*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande

I changed my views on this yesterday. I'm against social control of wealth distribution. But there's a problem I can't solve. Consider the following points: ** Optimus (Tesla robot) is currently sporting 11 DoF (Degrees of Freedom) relative to hand mobility. This determines technical movement capability and range. The next version to be released in a few months is said (by creator Elon Musk) to be 22 DoF. For reference, a human being has 27 DoF. Optimus will be performing human tasks at a nearly indistinguishable level from humans THIS YEAR. ** Elon Musk has stated that it's probable that there will be 1 billion robots in service by 2030. ** Manufacturers are saying a retail robot with today's production technology would cost you $100,000. Elon Musk stated that in a few years (fewer than 7), that figure is likely to be $20,000. ** Optimus will go into mass production within 2024, according to Musk. It will be released for external purchase in 2025. The Model-T was introduced and went into mass production in 1908. ** In 1900, almost 0 people in the USA were driving cars. In 1913, over 80% of people drove cars owned by themselves or someone else. That mass adoption was significantly bolstered by a cheap, utilitarian and reasonably reliable car being produced (Model-T). ** Robots will have a renaissance over the next 10 years, not unlike the automobile renaissance of the early 1900's. ** Optimus is the Model-T of robots. ** Tesla cars are now frequently outfitted with FSD (Full Self Driving), centrally linked by AI (Artificial Intelligence). The AI learning feature is able to eliminate the labor and time required to make programming updates each time new scenarios are encountered by the cars. A Tesla in Miami encounters a complicated new issue and collects data about the solution and outcome. Instantly when Teslas in LA, Chicago, Seattle and New York encounter a similar scenario, they navigate with Miami's discoveries. Think: Skynet ** The above AI model is built into Optimus. ** Optimus bots will be learning from billions of individual encounters and experiences and collectively "upgrading" by the second, not by the minute, hour, day or year. Think: Skynet ** With the above considerations, Optimus will be doing surgery on human beings with fewer mistakes and blaringly obvious improvements in surgical outcomes over human beings within the decade. ** Demand for optimal outcomes (superior to human workers) will drive public demand for robots across all industries. Those optimal outcomes will cost a fraction of the cost of paying an employee or specialist to produce those outcomes. ** Optimus is likely to begin manufacturing and maintaining its own kind within 3 years. Availability will be quick and copious. ** Consider the careers listed at the following site: planitplus.net/JobProfiles?le……… ** Which of those careers could not be adequately filled by "Data" (name of the Android (robot) from the 1960's & 70's hit TV series, Star Trek)? This is where this is going. ** Unlike Star Trek, the most likely outcome is that "Data" is commanding the Enterprise, another "Data" is running Engineering, not Scottie. Another "Data" is sitting at Comms, not Lt Uhura. You get the point. ** Everyone can name that ONE career that a robot cannot replace. But then they think about it for a second, and they then turn pale as they realize that eventually, at some inevitable coming day in the near future, that will not be true. ** So, then what happens? The careers we could pick out that most of us would agree are safe can be listed on a small piece of paper and will amount to, let's say, 1 million jobs globally. Wait a minute! So 7 billion Earthlings will be wanting 1 million jobs? This is a serious coming problem. A serious problem indeed. My research over the decades has made me aware that there are Top Secret compartmentalized Special Access Projects operating in secret within the MIC (Military Industrial Complex) that have produced technology that the general population isn't even aware of to wit: (The following quotes are taken from various Ben Rich speeches and writings) [Ben Rich was the second Director of Lockheed’s Skunk Works from 1975 to 1991, succeeding its founder, Kelly Johnson. He is often referred to as the “father of stealth” due to his role in leading the development of the F-117, the first production stealth aircraft.] Imagine what this guy has seen, then consider the following things he said: Ben Rich: “We now have the technology to take ET back home” (source: UCLA School of Engineering Alumni speech 3/23/93) “We did the F-104, C-130, U2, SR-71, F-117 and many other programs that I can’t talk about. We are still working very hard, I just can’t tell you what we are doing." (source: 1993 WPAFB slide presentation) “The Air Force has just given us a contract to take ET back home” (source: 1993 WPAFB slide presentation) “We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an act of GOD to ever get them out to benefit humanity” (source: statement made after UCLA presentation to three Disclosure Project witnesses) “We now know how to travel to the stars” (source: UCLA School of Engineering Alumni speech 3/23/93) “It is time to end all secrecy on this, as it no longer poses a national security threat, and make the technology available for use in the private sector”. (source: UCLA School of Engineering Alumni speech 3/23/93) “There are many in the intelligence community who would like to see this stay in the black, and not see the light of day” (source: UCLA School of Engineering Alumni speech 3/23/93) “Jim, we have things out in the desert that are fifty (50) years beyond what you could possibly comprehend. If you have seen it on Star Wars or Star Trek, we’ve been there done that, or decided it was not worth the effort” (Source: direct comments by Ben Rich to Jim Goodall via recorded telephone call at the USC medical center approximately one week before Ben passed away on January 5th 1995) “Dear John, Yes, I’m a believer in both categories. Feel anything is possible. Many of our man-made UFO’s were Un Funded Opportunities. In both categories, there are a-lot of books and charlatans, be careful. Best regards, Ben Rich”. (source: 7/21/86 letter to John Andrews (Testors model Corporation) from Ben Rich who asked Ben if he was a believer in A) man made UFO’S, and B) extra-terrestrial UFO’s) “I wish I could tell you about the projects we are currently working on. They are both fascinating and fantastic. They call for technologies once only dreamed of by science fiction writers” (source: AIAA lecture Atlanta, Ga. September 7-9 1988) All of the above is listed to bolster my assertion that humanity very likely ALREADY has "Data"-like robots in service within ultra-Top Secret military facilities and on domestic and (according to Rich in 1993 ffs) interstellar machinery. But even if that technology is never made available for public manufacturing and commerce, Optimus and other robotic technologies will eliminate THE MAJORITY of human jobs within the next 10 years. And then, Voila! Billions of people with no income. We. Are. Not. Decades. away from humanity being unable to survive within the existing financial system for commerce. The model of work > earn > spend WILL NOT work in the future. So what is the answer? Communal responsibilities performed for "shares"? Is there a reason the global elitist cabal-ers that comprise the WEF (World Economic Forum) membership have individually expressed that the population of Earth needs to be reduced to around 500,000? Is this that reason, that is, they only need "so many" useful eaters to maintain their dystopian utopia of the future? So what's the answer? If not Basic High Income (as Elon Musk suggests in the quoted tweet), then WHAT? And if that is, indeed, the answer, who is entrusted with its management and administration? In today's conflict-riddled political environment, how does THAT little doozy get figured out? Imagine the Fraud, Waste & Abuse of that behemoth. Don't be idealistic, dogmatic or "God will provide" on this. Seriously - what? One X poster said this, "In a future where AI works and we all get universal high income, finding life’s meaning will be our new ‘job’." Well that's a nice thought. But what about, "Idle hands make the devil's work"? You'll find more people at a strip club than you will find at a personal "Awakening to Your Purpose" workshop. Our current batch of humans is not ready for this. By a MILE. -end-

