LionRiver

@clintoptions “According to people familiar with the matter”

GameStop Preparing Offer for eBay -WSJ

@TheUltimator5 WSJ’s “According to people familiar with the matter” is trust-me-bro catshit wrapped in fake-news dogshit until it’s officially announced by GameStop themselves. But big if true.

The WSJ article is bullshit and we all know it. MSM just needs the cover to explain away price action as it happens so people don’t go looking deeper. $GME

@Cointelegraph “According to people familiar with the matter” per WSJ It’s not official until it’s official.

🔥 BIG: GameStop ($GME) is preparing an offer to acquire eBay, per WSJ.

@Cointelegraph “According to people familiar with the matter” is not official news.

🚨 HUGE: GameStop (GME) surges over 9% following reports the company is exploring an acquisition of eBay.

@wallstreetbets Big if true. But it’s “According to people familiar with the matter” - WSJ So it’s not official until it’s official.

GameStop $GME is preparing to make an offer to acquire eBay $GME up 6% at $26.53 WE'RE SO BACK

@SiriusStonks @Polymarket Big if true. But not official until its official. WSJ says its “according to people familiar with the matter”.

@Polymarket Steven Cohen owns PSA, whose marketplace relies on eBay to sell and buy graded cards online thru a reputable retailer. Both PSA and eBay agreed to a joint vault platform which now will be owned by $GME is absolute 3D chess

NEW: GameStop reportedly preparing a bid to acquire eBay.

@Polymarket Big if true. Otherwise, WSJ is full of shit with the “according to people familiar with the matter” as the alleged source for this news leak. It’s not official until its official. For now it’s trust-me-bro catshit wrapped in fake-news dogshit.

@Kalshi JUST IN: WSJ claiming unconfirmed bullshit “according to people familiar with the matter”. Sounds like a load of fake-news catshit wrapped in trust-me-bro dogshit. It’s not official until it’s official. Until then, it’s a convenient narrative to justify price volatility.

JUST IN: GameStop reportedly preparing an offer to acquire Ebay

@LightOfTruth47 @KobeissiLetter Yes because it’s “according to people familiar with the matter”

@KobeissiLetter Don’t believe any unconfirmed anonymous “sources” unless RC/GME confirm it themselves publicly, until the it’s just BS

BREAKING: GameStop stock, $GME, surges over +9% on reports that the company is looking to acquire eBay.

@KobeissiLetter Until it’s confirmed by GameStop themselves, this is a fake narrative to help explain swap volatility. WSJ says “according to people familiar with the matter” Nothing is official until it’s official.

@zerohedge Article says “according to people familiar with the matter” Sounds like a load of fake-news catshit wrapped in trust-me-bro dogshit. Which hedge fund, bank or market maker needs a narrative this time? Someone prove me wrong. The FTD’s and swaps still exist.

*GAMESTOP COULD SUBMIT OFFER FOR EBAY AS SOON AS THIS MONTH: WSJ not Amazon?

@Shadowbutton @ButtFarm69 “According to people familiar with the matter” sounds like a load of trust-me-bro catshit wrapped in fake-news dogshit. WSJ and Lauren Thomas are full of shit.

@KobeissiLetter “According to people familiar with the matter” Sounds like a load of trust-me-bro catshit wrapped in fake-news dogshit. But I’d like to be proven wrong.

@KobeissiLetter “According to people familiar with the matter” Fake news. WSJ is full of shit. The volatility is due to swaps/FTD’s/shortselling. WSJ is in on it and needs a fake story to explain the volatility. But also, if I’m wrong, then I support it. Lol.

BREAKING: GameStop, $GME, is preparing to make an offer to acquire eBay, per WSJ.

@WSJ “According to people familiar with the matter” sounds like a load of fake-news catshit wrapped in trust-me-bro dogshit.

GameStop is preparing to make an offer for eBay, according to people familiar with the matter, part of CEO Ryan Cohen’s plan to turn GameStop into a $100 billion-plus juggernaut. on.wsj.com/4eVoYgX

@golem123456789 @wokenessucks Probably. I voted 🔴 at first too. But then I realized that in a world where not everyone is rational enough to pick 🔴; then making a risk for collective group survival 🔵 can be better than guaranteed individual self-preservation🔴.

@LionRiver3 @wokenessucks Me gustaria ver a todos los que presionais el azul si en vuestro dia a dia os jugais la vida por salvar al resto o en la hora de la realidad la cosa cambia

The problem with the red button/blue button thing is that blue button people still live with this filter over their eyes that distorts reality. They lack the self-awareness to realize that if they were actually in that situation in real life, they’d push the red button too. That’s exactly why they get so mad and take it personally when we don’t see it their way. They call us immoral and evil. But we see the world realistically. They don’t. When you factor in the other 8 billion people on Earth and the raw fear of possibly dying, there’s zero chance 51% hit the blue button. 95–98% of people would take the guaranteed safe option and choose red. We know this because we deal in reality, not fantasy. For us red-button people, pushing blue is suicide. Is it sad that out of 8 billion some will inevitably hit blue and die? Yes. But if blue is suicide, I’m still hitting red. The vast majority of blue button people lack the self-awareness to know how they’d actually react under pressure. They’re the morons who die first in horror movies.

@ozmosize @tspencer322 @KobeissiLetter And where is WSJ getting their source?

@tspencer322 @KobeissiLetter Its Wall Street journal

@SneakyEleph4nt @tspencer322 @KobeissiLetter And where is WSJ getting their source?

@tspencer322 @KobeissiLetter Can you read? the source is the WSJ lol

@KobeissiLetter Sounds like a fake narrative with no confirmed sources.

@galthen @Quasilocal 🔴tards are too retarded to understand that they were literally raised/protected by others, and that they live in a 🔵 system that survives off collective group coordination. You still need 🔴 people though to thrive, because a 🔵-only society will stagnate.

@LionRiver3 @Quasilocal Blue voters are too retarded to understand they will not get 25% let alone 50%

Roughly it's like this right? Red button: "I don't think blue would come close to 50% in the real world" (So I can't safely press it) Blue button: "I feel confident in my fellow human to do the right thing and blue will win" (so it's safe to press blue)