Foxy Fomo

SpaceX revenue, $18.7B in 2025 $1.8T IPO valuation Revenue expected to grow exponentially in the next 3-5 years (and beyond) Very interested in owning this stock, but will wait for the euphoria to die down.. I'm sure it'll provide plenty of opportunities $SPCX

The proposed social media ban for children under 16 is not about creating a digital ID system. It is about protecting kids. Social media companies are designed to maximize engagement. Their algorithms push endless content, collect personal data, and expose children to cyberbullying, predators, scams, misinformation, and content that can negatively impact mental health. We already have age restrictions for alcohol, tobacco, gambling, and driving because children are not equipped to handle certain risks. The internet should not be treated differently simply because it is digital. Critics claim this is the first step toward a national digital ID. There is no evidence that banning under 16s from social media automatically leads to a government controlled digital identity system. Countries around the world are exploring age verification methods without creating universal digital IDs for all citizens. Parents cannot monitor every app, account, or algorithm 24 hours a day. Requiring social media companies to keep children off their platforms places responsibility where it belongs: on the companies profiting from children’s attention. This is not about government control. It is about child protection. If we agree kids should be protected in the physical world, we should be willing to protect them online too.