Cohner

200 posts

Cohner banner
Cohner

Cohner

@CohnerTodd

Your Local Graveyard Degenerate

Wilmington DE เข้าร่วม Ağustos 2011
38 กำลังติดตาม24 ผู้ติดตาม
Cohner
Cohner@CohnerTodd·
@mtgbanding Put Divine Intervention in a Show and Tell deck with Clockspinning called Show and Draw, it pisses people off way more than just winning. Also put Goblin Game into a Burning Wish Depths list for a bingo night with friends to great effect.
English
1
0
5
1.2K
Phil Nguyen
Phil Nguyen@mtgbanding·
the power 9 of strange card effects > how many have you experienced? > what card belongs here?
Phil Nguyen tweet media
English
59
10
283
28.2K
Cohner
Cohner@CohnerTodd·
@PascalMaynard @wizards_magic I argue they should continue, if commander isn't the most popular format anymore, maybe we can have sets not design with commander in mind.
English
0
0
1
486
Pascal Maynard
Pascal Maynard@PascalMaynard·
Making Commander bans is the worst decision I ever seen @wizards_magic make. Does not matter if you had a good reason, casual players will not see the big picture (and they have no reason to). Now players will fear bans and stop buying staples which was never in their mind before
English
83
48
550
56.7K
Cohner
Cohner@CohnerTodd·
@bmkibler @Burzolog Isn't that half of the problems in Vintage and Legacy? Cards that become too format defining for them to have action against them so they just ban cards around it? Cards like Brainstorm, Bazaar and Workshops come to mind.
English
0
0
2
275
Brian Kibler
Brian Kibler@bmkibler·
@Burzolog I think it is nonsensical, as I said. A ban philosophy that says fast mana of a certain power level isn't allowed and banning weaker cards than sol ring (like lotus) isn't coherent.
English
10
3
223
11.3K
Brian Kibler
Brian Kibler@bmkibler·
I feel like banning Crypt and Jeweled Lotus is a huge miss. Some people like playing high powered Commander and these cards are part of that. They are a rule zero issue, not a ban list issue, and to ban them and leave Sol Ring legal is just nonsensical.
Commander Rules Committee@mtgcommander

UPDATE: Changes to the banned list: Dockside Extortionist is banned Jeweled Lotus is banned Mana Crypt is banned Nadu is banned. Additional details: mtgcommander.net/?p=1729. or magic.wizards.com/en/news/announ…

