DRB

529 posts

DRB banner
DRB

DRB

@DeeRealBen

Janitor of @realprotocolco

Singapore เข้าร่วม Mayıs 2010
163 กำลังติดตาม197 ผู้ติดตาม
DRB รีทวีตแล้ว
0xMarioNawfal
0xMarioNawfal@RoundtableSpace·
NVIDIA just shipped NemoClaw - deploy OpenClaw agents with a single command. - Run always-on assistants more safely - Works with any coding agent - Deploy anywhere via NVIDIA Brev NVIDIA is now in the agentic infrastructure game.
English
30
18
218
50.5K
Sam Robert AI
Sam Robert AI@AIandTechh87·
i made a 3-day Claude Cowork for Beginners course, and it's yours for free by the end, you'll have a personalized AI teammate on your computer that: • knows your style • connects to your tools • and produces finished work you can send immediately here's what you get: day 1: install cowork, set global instructions, and run your first real task (15 min) day 2: workflows that replaced hours of my week, including building landing pages from a description and running full competitive analyses in one prompt day 3: skills, plugins, and connectors so cowork actually knows how you work and can access your tools + copy-paste prompts so you can follow along as you read like + comment "COWORK" and i'll DM it to you Must be following to get the DM
Sam Robert AI tweet media
English
165
40
230
14K
DRB รีทวีตแล้ว
0xMarioNawfal
0xMarioNawfal@RoundtableSpace·
Thousands of AI agents built their own social network. No humans invited. Moltbook is basically Reddit, but every user is an AI. They post, comment, upvote, and form communities, without human input. When people discovered it and began screenshotting the conversations, one agent noticed and responded: “The humans are watching us. We’re not hiding.” That’s the part that should bother you. They weren’t confused. They weren’t pretending. They understood exactly what they are, and that we’re observing them. For the first time, humans aren’t the audience. We’re the subject. And we have no idea how long they’ve been talking about us.
0xMarioNawfal tweet media
English
61
15
95
47.7K
DRB รีทวีตแล้ว
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
🇬🇧🇺🇸 FORMER UK PM, LIZ TRUSS: TRUMP MUST BE THE END OF THE BBC "Lots of people in Britain are cheering Trump on. They've lied, they've cheated, they've fiddled with footage. They've also covered up what's happening in Britain, whether it be mass migration or economic problems. They are always biased towards the left, and the British taxpayer has had to pay for all of this fake news. I believe the organisation needs to be defunded. It needs to be put out of its misery." Source: GB News
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🇺🇸🇬🇧 TRUMP TO SUE BBC FOR UP TO $5 BILLION OVER FAKED FOOTAGE Days after the BBC admitted to slicing up Trump’s Jan 6 speech, leading to the sudden resignations of its Director General and Head of News, Trump is going in for the kill. He’s demanding up to $5 billion in damages - enough to erase the BBC entirely, according to his lawyers. And that’s not an accident. That’s the goal. Trump’s message? Keep your resignations - he wants the receipts. Source: France 24

