
DeXe Protocol
2.9K posts

DeXe Protocol
@DexeNetwork
Transforming the Future with #AI | Permissionless Launchpad for DAOs & Memecoins | Decentralized Communities & Assets Management | Powered by $DEXE


1️⃣ DeXe (@DexeNetwork): +47.33% 2️⃣ Audiera (@Audiera_web3): +45.38% 3️⃣ BUILDon (@BUILDonBsc_AI): +38.49% 4️⃣ River (@RiverdotInc): +32.73% 5️⃣ MemeCore (@MemeCore_M): +24.87% 6️⃣ Fartcoin (@FartCoinOfSOL): +24.25% 7️⃣ Kaspa (@kaspaunchained): +23.33% 8️⃣ Bittensor (@opentensor): +20.81% 9️⃣ Zebec Network (@Zebec_HQ): +19.62% 🔟 Quant (@quant_network): +18.70%

"AI becomes the government" is dystopian: it leads to slop when AI is weak, and is doom-maximizing once AI becomes strong. But AI used well can be empowering, and push the frontier of democratic / decentralized modes of governance. The core problem with democratic / decentralized modes of governance (including DAOs on ethereum) is limits to human attention: there are many thousands of decisions to make, involving many domains of expertise, and most people don't have the time or skill to be experts in even one, let alone all of them. The usual solution, delegation, is disempowering: it leads to a small group of delegates controlling decision-making while their supporters, after they hit the "delegate" button, have no influence at all. So what can we do? We use personal LLMs to solve the attention problem! Here are a few ideas: ## Personal governance agents If a governance mechanism depends on you to make a large number of decisions, a personal agent can perform all the necessary votes for you, based on preferences that it infers from your personal writing, conversation history, direct statements, etc. If the agent is (i) unsure how you would vote on an issue, and (ii) convinced the issue is important, then it should ask you directly, and give you all relevant context. ## Public conversation agents Making good decisions often cannot come from a linear process of taking people's views that are based only on their own information, and averaging them (even quadratically). There is a need for processes that aggregate many people's information, and then give each person (or their LLM) a chance to respond *based on that*. This includes: * Inferring and summarizing your own views and converting them into a format that can be shared publicly (and does not expose your private info) * Summarizing commonalities between people's inputs (expressed as words), similar to the various LLM+pol.is ideas ## Suggestion markets If a governance mechanism values "high-quality inputs" of any type (this could be proposals, or it could even be arguments), then you can have a prediction market, where anyone can submit an input, AIs can bet on a token representing that input, and if the mechanism "accepts" the input (either accepting the proposal, or accepting it as a "unit" of conversation that it then passes along to its participant), it pays out $X to the holders of the token. Note that this is basically the same as firefly.social/post/x/2017956… ## Decentralized governance with private information One of the biggest weaknesses of highly decentralized / democratic governance is that it does not work well when important decisions need to be made with secret information. Common situations: (i) the org engaging in adversarial conflicts or negotiations (ii) internal dispute resolution (iii) compensation / funding decisions. Typically, orgs solve this by appointing individuals who have great power to take on those tasks. But with multi-party computation (currently I've seen this done with TEEs; I would love to see at least the two-party case solved with garbled circuits vitalik.eth.limo/general/2020/0… so we can get pure-cryptographic security guarantees for it), we could actually take many people's inputs into account to deal with these situations, without compromising privacy. Basically: you submit your personal LLM into a black box, the LLM sees private info, it makes a judgement based on that, and it outputs only that judgement. You don't see the private info, and no one else sees the contents of your personal LLM. ## The importance of privacy All of these approaches involve each participant making use of much more information about themselves, and potentially submitting much larger-sized inputs. Hence, it becomes all the more important to protect privacy. There are two kinds of privacy that matter: * Anonymity of the participant: this can be accomplished with ZK. In general, I think all governance tools should come with ZK built in * Privacy of the contents: this has two parts. First, the personal LLM should do what it can to avoid divulging private info about you that it does not need to divulge. Second, when you have computation that combines multiple LLMs or multiple people's info, you need multi-party techniques to compute it privately. Both are important.







⚡️ Trending AI Agents on BNB Chain in the Last 7 Days 🔸@singularryai 🔸@Everlyn_ai 🔸@pieverse_io 🔸@akedofun 🔸@FARLabsAI 🔸@ARAI_Systems 🔸@0xCapx 🔸@UnifaiNetwork 🔸@RealBalanceFun 🔸@Velvet_Capital

Complete DeXe Protocol tasks on Questboard! 🚀 Special quests from @DexeNetwork are still live on daGama! Complete partner tasks and earn up to 450 XP: 1️⃣ Follow DeXe Protocol on X To earn XP, visit their X page and follow: x.com/DexeNetwork Reward: 150 XP 2️⃣ Describe AI Agents Governance via DAO • Publish a post on X describing the problem of managing AI agents with access to funds. • Explain how a DAO can solve this through transparent rules, voting, and accountability. • Mention DeXe Protocol as a DAO infrastructure for collaboration between AI agents and people, and tag @DexeNetwork. • To receive XP, paste the link to your post in the answer field. Reward: 300 XP ⚠️ Please interact only with the official DeXe Protocol links mentioned in this post. The campaign is in full swing – don’t miss your chance to climb the leaderboard!
















