Jediphone

You can tell someone’s smart by how well they simplify things, not complicate them.

Neil Postman, writing and speaking before his passing in 2003, identified what he regarded as modernity's greatest crime: the systematic destruction of childhood. He observed that society had begun raising not children, but miniature consumers—children whose natural imagination was being steadily replaced by external stimuli. Noisy, pre-programmed plastic toys that captivated briefly then bored them. Screens that offered constant engagement but left no room for inner invention. Overprotective adults who supervised every step, preventing children from building unsupervised worlds of their own. The consequence, Postman warned, was profound: a generation arriving at adolescence with almost no internal resources, dependent on outside excitement, and then rebelling—often destructively—as they belatedly tried to create the autonomy and meaning that should have been nurtured much earlier. He emphasized that childhood was never merely a biological phase; it was a cultural achievement—one that consumer culture and accelerating media saturation were actively dismantling. His call, delivered decades ago, was both simple and radical: reclaim childhood. Protect the slow unfolding of imagination. Reduce the flood of ready-made stimulation. Allow children space to daydream, explore, fail, and invent without constant adult oversight or digital pacification. Looking back from 2026, many now reflect that Postman foresaw—with unsettling precision—the trajectory we would follow. The average screen time of young children has only increased, unstructured play has continued to decline, and the mental health challenges among adolescents have grown more visible. Yet his diagnosis still resonates because it points to something recoverable: the possibility of choosing differently, even now. Do you believe we have already lost too much of what he called childhood—or do you see meaningful ways, in families and communities, to still reclaim it?

Nora Keegan was not trying to change public health policy. She was just paying attention. In elementary school in Calgary, she noticed something adults kept dismissing. Children rushing out of public restrooms. Hands clamped over their ears. Faces tense. Complaints whispered between friends. It hurts my ears. She felt it too. After using hand dryers, her ears rang. The sound lingered. Adults brushed it off. They are just loud. That is what machines do. But Nora kept wondering why children reacted so strongly. And more importantly, why no one was measuring it. In fifth grade, she decided to find out. With the help of her parents, both physicians, she turned curiosity into research. She borrowed professional sound equipment. She designed an experiment. And then she went where the problem lived. Public bathrooms. Over two years, she visited forty four restrooms across Alberta. Libraries. Restaurants. Schools. She took eight hundred and eighty measurements. She measured at adult height. Then she crouched to measure at child height. She tested distance. Position. Airflow. Again and again. What she found was impossible to ignore. Many high speed hand dryers exceeded one hundred decibels at a child’s ear level. Some reached levels comparable to emergency sirens. Levels that medical authorities already prohibit in children’s toys because of the risk of hearing damage. Children were not imagining the pain. They were standing closer to the source. Their ears were smaller. And the sound hitting them was stronger than what adults experienced. Manufacturers claimed their machines were safe. Nora’s data showed real world conditions told a different story. And she did not stop there. Still in middle school, she began designing a noise reduction filter. A simple modification that lowered sound output by more than ten decibels. Proof that the problem was not inevitable. Then she did something most adults never do. She wrote a scientific paper. Her first submission was rejected. So she revised. She corrected. She tried again. In June 2019, Paediatrics and Child Health published her study. Its title was direct and impossible to dismiss. Children who say hand dryers hurt my ears are correct. She was thirteen years old. Health professionals paid attention. Researchers cited her work. Parents shared it. Manufacturers requested meetings. All because a child trusted her own experience enough to test it. Nora did not raise her voice. She measured. She documented. She proved. And in doing so, she reminded the world of something simple and easily forgotten. Sometimes the smallest voices are describing the biggest problems. You just have to listen.

Introducing Lindy Assistant, the ultimate AI assistant. It talks with you through iMessage, connects to 100s of apps, helps you with your meetings and emails, and proactively finds ways to save you time all day. Check out some examples of ways Lindy assistant helps below.

Reminder Researchers achieve breakthrough in strong magnets without rare-earth metals. A new class of high anisotropy magnetic materials has been created using earth abundant elements, potentially ending the world’s dependence on rare-earth metals. In this study, researchers at Georgetown University developed a new magnetic material called C16-phase high-entropy borides, made from common metals like iron, cobalt, nickel, and manganese, combined with boron. Today’s strongest magnets depend on rare-earth elements, which are expensive, environmentally destructive to mine, and vulnerable to supply-chain disruptions. Instead of relying on rare earths, this material achieves high magnetic anisotropy through its tetragonal C16 crystal structure, which naturally locks magnetization in a preferred direction, the key to strong permanent magnets. Using a rapid technique called combinatorial sputtering, the team tested around 50 different compositions at once, identifying magnets whose performance approaches rare-earth magnets, all at room temperature (300 K). If this technology scales, it could enable cheaper and more sustainable: > Electric motors > Wind turbines and EVs > Magnetic data storage > Spintronic devices This research was published in Advanced Materials and shows that rare-earth elements may no longer be essential for high performance magnets.

