CLINTEL.ORG

We are proud to announce that today, during a press conference in Brussels, we revealed that former Czech President Václav Klaus will succeed Guus Berkhout as President of Clintel after seven years. Read the press release on our website. 👇 clintel.org/former-czech-p…

🚨 Three-time @IPCC_CH Lead Author Dr. Kevin Trenberth @NSF @NCAR_Science just called our new paper “ABSOLUTE NONSENSE” in the activist publication Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists WE COULDN'T BE MORE EXCITED! Dr. Trenberth: You once called the inability to close the Earth’s energy budget a “travesty.” What changed? Should we have a real scientific debate on the foundations? Or just call things “absolute nonsense”? YOUR words over the years: • 2009 ClimateGate email: “... we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.” • 2010 Science paper (w/ John Fasullo @jfasullo): “missing energy” in the climate system that could not be properly accounted for. • 2014 Journal of Climate paper (w/ Fasullo): “...state-of-the-art observations and basic analysis are unable to completely account for recent energy variability at interannual time scales, since they provide either an incoherent narrative or imply error bars too large to make the products useful.” Our new paper Cohler et al. 2026 doi.org/10.5281/zenodo… finishes what you started, Kevin, using basic physics anyone can understand. A few key points: Temperature: NOT the same thing as energy. It is an “intensive property.” When you average temperatures from thousands of drifting Argo floats, whose exact underwater paths are unknown, the result is just a number. It is not a real measure of total energy stored in the ocean. Uncertainty: We prove the real uncertainty is at least ±1 W/m² (more than 5x larger than what your IPCC and recent papers claim). That means today’s official “Earth’s energy imbalance” numbers are scientifically no different from zero. Satellites: The NASA CERES satellite data is quietly adjusted to match these invalid ocean-based calculations.

The Prophet Who Got It Wrong He predicted mass starvation… He lived to 93 in wealth and comfort. The world? Fed more people than ever. The ultimate irony of Paul Ehrlich. 👉clintel.org/paul-ehrlich-1… #PopulationBomb #ClimateDebate #Malthusianism #Clintel

🚨 While the United States doubles down on energy independence and is reaping the benefits in the Iran crisis… Europe remains stuck with expensive imports, rising energy prices, and looming shortages. 💸 Citizens are paying the price 🇺🇸 The U.S. is reaping the rewards Read the article by Vijay Jayaraj 👉 clintel.org/us-energy-real… #EnergyCrisis #EU #US #Inflation #GasPrices #Geopolitics #EnergyPolicy

🚨 AI just rewrote Antarctica’s temperature history A groundbreaking study shows AI can reconstruct temperatures across Antarctica with striking accuracy — despite sparse data. What does this mean for climate records we’ve trusted for decades? Read the full story by Ralph Alexander 👉 clintel.org/ai-accurately-… #AI #climate #Antarctica #science #data #climatedebate

🔥 “Nothing has changed in Europe.” 😳 Clintel President Václav Klaus shuts down hopes for climate policy shifts — and says real change isn’t coming anytime soon… 👉 Read why he has zero faith in a “radical change” in the EU clintel.org/clintel-presid…

Frank Stefani compared solar variability and CO₂ emissions as drivers of sea surface temperatures. His study estimates a transient climate response (TCR) of about 1.1 to 1.4 degrees, near the lower end of the IPCC range. The results align closely with other observation-based estimates. Andy May explains: clintel.org/new-study-find…

Prof. Ian Plimer did not hold back during his recent interview on Triggernometry: “There is a very large group of people who use science to promote fraud. Climate science is the biggest cult in scientific history.” clintel.org/clintel-ambass…

The climate debate is often reduced to a narrow narrative with little room for uncertainty or alternative interpretations. Nicola Scafetta’s new book, The Frontier of Climate Science, was written to address this gap. It examines the complex interplay between solar variability, natural climate cycles, and the limits of current climate models. clintel.org/the-frontier-o…

@dennisdekker72 No, if you could measure 'current' levels in an ice core, this would be a good guess. Because the value in ice cores are representative for a much longer period.

@ClintelOrg So if i understand correctly, you claim that current CO₂-levels are actually lower than the measured mauna loa level?