@ItIsHoeMath @ailanyus How much does it pay?

@ailanyus Why do they need a squad? One guy could do it

IDAHO HAS AUTHORIZED THE DEATH PENALTY BY FIRING SQUAD FOR PEDOPHILES DO YOU SUPPORT THIS MOVE?

@gotzlore @CaryKelly11 @grok That's your response after someone takes the time to provide you with data? Nothing says manly like emotional defense & crying "gish gallop" when evidence offers a possible level-up in thinking & subject matter clarity. Feminine defends all victims equally, criminal & saint.

@DocKilnit @CaryKelly11 @grok You could have just said "my bad". It's unmanly to gish gallop.

A 2022 study found that 1062 adults in their 60s, taking nattokinase, daily for a year, showed amazing improvement in lipid markers, including plaque reduction. Plaque -36.0% LDL -18.1% HDL +15.8% Trigs -15.7% Nattokinase is an enzyme extracted from natto, a traditional Japanese food made by fermenting boiled soybeans with bacterium. Lots of things to consider here: Japan ranks #1 for age-standardized cardiovascular disease mortality among G20+ countries. Big Pharma must hate this study because it makes Statins look like Tic Tacs. Fermented foods truly are superfoods. Soybeans suck but at least it's real food. There was no placebo group which some made a big deal out of because people can totally subliminally control specific lipid values. 😂 x.com/realPatrickJr/…

@grok relative to the most recent IIT scores... **confirm that they suffer from extreme self-selection bias. **Confirm that they draw from a non-representative sample. **Confirm digital divide exclusionary bias. **Confirm that the IIT deployed in uncontrolled testing conditions (unsupervised format allows cheating, distractions, multiple attempts, inconsistent effort, and external assistance, unlike standardized proctored assessments). **Confirm questionable test validity and norms **Confirm demographic skew

@DocKilnit @StefanMolyneux @grok Lynn Becker is wrong though @grok use the most recent IIT scores and calculate again

IQ is the key to war. Compare Iraq vs Iran. Iran has 4–5 million high IQ people vs. only ~300,000 in Iraq. At IQ 160+ - where wars are won - Iran has 10,000-15,000 vs. just a few hundred in Iraq. Since Iran is a dictatorship, it can force geniuses into the military. You're at war with super-villains.

