CutSteel

4.4K posts

CutSteel

CutSteel

@CutSteel_truth

เข้าร่วม Ağustos 2024
141 กำลังติดตาม551 ผู้ติดตาม
CutSteel
CutSteel@CutSteel_truth·
@simoneinamerika Nope... Decided instead of sharing all my personal information with everyone on Facebook, I have decided anonymity, and personal information privacy is more important. Keeping my id footprint small with all that is happening is paramount. Pure evil out there
English
2
0
1
21
Simone Venter
Simone Venter@simoneinamerika·
@CutSteel_truth I had this exact issue too. The suspension was removed and the account is active again. You need help?
English
1
0
0
5
Darrell B. Jones
Darrell B. Jones@darrellbjones·
My 18 year old Facebook account - permanently disabled overnight. My pages 5 in all are gone too. Instagram account as well. Meta account is attached, so also gone. Meta VR and glasses no longer work without this, which makes the products itself unusable. Yesterday I changed my password and created a passkey. Later I saw there was a login from singapore was emailed to me, a chinese account accepted a "friend request", then the account was disabled. I'm sure it's AI that processes it all, and getting to a human agent probably implausible. But they should be able to tell that the account was compromised, but alas, no human agent will intervene. And I am locked out permanently. This is the power these tech companies have. To permanently affect you and kill anything you have done, created, built, or posted on their platform. They can't be trusted. Not with your data, not with your personal information. I guess it was time to #deletefacebook
Darrell B. Jones tweet media
English
437
327
2.3K
322K
CutSteel รีทวีตแล้ว
🇨🇦Joan Massey🍎🍏
@JimFergusonUK While I don’t believe digital ID itself is the Mark of the Beast, I do believe it just might be the vehicle for this future menace. Starmer unknowingly voices the perimeters of this future mark. Regardless, it must be resisted, for digital ID will truly destroy all freedoms.
🇨🇦Joan Massey🍎🍏 tweet media
English
0
2
2
33
CutSteel รีทวีตแล้ว
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 NOW: Americans are noticing that Japanese World Cup fans are doing MASS CLEANUPS of AMERICAN STADIUMS after the match "In Japan, we are taught to clean up in school" Thug cultures destroy and ravage, others clean and build! This is why we LOVE JAPAN! PURE CLASS ACT! 🇺🇸🇯🇵
English
904
10.4K
50.4K
828.3K
CutSteel
CutSteel@CutSteel_truth·
@RealDonKeith The new UK ....Speak no evil, See no evil, Hear no evil...All based on the states view of what it decides is evil. Specifically,,, how corrupt the state is.
CutSteel tweet media
English
0
0
0
20
Don Keith
Don Keith@RealDonKeith·
🚨Stop the presses! Now I’m Hearing Starmer is banning all of the social media apps except for notorious Left wing propaganda app, Bluesky. There is always some communist reason for everything he does.
Don Keith@RealDonKeith

🚨British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announces a nationwide ban on social media for children under the age of 16. This is perhaps the only thing he has ever done that I would like to see duplicated in The United States.

English
64
79
270
5.3K
CutSteel
CutSteel@CutSteel_truth·
@RealDonKeith If it's not obvious at this point..... The UK , EU elites are the handmaids of the anti-christ. They are full out exposed in opposition to God's free agency for man. They are evil. Stand up and fight.... Next after social silence, comes genocide of the people.
English
0
0
0
31
CutSteel
CutSteel@CutSteel_truth·
@BenGrahamUK It's obvious that Keir Starmer is a human trafficking, pedophile protecting, pro child rape advocate, ... Everything he does had nothing to do with protecting children. What next Starmer? Cannibalism in your closet?
English
0
0
0
31
Ben Graham
Ben Graham@BenGrahamUK·
BlueSky is a far bigger threat to children than X, Facebook or YouTube. No social media platform is perfect, but BlueSky has serious child safeguarding issues that need addressing. Yet somehow it's been left off the ban list. The Government needs to explain the logic.
BRITAIN IS BROKEN 🇬🇧@BROKENBRITAIN0

🚨NEW: Social media app BlueSky, is absolutely FULL of accounts that claim to be a “minor attracted person” In other words, they are PROUDLY calling themselves a pedophile. BlueSky was also conveniently left off of Starmer’s under 16s social media ban list…… H/T: @Inevitablewest