English
408
399
4.2K
388.1K
Cohner
Cohner@CohnerTodd·
@TheZZielinski @stranglercore @_claypot @Gripmaestro Contemporary dungeon synth has become very on the nose, which is not fault of anyone but if it evokes the feeling of being in a fantasy world of medieval times then who is to say it is wrong to label it that.
English
1
0
1
80
Cohner
Cohner@CohnerTodd·
@TheZZielinski @stranglercore @_claypot @Gripmaestro Pseudiom on YouTube talks in great lengths about the history of Dungeon Synth, prior to picking up the name Dungeon Synth, it definitely was very much the interludes of metal albums that defined the original songs people would consider "dungeon synth".
English
1
0
2
92
claypot.blue 🪴
claypot.blue 🪴@_claypot·
dungeonsynth music having a spike in popularity again on tiktok because some guy keeps dressing like a little green wizard and skittering around malls to it is very funny
English
246
7.9K
90.3K
4.7M
Cohner
Cohner@CohnerTodd·
@leemcleo I’ve felt that all but the Timespiral Remaster ones felt like proxies of old bordered cards. Between that and to juxtaposition with art that didn’t fit the frame to ultimately feel lazy for me to get behind.
English
0
0
1
326
Saffron Olive
Saffron Olive@SaffronOlive·
The number of unwritten rules in Commander that you are expected to follow but aren't enforced by the ban list or rules is probably my least favorite part of the format. It's like Commander is a bunch of 80 year old baseball fans that throw a fit when someone flips a bat.
English
171
92
1.7K
141.7K
Cohner
Cohner@CohnerTodd·
@SandwurmFood @depthofend @DGallenMtg You ever use GrubHub or DoorDash? You’re paying for convenience of not needing to obtain it before the event. It’s not deeper than that.
English
0
0
0
55
Dan
Dan@SandwurmFood·
@depthofend @DGallenMtg yeah but you can step outside the venue and avoid that pretty easily. you can't just find another card vendor as easily. the on site vendors are literally exploiting a temporary market with cartel-like conditions of price fixing.
English
1
0
0
79
Cohner
Cohner@CohnerTodd·
@NotQuotable Based on the replies to this type of discourse, if it's not dirt cheap they think it's unreasonable regardless if there's none on the market.
English
1
0
0
25
Rosa
Rosa@NotQuotable·
@CohnerTodd so less people will crack boxes to put the singles online, because it is not worth their time & investment. what happens to the prices of singles if their availability decreases?
English
1
0
1
32
bashmcalister
bashmcalister@bashmcalister·
As someone who has multiple companies in the industry and who has vended the smallest ptq to the largest events in the country across multiple games, i feel i can speak on this. Both @TandyMTG and @CardGardenMTG are right here, but there are nuances at play. 1/🧵
English
5
27
147
79.5K
Cohner
Cohner@CohnerTodd·
@NotQuotable Yes it does, why would you sell something online that is not worth the time to put into an envelope and a stamp on it? Both can be true at the same time. You can have so much product and also none of it being sold. It's literally happening as we speak.
English
1
0
0
35
Rosa
Rosa@NotQuotable·
@CohnerTodd this does not address the point at all; structural overprinting cannot be held responsible for prices going down if it is also responsible for less product appearing on the market as singles.
English
1
0
2
38
Cohner
Cohner@CohnerTodd·
@NotQuotable So then how much does the EV need to increase for the average LGS to make money? Hard to say, especially when anyone can sell on TCGplayer keeping prices down since you and I can open our own shop.
English
1
0
0
34
Cohner
Cohner@CohnerTodd·
@NotQuotable A store would not only need to crack packs, sort, price, and then list their inventory online fill their cases. That takes time and labor, that just is the overhead. Then still need to make profit. It's not EV > Box Value, it's EV > Box Value + Labor
English
1
0
0
36
Cohner
Cohner@CohnerTodd·
@andrejsprost @TandyMTG No it has not? If it was never a contractual agreement before with the tournament organizer, it was because it was profitable (in the interest of the vendor) to bring cards relevant to format being played. It is now not worth their time. You again are entitled for thinking this.
English
1
0
0
22
Andrejs Prost
Andrejs Prost@andrejsprost·
@CohnerTodd @TandyMTG That's been the entire purpose of having vendors at these events in the first place. I don't care what's profitable for the vendors in the same way they don't care if its convenient to me. If they don't want to voluntarily carry the cards it should be written into contract.
English
1
0
0
20
Cohner
Cohner@CohnerTodd·
@andrejsprost @TandyMTG Why is it the vendor's job to make sure your registered deck is at the tournament? Why do you feel entitled to have it that way? It worked in the past because standard legal cards still held decent value, enough where you could make a profit as a vendor.
English
1
0
0
25
Andrejs Prost
Andrejs Prost@andrejsprost·
@TandyMTG Venders should be forced as part of theyre contracts to bring a certain amount of staples for whatever the constructed format the main event is. It worked for the WMC and Pro tours for years. If you don't want to/ aren't able to someone that will can buy the booth.
English
1
0
1
57
Cohner
Cohner@CohnerTodd·
@sarahceliann @FrankLepore If the main draw to a product is the fact they have shocklands, and they're "printed into the ground", would that be a draw for people to buy said product?
English
0
0
0
32
Sarah Celiann
Sarah Celiann@sarahceliann·
@FrankLepore Honestly, shocklands are the most stapliest of staples. Let them get printed into the ground, I say.
English
1
0
5
268
Frank Lepore
Frank Lepore@FrankLepore·
So we're reprinting shocklands in both Ravnica Remastered (January 12th) AND Murders at Karlov Manor (February 9th)? And each set will have multiple treatments? That seems like...a lot in less than a 30 day period.
Frank Lepore tweet mediaFrank Lepore tweet mediaFrank Lepore tweet mediaFrank Lepore tweet media
English
12
3
35
11.8K
Cohner
Cohner@CohnerTodd·
@PleasantKenobi @fffreakmtg @mechalink @SaffronOlive Wasn't the competitive diversity mostly based on Pro Tour Coverage? It was a deck that a larger than 10% of people who play at the PT gravitate to, which would lead to a lot of similar matches and sake of watching competitive diversity be bad. But it was the Eldrazi PT anyways
English
0
0
1
159
Saffron Olive
Saffron Olive@SaffronOlive·
On the left is the Modern meta from January 5, 2016, less than two weeks before Splnter Twinw as banned "In the interest of competitive diversity." On the right is the Modern meta today.
Saffron Olive tweet mediaSaffron Olive tweet media
English
129
133
1.3K
160.4K
Cohner
Cohner@CohnerTodd·
@PleasantKenobi Why? Disney/Marvel have and will continue to try to push their IP on everything they think that can grow their consumer base and that won't hurt their image. They did it with Fortnite, it only makes sense they'd work with a company like Hasbro. I for one hate it though.
English
0
0
1
137
Corporate RyRy
Corporate RyRy@RyRySamurai·
@DBoTheGreat @CohnerTodd @FierceDeity2019 @_Memo_4302 i find jumping into a conversation with ‘just get good’ ‘i’m not gonna coddle you’ and invalidating other people’s play experience as a strawman to win a nonexistent argument all unnecessarily antagonistic if i hurt anyone’s feelings by calling that out with a meme, then My B.
English
1
0
0
64
Memo, the Coach
Memo, the Coach@_Memo_4302·
Lord Tony is a homie 🫡
Memo, the Coach tweet media
English
65
42
691
160.1K