Marc Harris ✡️

@KeithWoodsYT Jews reacting to Christians talking about Jesus the last 2000 years.

Hej och välkommen till världshistorien

How many Jewish terrorists with blood on their hands have been released from life in prison as a result of Israel taking hostages and using them as bargaining chips?

@Carlstrm2023 @sdriks Tror vi lugnt kan konstatera att du är Sveriges konstigaste person

De här 2 är väl Sveriges mest konstiga personer? Den ena - Inas Hamdan, med palestinsk/syrisk bakgrund gör allt för att tysta... Palestinavänner! Den andra Simona Mohamsson, libanesisk/muslimsk bakgrund gör allt för att stödja @sdriks som... just vill utvisa personer som henne!

@martenschultz Många kommentatorer förväntar sig att den här lagen kommer slås med av HD. Och att en mer genomarbetat lag som förbereds i de normala kanalerna kommer att antas längre fram. Men Hamas skapade en ”folkvilja” hos israelerna, en vägran att hålla de värsta terrormördarna fängslade.

@Harris_Marc Israel som rättsstat har för mig varit ett hopp. I en region full av skurknationer.

Israel öppnar för dödsstraff. Deprimerande. svd.se/a/3ppemv/israe…

All I have to say about Ben Gvir is this: When the Jews of Egypt were finally freed, they started to praise God when the Egyptians, who charged after them trying to re-enslave them, were drowned in the sea. God chastised them, and to this day, we spill a little wine out of our cups at the Seder to remember to have empathy and pity - even if it is our enemies being destroyed. We are not supposed to be pacifists. But neither are we supposed to cheer at the downfall of men - any men - all whom are created in the image of God. Have a death penalty for terrorists. Don't have a death penalty for terrorists. For me - the conversation SHOULD have been about this worthy debate. Instead, we're all rightfully distracted by the disgusting and disturbing actions of a man who pops open champagne and wears a pin of a noose to celebrate the death penalty. Lest you think most Israelis support this inhumanity, I will remind you that Ben Gvir was banned from serving in the IDF, and has 13 criminal convictions. Every country has more than a few politicians worthy of being embarrassed of. Ben Gvir is one of Israel's.

Last night, Internal Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir’s law mandating the execution of terrorists convicted of murder passed 62–48. Ben-Gvir attempted to propose a toast, but before he could pop the cork on his champagne, the Knesset speaker demanded he stop, and the ushers confiscated the bottle. The stunt was much like the law itself: all style, no substance. Contrary to much of the rhetoric, Israel has had the death penalty for nearly 70 years. The original law was designed to execute Nazi war criminals but can technically apply to anyone who commits similarly genocidal crimes. Every prosecutor can request the death penalty, and under certain circumstances, judges may grant it. That’s why Ben-Gvir advertised his law as forcing left-wing prosecutors to request the penalty and left-wing judges to grant it for terrorists—particularly the Nukhba forces, who invaded Israel on October 7. In reality, it does neither. The law explicitly excludes Nukhba terrorists from receiving the death penalty and provides no evidentiary infrastructure or procedural framework to secure convictions. Its wording actually helps judges avoid the penalty, mandating only “death penalty or life imprisonment” for convicted terrorists. Those hoping this law would change the calculus of hostage deals should think again. Not only does it fail to reduce the number of terrorists in Israeli prisons, it does not abolish the president’s power of pardon—the primary mechanism for releasing terrorists in deals. Even if Ben-Gvir somehow manages to secure a death penalty, the law does nothing to prevent the conviction from being overturned or the terrorist from being handed over. The law does more than fail in its objectives—it actively backfires. Despite being marketed as targeting Palestinian terrorists (raising its own legal problem of discrimination), it explicitly allows for the death penalty for Jews. The law defines terrorism as acts “to negate the existence of the state,” a definition that could apply to groups such as extremist Haredi factions and violent members of the “Hilltop Youth” (which Ben-Gvir supports). Its most glaring flaw is that it mandates carrying out a sentence within 90 days—an explicit violation of the Geneva Convention’s mandatory 180-day waiting period. As a signatory, Israel could expose IDF officers to international lawsuits, with no tangible benefit. The IDF warned Ben-Gvir, but he disregarded their advice. Its blatant illegality gives the Supreme Court clear grounds to strike it down, returning Israel to square one while damaging the country’s international reputation. Had Ben-Gvir managed to keep his champagne, I would have proposed a toast—to a self-destructive law that makes Israel look terrible, benefiting no one but Ben-Gvir himself. L’chaim. That said, while Ben-Gvir’s law is essentially a campaign stunt, a more responsible law is making its way through the system. Proposed by MKs Simcha Rothman and Yulia Malinovsky, the law establishes the practical mechanisms—procedural and evidentiary—to secure convictions of Nukhba terrorists, after which the death penalty could be imposed. The Rothman–Malinovsky law was developed in consultation with all relevant authorities. The Shin Bet, IDF, and National Security Council have expressed similar concerns about Ben-Gvir’s law and consulted on this alternative. The death penalty is a complex issue. Personally, I support executing terrorists who attempt to murder civilians—especially the monsters of October 7. Currently, these terrorists face one of two outcomes: spend the rest of their lives in prison at Israel’s expense, or eventually be released in a hostage deal and likely return to terrorism. Neither option is good for Israel. What we can all agree on is that this issue demands a serious, responsible approach—one that prioritizes the security and best interests of the country over personal electoral ambitions. To read the rest of today's newsletter click here. amitsegal.substack.com/p/its-noon-in-…

