Nothing special to see

4.8K posts

Nothing special to see banner
Nothing special to see

Nothing special to see

@M_P_net

Don't know why you're bothering to look. Wrong or right, Opinions are my own. Try to see from a different points of view. Challenge my view or change my mind

why do you want to know, เข้าร่วม Ekim 2022
211 กำลังติดตาม141 ผู้ติดตาม
Nothing special to see
When I was a child I love cadburys chocolate. Up until the point mondelez destroyed it The chocolate that comes out of that factory now is not cadbury's chocolate. It tastes like sick tasting plastic. It's not that people don't want to pay more for the product it's that the product is disgusting. Luckily I can find real chocolate elsewhere.
English
0
0
14
102
BBC Radio 4 Today
BBC Radio 4 Today@BBCr4today·
"It's not like we're trying to fool the consumer in any way." Dirk Van de Put, CEO of Mondelez International - the company who own Cadbury - tells @Leanna_Byrne how the brand wants to keep consumers happy with a familiar price point but that this can result in smaller products.
English
67
1
4
7.8K
Nothing special to see
I would add that I do like to exclude a trans person for the fantasy. But I do not take part in it and do not believe it. At the end of the day I see them as somebody with a mental illness and we should take pity on that. Their way of coping is to go into the feminine role as the female gender is protected. It is a hard life to be a man with judgement and responsibility.
English
1
0
0
13
Danny Beales MP
Danny Beales MP@DannyBeales·
LGBT+ people deserve to be able to live freely and safely. I don't believe the EHRC's guidance is helping to make that possible. My statement on why I've signed EDM 240 to stand up for trans people in my constituency and across the UK.
Danny Beales MP tweet mediaDanny Beales MP tweet mediaDanny Beales MP tweet media
English
1.7K
115
881
273.2K
Nothing special to see
Nothing special to see@M_P_net·
@beffjezos 398B-parameter, I can run it just about but with that much context unless they get turbo quaint working. Really it'd be good if it distilled it down to 250 billion or even release a 120 billion. With 10 billion active
English
0
0
2
44
Beff (e/acc)
Beff (e/acc)@beffjezos·
If you're considering doing something with open source models, this American model might be the way. Encourage american open source!
Ahmad@TheAhmadOsman

INCREDIBLE Trinity-Large-Thinking just dropped > The STRONGEST American open model we’ve gotten so far > #2 on PinchBench > ~96% cheaper than Opus > not hype, look at the benchmarks > GPQA-D > 76.3 > beats MiniMax M2.7 !!! > but still behind Opus 4.6 > Tau2-Airline > 88.0 > basically trading blows with the frontier > ahead of most of the pack > Tau2-Telecom > 94.7 > strong > but GLM-5 still spikes higher here > PinchBench (agent check) > 91.9 > #2 overall > sitting right behind Opus 4.6 > and ahead of all other opensource attempts > this is the important one btw > because this is what your agents actually feel like in prod > AIME25 (math / reasoning) > 96.3 > competitive with Kimi and GLM > still under Opus ceiling > MMLU-Pro > 83.4 > solid general intelligence baseline > BCFLv4 > 70.1 > middle of the pack, not its strongest axis > this model is not trying to be the best at everything > it’s optimizing for: > multi-turn coherence > tool use > long-horizon agents > cost > aka the stuff that actually matters when you deploy > not “we beat everyone on X benchmark” > but “we’re close enough where economics flip the decision” > also Apache 2.0 weights > meaning: > you can run it > fine-tune it > break it > own it > American open models finally starting to look real again > took long enough Buy a GPU