English
250
3.2K
9K
118.6K
CutSteel
CutSteel@CutSteel_truth·
@FreyjaBakke This is the judge that will hold him accountable...
CutSteel tweet mediaCutSteel tweet media
English
0
0
0
51
Freyja1 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇸🇯🇩🇪🇮🇪🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
🚨THIS IS JUDGE LORD JUSTICE TIMOTHY HOLROYDE This is the judge who REFUSED Lucy Connolly her appeal after she was convicted for a social media post. Meanwhile this very same judge CUT the sentence of Labour's Lord Ahmed by THREE YEARS after he was convicted of child sex offences. His sentence was reduced to just two and a half years from five and half years. SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE!!
Freyja1 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇸🇯🇩🇪🇮🇪🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 tweet media
English
526
4.3K
7.6K
66.9K
CutSteel รีทวีตแล้ว
Liz Churchill
Liz Churchill@liz_churchill10·
Keir Starmer: “We care about children…so we’re banning Social Media for under 16 year olds” Below: Keir Starmer’s Police abusing a child
Liz Churchill tweet media
English
370
7.7K
21.3K
121.9K
Jay Darkmoore
Jay Darkmoore@JayDarkmoore·
I don’t see the problem with why stopping under 16’s using social media is a bad thing. Can someone please tell me what the counter argument is? Why are people upset / concerned?
English
3K
23
302
289.3K
CutSteel
CutSteel@CutSteel_truth·
@harrystabbings Absolute dictator, communist control...here we fought with the UK in World War II, as an ally against NAZI fascist..now their government is the NAZI fascist. Is America going to have to save the UK with our military?
English
0
0
0
3
Harry Stabbings
Harry Stabbings@harrystabbings·
What you need to know about the new Social Media Ban in the UK: 1. All persons under 16 are prohibited from accessing social media platforms without verified parental supervision. 2. Parental supervision must be logged digitally through the UK. gov app. 3. Parents must approve each post, comment, like, or share in real-time. 4. Failure to supervise constitutes negligent digital guardianship. 5. Penalties for negligent digital guardianship include fines up to £10,000 and potential removal of devices from the household. 6. Educational use is not exempt. 7. Mental health considerations are not exempt. 8. Checking the weather on a browser that could access social media counts as attempted access. 9. Screenshots of banned platforms are treated as contraband. 10. Discussing banned platforms in school counts as conspiracy to access. 11. Parents who express disagreement with these rules online will have their supervision privileges revoked. 12. Any family member can report violations anonymously (encouraged). Compliance is mandatory. Britain is safer for it.
Harry Stabbings tweet media
English
2.3K
1.1K
2.9K
641.7K
CutSteel รีทวีตแล้ว
David Shaw
David Shaw@David90shaw·
🚨 I TOLD YOU LAST WEEK EXACTLY WHAT THIS WAS. DO NOT MISS IT AGAIN. This is Keir Starmer's actual master plan. The social media ban has absolutely nothing to do with protecting children. It is Step One. Step Two is coming. He is copying the authoritarian survival manual directly from his globalist mate, Albanian PM Edi Rama. 🤡 Step One in Albania. Rama used the exact same excuse to ban social media and control the internet. Step Two in Albania. Rama used a weaponised justice system to hold the Mayor of Tirana, Erion Veliaj hostage for sixteen months without a single conviction! Why? Because the Mayor was from his OWN party and was popular enough to replace him! Now look at Starmer. His ministers are quitting. Ninety eight of his own MPs want him gone. Andy Burnham is measuring the curtains. Starmer is a completely paranoid political squatter. He is forcing us onto a mandatory Digital ID so he can track, censor, and purge absolutely anyone who threatens his grip on Number 10. Step One is taking your phone. Step Two is a digital dictatorship. RT if you see the trap and refuse to let them take our freedom! 🔁🇬🇧🔥
English
57
734
2K
68.2K
CutSteel
CutSteel@CutSteel_truth·
@harrystabbings Number 12... Just like a true communist country...turn your family member in to the authorities. Hell on earth for UK citizens. Better start earnestly calling on God for help
English
0
0
0
2
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
🇬🇧 UK announces ban on social media for under-16-year-olds The ban covers 10 social media apps, including X, that they have labeled "high-risk." One app that didn't make the cut? Bluesky, the platform drowning in woke leftist BS. Soon to be ex-PM Keir Starmer can't have young impressionable people finding out the truth about what's going on in the world. Another useless policy from a useless politician Writers: Ian, Julie
English
386
427
1.1K
124.6K
CutSteel
CutSteel@CutSteel_truth·
@JimFergusonUK How many teens is he putting in danger? Consider the ramifications: 1. No way to make contact with someone, (family or other), in an emergency. 2. Suddenly cut-off from social life, and a radical isolation pushed on them. Suicide rates are going to increase. Real Consequences
English
0
0
1
48
Jim Ferguson
Jim Ferguson@JimFergusonUK·
🚨 THEY ASKED THE KIDS. THE KIDS SAID NO. The government says banning social media for under-16s is necessary to protect young people. So BBC News asked young people what they thought. The response was clear. The very people affected by the ban appear overwhelmingly unconvinced. Politicians often tell us they are acting in the best interests of young people. Perhaps the next question should be: Did anyone actually ask them first?
English
95
248
746
29K
Jim Ferguson
Jim Ferguson@JimFergusonUK·
🚨 THEY CAN'T CONTROL THE BORDERS. BUT THEY CAN CONTROL YOU. The government cannot stop the boats. Cannot stop the hotels filling up. Cannot stop the public anger. Cannot stop the protests spreading from city to city. But it can ban social media. Interesting. Because when governments begin losing control of events, they often become increasingly interested in controlling information. Millions of people are worried about immigration. Worried about crime. Worried about the future of the country. Yet instead of addressing the concerns driving that anger, the political class appears increasingly focused on regulating what people can see, hear and say online. The public is beginning to ask a simple question: Why is controlling access to information suddenly more urgent than controlling Britain's borders? That question is not going away. In fact, it is getting louder by the day.
English
519
4.5K
12.7K
136.7K
CutSteel
CutSteel@CutSteel_truth·
@W_L_M__U_K Stark difference from US & UK ... Ice Agents violently being assaulted by ANTIFA thugs deserve to be arrested in the USA. These are British everyday citizens out protesting the rapes and murders of their people by immigrants, and the UK Police violently assault the citizens.
English
0
0
1
54
CutSteel
CutSteel@CutSteel_truth·
Very interesting timing today! Is the movie about to end, and the actors are wrapping up, no longer needed? Time to check out?🤔 foxnews.com/politics/sen-m…
CutSteel tweet mediaCutSteel tweet media
English
0
0
1
67