Propah Gandah

@DixieNormu95224 I think the proceeds from Plevin's book should cover the costs...

who pays the detail? Because those aren’t free. And the detail sheet lists Big Picture Media. Just trying to follow the paperwork.

I’m trying to keep up here. We were told Jen put the fundraiser together. Now we’re told Megan volunteered her professional skills. But the police detail paperwork lists Big Picture Media. So was this a personal favor… or a company event… or whatever version we’re on this week

@sjs856 Lol yeah those Amish kids are so unhealthy huh

There’s no credible evidence anywhere on Earth showing vaccinated kids to be less healthy than vaccinated kids. It literally does not exist.

Because you fucking asshole that’s how it works.

@merissahansen17 Where's the blood??

@rgfray1 @MikeMutnansky

Dave Portnoy has gone too far MutStack has been canceled indefinitely… @MikeMutnansky

@KyleSharkey8 @suspiciousauce @BoozeyBeauty @DixieNormu95224 Lol in a world of ratchets, don't be a Krusty

CW vs Kate Peter “Fact Check” —NOT DISMISSED— Placed on file without change of Plea until 9-18-26 with order to stay away from named Victim. @suspiciousauce @BoozeyBeauty @DixieNormu95224

@Not_my_Circus24 @DixieNormu95224

@DixieNormu95224 Your obsession over an event that has nothing to do with you is concerning. Here are the facts. There was a fundraiser, there were approx. 400 people there, there was a lot of money raised and most importantly you weren’t invited. That’s the big picture.

Funny how when you start asking the right questions, people start talking… Hearing some interesting things about the real $$ from the other night & who was actually responsible for putting it together. The big picture is coming into focus.

@DrNeilStone Sanitation and nutrition

Why do some people have such a hard time accepting the immense good and millions of lives saved by vaccines over the decades? Why? What hurts them about that fact?

@JackMac Lol publicity stunt

Yeah, The Bachelorette isn’t airing this year.

@merissahansen17 It's so obvious it was a psy-op at this point

PPI Cancer Treatment Expenditures (Constant-$) Update 🔸27.9% elevated above baseline 🔸17 x the old growth rate $52.4 billion in new TV ads, Cape Cod / Nantucket / Martha’s Vineyard homes, and Mercedes / BMW's for pharma industry executives. Everytime you watch one of those formulaic, tedious, and poorly-crafted pharma ads --> know that it was paid for through the suffering and death of your loved ones.

32-year old man dead after 1st Pfizer shot "A catastrophic case of ischemic stroke and acute myocarditis in a young patient following (Pfizer) mRNA COVID-19 vaccination:" "Brain stem death was verified 72h later"

BREAKING: The CDC is moving to officially recognize COVID-19 vaccine injury with a new ICD10 code. T50.B25x: Adverse effect of COVID-19 vaccines. No code existed. No tracking. No accountability. That changes now. This is a major win for the injured. Recognition begins. Truth follows. Public comment period opens soon. Make your voice heard.

@Bugimus Exactly! Well said 👍

Science vs. Story: Why Capturing Bigfoot May Not Close the PGF Case Hairy Man Road’s “I Saw the Footage…It’s A Hoax” was the first review I watched after the documentary “Capturing Bigfoot” premiered at SXSW. I had read summaries from other reviews that clearly stated the suit in the new footage did NOT match the PGF suit, but came close. So I was surprised by the Hairy Man Road review claiming it was a 100% match. After watching the full review, it became clear that Eric bought the documentary’s narrative hook, line, and sinker. But if the suit/gait/staging was a 100% match, then why didn’t any other reviews—or the director himself—mention it? I have yet to see the footage and will certainly reserve full judgment until I do, but in the meantime I must point out that Bill Munns has done more detailed analysis on “Patty” than anyone else. He adamantly maintains that the new footage is clearly a fake and that the PGF footage shows 100% a real biological creature. I acknowledge that Capturing Bigfoot brings strong corroborative evidence to support the PGF hoax theory, but in a lot of ways, we’re left with the same old debate. We’re faced with two competing theories bolstered by two separate paths of evidence—hoax supporters lean on people/lives/context-based arguments, and Patty supporters lean on science/forensic arguments. One of these categories is “good” evidence and the other is “not as good.” I’ll leave it to you to decide which is which. People/lives/context: Testimonies, motives, confessions, family drama, financials, and the 1966 clip (as proof of practice) are circumstantial and subjective. They rely on human reliability—witnesses can lie, misremember, have agendas, or be influenced by money/family pressure. The 1966 footage shows premeditation but (per most reviews) a cheaper/skinnier figure—not resolving how it evolves into Patty’s alleged realism. Science/forensics: Munns’ costume and camera expertise and Meldrum’s anatomical analysis are frame-by-frame, measurable, replicable in principle—focusing on what the 1967 footage objectively shows (muscle flow, gait biomechanics, proportions, lack of suit artifacts, mid-foot flexibility, etc.). These stand independently from who Patterson was, what his life story was, or what people later said. No replication using only 1967 tech has matched it, and the doc doesn’t attempt one or counter Munns point-by-point. Clearly, Eric prioritizes the people/lives/context category—once you have strong proof of hoax planning + direct admissions, the “how did they make it look that good?” becomes a secondary puzzle, not a deal-breaker. But the documentary doesn’t bridge the gap technically—it leans on narrative/emotion (Clint’s estrangement, Patricia’s “nest egg,” Al DeAtley’s villainous portrayal, Gimlin’s blocked confession attempt) to make the hoax feel inevitable. That’s why it converts viewers like Eric but leaves forensic-focused people unconvinced. The PGF’s scientific case hasn’t been falsified by this doc; it’s been contextualized around it. If more people (like Eric) accept the story over the science, it shows how powerful human drama can be—even when the core visual data remains unchallenged. At this point my stance remains unchanged: the PGF stands on its own merits until someone replicates Patty with period tech. Buckle up because we’re witnessing a new chapter in Bigfoot history, and it’s only going to get more contentious from here. #Bigfoot #CapturingBigfoot #PattersonGimlin

