LatroInMist

@ConceptualJames @FischerKing64 @christopherrufo Look at this absolute phaggot. Diving in threads with no substance and proving everyone’s point for him. Absolute pseud grifting loser

@FischerKing64 @christopherrufo

Here is James Lindsay criticizing @christopherrufo for pursuing the same objectives as Lindsay. Lindsay doesn’t like that Rufo has relied on Burnham as a ‘former Marxist’ - even though Burnham is a totally mainstream dead NR guy. But Lindsay can’t even remember Burnham’s name.

@ScottRoberts Interesting. I guess the KJV just fell from heaven, complete and unedited, a full 1600 years after Christ. Everything and everyone prior to 1600 must have just going off of vibes…

You don't need a new revelation. You don't need a fresh word from God. You need to read the one He already gave you. The Bible is sufficient. Full stop.

@prageru Christian Bible. It’s comes from the New Testament. Try again

America’s values come from the Hebrew Bible. Antisemitism and anti-Americanism go hand in hand—Rabbi Meir Soloveichik explains why.

@StefanMolyneux Not an argument

Oh shut up. You're just removing rational standards and think you are proving something "2 and 2 make 5, but my math is beyond logic, bro!" Just dumb.

@HarrierMagnus Correct. Which is why democracy always devolves into total degeneracy, debauchery, and a breakdown of social cohesion. When the best way to gain power is to promise whatever the masses most want, the end result is chaos.

The problem is that so many people, when they get a vote, will vote for pleasure, and the loosening of mores. People like voting for treats. It's what they do. As we have seen in the case of Ireland, even nominally Catholic democracies are not immune to this.

@joelmowbray @TuckerCarlson @TCNetwork @megynkelly @MegynKellyShow That’s a lot of words when you could have just said, “I’m retarded” and been done with it.

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson won't say that Hitler murdered 6 million Jews. Based on my own long ago conversation with him, this isn't some weird fluke. Tucker simply doesn't believe the Nazis slaughtered six million Jews. So, is Tucker a Holocaust denier? Yesterday, Tucker said that "the Nazi government murdered... a whole bunch of Jews," but stressed that this was "in addition to a whole bunch of other people." He expressed outrage that Jewish victims of Hitler receive so much attention because they were "only... one specific ethnicity" murdered by the Nazis. Last month, Tucker told Clayton Morris, "Hitler killed a ton of people, including a ton of Jews." Despite extensive research, I could not find a single example of Tucker acknowledging the extraordinarily well-documented fact that six million Jews were exterminated in the Holocaust. Which brings me to a private conversation Tucker and I had maybe 15 years ago, one which I had written off at the time — but in hindsight, probably shouldn't have. (We've never been close, but would chat if we ran into each other.) For some reason, I think because I had just toured Yad Vashem, I mentioned to him how mind-boggling it is that the Nazis murdered six million Jews. Tucker shot me a strange look, almost incredulous. Sarcastically, I quipped, "You’re not one of those nutjobs who don't believe that six million Jews died, are you?" Instead of a jabbing back or acting indignant, Tucker responded, "I mean, whatever, Hitler killed a bunch of different people." It was awkward, enough so that I dropped it and quickly exited the conversation. I've thought about that a few times over the years, but couldn't bring myself to the idea that Tucker was any sort of a Holocaust denier. Now, though? The most charitable interpretation is that he's not bothered by people who downplay or minimize what the Nazis did specifically to the Jews. But by continually refusing to acknowledge that Hitler killed six million Jews, that at least borders on Holocaust denial. Even Megyn Kelly recognized that denying the full scope of what Hitler did to the Jews IS a form of Holocaust denial, at least before she became Tucker's self-appointed guardian. In her now-infamous show in front of a live audience last November, Megyn pressed him about why he "didn't raise" with Nick Fuentes his ongoing contention "that we’ve way overstated the number of Jews killed in the Holocaust." Tucker responded, "Buzz off!" The likelihood that Tucker, at least to some significant degree, is a Holocaust denier is reinforced by something else he said last month to Clayton Morris. He bizarrely claimed that Hitler hadn't "ever" called to "exterminate" the Jews, despite ample historical evidence that he (and Nazi leadership) had done exactly that. Even more shocking is that he said this as part of his argument that Hitler's rhetoric wasn't as extreme as — wait for it — Bibi Netanyahu's. Then, of course, there's the viral story that I broke last November regarding Tucker's warning that "calling people Nazis" could make people become like Dietrich Bonhoeffer — specifically that it was tragic that the Lutheran pastor had been involved in plotting to assassinate Hitler. During the middle of World War II and the Holocaust, to be clear. Like most people who have known Tucker — who is incredibly charming and often warm in person — it took me a very long time to realize that how dark some of his views truly are. But look again at just this partial track record: (1) refusing to state that Hitler murdered six million Jews, (2) denying that Hitler had ever called to exterminate the Jews, (3) insisting that Bibi's rhetoric is worse than Hitler’s, and (4) that attempting to assassinate Hitler during WWII was un-Christian and just wrong. Maybe any one of those could be explained away. But all of them together? Because, make no mistake, Tucker knows exactly what he's doing. That is probably what's scariest of all.

