wrangle enjoyer ⏹️ ⏸️

5K posts

wrangle enjoyer ⏹️ ⏸️

wrangle enjoyer ⏹️ ⏸️

@Idgitbhh

เข้าร่วม Aralık 2024
194 กำลังติดตาม61 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
wrangle enjoyer ⏹️ ⏸️
@CorleyAaliyah @princessakano A lot for ppl in labs literally believe super intelligence is possible, they can create a machine god, and they are actively trying to make AI better than them at AI research If an AI is better than humans at improving itself, you should be very worried.
English
2
0
5
984
wrangle enjoyer ⏹️ ⏸️
@krishnanrohit I’m using “benefits the rich” to mean that Econ says infinite taxes on the rich are inefficient and most schools of thought lean on the free market being better than state intervention
English
0
0
0
4
wrangle enjoyer ⏹️ ⏸️
@krishnanrohit Econ is abstract and often benefits the rich so ppl subconsciously don’t even think about it, the case for landlords being parasitic rent-seekers is simple, greed is easily understandable, and it seems intuitively unfair some ppl have many houses and other don’t
English
2
0
0
18
rohit
rohit@krishnanrohit·
What's the underlying reason why so many people so radically prefer bad economic policies like price controls, considering we've known they're bad for decades now?
English
44
0
77
5K
wrangle enjoyer ⏹️ ⏸️
@krishnanrohit I can imagine myself (granted me with worse epistemics than I have now) being so enraged by how straightforwardly unfair it is that landlords can just keep hiking prices for ppl who can already barely pay rent, that I wouldn’t even want to listen to counteraguments
English
0
0
1
4
wrangle enjoyer ⏹️ ⏸️
@corsaren @DHomonge Disagree with the comment you’re replying to, but for the sake of your confusion: I also thought came across as being snarky with the second part, as in implying it was wholly bad, but u clarified in the replies u liked it The person isn’t being very charitable to you tho
English
0
0
0
12
corsaren
corsaren@corsaren·
@DHomonge So like, what prompted this? I get it when I receive these sorts of comments on posts where I’m being a dick or talking my ass off about AI but this one is genuinely puzzling
English
1
0
123
4.2K
wrangle enjoyer ⏹️ ⏸️
@AbsentVxX @CantEverDie @esjesjesj This isn’t to say Elon isn’t impressive (as a businessman) or that managing and hiring for SpaceX isn’t really fucking difficult But if he has a lot more latitude for making X worse, and a worse X doesn’t impact revenue as much bc of network effects and the fact X is addictive
English
0
0
0
25
wrangle enjoyer ⏹️ ⏸️
@AbsentVxX @CantEverDie @esjesjesj person you’re replying to prolly believes Elon is dumb in general, but you’re also wrong being a social media CEO is very different from being a CEO for a hard tech company. Latter has clearer feedback loops, either things work or don’t Plus Elon Musk is brainrotted by X
English
1
0
0
63
onion person
onion person@CantEverDie·
seems like the current dynamic of nikita bier and elon musk is that nikita understands exactly how elon has completely ruined this website as a tool of spreading propaganda, and is trying to fix it as much as he can until elon notices lol
English
27
94
2.1K
54.7K
Saving for Act III
Saving for Act III@BeLikeAudrey·
@prizzvi Erm..a key part of university and schools is literally doing your own research! Homework, essays, reading the text. A qualified teacher is not the same as a random person on the internet or a friend. Go seek out knowledge
English
2
0
1
203
wrangle enjoyer ⏹️ ⏸️
@peehole4 @prizzvi @JohnTibbetts2 Have you heard about sealioning? Of course there was/is an enormously hige problem with people writing off those who disagree as bigoted, but some ppl also genuinely refuse any form of debate and “just ask questions” to troll
English
0
0
0
0
peehole
peehole@peehole4·
@prizzvi @JohnTibbetts2 Claiming people who asked questions out of disagreement are arguing in bad faith is cope and bad faith itself. "I'm willing to spout my views but lack the intellect and integrity to back them up so I'll just put you at fault for not immediately bowing down to my shitass beliefs"
English
3
0
3
333
Rigel
Rigel@RigelOrionBeta·
