Jack_Gray
506 posts

Jack_Gray
@JackGrayEcom
Over £6 million in ecom sales | 22 l ☘️ Irish Guy l Posting to build connections (I have none) | Brand Owner l Creative Strategist Role l CMO












This is what a properly built persona system looks like in practice. 3 micro personas. 4 angles each. 4 vehicles each. 48 genuinely distinct ads from a single macro persona. Take one macro persona: "The Conscious Parent." On paper, one audience. In reality, completely different people with completely different fears, motivators, and trigger points. That's the micro persona layer. And it's where most creative strategies stop being strategic. P1.1, P1.2, and P1.3 sit inside the same macro. Same broad demographic. But each one needs a different hook, a different setup, a different cognitive bias tapped to actually convert. An ad built for one will not land the same way with another. If you're writing to all three with the same message, you're reaching none of them properly. Here's what building to that level of specificity actually unlocks. Each one a different signal. Each signal giving Andromeda something new to work with. Each piece of creative capable of reaching a person the last one couldn't. That's how incremental reach actually grows. Not by producing more, but by covering more psychological territory with what you produce. Most accounts have far more creative territory available to them than they realise. The personas are there. The angles exist. They just haven't been mapped and briefed against each other yet.



@SarahLevinger How would you start creating ads? By desire, angle, persona? You match those together? Do you then create iterations of those and based on what? Or new ads/ideas?
















