David

155 posts

David banner
David

David

@JewAnalyst

Examining Jewish history, rabbinic literature, and theology—and their real-world implications.

เข้าร่วม Ocak 2026
0 กำลังติดตาม8 ผู้ติดตาม
David
David@JewAnalyst·
@SpiritedIrish @FatherAltman Yahweh was originally one of the seventy sons of El, the Almighty Canaanite God, and thus brother of Baal.
English
0
0
0
12
SpiritedIrish
SpiritedIrish@SpiritedIrish·
Bolsheviks/Zionists killed over 60 million Christians between 1917-1946. Friday James Altman True. And as today's Zionist atheists and Leftists are talmudists, if we trace the talmud to its beginnings we find the Pharisees. So Zionists and Leftists are cut from the cloth of the Pharisees. They are also of the cloth of the Israelis who ran after Baal and other Canaanite gods during the time of Isaiah. When Isaiah cried out to God--Lord no one hears me, the Lord answered: I have my remnant, they will hear you. So we know the faithful remnant is not the faithless, even God-hating Baal and self worshipping Left and Zionist atheists (some are Baal worshippers like Epstein) trampling down faithful Christians today.
English
1
0
0
47
Fr. James Altman
Fr. James Altman@FatherAltman·
Bolsheviks/Zionists killed over 60 million Christians between 1917-1946. As we speak they are targeting, killing and ethnically cleansing Christians in the Holy Land ad surrounding countries. So. Bottom line. The Zionists can take their "anti-semite" card and shove it straight up where the sun don't shine. It's time 2.8 billion Christians stand up and oppose the 16.9 million Zionists in the world. FIGURE IT OUT, dear family. Zionists crucified Jesus. Nothing has changed.
conspiracybot@conspiracyb0t

Between 1917-1946, the Bolsheviks killed over 60 million Christians... yet, you won't be taught about that

English
29
234
649
8.8K
David
David@JewAnalyst·
The book of Hebrews declares that Jesus mediates a superior covenant: “But as it is, Christ has obtained a ministry that is as much more excellent than the old as the covenant he mediates is better, since it is enacted on better promises. … In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.” (Hebrews 8:6, 13) It then quotes the Old Testament promise verbatim (Hebrews 8:8-12, citing Jeremiah 31:31-34): “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will establish a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah … I will put my laws into their minds, and write them on their hearts … For I will be merciful toward their iniquities, and I will remember their sins no more.” The new covenant, promised to the house of Israel and Judah, is fulfilled in Christ. The old covenant is obsolete.
English
0
0
0
4
Brandon
Brandon@brandonnn_18·
@JimBobT when the heck did GD ever say that his covenant would be "fulfilled"? this is such a weird thing that christians love to say GD did say it was an EVERLASTING covenant What does everlasting mean?
English
2
0
0
16
zeropanican
zeropanican@tutientoi·