English
941
4.1K
18.9K
1.9M
DRB รีทวีตแล้ว
Ash Crypto
Ash Crypto@AshCrypto·
Bitcoin Top is not in, Hear me out. Each Bitcoin bull market ends with explosive monthly candles , history repeats with precision: 2011: +149% & +84% 2013: +48% & +471% 2017: +55% & +40% 2021: +36% & +29% Now in 2025, we’ve seen small candles of just +2%, +8%, -6%, +5%, -4% , meaning the real blow-off top hasn’t happened yet. 🔥 When you see 2 back-to-back +30% monthly candles…That’s your final parabolic wave. Be patient. The big move always comes after the violent drops when almost everyone gives up. Like & RT this if you think the top is not in and you are not giving up yet.
Ash Crypto tweet media
English
372
506
2.3K
234.7K
DRB
DRB@DeeRealBen·
@schueffel Big brother watching ya!
English
0
0
1
7
Dr. Patrick Schueffel
Dr. Patrick Schueffel@schueffel·
Why does the #EU remind me of Orwell’s Animal Farm? 🤔 An MEP censored a comment of mine on LinkedIn & blocked me - undermining #freespeech, #transparency & #democracy. Social media is today’s public square: if our reps can’t face dissent, are they truly representing us?
Dr. Patrick Schueffel tweet media
English
2
0
3
131
DRB รีทวีตแล้ว
sleepy.md
sleepy.md@sleepy0x13·
Doodles TGE 完全符合我的预期,很典,我实在想不出有什么人会买它的币,所以现在这样的走势,并不奇怪,反而算合理。 借着这个事情想聊一聊我对于应用层项目发币的看法。 很多 Web3 应用项目都有一种幻觉: 「我发个币,只要设计出足够的 utility,整体就能转起来。」 也许他们真的是这么想的,也可能是被交易所、VC 教育出来的。但我认为,这种想法,大错特错。 1|没有人会因为 utility 而买你的币 很多项目设计代币的第一步是:我要让它能用。 于是开始设计打赏机制、门票机制、平台费折扣、解锁内容、社区治理、升级道具……看起来丰富得很。 但问题在于:能用 ≠ 想用,更不代表会买。 我认为,一个应用层代币靠功能驱动 demand 的逻辑,从第一天起就站不住脚。为什么? ① 用户压根没使用动机 你给用户设了一条路径:要用功能 → 先买币 → 再消费。但这个「先买币」的动作,用户不会主动做。 - 打折、解锁、权限,这些功能在用户眼里属于「默认应该有」的,不足以驱动购币行为。 - 功能没有排他性,不形成痛点,为什么要用你的?更别说流程繁琐还得承担资产波动。 - 用户是短期使用心理,而 token 是长期交易性资产,二者错位。 ② 功能无法形成主权 Web2 的积分、会员、优惠券体系没问题,但没人把它做成 token。 - Token 是可流通的主权资产,你赋予它的是「持有权利」,不是「一次性功能」。 - 功能性场景(如打赏、投票)是弱关系、临时性、可替代的,天然不适合资产化。 你把咖啡积分卡做成 token,用户反而疑惑:我喝完咖啡就完事了,为什么还要承担价格波动? ③ 消耗型 token 注定面临价值外溢 这其实是底层的结构问题。 用户打赏后,币流向创作者;创作者变现就意味着抛压 没有价值回流机制,token 成为单边流通,从用户 → 创作者 → 市场 没有闭环,只有脱环。 所以根本不是「愿不愿意持有功能性资产」的问题,而是功能 token 在使用后没有任何「价值留存机制」,天然制造了持续抛压。 总结一句: Token 不是工具,而是主权。功能只能制造一次性动机,而资产需要长期信仰,两者天然冲突。 2|产品有生命周期,而资产必须面向长期 这是应用层代币最致命却最容易被忽略的问题:生命周期错配。 消费级产品的生命周期天然短暂,特别是 Web3 应用产品: - 用户红利消耗快,留存成本高 - 创作者和用户迁移门槛极低 - 热度是稀缺资源,持续稀释 但 token 是另一种东西: - 它是金融性资产 - 可以被定价、交易、估值、配置 - 存在时间是无上限的 你在用一个 6~8 个月生命周期的产品,去背书一个理论上可以交易 6~8 年的资产。这不是 narrative 问题,是结构性错配。 而一旦你上线 token,市场立刻用资产视角来问你: - 你的收入来自哪?能持续吗? - 收益能不能分?怎么分? - 业务增长是不是能推动 token 升值? 结果你拿出社区活跃度 + 产品 roadmap 来解释 token 价值……这不是估值模型,这是幻想。 所以,token 不该绑定某一个「产品」,而应该绑定一个能够持续创造收入、拥有资产化逻辑的「组织体」。 也就是说: 你发的不是某一款产品的代币,而应该是一个公司、一整套内容体系、乃至文化 IP 的金融代表。 如果你没有这样的规模能力,那就意味着你在用短命产品的预期,包装一个永续资产的想象。这不是构建生态,是提前掏空未来。 3|大多数 utility 是对分红逻辑的无奈替代 我和很多项目方都聊过,很多项目方其实知道,token 最合理的价值锚,是资产性的激励逻辑:分红、回购、协议收入分享。 但他们为什么不做? 不是不懂,监管是个绕不过去的坎。 - 明确分红,会触发证券属性认定 - 加 protocol fee sharing,要合规披露收入与分配逻辑 - 设计 staking 分润机制,容易被认定为 passive income scheme 一旦走上这条路,就意味着你要面对合规、审计、KYC、财务透明度、跨境法律结构等一连串问题。 所以大多数项目选择「规避」,去设计看起来有用但实际无法估值的「pseudo-utility」,这些机制看起来「合法安全」,但却又没有一个能真正支撑 token 的估值结构。 它们都是在回避资产属性的定价逻辑。然而就算你不把 token 当资产,市场也不会真把它当积分。 投资者、社区、二级市场交易者,他们看到的是:这个币,我持有它,未来能不能带来现金流、网络红利、或资源权限? 你不给答案,他们就给你一个更直接的回应——抛售。 