GoPats

BITCOIN IS GOING TO $200,000. CHART SAYS IT ALL 🚀

@Borg_Cryptos Proved an idiot before end of week. Save it.

$BTC below $62k before end of the week. Save it. Come back later.

@GordonGekko What did u say

Bears are about to get violently ASSAULTED. Everything is going exactly as I said. Do you understand?

@SquawkCNBC Robert Frank is an idiot...he totally doesn't understand the wealth tax brackets He said if u make 5 million or more u pay a top rate of 59% Its 47% (37 +12 wealth) Dope

Rutgers University History Professor Katherine Epstein breaks down the latest in the Pentagon’s dispute with Anthropic and what it means for the future of the tech company: cnb.cx/4bowxK0

@moneymoverscnbc Robert Frank is an idiot...he totally doesn't understand the wealth tax brackets He saud if u make 5 million or more u pay a top rate of 59% Its 47% (37 +12 wealth) Dope

"I don't think surrender is in the cards." Puneet Talwar, former Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs, outlines potential off ramps for U.S. involvement in Iran: cnbc.com/video/2026/03/…

@Osemka8 Bearish or bullish?

[ $COIN ] Broadening wedge on top of monthly demand. Volume is increasing and was no present in any of the two previous bottoms of the wedge.

@bitcoincypher1 3400

@DaveHcontrarian Hi David. Another excellent video. I'm curious to know where you think gold will hit as a low after the $6800 top and before the major run up possibly to the $20Ks

Here is my latest interview recorded 3/5/26 with Kerry Stevenson of Making Money Matter. Lots of good discussion about the impact of the war and my views on U.S. equity markets & the metals as well as comments about the coming global deflationary bust. youtube.com/watch?v=WGj2gI…

@Borg_Cryptos ...and youre too still an idiot

I’m still bearish on $BTC ! You must be too.

@DaveHcontrarian Ok tks

@GoViewxyz I never discuss personal investments.

@DaveHcontrarian Tks. What path will u personally take?

@GoViewxyz Individual choice.

@DaveHcontrarian @joekerrigan20 @tuskercap David how low do u see oil dropping next 12 months? Tks

@joekerrigan20 @tuskercap LOL.Oil went from $130 to below $60.I was the only one to call that.I was bullish gold & silver when most weren't & called this huge run.Same with copper.Any many of my equity targets were hit & well ahead I correctly raised them. You win the award as most clueless/asleep on X.

What a fucking moron, deliberately leading investors over the cliff

@Michael_EWpro So 82k no....52k yes? On tariff nonsense? To radical a flip flop mike

This is pretty much the main count, market structure did support a possible move back to $88k but the tariff uncertainty pretty much locked this impulse in on $BTC #RugSzn

@ArtificialAnlys Is claude opus 4.6 better than sonnet 4.6 whdb editing a lengthy word document

Claude Sonnet 4.6 takes second place in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (behind Opus 4.6), but used ~3x more output tokens than Claude Sonnet 4.5 in its max effort mode. Sonnet 4.6 leads all models in GDPval-AA and TerminalBench, including a slight lead over Opus 4.6 Key takeaways: ➤ @AnthropicAI Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 51 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, an 8-point jump from Sonnet 4.5 (Reasoning, 43). Our Intelligence Index is our synthesis metric that incorporates 10 evaluations covering capabilities including agentic tasks, coding and scientific reasoning. This places Sonnet 4.6 essentially tied with GPT-5.2 (xhigh, 51) and only behind Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, max effort, 53). This is the first time Anthropic has occupied the top 2 spots on our Intelligence Index, and the gap between Sonnet and Opus has narrowed significantly, from 7 points (Opus 4.5 vs Sonnet 4.5) to just 2 points. ➤ Sonnet 4.6 has a slight lead in 2 of our evaluations: GDPval-AA (Agentic Real-World Work Tasks) and TerminalBench (Agentic Coding & Terminal Use). Notably, Sonnet 4.6 outperforms all other models on these evaluations including Opus 4.6, making it the overall strongest model we have tested for agentic use cases. ➤ For agentic tasks, Sonnet 4.6 offers a better price to performance tradeoff compared to Opus 4.6. Sonnet 4.6 outperforms Opus 4.6 on both GDPval-AA (1633 vs 1606) and TerminalBench (53% vs 46%), while being priced 40% lower ($3/$15 vs $5/$25 per 1M input/output tokens) - although Sonnet 4.6’s increased token usage leaves it only slightly cheaper than Opus. ➤ Sonnet 4.6 is less token efficient than Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.5. Sonnet 4.6 used ~74M output tokens in max effort mode to run our Intelligence Index evaluations, ~3x Sonnet 4.5 (Reasoning, 25M) and ~28% more than Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, max effort, 58M). This is particularly driven by HLE, where Sonnet 4.6 used 47M output tokens alone (64% of its total), but the pattern holds broadly across evaluations. We evaluated both Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.6 in ‘adaptive thinking’ mode with ‘max’ effort. ➤ Sonnet 4.6 (in adaptive thinking mode with max effort) cost $2,088 to run the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. This is ~3x the cost of Sonnet 4.5 (Reasoning), which cost ~$733, driven by the significantly higher output token usage. However, Sonnet 4.6 remains cheaper than Opus 4.6 ($2,486) due to its 40% lower per-token pricing ($3/$15 vs $5/$25 per 1M input/output tokens). This does not account for cached input token discounts offered by Anthropic and others. ➤ Sonnet 4.6 is priced identically to Sonnet 4.5 ($3/$15 per 1M input/output tokens). However, the significantly higher token usage in adaptive thinking mode means that real-world costs will be substantially higher than Sonnet 4.5 for comparable tasks. With Sonnet 4.6 priced at only 40% less than Opus 4.6 (Anthropic cut Opus pricing with the Opus 4.5 launch in late November 2025 by 66% - from $15/$75 to the current $5/$25), the set of use cases that Sonnet makes sense for over Opus is narrower than ever. ➤ Sonnet 4.6 introduces the same 'adaptive thinking' mode as Opus 4.6, replacing Anthropic's previous 'extended thinking' mode. Instead of setting a 'thinking token budget', developers can now control the model's thinking with the 'effort' setting (with 'low', 'medium', 'high' and 'max' settings). We evaluated adaptive thinking with max effort. Key model details: ➤ Context window: 1M tokens (currently in beta), up from Sonnet 4.5's 200K standard context window ➤ Max output tokens: 128K tokens (vs. Sonnet 4.5’s 64K max output tokens) and equivalent to Opus 4.6 ➤ Pricing: $3/$15 per 1M input/output tokens (unchanged from Sonnet 4.5) ➤ Availability: Sonnet 4.6 is available via Anthropic's first-party API, @Google Vertex, @awscloud Bedrock and Microsoft @Azure. Sonnet 4.6 is also available for Claude Chat, Claude Cowork and Claude Code