@Israel2252 Japanese have the ability to know when they’re conquered. Can you say the same for Islamists?
English
3
0
4
711
Uri Israel
Uri Israel@Israel2252·
America can win a war and win it easily without any boots on the ground. Don’t take my word for it, take Japan’s.
English
89
27
387
12.6K
David
David@JewAnalyst·
@Israel2252 @grok, how many US ground forces perished fighting the Japanese in the Pacific theatre?
English
1
0
1
13
David
David@JewAnalyst·
@TheJewishIdea Hayim Nahman Bialik, the Russian-Jewish poet who is considered the pioneer of modern Hebrew poetry, part of the vanguard of Jewish thinkers who "gave voice to a new spirit of his time," and recognized today as Israel's national poet: benyehuda.org/read/4648
David tweet media
English
0
0
0
6
The Jewish Idea
The Jewish Idea@TheJewishIdea·
Communists are the stupidest people on earth.
English
2
0
23
274
David
David@JewAnalyst·
@srulibroocker @OnlyGB Hayim Nahman Bialik, the Russian-Jewish poet who is considered the pioneer of modern Hebrew poetry, part of the vanguard of Jewish thinkers who "gave voice to a new spirit of his time," and recognized today as Israel's national poet: benyehuda.org/read/4648
David tweet media
English
0
0
0
4
GB
GB@OnlyGB·
I follow Moses. I know many that follow Jesus. I have a problem with some that follow Marx. But isn't it strange that all three of us are following Jews?
English
11
1
54
1.4K
David
David@JewAnalyst·
@LilyRoslynWest I’m surprised to see that some Jews on this app aren't shying away from admitting—albeit somewhat obscurely, and likely missed by most—that there's no such thing as a Christian Zionist.
English
0
0
0
2
David
David@JewAnalyst·
@RabbiPoupko @grok, what was the indigenous Jewish population, known as the Old Yishuv, overwhelming stance on Zionism?
English
1
0
0
9
Rabbi Poupko
Rabbi Poupko@RabbiPoupko·
In 1937 the majority of Jerusalem's residents were Jewish. 30% of the people living on this piece of land were Jewish. The proposed Jewish state would have hundreds of thousands of Arab Palestinians. The proposed Arab Palestinian are would have ZERO Jews. It was a horrible compromise that the international community made us with the Peel Commission. But we took it, even though they were stealing our lands. Palestinians rejected this offer even though it favored them so heavily. It was never about Gaza or freeing Palestine. They want to annihilate us.
Rabbi Poupko tweet media
English
14
42
170
3.7K
David
David@JewAnalyst·
Fun fact, before the site's [Valley of Hinnom; Gehenna evolved from referring to the literal valley into a metaphorical concept] dark reputation developed during the late First Temple period [8th–7th centuries BC], the Paleset, Ph'listm, Phillistines, or as we now call them, the Palestinians, were already in Palestine for 300-400 years, when they settled in southern Canaan, where they established the Philistine Pentapolis (Gaza, Ashkelon, Ashdod, Ekron, Gath) after their defeat against Ramsesses III ca. 1150 BC.
Ayn Reagan@AynReagan