@harryfisherEMTP If anyone who sees this tweet happens to fit into the first category, PLEASE educate yourself

@HWOnYourCase @KYMaverick1 #teamSam

Is that what happened? Did you just mention someone’s name or did you parrot Lindsey Gaetani and Grant’s baseless claim that Meredith sent a video of her having sex to her child as if it were true and without evidence? A claim by the way that she never contacted the police and reported because it was false. A claim made directly after Lindsey herself called Meredith’s daughter a whore while mentioning her full name on Grant’s spaces event. Much like your leader, you relish in playing the victim with absolutely no willingness to accept accountability for your own actions. Grow up. If you’re going to step onto the field, don’t cry about people assuming you intend to play the game.

For anyone who is naive enough to believe you don’t get attacked by trash on X just for mentioning someone’s name… I just posted the proof.

@PardonMyTake Shoe don't lie

Caruso Shoe Block

@LlamaOfGod6w50 @stkirsch VAERS and Yellow Card very much disagree with you.

It takes a special brand of deception to make a claim like that. Contrary to the claim that zero studies show a mortality benefit for COVID-19 vaccination in the elderly, there is a large body of peer-reviewed research, including systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and large-scale observational studies, that demonstrate significant reductions in mortality. The following studies utilize standard epidemiological methods such as propensity score matching, age-standardization, and meta-analysis to evaluate these benefits: 1. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (The Gold Standard) * Frontiers in Immunology (2023): This systematic review and meta-analysis specifically analyzed RCTs evaluating vaccine effectiveness in adults aged 60 and older. It found that vaccination significantly reduced the number of COVID-19-related deaths, with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 0.16, indicating a substantial protective effect. * Source: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in older adults 2. Large-Scale Population Studies * The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific (2023): A population-based study in Australia assessed the effectiveness of vaccination against both COVID-19-specific and all-cause mortality in older adults. The research showed that vaccine effectiveness against mortality remained high (over 50%) even six months after a booster dose and confirmed a reduction in all-cause mortality. * Source: Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination against COVID-19 specific and all-cause mortality in older Australians * UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2022): Using Census 2021 variables to adjust for various factors, this report estimated that vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 mortality for a third dose was 93.2% in the adult population in England during the study period. * Source: COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness estimated using Census 2021 variables, England 3. Real-World Evidence and Clinical Cohorts * Veterans Health Administration Study (2025): An observational study conducted in the U.S. Veterans Health Administration found that the updated 2024–2025 KP.2 vaccines offered high protection against death (approximately 75% early on, maintaining 63% after 120 days) among a population with a median age of 63, where over half were 65 or older. * Source: Effectiveness of the 2024–2025 KP.2 COVID-19 vaccines in the United States * Journal of the American Heart Association (JAHA) (2025): A large propensity-matched cohort study focused on older adults with coronary artery disease or heart failure. It demonstrated a "clear dose-dependent reduction in all-cause mortality" following vaccination, with those receiving three or more doses seeing the most significant survival benefit. * Source: COVID‐19 Vaccination and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Adults 4. Public Health and Modeling Data * JAMA Network Open (2025): A modeling study estimated that universal COVID-19 vaccination in the U.S. for the 2024-25 season would prevent 10% to 20% of deaths compared to no vaccination, specifically highlighting direct and indirect benefits for those aged 65 and older. * Source: Universal COVID-19 Vaccination Could Have Averted 20% of US Deaths These studies represent a cross-section of global data from major health institutions (the CDC, UKHSA, and TGA) and independent researchers, all showing that COVID-19 vaccines consistently provide a mortality benefit to the elderly across different variants and time periods.

Grok searched the literature and found zero studies meeting basic epidemiological standards showing COVID shot mortality benefit in elderly open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsc…

@RenataPatientz @adamdeitch

Really appreciated the chance to spend time with voters in Braintree, Franklin, and Bellingham this weekend. It was great connecting with so many people and seeing such strong engagement across the county!

"adolescent developed a severe local inflammatory reaction, acute kidney injury, extensive myofascitis, & profound immune thrombocytopenia resulting in vitreous hemorrhage & long-term permanent visual impairment after 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine administration"