
GAMEYE
6.2K posts

GAMEYE
@GameyeVG
GAMEYE is a free, revolutionary way to track every aspect of your videogame addiction. Track what you own, what you’ve beaten, lookup prices and more!






These two photographs are separated by only 66 years.


No, I wouldn't say that at all. I think his reasoning for his own work is perfectly sound, though I disagree with its universal application. I agree with John in that reputation building, social change, career advancement, and so on is downstream of gift-giving, but only if the "chain of custody" is actually preserved, which when used as training data, it's not. The problem with that is that it makes the already-low incentives of gift-giving close to 0. Now, when publishing code openly, it is much more like a completely anonymous donation. Some people will still be selfless about it, but obviously, this will just result in vastly less gift-giving. Furthermore, given the lack of "chain of custody", there is the question of whether or not it is ethical that John's altruism is being assumed for all open source authors, via AI companies assuming all open source code is indeed a gift, free to feed into their systems. In my mind, the *general* answer is no. Codebases are like property with specifically outlined license requirements. I don't see AI as "learning" in the same way a human does, but more like an information compression system (which is why you can reconstruct licensed code with the license stripped using these systems). Obviously if I zip/unzip some licensed code, that doesn't revoke the license. In any case, this all means that the economic non-viability of open source development has become even more dramatic, and so this move by AI companies - whether you think it's acceptable or not - will move a lot of development behind closed doors.






I feel like an idiot. I just learned today Douglas from The Chair Company is Jim Downey.



























