Gregory Lisa

7 posts

Gregory Lisa

Gregory Lisa

@Gregberg84

เข้าร่วม Temmuz 2025
12 กำลังติดตาม5 ผู้ติดตาม
Gregory Lisa
Gregory Lisa@Gregberg84·
@GovernorVA @GovernorVA the commonwealth argued to the VA Supreme Court to not make a ruling prior to the referendum. Try the referendum again for 2028 and this time follow the VA constitution.
English
0
0
0
11
Governor Abigail Spanberger
Governor Abigail Spanberger@GovernorVA·
The Supreme Court of the United States has now joined the Supreme Court of Virginia in choosing to nullify an election and the votes of more than three million Virginians. These Virginians made their voices heard — casting their ballots in good faith to push back against a President who said he’s “entitled” to more seats in Congress before voters go to the polls. As Governor, I will make sure voters know when and how to cast their votes this year. Because our votes are how we choose the representation we deserve.
English
17.3K
4.2K
18K
3.6M
Gregory Lisa
Gregory Lisa@Gregberg84·
@SenThomTillis @SenThomTillis I agree with you on principle. but I think the only option is to sponsor a constitutional amendment that protests the filibuster sans the carve outs that exist now. Tell the democrats either the filibuster is added to the constitution or it ends now.
English
0
0
0
8
Senator Thom Tillis
Senator Thom Tillis@SenThomTillis·
I am one of the few members of Congress who has actually passed a voter ID law (on a bipartisan basis), which I did as Speaker of the House in North Carolina, and that’s why I proudly co-sponsored the SAVE Act. While I support strengthening mail-in ballot integrity, many states like Utah, Florida, Alaska, and Montana rely on the use of mail-in ballots to conduct their elections, and we should not be completely upending how states already securely conduct their elections. Even if this issue is fixed, the SAVE America Act still will not have the 60 votes required to pass it. While the so-called ‘talking filibuster’ has been floated as an option, there is a reason why previous attempts to utilize it in recent history have failed. A ‘talking filibuster’ would effectively make Chuck Schumer the new Senate Majority Leader, allowing Democrats to block every single Trump judge and executive branch nominee, and allow them to force endless votes on anything they want. Democrats would control the floor of the U.S. Senate until the end of the year. There are only two ways out of a ‘talking filibuster.’ The first is for Democrats to miraculously give up and allow Republicans to pass the bill with a simple majority. That is never going to happen, and anyone who claims it’s even a remote possibility is either completely misinformed or intentionally misleading the American people. The second way is for Republicans to substantially weaken or eliminate the filibuster altogether. I have made it crystal clear that I will never vote to do this. Eliminating the filibuster is a foolish and lazy idea pushed by politicians seeking short-term gain at the expense of causing irreparable long-term harm to our nation. Succeeding in eliminating the filibuster would significantly weaken the minority party, end the need for bipartisan compromise, and allow erratic swings in policy that would transform America for the worse. Those are just the consequences of a best-case outcome. During the last Congress, all of my Democratic colleagues currently serving supported nuking the filibuster to try to pass their own partisan election reform bill. Democrats were dead wrong to try to change the filibuster when they controlled the Senate, and Republicans would be dead wrong to try to change the filibuster now that we control the Senate. The only real path to address the American people’s declining confidence in our elections is for both parties to find common ground on legislation that supports universal adoption of voter ID, proof of citizenship, and other vital election integrity measures.
English
1.4K
72
600
137.2K
Gregory Lisa
Gregory Lisa@Gregberg84·
@danturrentine I am politically opposed to most of what you say, however you are a great American.
English
0
0
0
36
dan turrentine
dan turrentine@danturrentine·
Some D elected’s and media personalities this weekend are unhinged. Every situation is not zero-sum, Trump vs us. Sometimes, it’s just 🇺🇸. I don’t know what will happen, and have legit questions and concerns. But, some appear to be rooting for failure. Voters will tune us out when knee-jerk crazy. Take a deep breath, think calmly and analytically, and ground everything always in 🇺🇸 sucess and that of our ally 🇮🇱and now for the people of 🇮🇷.
English
118
84
958
31.5K
Gregory Lisa
Gregory Lisa@Gregberg84·
@danturrentine Agree, 100%. You try hard to understand both sides. Thank you for everything you add.
English
0
0
0
5
dan turrentine
dan turrentine@danturrentine·
MAGA friends, go back and listen to previous podcasts, writings and interviews I did and you will see I was very blunt about Biden, much to the anger of many in my party 😉
English
21
1
64
3.9K
dan turrentine
dan turrentine@danturrentine·
Some have bristled and laughed at me for saying it, but, it is clear, if you look, Trump is aging and slowing. Father Time is undefeated. Nothing to the degree of Biden, but, obvious nonetheless. As Signs of Aging Emerge, Trump Responds With Defiance wsj.com/us-news/as-sig…
English
82
3
37
9.8K
Gregory Lisa
Gregory Lisa@Gregberg84·
@davemeltzerWON any chance the masked man (obviously wasn’t played by him last night) is revealed to be Chris Jericho ?
English
0
0
0
3
Gregory Lisa
Gregory Lisa@Gregberg84·
@ScottJenningsKY Will you be doing a book tour? Would love to grab a signed copy. Appreciate you and your segments remind me of political science classes at Baruch college in Manhattan. Entire classroom and professors v 1 conservative and myself.
English
1
0
0
42
Scott Jennings
Scott Jennings@ScottJenningsKY·
Fun fact: I let President @realDonaldTrump pick the cover photo of my new book "A Revolution of Common Sense" — and he made a great call. If you want to understand how Trump has accomplished more than most two-term presidents in less than a year, you need to read this book 👇
English
333
953
9.8K
167.2K
Gregory Lisa
Gregory Lisa@Gregberg84·
@davemeltzerWON Question are you basing the formula for same day raw viewers off of that one June 30th raw where because Netflix cut off on end of June it gave an idea of how many viewers Netflix has same day?
English
1
0
0
57
Dave Meltzer
Dave Meltzer@davemeltzerWON·
The only assumption which is an educated one is that Raw doing 179,000 views live worldwide last week is clearly too low.
niko@nikochanr3

@davemeltzerWON You're using assumptions in your calculations. I listen to you and the people you work with all the time. No one is giving you the exact concrete numbers and pcts. This is a very disappointing f you can't separate "i am confident in my assumptions" vs. actual concrete data.

English
4
0
5
10.6K