@Idgitbhh @TrueSlazac @electionsjoe The point is that we will never know. The best that prediction markets tell us is what the public thinks the probabilities are. Not what the probabilities are. There are incredibly few things anyone can predict with any degree of certainty.
English
1
0
0
6
Joe
Joe@electionsjoe·
Gotta love prediction markets lmao
Joe tweet media
English
35
66
2.8K
161.4K
i/o
i/o@avidseries·
Musk must have realized that if Twitter deboosted certain Third World regions, a lot of the red meat pro-MAGA and far-right propaganda that he enjoys (like that from Ian Miles Cheong and Inevitable West) would get less circulation.
i/o tweet media
English
48
81
775
22.2K
Martin van Staden
Martin van Staden@Martin_ASFL·
@CBHawkeyes @avidseries People work in advocacy to get paid. I got paid to spend hours of my life constructing the Index of Race Law, which is why Elon Musk can say "there's more race laws today than under Apartheid". Me - or the accounts spreading awareness - getting paid, is not a bad thing.
English
2
0
6
135
wrangle enjoyer ⏹️ ⏸️
@RigelOrionBeta @TrueSlazac @electionsjoe purely selfishly, if you are thinking of investing in the US, you now have to take into account the risk of your business + the risk of political instability don't disagree lots of it is basically pure gambling (especially lots of sports betting) but nevertheless
English
1
0
1
5
wrangle enjoyer ⏹️ ⏸️
@RigelOrionBeta @TrueSlazac @electionsjoe I'm saying on average. Like, if you took 100 random bets that are trading at 20%, and you *also* found people willing to bet against you at 50% (1:1 odds) for the same thing, you'd gain money from betting on the Polymarket side (even if you lose in this particular case)
English
1
0
0
14
wrangle enjoyer ⏹️ ⏸️
@Fatwang69420 @tenobrus @cxgonzalez I really do hope you're right, but I also can see with my own eyes the complex (to me) project I couldn't vibe-code 4 months ago, that I am now able to, (so I can stop paying for a SaaS) and that makes me much less likely to believe what you said about Jensen
English
0
0
0
24
J$
J$@Fatwang69420·
Benchmark metrics are irrelevant once you take the outside in perspective. LLMs economically are clunky and inefficient engines chewing tokens to give garbage out, just to consume as much tokens as possible even if you give explicit commands for reduced output. Token sellers are incentivized to not solve the problem quickly 🤣 literally Jensen the other day was talking about a $150k or $250k figure and that’s not from how developers should be using AI but rather how much money they want to make. That’s why the units are in $$$ and not something else. We actually do not have the processing power for 500k engineers to spend 50% of their paid income in tokens but the guy who said they do sells the machines. Jensen is fundamentally looking like he’s subtly realizing this whole AI thing is not going to pan out the way they’ve indicated to investors over the past 2-3 years. It’s a fallacy that you’re going to have Super Devs who do double the amount of work for less than double the amount of money. Notice a shift in rhetoric of “you won’t need devs anymore” as we are up against the limitations of LLM tech.
English
1
0
0
14
christian
christian@cxgonzalez·
LLMs will lead to productivity gains and new forms of high skilled labor, not mass unemployment
christian tweet media
English
108
50
513
23K
i2dt
i2dt@SirWirtz·
@TrueSlazac @electionsjoe Unironically the fact people have such a hard time grasping this concept of probability is why it’s so easy to make money on these sites
English
1
0
3
287
wrangle enjoyer ⏹️ ⏸️
@armadillofan23 @TrueSlazac @electionsjoe The results not matching the odds doesn’t mean ppl are acting on inaccurate information (or accurate if they match) The only thing it “proves” is that people are acting on incomplete information, which is true of any predictions ever made (or even any decisions for that matter)
English
0
0
0
5
wrangle enjoyer ⏹️ ⏸️
@armadillofan23 @TrueSlazac @electionsjoe You can have a super biased pollster that decides the US presidential election based on a coinflip and gets it right 10 times in a row You can also have a survey of half of all americans that predicts D, and get ultra unlucky and the other half votes for the R candidate
English
1
0
0
10