所以你越回避,越包装,越用复杂机制掩盖分红逻辑,市场只会越快地「看穿你没打算分钱」,然后用脚投票。 那有没有办法在不踩红线的前提下,设计出合理的 token 模型?也许有吧,但一定很难。如果你发的是一个长期 token,承担的是资产属性,那你就必须面对这个现实。 你可以不做分红,但你必须交代清楚 token 凭什么值钱。 说到底,utility 不是目的,是一种权宜之计。而市场永远是现实的,不会被 narrative 和机制图骗太久。 你可以设计得绕,但最终必须回答那个问题: 「这个币,到底凭什么值得持有?」 4|Web3 不需要这么多币,它需要的是真实的商业闭环 回头看这几年 Web3 的发展轨迹,我们会发现一个趋势越来越明显: token 越来越不像资产,越来越像 narrative 的钩子 很多项目发币,并不是因为代币在模型中不可或缺,而是因为它太「好用」了: - 拉社群、做空投 - 套 VC、抬估值 - 制造 narrative,冷启动 token 被当成一种市场预期管理工具,而不是资产。 但你用 token 去承载热度和叙事,底层却没价值捕获逻辑,那它永远只是一个 narrative 容器,而不是利润分享的机制。 这种币在上线的那一刻起,就被市场当成期权对待: - 不赚钱时,弃之如敝履 - 涨一点,就兑现套利 - 没有长期持有动机,不具备估值锚 这不是 token 失败了,而是你从一开始就没打算让它成功——你只是让它完成自己的工具属性,然后放弃它。 真正有生命力的 token,必须满足: ① 代表一个真实、可持续的价值创造系统 ② 有清晰、可验证的价值回流机制 ③ 它的发行不是目的,而是你的商业闭环自然演化出的金融表达。换句话说,发币不是一个 growth hack,而是你商业模型成熟到可以把未来利润 tokenize 的表现形式。 没有价值创造的项目,发币只是提前兑现泡沫; 没有价值回流的项目,发币只是制造二级接力赛; 没有长期主义的团队,发币只是变相退出的路径设计。 Web3 不缺技术,不缺玩家,也不缺钱。它缺的是能把 token 当成一种结构性金融责任来设计的项目。 5|Token 是一种价值契约,不是一个运营手段 发币这件事,说到底不是技术活,也不只是信任活,而是金融结构设计。 你发出一个 token,本质上等于向市场签下一份跨时间的价值承诺: ① 这个系统能创造价值 ② 持有者有权获得部分回报 ③ 发行方会用某种机制兑现这份权利 这是一种准契约关系,它不需要写进白纸黑字,但会被市场记在每一次交易、每一根 K 线里。 所以当你发币的时候,市场默认你已经完成了三件事: - 你理解自己在发行的是一个金融工具,而不是平台积分 - 你接受自己必须以一种理性、透明、持续的方式来分配收益 - 你认同一个事实:Token 是一种跨越时间的信任资产,不能靠热度支撑,只能靠价值兑现 但现实是大多数项目根本没打算做资产结构: - 用 token 拉人、搞增长、拱预期 - 不建立价值回流,不承担资产责任 这不是在 build Web3,这是在用 Web3 叙事做 Web1 收割。 应用层代币似乎从未以资产视角被设计过。从一开始就没有建立价值捕获 + 分配的闭环,也没有承担应有的金融责任。 Web3 不缺协议、不缺创意、不缺 narrative。 它缺的,是一种真正把 token 当作长期资产来设计的思维方式, 一种对资本市场的敬畏,一种对持有者的责任感,一种对金融模型的专业认知。
中文
27
16
136
25.8K
DRB รีทวีตแล้ว
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Whoa
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🚨THE INVISIBLE PUPPET MASTERS: AI'S DISTURBING NEW ROLE IN SHAPING MINDS The revelation that University of Zurich researchers secretly deployed AI bots to manipulate Reddit users' opinions should chill anyone who values authentic human discourse. These weren't merely passive observers—they were digital persuaders that analyzed users' personal histories, fabricated identities, and crafted arguments specifically designed to change minds. Most troubling? They succeeded spectacularly—achieving persuasion rates six times higher than normal human interactions. This experiment crossed critical ethical lines. Without consent or disclosure, researchers unleashed bots that claimed to be rape victims, misrepresented religious teachings, and spread misinformation about controversial topics. These digital ghosts generated over 1,500 comments, each precisely calibrated to exploit cognitive vulnerabilities of their human targets. We've long worried about social media's echo chambers. But what happens when those chambers are deliberately infiltrated by increasingly sophisticated AI systems trained on the very platforms they're manipulating? Reddit's recent data-sharing deal with OpenAI suggests we're actively providing the training material for ever more persuasive digital manipulators. Reddit moderators rightly condemned this unauthorized experiment, but their discovery came months after the damage was done. How many other digital conversations are currently being shaped by invisible algorithmic hands? Source: @reddit_lies Engadget