@BibleInContext1 This is rich coming from you, a Jew pretending to be Christian for money. x.com/rblv73/status/…

You don’t need the pope for anything at all. The Roman Papacy is a hoax and the Roman Pontiff is a fraud.

@jrmiller777 Meanwhile, Jesus. “And I tell you, you are Peter (Petros-rock) and on THIS rock I will build MY church, and the gates of Hell will not prevail against it.” I think I’ll trust Christ before some random prot heretic

Christ alone is the rock upon which the church is built. Not Peter. Not Popes.

@L0m3z Hugo’s is mostly a popularity contest. How else do you explain writers like Gene Wolfe and R.A. Lafferty never winning a Hugo but both have received several Nebulas and a Damon Knight award. It’s been mostly trash since at least the 90’s

Disparate Impact but for Hugo awards

@HarrierMagnus …where one can discard any church or leader at any time the moment they disagree with their chosen political or theological personal feelings. It’s diet Christianity-all of the flavor with none of the calories.

@HarrierMagnus The hatred for Leo for having the gall to *gasp* meet with other religious leaders is further proof that most people are politically loyal first rather than religiously loyal. This is why prots love Protestantism, not for Truth, but because it affords endless choice…

People calling Pope Leo a communist is just yet another reminder for me that Saint John Chrysostom transcendes ages. Nobody who thinks Leo is a communist could withstand hearing Chrysostom talk about the poor and the rich. He's hard for ME to read, because he chastises me.

@StefanMolyneux Stefan, you’re a smart guy. I’m sure you’re familiar with Aquinas’s five ways. Please elaborate on where he errs in his definition of God as the Eternal Actual

Atheism is the understanding that self-contradictory entities cannot exist There is no such thing as a "square circle" There is no such thing as consciousness without a brain A being cannot be both all-powerful and all-knowing, since these properties contradict each other Etc

@NightwatchN8 Try again, port.

@NightwatchN8 Latin was the universal language from antiquity through the middle ages and well into the enlightenment. It was used so that priests and clergy could understand one text across several languages and dialects. It proves the Church always had the laity in mind, not the opposite

Thank Protestants for purchasing with their blood the Holy Bible Since the Reformation the bible has went on to become the most published, more influencial book in all history If it were up to Catholics it would still be chained to the pulpits and never translated out of Latin

@GmorganJr Neither does the church, retard phaggot. Proclamations are infallible when issued Ex Cathedra.

The answer is no.

@JoelWBerry I read it. Multiple times. It’s why I’m Catholic

If you’re disillusioned with the lies and psyops from globalists and corrupt religious leaders, I have some advice: Read the Bible. Read the words of Jesus for yourself. They are the ONLY thing that’s unassailable. They stood the test of time, and they always will.

@sola_chad Sounds like you’re giving authority to a man. Which would make it a man made tradition. Quite the conundrum, Mr sola

“There's not one tiny shred of evidence in Scripture for the papacy … It's all an invention of men and demons to create an illusion of spirituality and transcendence." —John MacArthur

@howertonjosh >”Pastor” >Promises made to the Jews that have yet to be fulfilled >”It is finished” The Protestant reformation and it’s consequences have been a disaster for the human race

Are the Jewish people really God's "chosen" people? Let's go to the only source that matters: the Word of God.

@taco_talks Catholics have faith, and according to your logic, that’s all that’s needed. And it can never be lost. Try again, retard

Being Catholic is the opposite of being saved.