@martenschultz Är dödsstraffet per se oförenligt med en rättsstat? Jag är inget fan av dödsstraff. Men att den här förändringen skulle komma efter att Hamas använt kidnappade Israeler för att tvinga frigivning av dömda terrormördare var tydligt ganska snart efter 7 okt.

@Harris_Marc Jag hade inte förväntat mig det här av Israel. Jag betraktar Israel som en rättsstat.

Israel now executes convicted terrorists who murder civilians. That’s what has people up in arms. Meanwhile, in Palestine, you can face death for being gay or even just selling land to a Jew. Funny which one gets labeled “outrageous.”

Brendan O’Neill absolutely nails it again. 🎯🎯🎯 Not mentioned and totally relevant too: Palestinian courts can impose death sentences for selling land to Israelis.

It's crazy how Israel never bombs Egypt or Jordan but does bomb southern Lebanon and Syria, wonder what the determining factor in this is.

Den västerländska antisemitismen sedan andra världskriget består i att begråta döda judar och fördöma de levande judar som insisterar på att judemördande måste få konsekvenser.

@gabbaygubben @Inte_Resting Dödsstraffet som PA har riktar sig alltså mot säljaren och inte köparen.

@Inte_Resting Käft och sluta med den sionistiska gaslighten. Kommer israeliska bosättare dömas till döden i ockuperade Västbanken? PA har ingen skyldighet gentemot ockupanterna.

🇮🇱 Palestinierna har lyckats lägga grunden till införandet av dödsstraff för terrorism. Efter decennier av nej till alla fredsförslag, och åratal av rasistiska palestinsk-arabiska terrororgier riktade mot främst judiska israeler, återinförs nu dödsstraff. En ytterligare anledning är att frånvaron av dödsstraff har orsakat palestinska terrormassakrer och gisslantagande för att frita tusentals dömda terrorister (senast 7 oktober -23) och för Gilad Shalit. Avrättade terrorister kan inte fritas, och därmed slipper offren se sina närståendes mördare gå fria. Jag är ingen större anhängare av dödsstraff, men palestinierna har genom sin fredsvägran och terrorism drivit israelerna högerut. Som tur är har inte terrorister tagit svenskar svenskar gisslan för att frita tusentals terrorister från våra fängelser. Straffet kan bli aktuellt för "en person som avsiktligt orsakar någon annans död i syfte att skada en medborgare eller invånare i Israel, med avsikt att förkasta staten Israels existens – hans straff ska vara dödsstraff eller livstids fängelse, och endast ett av dessa straff." Verkställighet kommer att ske genom hängning. Vilken metod föredrar du? 👇

How to avoid being executed by Israel: Step 1: Don't kill Israeli citizens in a terrorist attack.

Märker att svenska Twitter tycker det är extremt viktigt att konsekvenserna för den som mördar israeler inte ska vara för tuffa.

@Aboujahjah @gorberg Insane statement on so many levels

Israel has now become the first state to codify a death sentence that applies in practice to one ethnic group, while another is effectively shielded from it.

This is devastatingly well put by Jonathan Freedland in The Guardian. It leaves nowhere to go for the antisemites: “Every minority faces discrimination – note Tory frontbencher Nick Timothy’s appalling attack on Muslim prayer this week – but next to no other diaspora community goes through this. People can’t stand Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, but Russian Orthodox churches don’t require round-the-clock protection. People loathe Donald Trump and his bombing of Iran, but US-branded stores on UK high streets are not smashed and daubed. As for British businesses with investment links to the US, including to US security firms, those remain untouched. Israel and Jews are the exception.”

Why haven't the evil zionists of Israel made incursions into Jordan? Oh yeah. Because Jordan hasn't allowed itself to be used as a staging spot to attack Israel. Rockets aren't coming into Israel from Jordan & Israel leaves Jordan alone. Amazing how that works.

@mehdirhasan Palestinianism isn’t about ”oppression” or ”self-determination” it’s about a fifty-year long refusal to accept the total defeat of the Arab world in 1967. ”Google 1967” isn’t a gotcha against the pro-Israeli argument, it’s a reveal of the true sentiment behind the keffiya.

Put aside that you're an antisemite who constantly conflates "Jews" with "Israel", you're also an ignoramus who just repeats the hasbara talking points you've been given and know nothing about Middle East history. Here's what Israel's own prime minister said in 1982 about 1967: “In June 1967, we again had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.” Also, Google 1956 too, dumbass.

This is what the Green Party have allowed themselves to become. Nazis identifying as anti-racists.