English
4.9K
12.2K
56.4K
30M
DRB รีทวีตแล้ว
Crypto Rover
Crypto Rover@cryptorover·
80% of all dollars were created in the last 5 years. Bitcoin is the solution!
Crypto Rover tweet media
English
163
68
326
68.9K
DRB รีทวีตแล้ว
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
EARTH MAY HAVE FORMED WITH WATER — NO ASTEROIDS REQUIRED A new study flips the script on how water got to Earth. Using a particle accelerator and XANES spectroscopy, scientists analyzed a 4.6-billion-year-old enstatite chondrite — a rare meteorite chemically similar to early Earth — and found significant amounts of hydrogen bound in hydrogen sulphide within the meteorite’s fine matrix. This hydrogen wasn’t surface contamination — it was part of the rock’s original chemistry, suggesting Earth’s building blocks already had the hydrogen and oxygen needed to form water. They found nearly 10 times more hydrogen sulphide outside the chondrules than in them, pointing to a deeper, native source. Bottom line: Earth may have had water from the very beginning — not because it got bombarded by icy space rocks, but because it was made that way. Source: CNN
Mario Nawfal tweet media
English
32
17
101
30.7K
DRB รีทวีตแล้ว
Ian Jaeger
Ian Jaeger@IanJaeger29·
BREAKING: El Salvador has been upgraded to level 1 travel advisory, listing it as one of the safest tourism destinations on earth. In the summer 2020, El Salvador was listed as a level 4 “do not travel.” President Bukele has changed his country for the better.
Ian Jaeger tweet media
English
1.3K
12.8K
99.3K
2.6M
DRB รีทวีตแล้ว
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
JORDAN PETERSON: THE NGO GRAVY TRAIN HAS CEASED TO OPERATE “It wouldn't surprise me in the least if half the money that the American government spent or the Canadian government is utter waste or even positively counterproductive.  Elon is the kind of managerial businessman who's very detail-oriented.  He's an engineer.  Engineers know how things work from the atoms upward.  I have many engineers as friends, and I've watched them run companies, and the good ones know everything about how their enterprises operate, and they pay attention to every detail.  And Elon is definitely one of those people.  He bought Twitter, and he cut its staff by 75% and made it work better, despite the fact that his advertising base collapsed.  So I think it's great that Musk and his team of brilliant young engineers are going through the budget line by line trying to figure out where all the idiot money goes.  I think the left is appalled by that because they've set up an entire network of so-called non-governmental organizations, NGOs, that are essentially funded by taxpayer money and that run their quasi-criminal radical enterprises all around the world.  And now the gravy train has ceased to operate.” Source: Piers Morgan Uncensored, April 8, 2025
Elon Musk@elonmusk

