no place for this in the right.
English
@jeremyhopke @BretWeinstein No I have followed their nefarious activities since they blew up some of my contemporaries in Lebanon in 1983. When a nation screams death to Great Satan enough I believe them.
English
@Callous_Boomer @BretWeinstein Dude Bibi has been saying they are 2 weeks from having a nuke since before 1990...they convinced you the boogie man is real. Good luck out there. I won't be changing your mind.
English
@jeremyhopke @BretWeinstein Reasons for Withdrawal: Trump criticized the deal as "horrible" and "one-sided," arguing it failed to address Iran's ballistic missile program, regional activities, or permanently prevent a nuclear-armed Iran.
English
@jeremyhopke @BretWeinstein Trump wisely did not want Iran ever to have nukes. Did you see anything in last 47 years to think they are rational people. They probably sponsored 80% of terror across Mideast. The US did not make them religious fanatics trying to seek Shia Islam over the world.
English
@jdd_RTR @FirstSquawk Damn, so much for decent delivery times.
English
@FirstSquawk Welp, get ready for a lot of customer complaints Amazon. USPS delivery drivers are notorious for not delivering on time and putting bogus excuses for why on their system.
English
AMAZON REACHES DEAL WITH USPS ON PACKAGE DELIVERIES - SOURCES
AMAZON DEAL WITH USPS EXPECTED TO SEE RETAILER USE POSTAL SERVICE FOR OVER 1 BLN ANNUAL PACKAGE DELIVERIES, OR 80% OF CURRENT BUSINESS - SOURCES
English
@jeremyhopke @BretWeinstein A treaty that they used to enrich uranium higher than needed for peaceful purposes? One that eventually allowed them nuclear weapons?
Did they lets us inspect recently, no.
You worried Israel is going to nuke us?
x.com/omriceren/stat…
Omri Ceren@omriceren
That's a lie. It's not what happened. It's not how it ever could have happened. The nuclear deal was structured so that when it expired Iran would be able to build a nuclear weapons arsenal while being immune from American pressure. Trump's absolute minimum for a deal has always been that Iran can never have a nuclear weapons capability. The gap was unbridgeable. That's easy to see even at the broadest level. At that level, the Iran debate is divided into two issues: sanctions and nuclear. In the JCPOA, that meant - 1. Sanctions relief. The JCPOA required the US to lock up our most powerful sanctions, including and especially oil sanctions, which had been built against the full range of Iran's malign activities. Iran would get to reap hundreds of billions of dollars annually to build up its navy, missile arsenal, and terrorist proxies, in exchange for concessions just on nuclear issues. 2. Nuclear sunsets. Even those concessions were just temporary. The deal legalized Iran's nuclear program, eventually allowing it to enrich uranium in unlimited amounts to unlimited levels. According to Obama, after a decade under the deal, Iran's nuclear breakout time would shrink to almost zero. In Trump 45, US negotiators spent a year trying to get the Europeans to agree to a "Fix" that would have abolished sunsets and addressed Iran's malign activities. The Europeans said, correctly, that the sunsets were the whole point of the deal, and talks stalled. In Trump 47, US negotiators repeatedly offered the Iranians deals in which Iran's nuclear capabilities would be permanently curtailed. Each time, the Iranians came back with counteroffers that were only temporary, and so here we are.
English
@Callous_Boomer @BretWeinstein Don't leave the treaty that says we can come inspect your nuclear everything and have 24/7 surveillance on it and that you cannot enrich past a specific % for starters. DID YOU KNOW WE SIGNED THAT TREATY WITH THEM?!
English
@enochhowl @zriboua A dying regime, why sign on to get destroyed like Iran. They know funding is going to dry up.
English
North Korea not joining, Houthis not joining, Hezbollah can’t join, Militias in both Syria and Iraq are either handicapped or got completely destroyed. These things reveal that the IRGC’s strategy which has consisted of using proxies as both a shield and an offensive force is over. North Korea obviously cares far more about remaining independent than helping a dying a regime.
English
@JonScampi3 @BretWeinstein It might have been much easier if Obama did the opposite of what he did as President.
English
@Callous_Boomer @BretWeinstein 💯 but you can’t convince the Soft Right it’s enough to justify war
Similar to how you couldn’t convince the left not to wear a mask with COVID
The decision is made
English
They have been killing Americans and making threats against the Great Satan since 1979. They have a tremendous list of terror activities they proxied.
They had long range capabilities no one knew about. They clearly were arming up to threaten neighbors.
