Geoff
137 posts
@Geoff_852
PG tips back to square bags!
Here's a reference that should be bookmarked and used to shut down silly billies when they gleefully claim that: We don't have a constitution, or; We do have one but it's the British Constitution, not the English Constitution. This reference comes from the same authoritative source as relied on by the legal profession, namely 'The Laws of England, Being A Complete Statement Of The Whole Law Of England.' by the Earl of Halsbury; commonly known as 'Halsbury's Laws of England'. I believe the edition of this legal literature to be the first, published in 1909 200+ years after Great Britain and British governance was legislated into existence. This source being the second paragraph of the section entitled 'Constitutional Law'; proving that we do indeed have a constitution, and that it forms part of the English law: and, as the first sentence confirms, "the law of the English constitution is to be sought, ... " the Constitution is in fact the English Constitution. As it is English and it is Law, it is the birthright of our English People. 🏴 @englishexit @MCRReiners '455. As legally enforceable by the courts, the law of the English constitution is to be sought, not in any particular written document, but from the ordinary sources from which the substantive law of the land is derived, namely, Acts of Parliament, or quasi Acts of Parliament, and the rules and orders made thereunder; prerogative rules and orders made and issued by the Crown, acting in exercise of the power intrusted to it by virtue of the common law, and embodied in Orders in Council, treaties, charters, proclamations relating to the Colonies, and other executive documents; and the common law, which is largely embodied in judicial decisions.' - [Halsbry's Laws of England, Vol.VI, (1907). p.316]
🚨WIKILEAKS 1974: Rothschild Director Admits They “Had No Choice” But to Get Involved in Silver — Just Like Gold Sales!🚨 👉U.S. diplomats reported that a top N.M. Rothschild gold fixing director said Rothschild would bid on the U.S. Treasury gold sale “just as it did on silver” and “IT HAS NO CHOICE AND MUST BE INVOLVED.” 👉This was written in December 1974 — right as the 41-year U.S. private gold ownership ban (1933–1974) was finally ending! 👉Governments and big banks were openly coordinating how to handle precious metals flows the moment Americans were allowed to own gold again! 👉Silver wasn't spared! 🚨Crustacean Nation: 🔥They were already deep in the silver market in the 1970s… is that why the paper vs physical war still rages on COMEX today? 🔥Physical ozt's in your own vault = the one thing they can’t easily control? Direct WikiLeaks Cable: wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/1… *Not financial advice. Stay stacked!
America is heading for a disaster with this war but how can Trump switch directions? If he stopped thnis war it would be utter humiliation but keeping it going badly hurts us Is there an off ramp or do you think the plan is to destroy our nation?
So the UK's 10-year gilt yield - the cost of government borrowing - is now up at 2008 levels. An 18-year high The difference is that, back then, UK national debt was 48pc of GDP, and now it's the best part of 100pc. So the debt service costs are much MUCH heavier. Of the £14.3bn the UK government borrowed in February alone, no less than £13bn of that was spent on interest on existing debts - a situation which is not only unsustainable, but very close to provoking a disastrous financial collapse. Yet still, our national discourse is all about more spending, more borrowing, more "state intervention". When is the Labour party – and much of the listless, unthinking rump of the UK's political and media class – going to start acknowledging reality? WHEN ....?