Gehenna. Jewish hell. It is where the Master of the Universe sends Jew haters when they depart this mortal coil. If anti-Semites only understood the agony that awaits them...well...they would still be FUBAR. The searing flames. The cruel torment. And subsisting on gefilte fish!

English
0
0
0
22
David
David@JewAnalyst·
Fun fact, before the site's [Valley of Hinnom; Gehenna evolved from referring to the literal valley into a metaphorical concept] dark reputation developed during the late First Temple period [8th–7th centuries BC], the Paleset, Ph'listm, Phillistines, or as we now call them, the Palestinians, were already in Palestine for 300-400 years, when they settled in southern Canaan, where they established the Philistine Pentapolis (Gaza, Ashkelon, Ashdod, Ekron, Gath) after their defeat against Ramsesses III ca. 1150 BC.
English
0
0
0
19
David
David@JewAnalyst·
@afagerbakke hey @grok, what was the Jewish population in the land currently Israel, Gaza, Westbank in 1880, the Old Yishuv, and what was their overwhelming stance on Zionism?
English
1
0
0
11
David
David@JewAnalyst·
David@JewAnalyst

Christian-Zionism: A Rejection of Christ The term “Christian Zionist” is an oxymoron. One cannot simultaneously follow the teachings of Jesus Christ—the Messiah who fulfilled the Law and the Prophets—and regard Jews or the modern political state of Israel as possessing a special covenant status apart from Him. According to the New Testament, Jews who reject Christ are spiritually in the same condition as any other unbeliever: beloved by God and in need of the Gospel, but no longer automatically part of “Israel” or the “chosen people” by virtue of physical descent. Covenant membership is no longer determined by ancestry; it is redefined by faith in Christ alone. In Romans 9:6-8, Paul explicitly states this: “It is not as though God’s word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but ‘Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.’ This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.” This passage alone undermines the foundation of Christian Zionism, which treats modern Jews as covenant heirs irrespective of their relationship to Christ. Paul develops this further with the olive tree metaphor in Romans 11:17-24. The “natural branches” (ethnic Jews) were broken off because of unbelief in their Messiah. “Wild branches” (Gentiles) have been grafted in through faith. The root—God’s covenant promises—remains the same, but membership now depends entirely on faith, not ethnicity. Paul warns Gentile believers against arrogance, precisely because the natural branches were severed for the reason Christian Zionists refuse to ackowledge: rejection of Christ. The book of Hebrews declares that Jesus mediates a superior covenant: “But as it is, Christ has obtained a ministry that is as much more excellent than the old as the covenant he mediates is better, since it is enacted on better promises. … In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.” (Hebrews 8:6, 13) It then quotes the Old Testament promise directly (Hebrews 8:8-12, citing Jeremiah 31:31-34): “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will establish a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah … I will put my laws into their minds, and write them on their hearts … For I will be merciful toward their iniquities, and I will remember their sins no more.” The new covenant, promised to the house of Israel and Judah, is fulfilled in Christ. The old covenant is obsolete. Insisting on a future restoration of the old covenant contradicts Scripture’s clear statement that the new has rendered the old obsolete. Paul reinforces this to Gentile believers in Galatians 3:26-29: “for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith ... There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus ... And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise.” Every promise to Abraham—land, seed, blessing to the nations—belongs to those who are in Christ. There is no separate remainder for unbelieving ethnic Jews. The inheritance is not deferred to a future millennium; it is realized now in Christ. This truth is also evident in Peter’s words to largely Gentile Christians (1 Peter 2:9-10), where he applies language once reserved for a national Israel: “But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light. Once you were not a people, but now you are God’s people; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy.” Terms like “chosen people,” “holy nation,” and “God’s special possession” now describe the Church. The phrase “once you were not a people” echoes Hosea’s prophecy (Hosea 2:23), showing that Gentiles have been incorporated as God’s people. Multiple Old Testament texts foretold the inclusion of Gentiles (e.g., Isaiah 49:6, where the Messiah is made “a light for the nations”). The New Testament reveals this fulfillment through the Gospel. Whether Jew or Gentile, under the old or new covenant, only faith in Christ matters. Ethnic Jews without faith in Christ are not “Jews” in the covenant sense, just as uncircumcised Gentiles were not under the old covenant. Paul concludes in Romans 2:28-29: “For no one is a Jew who is merely one outwardly, nor is circumcision outward and physical. But a Jew is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter. His praise is not from man but from God.” The consistent biblical testimony is clear: true Israel is the community of faith in Jesus Christ. Believing Gentiles are grafted in; unbelieving Jews are broken off (though they may be regrafted through faith). Christ is the Israel of God, Abraham’s seed, the chosen people, the holy nation, and the heir of the new covenant. All Old Testament promises find their “Yes” in Christ (2 Corinthians 1:20) and thus in His body, the Church. To identify as a “Christian Zionist” is therefore a contradiction. It seeks to maintain two incompatible positions: [1] salvation and covenant membership come solely through faith in the Messiah [2] ethnic Jews retain a distinct covenant status and land promise apart from that Messiah. The New Testament permits no such duality. Jews who reject Christ are spiritually in the same position as any other unbeliever—lost and in need of the Gospel. Christians are called to love them, pray for them, and proclaim Christ to them, not to grant a political or theological exemption that Scripture plainly denies.