Once they got nukes, this SOH would be held over the world for ransom. Of course China would factor in and be part of problem. There is no disputing they had uranium enriched more than they needed for peaceful means.
x.com/omriceren/stat…
English
@Callous_Boomer @BretWeinstein Denial. That’s all they have. They just don’t want war, and that’s literally where it ends. Nothing else to it. They deny at all costs.
English
I don't know much about heart valve replacement either. So if I understand the parameters to require it, I don't study how to do it.
Iran already demonstrated much greater range in its ballistic missiles that we knew of. They clearly spend billions to target missiles at its neighbors. They have stated and acted on their attentions with great satan USA.
The USA has untold 1000's of people who studied and trained for 40 years to tackle Iran.
English
@Callous_Boomer @BretWeinstein So you’ve never given it much thought… got it Joe.
English
English
@VolgareT @scoshow23 @Callous_Boomer @BretWeinstein So how did you Christians and Jews thrive in Muslim nations?
English
@Melchizedek1972 @BretWeinstein I vote for a president. He has people who do such things.
English
@Callous_Boomer @BretWeinstein Those are strategic goals, not strategies to achieve them.
Again, Joe, please lay out your ideas of how we would achieve those strategic goals.
Convince me ( and the millions of MAGA that think it’s time to leave).
English
@Melchizedek1972 @BretWeinstein I would think we need the uranium and to get SOH open.
English
@Callous_Boomer @BretWeinstein We have already destroyed their ability to do that for at least a decade.
If you’re talking long term, it would mean taking over the whole country like we did in Iraq. As you have to agree didn’t turn out well…..
English
@Callous_Boomer @BretWeinstein this was already solved before Trump got into office
English
@VesperAegis @BretWeinstein Your response is consistent with the flag in your profile. Just like the pallets of cash Obama gave helped arm Gaza for 10 7.
English
Solution: It wasn't needed. A nuclear armed Iran was not an instant doomsday any more than Kim Jong Un or Israel getting nukes was doomsday. They would use nuclear weapons to solidify their regime and gain leverage, not start an apocalypse. That's what regimes with more power do with power.
English
@sival84 @BretWeinstein You are niave enough to think Trump takes orders from anyone?.
x.com/omriceren/stat…
Omri Ceren@omriceren
That's a lie. It's not what happened. It's not how it ever could have happened. The nuclear deal was structured so that when it expired Iran would be able to build a nuclear weapons arsenal while being immune from American pressure. Trump's absolute minimum for a deal has always been that Iran can never have a nuclear weapons capability. The gap was unbridgeable. That's easy to see even at the broadest level. At that level, the Iran debate is divided into two issues: sanctions and nuclear. In the JCPOA, that meant - 1. Sanctions relief. The JCPOA required the US to lock up our most powerful sanctions, including and especially oil sanctions, which had been built against the full range of Iran's malign activities. Iran would get to reap hundreds of billions of dollars annually to build up its navy, missile arsenal, and terrorist proxies, in exchange for concessions just on nuclear issues. 2. Nuclear sunsets. Even those concessions were just temporary. The deal legalized Iran's nuclear program, eventually allowing it to enrich uranium in unlimited amounts to unlimited levels. According to Obama, after a decade under the deal, Iran's nuclear breakout time would shrink to almost zero. In Trump 45, US negotiators spent a year trying to get the Europeans to agree to a "Fix" that would have abolished sunsets and addressed Iran's malign activities. The Europeans said, correctly, that the sunsets were the whole point of the deal, and talks stalled. In Trump 47, US negotiators repeatedly offered the Iranians deals in which Iran's nuclear capabilities would be permanently curtailed. Each time, the Iranians came back with counteroffers that were only temporary, and so here we are.
English
@Callous_Boomer @BretWeinstein Did it? Where are those nukes then?
Cuck Chair Trump only attacked Iran because Bibi told him to, not because there was any risk of Iran getting nukes in the foreseeable future. His attack INCREASED the risk of Iran working towards nukes.
English
@sival84 @BretWeinstein Sure, that will work until a nuclear weapon is demonstrated by Iran. They already used all their deals up. Obama's deal allowed them to eventually gain weapons no?
English
@Callous_Boomer @BretWeinstein Offer a deal to normalize relations with Iran and drop sanctions if they commit to a limit to uranium enrichment and regular inspections by international bodies.
English
@Callous_Boomer @BretWeinstein They said they did that with the strikes 6 months ago. All of our intelligence said they had no more program and still say that, counter to Trump and Bibi.
This war has been Bibi's obsession for DECADES. He's said "Iran is weeks away" for decades.
Admit we were all conned.
English
@wasimullahkhn @BretWeinstein Only Jew haters would raise that as an issue.
English