English
12
24
295
28.3K
NO CONTEXT HUMANS
NO CONTEXT HUMANS@HumansNoContext·
Who should be the next James Bond?
NO CONTEXT HUMANS tweet media
English
5.9K
174
3.3K
1.4M
Nothing special to see
Nothing special to see@M_P_net·
@Erdayastronaut Well you keep going down in size till it's the bare minimum. But then it's a custom unit, I think they want a standard size in stead of one offs.
English
0
0
0
82
Everyday Astronaut
Everyday Astronaut@Erdayastronaut·
(Ultimate arm chair engineer warning, long but hear me out) Artemis is a mess. I've been working on a very deep dive going over all possible options to get humans on the moon with existing (and near future existing) hardware and I've discovered something quite interesting about the current plans for Starship HLS. Starship HLS should ABSOLUTELY not do it's own Trans Lunar Injection. SpaceX should do a "stubby" HLS which only has enough propellant to get from NRHO down to the surface and back. This only requires about 400 tonnes of propellant because you could remove something like 20 or 25 TONNES of tankage that is currently baked into the design that's ONLY used ONCE to do the TLI. A stubby Starship HLS now has MUCH greater margins too, almost 700 m/s of dV for a round trip between NRHO and the lunar surface. This also means its refueling requires substantially less propellant for the subsequent missions. It makes the refueling trans lunar tanker require much less propellant, which means it requires fewer launches to fuel that up as well. It all works towards much fewer launches all together, a much more efficient lunar lander that isn't carrying around an additional 25 tonnes of dry mass, a shorter vehicle which requires less hardware for the elevator, a lower center of gravity, much lower landed mass since it requires less propellant to get back to NRHO etc etc. It's a win : win. The only drawbacks I've found so far is the trans lunar tanker and HLS would need to be able to dock nose to nose and have heavy bracing to be able to perform the TLI docked with the Trans Lunar Depot, however this would certainly be less mass than the 25 tonnes of parasitic tankage we've removed. The other drawback is a trans lunar refuel depot that has minimal dry mass (and therefore only 2 Rap Vacs) would likely need to expend a booster to be able to get into orbit initially since it would take about 19 minutes for two Raptors to burn through 1,600 tonnes of prop, so you'd have to launch it with less than 600 tonnes of prop which still gives it enough dV to get into orbit if the booster is expended, but also can get the job done with just two Raptor Vacuums, would be be most efficient for all trans lunar refueling operations. BUT, THIS IS TRUE OF THE FULL HLS AS WELL! The numbers BARELY close with little margin for error and boil-off with a full height HLS doing its own TLI. A stubby HLS is almost the only real viable option that has much greater margins and requires far less to refuel once its at the moon. Best of all, cargo and crew volume remain the same for a stubby HLS Starship. There's almost no compromise other than the complication of having to do the TLI with two docked vehicles. Something that's never been done before, but certainly the juice is worth the squeeze over having an inherently inefficient lunar lander. I'm working on a very in depth deep dive on all things Artemis and this is just something that stood out. I can't wait to show you my full rundown. There's some interesting options out there that can help ensure the US beats China back to the moon while also aligning with long term sustainability goals. What're your thoughts @elonmusk?
Everyday Astronaut tweet media
English
368
263
3.9K
476.6K
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
1/1 The study: Scientists tracked calories burned by 4,213 adults across 34 cultures using a method called doubly labeled water. Water molecules carrying harmless oxygen and hydrogen stable isotopes help track calorie burn based on CO₂ release. The findings: 1. Americans, Europeans,  and other developed nations burn about the same total daily calories as Hadza hunter‑gatherers in Tanzania and Bolivian forager‑farmers (when body size, age, and sex are factored in). 2. As countries get richer, people get heavier and gain more body fat. But burning fewer calories isn't the issue, it only explains about 10% of why we're getting bigger. The data is clear: more junk food = more body fat. No matter how many calories you burn.
Bryan Johnson tweet media
English
12
18
306
53.7K
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
We’re nearly twice as fat as hunter gatherers. Not because we get less exercise. But because of what we eat. Junk food is to blame. Here’s which foods to avoid based on this new study 🧵
English
79
120
2.5K
308.8K
World Insights
World Insights@World_Insights1·
🍽️ Top 15 Countries with the Most Delicious Food 1. 🇮🇹 Italy - Pizza, pasta, gelato 2. 🇫🇷 France - Pastries, cheese, wine 3. 🇯🇵 Japan - Sushi, ramen, tempura 4. 🇹🇭 Thailand - Curries, pad thai, street food 5. 🇮🇳 India - Biryani, butter chicken, chaat 6. 🇲🇽 Mexico - Tacos, mole, guac 7. 🇨🇳 China - Dim sum, noodles, duck 8. 🇹🇷 Turkey - Kebab, baklava, pide 9. 🇪🇸 Spain - Tapas, paella, churros 10. 🇬🇷 Greece - Moussaka, souvlaki, feta 11. 🇰🇷 South Korea - Kimchi, BBQ, bibimbap 12. 🇺🇸 USA - Burgers, BBQ, fried chicken 13. 🇱🇧 Lebanon - Shawarma, hummus, tabbouleh 14. 🇻🇳 Vietnam - Pho, banh mi, rolls 15. 🇵🇰 Pakistan - Karahi, nihari, kebabs
English
101
14
179
89.9K
Nothing special to see รีทวีตแล้ว
Grummz
Grummz@Grummz·
This is allegedly midjourney video side by side with the Ghibli original. If so, this is crazy and disturbing how far AI has come in just a year.
English
226
135
1.8K
186.8K
Nothing special to see
Nothing special to see@M_P_net·
@bryan_johnson I know you're vegan and that's fine. Hypothetically speaking what would a meat and veg style protocol look like to you. I wonder if the quantity will be less /easier to make.
English
0
0
0
186
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
my chef is sending recipes. will post next time
English
5
1
225
58.2K
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
what i'm eating for the next few days
Bryan Johnson tweet mediaBryan Johnson tweet media
English
169
44
2.1K
181K
Nothing special to see รีทวีตแล้ว
Sean
Sean@scs_real·
lmfao 😂😂😂
English
587
3.2K
31.5K
1.3M
Nothing special to see รีทวีตแล้ว
Dr Alexander D. Kalian
Dr Alexander D. Kalian@AlexanderKalian·
@KimJohnsonMP Here is the Laffer curve. Please learn basic economics.
Dr Alexander D. Kalian tweet media
English
2
1
8
182
Nothing special to see
Nothing special to see@M_P_net·
It's not the first time I've seen this kind of thing. Couple of years back I have it on CCTV footage at the back of my house. My CCTV footage helped capture one of the perpetrator. I had the police around looking at my footage. The other three are still at large. I was told by the victim that they were paid £75 each to come round with baseball bats and axes and smash his house and two of the houses up plus the cars to intimidate him. I'm planning to move house it's just not safe for my kids around here.
English
0
0
0
289
London & UK Street News
London & UK Street News@CrimeLdn·
A stabbing that happened in poplar ( tower hamlets) today.
English
479
890
3.8K
753.2K
Calgie
Calgie@christiancalgie·
TikTok pithily sums up Britain’s council planning insanity
English
17
232
2.2K
96.6K
WeGotitBack 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇺🇸
Went to meet a 12 yr old girl and all he has to say is “Slightly going off subject is to why you are here.. Vladimir Putin is now threatening to nuke the whole of the United Kingdom”
English
575
637
7.8K
2.3M