QME
1
0
0
7
🇺🇸 Jake Hilton 🇮🇱
“Chrislamists” are prepping for the end times wars. The Beast of the Revelation will be the Islamic Mahdi. The False Prophet of the Revelation will be the Islamic “Isa” (Jesus). Catholics and Orthodox—and many others—will join themselves to the Beast’s kingdom. And ENEMY NUMBER ONE will be… Israel/Jews and Christians Zionists. I say, “Bring all you got. It won’t be enough.” 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 “A prophecy: The word of the Lord concerning Israel. The Lord, who stretches out the heavens, who lays the foundation of the earth, and who forms the human spirit within a person, declares: “I am going to make Jerusalem a cup that sends all the surrounding peoples reeling. Judah will be besieged as well as Jerusalem. On that day, when all the nations of the earth are gathered against her, I will make Jerusalem an immovable rock for all the nations. All who try to move it will injure themselves. On that day I will strike every horse with panic and its rider with madness,’ declares the Lord. ‘I will keep a watchful eye over Judah, but I will blind all the horses of the nations. Then the clans of Judah will say in their hearts, “The people of Jerusalem are strong, because the Lord Almighty is their God.” On that day I will make the clans of Judah like a firepot in a woodpile, like a flaming torch among sheaves. They will consume all the surrounding peoples right and left, but Jerusalem will remain intact in her place. The Lord will save the dwellings of Judah first, so that the honor of the house of David and of Jerusalem’s inhabitants may not be greater than that of Judah. On that day the Lord will shield those who live in Jerusalem, so that the feeblest among them will be like David, and the house of David will be like God, like the angel of the Lord going before them. On that day I will set out to destroy all the nations that attack Jerusalem.’” — Zechariah 12:1-9
Insurrection Barbie@DefiyantlyFree

New psyop has dropped. Christian Zionism is now the anti-Christ lol.

English
18
16
58
1.8K
David
David@JewAnalyst·
Bolsheviks were Jewish, but because of the anti-Jewish laws in Prussia, they were forced to hide it; Crypto-Jews. Check Lenin's maternal grandfather who had to 'convert' to Christianity, or even Karl Marx's father, a descendant of a long line of rabbis that was also forced to 'convert' because he wasn't allowed to practice law. Roughly 8 months after seizing power, on July 26, 1918, the Council of People's Commissars issued a decree on anti-Jewish violence, famously signed by Lenin, which declared that anti-semitism was "a mortal danger to the Revolution," and that "the pogromists and all those who foment the pogroms" were to be placed "outside the law", which meant execution without trial under civil war conditions. This is why the Nazis were viewed as liberators in the East, and why so many Europeans voluntarily helped them.
English
0
0
0
15
Rich Toronto
Rich Toronto@rich_toronto·
No way! “They” erased something from history books that was never there about something that never happened! “They” must have super powers! Maybe “they” have a weather machine and a space laser too!
Yasir Khan@YasirRkhan111

