HypocrisyWatchman

Last December, Boston Mayor Michelle Wu said Somalis built Boston, but I don’t see any Somalis in this video. Weird.

@WhiteHouse India is part of the 3rd world. I hope this helps.

“‘If you import The Third World, you become The Third World!’— AND THAT’S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS LONG AS I AM PRESIDENT.” - President DONALD J. TRUMP 🇺🇸

@TheRealOANP @LaNativePatriot Do you see how you undermined your own argument?

@LaNativePatriot No, its not badass, its fucking stupid and dangerous. My trailer ended up on top of the last idiot that tried passing me on the shoulder and he lost control. The issue isn't the guy in the left lane, hes clearly governed and caught up with the governed truck on the right.

Risky move, but also…. Kinda badass MOVE OUT OF THE LEFT LANE!!!

@Nero Catholicism has failed us again and again..

It’s Catholics and Muslims versus Protestants and Jews Be on the right side of the line when the curtain comes down

@TheeIslanddd @EndWokeness Never relax near a wild animal.

@EndWokeness You're afraid of us. 🤷🏾‍♂️

BLM influencer harasses random Whites to prove a point. Not one responds with any vioIence.

@FHustede @HalfTangible I wish we had. Those poor, retarded Danes would have been annihilated in hours. The locals would not have helped them, btw.

You threatened to attack Greenland, so vehemently that Denmark actually already planned which bridges to blow up in the case of a landing. We told you every time to fuck off and that Greenland isn’t for sale, get the fucking memo. You wanted to bully Ukraine into giving up basically every relevant Ressource in exchange for Money you stopped sending two years ago and for weapons we, the Europeans, buy from you for Ukraine. We asked you to inform us about your actions in Iran, you didn’t. You said you don’t need our help, that we are worthless and weak, and then you wonder why nobody wants to join a mission. You treated Ukraine and his president like absolute dogshit in the White House, despite them beeing your allies, while sucking Putins cock every single inch, trying to make Ukraine give up territory that Russia hasn’t even won! You actively try to interfere into our elections and try to support far right parties. You try to lecture us about free speech and then you kill three innocent Americans for protesting against ICE. You did this and every step of the way you shat on your allies, and now you wonder why this has consequences. Stop complaining. This is the “America Alone” you wanted, right?

WE DIDN'T WANT TO BE IN UKRAINE. You wanted us there, putting more money than the entire rest of your continent put together. You don't treat us like an ally, you don't even treat us like a friend, you treat us like a piggy bank and attack dog. We asked for mineral rights in exchange for our help, you called us traitor. We asked to buy Greenland (for the hundredth time), you called us traitor. We ask you to do in Iran what we've been doing in Ukraine, you not only say no, but ACTIVELY HELP IRAN who is also btw ACTIVELY HELPING RUSSIA IN UKRAINE The strait of hormuz benefits YOU, not us!

Justice Thomas was the only one who asked the obvious question: what is the common thread among the recognized exceptions to the 14th Amendment, namely diplomats, enemy forces, and Native Americans? The respondent’s lawyer offered this word-salad answer: “So, as I just said, all of the exceptions involve situations where that U.S.-born child is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States because that extraterritoriality, the fiction of extraterritoriality, the interaction of another sovereign between the United States’ jurisdiction and that person applies to the child as well as to the parent.” What she seems to be getting at is that these categories involve some form of competing sovereign allegiance, even when the person is physically present in the United States. That may make sense for diplomats and enemy combatants, but it becomes far more muddled with respect to Native Americans, over whom the U.S. government did exercise jurisdiction. At best, it was a mixed and evolving situation. And that is precisely the point. There are modern analogues that fit this framework at least as well, if not better. For example, Chinese citizens are subject to legal obligations to the Chinese state, including intelligence cooperation, regardless of where they are in China or anywhere else. Other countries such as South Korea, Singapore, Greece, and Iran maintain strict extraterritorial conscription laws, meaning their citizens remain legally bound to serve even if they were born and live in the United States. If anything, those cases are cleaner examples of ongoing sovereign obligation than the historical status of Native Americans, who were physically present within the United States and still not fully covered at the time. Unfortunately, none of this was seriously explored during oral argument.

@upstatefederlst Definitely not. It wouldn't even be made by the same man who created it.

Terminator 2 would never be made today because Sarah's primary identity is being a mother and her primary motivation is protecting her son.

@sentdefender Was this really worthy of your repost?

Post on X from the Speaker of the Iranian Parliament, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, following today’s shoot down of an American F-15E Strike Eagle over Southern Iran:

Juries don't work because you changed the people Flying doesn't work because you changed the people Stores, schools, hospitals--they don't work because you changed the people You can't change the people and keep the system, the system was made for the people

Ever notice how the Constitution was utterly powerless to stop everything from COVID lockdowns to the explicitly anti-White/anti-Male DEI regime of the last dozen years, but it's now constantly being invoked to defend everything from giving citizenship to the children of illegals and CCP spies to sending unlimited sums of taxpayer money to the Progressive NGO complex?

@ankoromochuu Abe was great, but it began well before him.