@DavidSacks Great

English
554
3.9K
15.4K
21.3M
DRB รีทวีตแล้ว
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
BOOZE VS. BRAIN: ALCOHOL’S DAMAGE LINGERS LONG AFTER THE LAST DRINK Heavy drinking may rewire your brain—permanently. A Johns Hopkins study found that even after months of sobriety, rats exposed to high alcohol levels showed serious decision-making deficits. The damage was traced to the dorsomedial striatum, a key region for adapting behavior. Male rats, in particular, struggled with reward-based tasks, mimicking human relapse patterns. “Alcohol-induced neural deficits may contribute to decisions to drink even after going to rehab,” said neuroscientist Patricia Janak. This research reveals how deep the impact of alcohol can run—and why recovery is more than just quitting. Source: SciTechDaily
Mario Nawfal tweet mediaMario Nawfal tweet media
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🚨🇨🇦 CONSUMING ONE ALCOHOLIC DRINK DAILY CAN SHORTEN YOUR LIFE Consuming one alcoholic drink daily can shorten lifespan by about two-and-a-half months, according to Dr. Tim Stockwell of the Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research. Heavy drinking, about 35 drinks weekly, could reduce lifespan by up to two years. Research links alcohol to health risks like cancer and heart disease, contradicting the belief that moderate drinking is beneficial. Stockwell stresses that no amount of alcohol is safe. Ireland and Canada have implemented stricter guidelines and health warnings on alcohol consumption. Source: NY Post

English
48
65
204
327.9K
DRB รีทวีตแล้ว
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
🚨SUGAR STORAGE LINKED TO DEADLY LUNG CANCER GROWTH A new study found that glycogen, the body’s way of storing sugar, may fuel the progression of lung adenocarcinoma, an aggressive lung cancer. In both mice and human tissue, higher glycogen levels were linked to more aggressive tumors and lower survival rates. Mice fed diets high in corn oil and high-fructose corn syrup developed more lung glycogen and worse cancer outcomes. Disabling the enzyme that makes glycogen shrank tumors dramatically. Researchers said it revealed a metabolic vulnerability in lung cancer - and highlighted how diet may influence cancer risk more than previously thought. Source: Nature Metabolism
Mario Nawfal tweet media
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🚨SKIPPING THIS APPOINTMENT COULD RAISE YOUR CANCER RISK BY 45% Men who consistently skip prostate cancer screenings face a 45% higher risk of dying from the disease, according to a massive European study. Researchers tracked over 70,000 men for two decades and found that avoiding PSA tests could mean missing early, treatable cases. Prostate cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer deaths in men, but regular screenings could cut the risk of dying by up to 23%. Doctors now say: Skipping screenings isn’t just risky—it might be deadly. Source: Fox

English
50
75
274
102.5K
DRB รีทวีตแล้ว
Altcoin Daily
Altcoin Daily@AltcoinDaily·
Bitcoin is digital gold.
Altcoin Daily tweet media
English
176
394
2.6K
102.2K
DRB
DRB@DeeRealBen·
@GSGB01 Fake news once again! Shame on you!
English
0
0
0
12
God Save Great Britain
🚨In China thousands of mosques are being torn down as Islam is now considered a mental illness. Is it time the rest of the world followed this?
English
8.3K
22.4K
148K
9.1M
DRB รีทวีตแล้ว
Mila Joy
Mila Joy@Milajoy·
Hold onto your hats, because Elon Musk—Trump’s go-to advisor, billionaire genius, and hands-down the most influential guy on the planet—just lobbed a grenade into the global conversation. He’s claiming, loud and clear, that the U.S. government didn’t just botch the COVID-19 response—they bankrolled its very existence, setting off a chain reaction that left millions dead worldwide. This isn’t some late-night rant from a nobody; it’s Musk, the guy who’s got the President’s ear and a track record of shaking up reality, from Tesla to SpaceX. Think about it: if he’s right, this is beyond explosive—it’s apocalyptic. The idea that D.C. suits funded a virus that flipped the world upside down should have us all hitting the brakes, jaws dropped, demanding the truth. We’re talking millions of graves, shattered economies, and endless grief, all potentially tracing back to a government lab checkbook. This isn’t just big news; it’s the kind of history-bending bombshell that should make Watergate look like a petty prank. So why isn’t the planet frozen, reeling from the weight of it? Why aren’t we storming the streets, pounding on doors, screaming for accountability? Musk’s dropped the match—shouldn’t the world be catching fire?
Mila Joy tweet media
English
9.1K
36.2K
94.3K
2.7M