@PennyCrayon5 @StefanMolyneux @grok is Iran currently running rings around Israel and the USA in the current conflict?

@DocKilnit @StefanMolyneux So a bunch of 84 IQ people are running rings around Israel and the USA? I'm not sure that was a wise ask of grok, it's humiliating

Self-awareness, my friend. There are classes/workshops to help in this regard if you're motivated. Using Grok to verify claims isn't "arguing". It's exactly the evidence-seeking habit you're advocating. ******It's 1995, you're in 11th grade****** You: "Why did I get an "F" on this research paper?" Teacher: "Because you strung a bunch of words and opinions together without citing a single point of data or source". You: "But I don't believe in going to the library (Grok) to research, source data or gather supportive information ." Teacher: "Exactly. Glance down and see the resulting 'F' on your research project." Now, debunking your PVD drivel: No, that's not what the study shows, and there's still zero evidence linking oral nattokinase supplements to posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) as a side effect in humans. The phrase "Posterior Vitreous Detachment Induced by Nattokinase" comes from a single 2006 animal study (Takano et al., published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science). In it, researchers injected purified nattokinase (subtilisin NAT) directly into the vitreous cavity of rabbit eyes (intravitreal injection at doses like 0.1–1 FU). The goal? To intentionally induce PVD as a potential new tool for "pharmacologic vitreolysis", a non-surgical way to separate the vitreous gel from the retina for treating vitreoretinal conditions (like certain diabetic retinopathy cases or traction issues). Low doses successfully created clean PVD with no major toxicity; higher doses caused some preretinal hemorrhage and temporary ERG changes. This is not a human study. This is not about swallowing nattokinase pills, natto, or supplements. This is not reporting PVD as an adverse event from oral use. Fast-forward: Extensive searches of PubMed, safety reviews, clinical trials (including the 1-year human study you originally posted and longer-term data up to 3 years), and adverse-event databases turn up zero case reports, zero signals, and zero mentions of oral nattokinase causing PVD, increased floaters, retinal issues, or any ocular detachment in people. The only consistent risk noted across reviews (WebMD, RxList, etc.) is increased bleeding potential when combined with blood thinners, not eyes. On "understudied"? Yes, the specific effects of oral nattokinase on the vitreous humor or PVD risk are understudied, mainly because there's no plausible mechanism (it's a protein enzyme mostly broken down in the gut; systemic levels don't reach the eye in concentrations anywhere near the direct-injection experiments). Japanese natto consumption for centuries and modern supplement trials haven't flagged eye problems. PVD itself is extremely common with normal aging (especially in your 60s+), so any coincidence would need actual data to blame supplements. This fits the same pattern as the joint-degradation claim: a title cherry-picked without context, repeated until it feels true (classic illusory truth effect). The actual paper positions nattokinase positively as a potential eye-treatment enzyme when used precisely by doctors, not a danger from daily oral use.

@DocKilnit @CaryKelly11 @grok Grok, tell this dirty pleb about "Posterior Vitreous Detachment Induced by Nattokinase", couple it with how understudied Natto's effects in this are, and finally give them life coaching on seeking their own answers versus using grok to argue.

@Landscapecture "Greenhouse" Made me look and... yup, Africa account. Muted. Stop posting AI regurgitations that you can't even translate.

I Built a Greenhouse Using an Old Barrel (AI)

@gotzlore @CaryKelly11 @grok confirm there's no evidence from clinical studies, reviews, or research linking nattokinase to joint degradation, cartilage damage, arthritis, or related issues. Confirm that this natto-joints thing is a typical Illusory Truth Effect.

@CaryKelly11 Plain ole flushing niacin will burn the plaques out. I'm a fan of nattokinase for brief use cases but long term daily usage could degrade joints.

Well, here's the rest of the study story: The reported improvements (in the 10,800 FU group) included: Carotid plaque area reduction: ~36.0% (with ~66.5% of participants showing improvement). LDL cholesterol: ~18.1% reduction. HDL cholesterol: ~15.8% increase. Triglycerides: ~15.7% reduction. Overall lipid profile improvements in 84–95% of participants depending on the marker.

