Daniel Woods

883 posts

Daniel Woods

Daniel Woods

@IelTop

I research the economics of cybersecurity & privacy Cyber risk science at @SolveCyberRisk @EdinburghUni My own thoughts

เข้าร่วม Nisan 2011
793 กำลังติดตาม798 ผู้ติดตาม
Daniel Woods รีทวีตแล้ว
Lawfare
Lawfare@lawfare·
In a new paper for Lawfare's Security by Design Series, Sezaneh Seymour and @IelTop argue that "Secure by Design (SbD) policies should be calibrated to the actual risks faced by small businesses, rather than focusing primarily on software vulnerabilities."
Lawfare tweet media
English
1
3
6
3.3K
Daniel Woods
Daniel Woods@IelTop·
I moved to <the other platform> and hope others will join. @CDra_90n set up a "security economics" follower-pack so you can quickly build a network of WEIS-y people. Contact one of us if you join <the other platform> and want to be added to the starter-pack.
English
0
0
1
204
Daniel Woods
Daniel Woods@IelTop·
@RobTerrin Apparently it's the old number because that was 2004! Buffet as an unlikely Gen Z who thinks you need $500k a year for a comfortable life.
English
1
0
1
50
Daniel Woods
Daniel Woods@IelTop·
@rossjanderson @CDra_90n also scraped a bunch of descriptive stats on team size, finding that the biggest teams have 500+ members.
Daniel Woods tweet media
English
0
0
2
113
Daniel Woods
Daniel Woods@IelTop·
My favourite finding is that these teams function like labour unions in negotiating with large tech companies to receive fair bug bounty payouts. This fighting for the little guy was very much @rossjanderson.
English
1
0
2
125
Daniel Woods
Daniel Woods@IelTop·
@RobTerrin @ravirockks @ollieatnowhere The real question is what's more expensive. Paying an InfoSec person not to do Infosec and instead learn a bit of insurance, or to pay an Insurance person to learn a bit of InfoSec 😀
English
2
1
2
49
Daniel Woods
Daniel Woods@IelTop·
@ravirockks @ollieatnowhere The points about InfoSec expertise bothered me more, as if the industry hasn't thought about hiring/acquiring outside insurance.
English
1
0
1
24
Ravi Nayyar
Ravi Nayyar@ravirockks·
@IelTop @ollieatnowhere Yeah, agree re the pessimism of the tone. I mean, the samples in the Coalition, etc reports aren't tiny.
English
1
0
0
17
Alexandra Paulus
Alexandra Paulus@ale_paulus·
"Policymakers and practitioners currently lack the capacity to evaluate the cybersecurity ecosystem and assess [...] which policies work and how well. The need for such an understanding is fundamental." Good read by @CyberStatecraft 's Stew Scott. lawfaremedia.org/article/counti…
English
3
0
3
450
Daniel Woods
Daniel Woods@IelTop·
@ravirockks @jamiemaccoll @arekfurt I think insurance wordings/disputes are a red herring. They've made a court acknowledge the elephant in the room, e.g. that OFAC don't enforce ransomware sanctions. But that doesn't mean the specific wordings matter much.
English
2
0
3
84
Ravi Nayyar
Ravi Nayyar@ravirockks·
'The cantonal court thus ruled that it was highly unlikely that the Insurance would be subject to [US sanctions] penalties ... [Insurer then appealed unsuccessfully.]
English
1
0
0
52
Daniel Woods
Daniel Woods@IelTop·
@Maxwsmeets What do you see as the gold standard for estimating ransomware trends?
English
0
0
2
88
Max Smeets
Max Smeets@Maxwsmeets·
Using leak site data also makes it difficult to say anything meaningful about sectoral targeting: sectors where organizations are less likely to pay (due to regulation, difficulty of extortion, insurance coverage, etc.) are overrepresented, skewing the data
English
4
0
12
5.3K
Max Smeets
Max Smeets@Maxwsmeets·
I appreciate IST's work and @craignewmark efforts but these statistics can be misleading without proper context. The source of data matters; aggregated from leak sites.
craig newmark@craignewmark

#Ransomware attacks increased by 73% across the world in 2023, @IST_org and the #RansomwareTaskForce report. Once again, governments and hospitals were among the most targeted industries. Check out their map and learn more about how we can combat ransomware: securityandtechnology.org/blog/2023-rtf-…

English
2
5
24
5.3K