@rich_toronto

English
2
1
19
469
David
David@JewAnalyst·
David@JewAnalyst

Christian-Zionism: A Rejection of Christ The term “Christian Zionist” is an oxymoron. One cannot simultaneously follow the teachings of Jesus Christ—the Messiah who fulfilled the Law and the Prophets—and regard Jews or the modern political state of Israel as possessing a special covenant status apart from Him. According to the New Testament, Jews who reject Christ are spiritually in the same condition as any other unbeliever: beloved by God and in need of the Gospel, but no longer automatically part of “Israel” or the “chosen people” by virtue of physical descent. Covenant membership is no longer determined by ancestry; it is redefined by faith in Christ alone. In Romans 9:6-8, Paul explicitly states this: “It is not as though God’s word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but ‘Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.’ This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.” This passage alone undermines the foundation of Christian Zionism, which treats modern Jews as covenant heirs irrespective of their relationship to Christ. Paul develops this further with the olive tree metaphor in Romans 11:17-24. The “natural branches” (ethnic Jews) were broken off because of unbelief in their Messiah. “Wild branches” (Gentiles) have been grafted in through faith. The root—God’s covenant promises—remains the same, but membership now depends entirely on faith, not ethnicity. Paul warns Gentile believers against arrogance, precisely because the natural branches were severed for the reason Christian Zionists refuse to ackowledge: rejection of Christ. The book of Hebrews declares that Jesus mediates a superior covenant: “But as it is, Christ has obtained a ministry that is as much more excellent than the old as the covenant he mediates is better, since it is enacted on better promises. … In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.” (Hebrews 8:6, 13) It then quotes the Old Testament promise directly (Hebrews 8:8-12, citing Jeremiah 31:31-34): “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will establish a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah … I will put my laws into their minds, and write them on their hearts … For I will be merciful toward their iniquities, and I will remember their sins no more.” The new covenant, promised to the house of Israel and Judah, is fulfilled in Christ. The old covenant is obsolete. Insisting on a future restoration of the old covenant contradicts Scripture’s clear statement that the new has rendered the old obsolete. Paul reinforces this to Gentile believers in Galatians 3:26-29: “for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith ... There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus ... And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise.” Every promise to Abraham—land, seed, blessing to the nations—belongs to those who are in Christ. There is no separate remainder for unbelieving ethnic Jews. The inheritance is not deferred to a future millennium; it is realized now in Christ. This truth is also evident in Peter’s words to largely Gentile Christians (1 Peter 2:9-10), where he applies language once reserved for a national Israel: “But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light. Once you were not a people, but now you are God’s people; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy.” Terms like “chosen people,” “holy nation,” and “God’s special possession” now describe the Church. The phrase “once you were not a people” echoes Hosea’s prophecy (Hosea 2:23), showing that Gentiles have been incorporated as God’s people. Multiple Old Testament texts foretold the inclusion of Gentiles (e.g., Isaiah 49:6, where the Messiah is made “a light for the nations”). The New Testament reveals this fulfillment through the Gospel. Whether Jew or Gentile, under the old or new covenant, only faith in Christ matters. Ethnic Jews without faith in Christ are not “Jews” in the covenant sense, just as uncircumcised Gentiles were not under the old covenant. Paul concludes in Romans 2:28-29: “For no one is a Jew who is merely one outwardly, nor is circumcision outward and physical. But a Jew is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter. His praise is not from man but from God.” The consistent biblical testimony is clear: true Israel is the community of faith in Jesus Christ. Believing Gentiles are grafted in; unbelieving Jews are broken off (though they may be regrafted through faith). Christ is the Israel of God, Abraham’s seed, the chosen people, the holy nation, and the heir of the new covenant. All Old Testament promises find their “Yes” in Christ (2 Corinthians 1:20) and thus in His body, the Church. To identify as a “Christian Zionist” is therefore a contradiction. It seeks to maintain two incompatible positions: [1] salvation and covenant membership come solely through faith in the Messiah [2] ethnic Jews retain a distinct covenant status and land promise apart from that Messiah. The New Testament permits no such duality. Jews who reject Christ are spiritually in the same position as any other unbeliever—lost and in need of the Gospel. Christians are called to love them, pray for them, and proclaim Christ to them, not to grant a political or theological exemption that Scripture plainly denies.

QME
0
0
0
5
David
David@JewAnalyst·
@SamTPrince @calvinrobinson @GadSaad Was God antisemetic when he unleashed his wrath upon the Israelites, numerous times, because of their inability to stop their depraved cycle of sin?
English
0
0
0
13
David
David@JewAnalyst·
David@JewAnalyst