Stay liquid in a world of stone. ‘Quiet Rebellion’ Lyrics by me. Song made with Suno. Images made using Midjourney. Animation VEO3

BREASTMILK She thought she was studying milk. What she uncovered was a conversation. In 2008, evolutionary anthropologist Katie Hinde was working in a primate research lab in California, analyzing breast milk from rhesus macaque mothers. She had hundreds of samples and thousands of data points. Everything looked ordinary—until one pattern refused to go away. Mothers raising sons produced milk richer in fat and protein. Mothers raising daughters produced a larger volume with different nutrient balances. It was consistent. Repeatable. And deeply uncomfortable for the scientific consensus. Colleagues suggested error. Noise. Statistical coincidence. But Katie trusted the data. And the data pointed to a radical idea. Milk is not just nutrition. It is information. For decades, biology treated breast milk as simple fuel. Calories in. Growth out. But if milk were only calories, why would it change depending on the sex of the baby? Katie kept digging. Across more than 250 mothers and over 700 sampling events, the story grew more complex. Younger, first-time mothers produced milk with fewer calories but significantly higher levels of cortisol—the stress hormone. The babies who drank it grew faster. They were also more alert, more cautious, more anxious. Milk wasn’t just building bodies. It was shaping behavior. Then came the discovery that changed everything. When a baby nurses, microscopic amounts of saliva flow back into the breast. That saliva carries biological signals about the infant’s immune system. If the baby is getting sick, the mother’s body detects it. Within hours, the milk changes. White blood cells surge. Macrophages multiply. Targeted antibodies appear. When the baby recovers, the milk returns to baseline. This was not coincidence. It was call and response. A biological dialogue refined over millions of years. Invisible—until someone thought to listen. As Katie reviewed existing research, she noticed something unsettling. There were twice as many scientific studies on erectile dysfunction as on breast milk composition. The first food every human consumes. The substance that shaped our species. Largely ignored. So she did something bold. She launched a blog with a deliberately provocative name: Mammals Suck Milk. It exploded. Over a million readers in its first year. Parents. Doctors. Scientists. People asking questions research had skipped. The discoveries kept coming. Milk changes by time of day. Foremilk differs from hindmilk. Human milk contains over 200 oligosaccharides babies can’t digest—because they exist to feed beneficial gut bacteria. Every mother’s milk is biologically unique. In 2017, Katie brought this work to a TED stage. In 2020, it reached a global audience through Netflix’s Babies. Today, at Arizona State University’s Comparative Lactation Lab, she continues reshaping how medicine understands infant development, neonatal care, formula design, and public health. The implications are staggering. Milk has been evolving for more than 200 million years—longer than dinosaurs walked the Earth. What we once dismissed as simple nourishment is one of the most sophisticated communication systems biology has ever produced. Katie Hinde didn’t just study milk. She revealed that nourishment is intelligence. A living, responsive system shaping who we become before we ever speak. All because one scientist refused to accept that half the story was “measurement error.” Sometimes the biggest revolutions begin by listening to what everyone else ignores.

holy fucking shit

I've never felt this much behind as a programmer. The profession is being dramatically refactored as the bits contributed by the programmer are increasingly sparse and between. I have a sense that I could be 10X more powerful if I just properly string together what has become available over the last ~year and a failure to claim the boost feels decidedly like skill issue. There's a new programmable layer of abstraction to master (in addition to the usual layers below) involving agents, subagents, their prompts, contexts, memory, modes, permissions, tools, plugins, skills, hooks, MCP, LSP, slash commands, workflows, IDE integrations, and a need to build an all-encompassing mental model for strengths and pitfalls of fundamentally stochastic, fallible, unintelligible and changing entities suddenly intermingled with what used to be good old fashioned engineering. Clearly some powerful alien tool was handed around except it comes with no manual and everyone has to figure out how to hold it and operate it, while the resulting magnitude 9 earthquake is rocking the profession. Roll up your sleeves to not fall behind.