正直、アメリカ人がこんなに日本を愛してくれてるとは知らなかった。 むしろ、アメリカ人は日本を下に見ていると思ってた。左翼にそう思わされてた。 実際には尊敬してくれていると知って、心があたたかくなってる。 アメリカ国内の日本の良いイメージは、安倍元総理の貢献も大きいだろうね🇯🇵🤝🇺🇸

“Our baby was born in Rivendell. That means she’s an elf and gets to vote now.”

🚨 Democrat Senator Harry Reid introduced legislation in 1993 to end Birthright Citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants. "No sane country would do that — No sane country would give illegals citizenship" “If you break our laws by entering this country without permission and give birth to a child, we reward that child with U.S. Citizenship and a guarantee to have full access to all public and social services this society provides.” rumble.com/v77yymm-1993-d…

1993. Dianne Feinstein: Should people be able to come to this country, get on Medicaid, give birth to a baby, and then go back to their home country? The answer is no.

@MsMelChen @romanhelmetguy Do we audit where the 2% spending goes? We do not. Look at the state of the UK fleet. They've found a way to spend the money on migrants and DEI programs, yet still placate the US.

Let’s be real here. Europe has spent decades freeloading on American security. Even now, with every NATO member finally hitting the 2% GDP target in 2025. But beyond the financial contributions, the real rupture is philosophical and the Iran crisis has shown a spotlight on it. Europe worships process. Endless committees, consultations, and “predictability.” Macron actually calls it a virtue. For Trump, this is paralysis as his style is to articulate a threat, fix a target, and act. The Americans are men of conviction and purpose. Europe on the other hand lives by bureaucratic liturgy and in high-minded abstractions. Sure, Americans might make mistakes when acting. But Europe never considers what the costs of not acting actually are. Just look at how their nations are doing on various fronts, especially on the border crisis, and you see the same cancerous rot that undergirds their foreign policy approach play out domestically. It's the same problem on a different scale. Iran is currently holding the Strait of Hormuz hostage, choking 20% of global oil and spiking prices past $100 a barrel. Meanwhile, the regime is bleeding from strikes, its nuclear ambitions are still alive despite degraded capability, and its proxies are firing missiles at allies and oil tankers. If this isn’t a clear and present danger to the global economy - of which Europe is a part - then I don’t know what is. Yet when Washington asked to use European bases to finish the job - bases the US has defended for generations, the response was hesitation and hand-wringing. The US did strike from RAF Fairford, but only after warnings that British soil could become a “legitimate target.” If you cannot agree that a theocratic regime with eschatological ambitions who have shown no restraint in hitting out at Gulf countries and threatening the world’s energy jugular is an enemy worth confronting, then what, exactly, are we allies about? Europe loves to preen about being tough on Russia. They issue condemnations and speeches and slap sanctions that hardly work to cripple the Russian economy. Now here was a chance to do something concrete: let the Americans use the bases they already pay for, help clear the Strait, and actually degrade the Iranian war machine that arms Moscow’s proxies. Turmp didn’t ask for boots on the ground or any kind of more offensive action. All he wanted was permission to operate from the infrastructure America has underwritten for decades. They couldn’t even manage that. So can you blame the Americans for seeing NATO for what it is? A paper-tiger alliance that expects Washington to bleed and pay while Brussels and London convenes and deliberates. If Europe refuses to treat Iran as the threat it is while happily letting American power keep the Strait open and the lights on, then the alliance is already dead. Trump is simply stating the obvious and the Americans are becoming very reluctant to subsidize the European delusion any longer.

@lakes12341 @TheLaurenChen Thanks for the block.

@lakes12341 @TheLaurenChen Answer the real question. What should a server earn per hour?

Assuming these people were at the restaurant for 2 hours A $60 tip means this server made $30/hour off this ONE TABLE Is that not enough for a waiter to make? Does being a waiter really need to be a $150/hour job? The entitlement behind a lot of tipping culture is insane

The broader application of birthright citizenship is so incredibly insane that even Europe doesn't allow it. Anyone, from anywhere in world can travel here, legally or illegally and pop out a baby and that baby is now a citizen of the USA. A pregnsnt Honduran woman can crawl across the border after her water broke, diving onto American soil like it's in the end zone in the Super Bowl and that baby is now a citizen. A pregnant Indian woman on vacation can give birth inside Epcot and that baby is now a citizen. It is the most ludicrous policy in the world. Everyone knows it, the people who disagree know it, they just want it. I can't believe this hinges on Amy Coney Barrett. If we lose this, we have no chance of ever fixing America.

@hanglojapan If the American press is smearing her as right wing, what did she do to upset them?

私のフィードに流れてくるアメリカ人のポストを見ていると日本の総理大臣高市早苗をナショナリストだと勘違いしてる人が多いことにビックリしている あきらかにアメリカのメディアの情報操作だとよくわかった📺 高市総理はグローバリストであり、移民を止めるどころか推進している そしてLGBTの理解増進法なども推進している 日本を海外に切り売りし、歴史ある日本の文化を破壊しようとしているのが日本の総理大臣だと知ってもらいたい