Jonathan McCready

@RioMeets Naglesmann, Emery, Glasner, Poch, Ireola? All better managers. The football is terrible and thw wins are pretty lucky. The metrics show performances,xg and possession are worse than Amorim.

Michael Carrick has to get the job, who else?

@yaredo_Et @markgoldbridge Amorim football was better. Players just missed chances. Carrick's wind mostly luck and against 10 men including the goal against Chelsea

@markgoldbridge Amazing how u supported no garbage style of football suddenly when it is carrick and he's number one in the table u fucking want Champaign football! What an idiot

Amazing how counter attacking and boring football suddenly isn't a problem with these pundits. Very different story under the last two managers. Wonder why?...

@AjeyGee @markgoldbridge So naive

@markgoldbridge We’re top of the league on form. Amorim could barely scrape two consecutive wins together . If Carrick came in a month earlier there’s a fair chance that we may have been in the title race. The football isn’t perfect but there are reasons to be pleased.

@Mark368964 @markgoldbridge Lowest xg since 2017 v chelsea. Lucky wins that are unsustainable

@markgoldbridge Because Hargreaves understands club's circumstances. Utd are targeting to play in UCL next season. With the limited tool Carrick has, entertainment football is not priority but top 4.

@United_Army_ @markgoldbridge From this season...

@markgoldbridge You are a fucking stain on this fanbase. Sniveling little weasel is all you are. The fact there's actual United fans that watch you blows my mind. You and Neville suit each other. Cunts.

@markgoldbridge Mates...

@markgoldbridge It's more like Hag staying when they knew he wasn't good enough because he fluked the cup

It is ok to be scared about appointing an interim again. In 2012 Chelsea appointed Di Matteo and thanks to ageing stars like Drogba, Terry and Lampard they won the UCL and FA Cup. How much are United's results down to Bruno, Maguire and Casemiro? How sustainable is this?

@UJ_SZN @markgoldbridge No they weren't. Terrible performances, poor xg, poor possession, relying on luck and moments.

@markgoldbridge The performance was there when Micheal Carrick had the full squad, now is all about finding a way to get results. What is even hard to understand about this?

Some people just can't have the factual grown up conversation that it's results vs performance. Behind our results is very poor performances. Will the results lasts? Take your pick

@markgoldbridge Ineos are weak. It's like keeping Hag all over again when they knew they shouldn't just because he fluked the cup and performances terrible all year.

@samuelluckhurst Luck of the Carrick. Amorim played better football and more attacking but had no luck in fine margins. Carrick has the luck but like Ole and Hag it will run out if they keep him.

Rosenior: ‘The reality is Man United had one shot on target, scored against ten men and won the game 1-0. That should be impossible.’ #mufc

@talkSPORT He doesn't. Lower possession, lower attacking stats, worse football and half the games against ten men. Chelsea outplayed utd and utd scored their only shot on target against ten men. Luck.

Darren Ambrose: "He deserves it!" 🙌 Adam Catterall: "Why rush it?!" 🤷‍♂️ Adam Catterall questions if Man Utd should rush to give Michael Carrick the job full-time!

@sistoney67 @ManUtd No thanks.

Marcus Rashford could come back to @ManUtd bbc.co.uk/sport/football…

@hodson460949 @realsavanti Exactly

@realsavanti We don’t have a project how can you claim we have a project? We hired a manager with a specific system, didn’t buy players for it, asked him to change then sacked him when he didn’t and now we’re looking at 2/3 mangers who all have different styles etc 😂 that’s not a project

Nagelsmann would kill United's project. Ask Bayern.

@markgoldbridge Amorim proven right

United with an injury crisis playing the least games we've played in 100 years. Imagine next season

@samuelluckhurst Where was this sympathy for Amorim over Christmas

#mufc failed with their Lisandro Martinez appeal and he’ll miss their next three games. All three senior centre backs out vs Chelsea.

@lauriewhitwell Yes.

Do Manchester United need a super coach? A look at the latest on club’s big decision, which will come end of season, featuring Carrick, Nagelsmann, Enrique, Emery, Iraola. Plus thoughts from McClaren, Fortune, Smalling. Also, Ratcliffe ⬇️ #MUFC nytimes.com/athletic/72019…

@BhavyaOnSports @markgoldbridge Then sacked him for that personality

@markgoldbridge The report also says that Ratcliffe went with Amorim because he had a “fire personality”. The justification for the decisions they take is more ridiculous than the decisions themselves.

Who are these morons insiders 😆 Arsenal and City was clearly just the fumes of the intensity we'd had under Amorim and new manager bounce. We've quickly seen there isn't much else

@markgoldbridge Indecisive and weak

@UnitedStandMUFC What uplift?

🚨 Several industry insiders with access to the club believe #mufc should go with Carrick due to the major uplift in position that has come since his arrival. They view the wins over Manchester City and Arsenal as evidence of his ability to smartly set United up against the country’s BEST. 🌟 By sticking with him, executives would be giving themselves, in effect, two BITES of the CHERRY. If they appoint somebody else and it starts badly, going back to Carrick is NOT an option. ❌ [@lauriewhitwell, @TheAthleticFC]

@markgoldbridge Lower standards with Carrick

Rashford open to a United return. Wonder why?