We often see graphs of past CO₂ concentrations from ice cores simply sliced onto modern instrumental measurements. The modern CO₂ spike looks dramatic, even alarming. But that is not a fair comparison, explains Renee Hannon. clintel.org/why-the-modern…

Nicola Scafetta has published an excellent new book that is a very important contribution towards grasping the true complexity of Earth's climate. He describes the book in a post at Climate Etc. judithcurry.com/2026/03/10/ret…

Science advances through scrutiny, not through untouchable claims or enforced consensus.

@dennisdekker72 Is not the issue here; this is just about how to do a fair comparison with current CO2 levels (measured) and values from ice cores (smoothed values)

@ClintelOrg If this is true, then what is the value of Happer's CO₂ saturation-theory? CO₂-level still rises, but is below where Happer claims that saturation is reached. So much more greenhouse effect then expected?

Key graph in the article: Figure 2: Firn smoothing effects for low snow accumulation sites; Dome C and Vostok. Six different calculations were run for 100, 200, and 300 years temporal resolution smoothing. Bk=backward. MMCO₂ = muted modern CO₂ These “suppressed” curves illustrate how dramatically firn diffusion would dampen today’s rapid rise if it were recorded in low-accumulation Antarctic ice cores. Averaged computations show the mean Muted Modern CO₂ (MMCO₂) value for 2025 is 345 ppm +/- 24 ppm compared to the Mauna Loa annual record of 427 ppm.

Thirteen tweets in the past five minutes 🍿🍿🍿 I’m enemy #176 Read my review here: mindingthecampus.org/2026/03/09/the… Share it around

Just a little fun today! Good news! Researchers from various British universities have discovered that ‘hairdressers could be a secret weapon in the fight against climate change’. Jo Nova reflects on this absurd finding. clintel.org/hairdressers-c…

𝗨𝗿𝘀𝘂𝗹𝗮 𝘃𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗟𝗲𝘆𝗲𝗻 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘀 𝗔𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗡𝘂𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗣𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 “𝗔 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗰 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲” – 𝟭𝟱 𝗬𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗔𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝘂𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗣𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲-𝗢𝘂𝘁 Ursula von der Leyen, who championed Germany's nuclear phase-out after Fukushima in 2011, now calls it a "strategic mistake." Fifteen years later, she's pushing for the EU to lead in nuclear tech, admitting Europe's energy share from nukes dropped from a third to just 15%. Talk about a massive flip-flop—especially when Germany's stuck with sky-high costs and no way back. What's really going on here? Read the full article: wattsupwiththat.com/2026/03/11/urs…

As promised, the climate science obliteration has arrived TODAY. The IPCC's central claims have now been torn apart. The oceans are not “warming” let alone “boiling.” That claim is false. The claimed Earth Energy Imbalance is false. It's no different from zero. Full demolition: Cohler et al. (2026) IPCC's Earth Energy Imbalance Assessment is Based on Physically Invalid Argo-Float-Based Estimates of Global Ocean Heat Content doi.org/10.5281/zenodo… Press Release: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo… Easy-to-Read Summary: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo…

Africa does not need Western pity, and it certainly does not need Western solar panels. While the rest of the world is moving toward greater prosperity, Africa is being forced to follow a path of poverty. This is an indictment of the modern ‘green’ agenda. clintel.org/green-ideology…

This is fun! Four years ago, The @Guardian reported that Spain and Portugal are becoming too dry because of [man-made] climate change. 🏜️ But, after the devastating floods in the fall of 2024, The Guardian changed their tune. They now say Spain is too wet thanks to climate change. 🌧️ The real-world data, however, tells a consistent story. A study published in Nature last March analyzed long-term rainfall data in the Mediterranean and found that no statistically significant trends exist in the region as a whole. 🗨️ “𝐻𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑤𝑒 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑤 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑀𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑛 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑙𝑦 𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 1871 𝑡𝑜 2020, 𝑎𝑙𝑏𝑒𝑖𝑡 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖-𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦… 𝑊ℎ𝑖𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑏𝑒 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑒𝑑 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠, 𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑙𝑦 𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑐 𝑑𝑦𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑠, 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑤𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑏𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑙𝑦 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑘𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦.” 🔗 nature.com/articles/s4158… Interestingly, in Spain, there has been little trend in rainfall since 1871. However, if the analysis starts in 1951, there is a significant decrease (p <0.05), while starting in 1981 yields a statistically significant increase (p <0.05). This just goes to show that people (like the writers at The Guardian) can manipulate data to get a desired trend to suit a specific narrative.