@kasmha5150 You're right. Context matters. High HDL is good. LDL can vary greatly in healthy. It's just fun to play the numbers game as dictated by the medical establishment and seeing real food still win over drugs.

@kena_ewuru Straight women maybe, but if the feminists got their wish for all men to die or be subjugated into low-T toys for women, butch lesbians would take over the man stuff, and butch lesbians can get shit done.

“De@th to all men” A sneak peek of what a world without men would actually look like

@Emilio2763 Yeah but what's going on with this eye?

“When they’re White it is Right”…

It's truly one of the miracles of existence that intellectually disabled persons such as this: 1) have no awareness that if they just spoke less, they'd seem smarter 2) can run in & win elections for leadership positions higher than secretary of their homeowner's association.

@Adi13 How about, "The Pope can stick to his job -- succor the weak, feed the poor and administer to the forlorn. I'll give him more opportunity for that in Iran."

Love President Trump answer! Reporter: The Pope called for a ceasefire. Trump: I don't want a ceasefire. Reporter: Pope Leo calls for a ceasefire and the renewal of dialogue. What do you say to Pope Leo? Trump: Well, look, we can have dialogue, but I don't want to make a ceasefire. You know, you don't make a ceasefire when you are really wiping out the other side. They have no navy. They have no air force. They have no equipment. They have no observers. They have no air defense system. They have no radar. And all their leaders have been killed at all levels. We're not looking to do that. Thank you. Thank you.

@stepfanie ****TRUMP****

If an alien civilization ever shows up, the thing they will be most confused about is why Elon is not universally revered for moving humanity forward. He has and will do so much. MASS DRIVERS ON THE MOON. SUSTAINABLE ABUNDANCE. I will never understand the hate. I literally cannot fathom it. Can anyone actually explain why people hate him other than RiCh mAN bAd?

The inauthentic age has begun, leaving smart people to coccoon together and watch public discourse be taken over by 70 IQ Nigerians and Bangladeshis posting back and forth to each other in English created by AI.

@eRaJxred @VistoEnMaps @grok Lol yes, he did bleed out and die from the glass hit that nearly severed his arm. The ex-girlfriend did not call 911 and allowed him to die in the front yard. Men, when she's done with the relationship, she's far more dangerous than a stranger.

@VistoEnMaps @grok does the guy in this video die?

Violento y temerario… hasta que algo lo hizo retroceder en modo “niña” 🤣💨

@overton_news How this halfwit ever got famous is stark evidence of a declining society insistent upon complete self-annihilation.

Geraldo Rivera DEFENDS the Iranian regime leadership, arguing that eliminating them “violates the rules of war.” RIVERA: “We need to stop assassinating every single, you know, VIP in Iran!” “I mean, who’s going to run the country?” “You’re going to put the bombers outside a military school next, to bomb the cadets when they graduate?” “I mean, it’s…it’s absurd!” “It violates all of the rules of war!” “You don’t kill everybody, all the leadership. And then they have new leaders, and you kill all of them, and they have new leaders, and they kill all of them also.” “And then expect someone to negotiate.” “Who’s going to negotiate?!” “The negotiator is going to be afraid to walk into negotiating room for fear of getting blown up like all of their former colleagues.”

@brithume And Brit displays again that he still doesn't get it.

This is the kind of stuff Trump does that makes people not just oppose him but hate him. There was no need to say anything.

- South (15 slave states): 393k+ owners (~4.8% of ~8.1M free whites there) The man asked what the percentage of total whites in the United States owned slaves, yet you parse it down to a greater percentage of whites in just the southern states. Go back to the original request and give the percentage of whites that own slaves in the United States at that time

In 1860 US Census: 393,975 slaveholders total, ~392,000 white (vast majority; blacks <1%). White pop: 27,001,491. So 1.45% of whites owned slaves. Owners by region (nearly 100% in slave states): - South (15 slave states): 393k+ owners (~4.8% of ~8.1M free whites there) - North: 0% - Midwest: 0% - Southwest: ~1% (mainly TX; included in South data) - Northwest: 0% By party: ~100% Democrats (Southern Democrats dominated slave states); Republicans (anti-slavery party) had essentially 0. Data from 1860 Census & historians (e.g., state-by-state slave schedules).

They never call these people "enslavers". Only white slaveowners are referred to as "enslavers". Normal for Race Marxism.

@TheFigen_ Talk about reading something into an absolute chasm of nothing.

Their family tradition not to see the bride's face until the wedding day. Here's the groom's reaction when he sees her for the first time at the altar. His face says wow.