Edward
2.3K posts

@Sargon_of_Akkad No. She has a valid point. The root cause of the immigration catastrophe was white indolence. We didn’t want to dig ditches, clean toilets, run corner shops or drive buses. It’s always been the white curse, caused by welfarism, Trotskyist agitation, unions and postwar entitlement



That’s a good use of free will

🚨 BIG The Grand Mufti of the Supreme Court of Afghanistan, Sheikh Mawlawi Abdul Rauf, has issued a fatwa of jihad against the Pakistani military regime. He stated that it is obligatory upon all Muslims to go to or join the battlefield against the Pakistani military regime.

News: the Hereditary Peers Bill has tonight finally passed the Lords, ending centuries of tradition. Expect a handful of life peerages for a smattering of hereds.

Why do so many ethno-obsessives on this site operate under fake names? I mean, if they really believed their arguments were mainstream and respectable, why wouldn't they post under their own names? Could it be that they know deep down that their views are seen as extreme by the real mainstream?


Ē plūribus ūnum — “Out of many, one.”

Interesting confirmation here that the self-consciously "zany" and "wacky" candidates are very often just more tedious outriders for the po-faced moralism of the status quo.

Silver shines just as bright ❤️

It's not that people don't want to garden, it's because society stopped building mass council housing like this with gardens and sold off all those houses like this under the right to buy. In 1979, 42% of Britons lived in council homes. That figure is now 16.3%.

I'm very sympathetic to the @j_amesmarriott thesis and I've also seen the same issues @b_judah talks about - select committees in the UK (and senate committees in the US) becoming content fodder for social media, very senior politicians apparently unable to focus without getting distracted by their phones. But there are obvious problems with the thesis too. Does anyone really believe that Britain was so exceptionally well-governed 1970s-1990s? Wilson & Macmillan were both very well-read - did that make them brilliantly effective leaders? Also, the peak of mass deep literacy probably isn't 70s-90s but pre-TV & post-universal schooling- so maybe 1890s - 1930s. There were two massive world wars then and public opinion did play a part in them. How does that fit the thesis? Plus do you know who else was a great reader? Hitler! He read a book a day and was apparently always quoting Shakespeare. Stalin loved literature and had a personal library of thousands of books. I don't want to completely dismiss the thesis because there is something going on here but it is not as straightforward as it first seems.