@billmaher dont expect Kimmel to ever forgive u A really stupid narcissist comment from u...not an apology, its telling Kimmel grow up. “Jimmy Kimmel, he’s very mad at me. And I know you’re close to him. I hope you tell him that, you know, I’m sorry that he got bent out of shap

@CryptoNobler So what now?....pump to $...then dump End your thought with a price direction conclusion...otherwise its more mumbo jumbo

🚨 HERE’S WHY BITCOIN IS NONSTOP DUMPING RIGHT NOW If you still think $BTC trades like a supply-and-demand asset, you MUST read this carefully. Because that market no longer exists. What you’re watching right now is not normal price action. It’s not “weak hands.” It’s not sentiment. And it’s definitely not retail selling. Most people are completely unaware what’s happening. And by the time it becomes obvious, the damage is already done. This move didn’t start today. It’s been building quietly under the surface for months. And now it’s accelerating. Here’s the truth: The moment supply can be synthetically created, scarcity is gone. And when scarcity is gone, price stops being discovered on-chain and starts being set in derivatives. That is exactly what happened to Bitcoin. And it’s the same structural break that already happened to: → Gold → Silver → Oil → Equities Once derivatives took over. The original Bitcoin thesis is broken. Bitcoin’s valuation was built on two ideas: → A hard cap of 21 million → No rehypothecation That framework died the moment Wall Street layered this on top of the chain: → Cash-settled futures → Perpetual swaps → Options → ETFs → Prime broker lending → Wrapped BTC → Total return swaps From that point forward Bitcoin supply became theoretically INFINITE. Not on-chain. But in price discovery, which is what actually matters. Synthetic Float Ratio (SFR). The metric that explains everything. Once synthetic supply overwhelms real supply, price no longer responds to demand. It responds to positioning, hedging, and liquidation flows. Wall Street can now trade against Bitcoin. They’re not guessing direction. They’re doing what they do in every derivatives-dominated market: 1⃣ Create unlimited paper BTC 2⃣ Short into rallies 3⃣ Force liquidations 4⃣ Cover lower 5⃣ Repeat This isn’t “betting.” It’s inventory manufacturing. One real BTC can now simultaneously back: → An ETF share → A futures contract → A perpetual swap → An options delta → A broker loan → A structured note All at THE SAME TIME. That’s six claims on one coin. That is not a free market. That is a fractional-reserve price system wearing a Bitcoin mask. Ignore it if you want, but don’t pretend you weren’t warned. I’ve been calling Bitcoin tops and bottoms for over a decade now, and I’ll do it again in 2026. Follow and turn on notifications before it's too late.

@LAGWAFIS1 @MarketCanary Whats beachball

@MarketCanary is the beachball still in play or is this toast now?

BTC Pattern Target hit at 63k and held, almost made it to 618 at 57k. RSI Oversold on Weekly 2nd time in 5yrs, first time since 2022 lows.

@MarketCanary Meaning what? Rebound? To what $?

@MarketCanary @alden_faas ...this aged well

@alden_faas 69k was never crossed. I will cover it in Monday's video

Bitcoin Breakdown - Look for the Bottom - Here sfx.unilink.io/MarketMakersVIP

@GordonGekko So buy or sell?

Bitcoin dropped to $78K on a SATURDAY. Weekend trading. Razor thin volume. No institutional desks open. Headlines screaming Iran. This isn't a real selloff. This is a LIQUIDITY event. You can move markets $5,000 on a Sunday with half the capital it takes Monday-Friday. Wait for Monday. THEN judge the damage.