Christian-Zionism: A Rejection of Christ The term “Christian Zionist” is an oxymoron. One cannot simultaneously follow the teachings of Jesus Christ—the Messiah who fulfilled the Law and the Prophets—and regard Jews or the modern political state of Israel as possessing a special covenant status apart from Him. According to the New Testament, Jews who reject Christ are spiritually in the same condition as any other unbeliever: beloved by God and in need of the Gospel, but no longer automatically part of “Israel” or the “chosen people” by virtue of physical descent. Covenant membership is no longer determined by ancestry; it is redefined by faith in Christ alone. In Romans 9:6-8, Paul explicitly states this: “It is not as though God’s word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but ‘Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.’ This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.” This passage alone undermines the foundation of Christian Zionism, which treats modern Jews as covenant heirs irrespective of their relationship to Christ. Paul develops this further with the olive tree metaphor in Romans 11:17-24. The “natural branches” (ethnic Jews) were broken off because of unbelief in their Messiah. “Wild branches” (Gentiles) have been grafted in through faith. The root—God’s covenant promises—remains the same, but membership now depends entirely on faith, not ethnicity. Paul warns Gentile believers against arrogance, precisely because the natural branches were severed for the reason Christian Zionists refuse to ackowledge: rejection of Christ. The book of Hebrews declares that Jesus mediates a superior covenant: “But as it is, Christ has obtained a ministry that is as much more excellent than the old as the covenant he mediates is better, since it is enacted on better promises. … In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.” (Hebrews 8:6, 13) It then quotes the Old Testament promise directly (Hebrews 8:8-12, citing Jeremiah 31:31-34): “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will establish a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah … I will put my laws into their minds, and write them on their hearts … For I will be merciful toward their iniquities, and I will remember their sins no more.” The new covenant, promised to the house of Israel and Judah, is fulfilled in Christ. The old covenant is obsolete. Insisting on a future restoration of the old covenant contradicts Scripture’s clear statement that the new has rendered the old obsolete. Paul reinforces this to Gentile believers in Galatians 3:26-29: “for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith ... There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus ... And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise.” Every promise to Abraham—land, seed, blessing to the nations—belongs to those who are in Christ. There is no separate remainder for unbelieving ethnic Jews. The inheritance is not deferred to a future millennium; it is realized now in Christ. This truth is also evident in Peter’s words to largely Gentile Christians (1 Peter 2:9-10), where he applies language once reserved for a national Israel: “But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light. Once you were not a people, but now you are God’s people; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy.” Terms like “chosen people,” “holy nation,” and “God’s special possession” now describe the Church. The phrase “once you were not a people” echoes Hosea’s prophecy (Hosea 2:23), showing that Gentiles have been incorporated as God’s people. Multiple Old Testament texts foretold the inclusion of Gentiles (e.g., Isaiah 49:6, where the Messiah is made “a light for the nations”). The New Testament reveals this fulfillment through the Gospel. Whether Jew or Gentile, under the old or new covenant, only faith in Christ matters. Ethnic Jews without faith in Christ are not “Jews” in the covenant sense, just as uncircumcised Gentiles were not under the old covenant. Paul concludes in Romans 2:28-29: “For no one is a Jew who is merely one outwardly, nor is circumcision outward and physical. But a Jew is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter. His praise is not from man but from God.” The consistent biblical testimony is clear: true Israel is the community of faith in Jesus Christ. Believing Gentiles are grafted in; unbelieving Jews are broken off (though they may be regrafted through faith). Christ is the Israel of God, Abraham’s seed, the chosen people, the holy nation, and the heir of the new covenant. All Old Testament promises find their “Yes” in Christ (2 Corinthians 1:20) and thus in His body, the Church. To identify as a “Christian Zionist” is therefore a contradiction. It seeks to maintain two incompatible positions: [1] salvation and covenant membership come solely through faith in the Messiah [2] ethnic Jews retain a distinct covenant status and land promise apart from that Messiah. The New Testament permits no such duality. Jews who reject Christ are spiritually in the same position as any other unbeliever—lost and in need of the Gospel. Christians are called to love them, pray for them, and proclaim Christ to them, not to grant a political or theological exemption that Scripture plainly denies.

QME
0
0
0
4
David
David@JewAnalyst·
Is it truly that hard to grasp that people do not like a foreign, adversarial military presence, especially during civil war conditions? What are Americans going to do when the US President is assassinated, the country is in a violent civil war, and suddenly China launches a "peace keeping" mission and deploys two thousand CCP troops to patrol Washington DC? And on Hamas..
David tweet mediaDavid tweet mediaDavid tweet mediaDavid tweet media
English
0
0
0
11
Reza Nasri
Reza Nasri@RezaNasri1·
Iran has never contemplated to initiate an unprovoked attack on Europe. Israel, on the other hand, has spent decades theorising what’s dubbed the “Samson Option". Israeli military historian Martin van Creveld put it bluntly back in 2003: " We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force… We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.” Now, who poses a real threat to the world. A country that has only ever fought defensive wars, or an expansionist apartheid regime with a documented record of genocide that's openly prepared to turn on its own allies the moment support wavers?
Reza Nasri tweet media
English
253
3.1K
9.8K
245.1K