MrMoonMath 🚀😎

8.5K posts

MrMoonMath 🚀😎 banner
MrMoonMath 🚀😎

MrMoonMath 🚀😎

@MrMoonMath

Exploring exponential network effects in crypto and clean tech

California เข้าร่วม Aralık 2008
811 กำลังติดตาม497 ผู้ติดตาม
MrMoonMath 🚀😎
MrMoonMath 🚀😎@MrMoonMath·
Slowly at first… then all at once
Chris Meder@EVCurveFuturist

South Australia wasn’t supposed to move this fast. Models assumed slow, steady, controlled change. Instead it’s already at ~74% renewables, hitting 100% around 74% of the time. Beyond targets. Beyond plans. When cost curves hit, the system doesn’t transition… it flips. That’s where the models start to break. They assumed renewables would gradually take share. Instead they’re already setting the behaviour of the grid. Price, flow, stability… all increasingly driven by wind and solar. That shift wasn’t meant to happen this early. And here’s the part most people still miss. Demand isn’t sitting back waiting for the grid to catch up. It’s starting to move toward it. What used to be a ~3.3 GW system is now planning for 6.5 GW and beyond, with long term thinking pushing toward ~25 GW. SA already has way more generation capacity than it needs most of the time, which is why you’re seeing 100%+ renewables periods, negative demand events, exports to other states, and a surge in new battery plants. That’s a classic sign of a system moving into energy surplus mode. That’s not normal growth. That’s a system being rebuilt for something bigger. Mining, green metals, data centres. Energy-intensive industries don’t wait around. They move to where energy is cheapest, most abundant, most reliable. At the same time, the old intermittency argument quietly collapsed. Not through debate, but through deployment. Storage scaled. Batteries moved from experiment to infrastructure. Multi-hour systems are becoming standard, not exception. Now the grid is doing things it wasn’t supposed to do this early. Negative demand. Excess generation. Exporting energy instead of scrambling for it. These aren’t edge cases anymore. They’re signals the system has already flipped. This is why calling it a transition doesn’t quite fit anymore. It implies something slow, linear, predictable. What this looks like is a phase change. The models assumed gradual adoption. Reality followed cost curves. China is winning on scale. No question. But South Australia is showing something just as important… what the end state actually looks like. A grid where energy becomes abundant at times, local by default, and detached from fuel markets. reneweconomy.com.au/100-pct-renewa…

English
0
0
0
3
MrMoonMath 🚀😎
MrMoonMath 🚀😎@MrMoonMath·
To the Moon!
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

Lunar soil is 45% oxygen by mass. Almost half the ground astronauts walk on is breathable air, locked inside chemical bonds with iron, titanium, and aluminum. Blue Origin's Blue Alchemist reactor heats crushed Moon rock to 1,600°C, turning it into a molten conductor. Then it runs an electric current through the melt. Oxygen ions migrate to one electrode and bubble off as gas. Iron, silicon, and aluminum collect at the other. The economics are where this gets wild. Delivering one kilogram of anything to the lunar surface costs roughly $1.2 million. A single astronaut breathes about 0.84 kg of oxygen per day. That's over $300 million per year per person just to keep breathing, shipped from Earth. This reactor doesn't just solve the breathing problem. The metals that come out of the same process are construction-grade iron and aluminum. The silicon gets refined into radiation-resistant solar cells. The glass covers those solar cells to protect them for 10+ years on the surface. One machine, running on solar power, producing air, building materials, electronics, and rocket fuel from dirt. Blue Origin estimates this could cut lunar landing costs by 60% and reduce fuel cell mass by 70%. Their facility in LA already spans 60,000 square feet of lab space with 65 researchers. They're running an autonomous demo in simulated lunar conditions this year. The real constraint on a permanent Moon base was never getting there. It was staying there without a $1.2 million-per-kilogram supply chain from Earth. This reactor breaks that constraint at the molecular level.

English
0
0
0
4
David Sinclair
David Sinclair@davidasinclair·
Longevity science is accelerating faster than expected
English
135
140
2.3K
71.4K
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis·
Most people hear “bring back the woolly mammoth” and say, “impossible.” Colossal might be considered a de-extinction company, but Ben Lamm is actually building a synthetic biology platform with consequences that could be much bigger than bringing back mammoths. -- $10B valuation in 4 years  -- 260 scientists already across the US and Australia, plus a growing AI engineering stack -- 12+ potential spinouts from the same platform, including microbes designed to break plastic at the chemical-bond level -- 73,000-year-old skull to living direwolf puppies in 18 months  -- 78% cloning efficiency vs. ~2% industry norms
English
27
22
258
21.5K
MrMoonMath 🚀😎
MrMoonMath 🚀😎@MrMoonMath·
California built “six Hoover dams” worth of batteries in last 5 yrs, now powering 43% of grid demand - and STILL just getting started - Fast Company apple.news/A3I5wU6ESSPqLI…
English
0
0
0
11
Jesse Peltan
Jesse Peltan@JessePeltan·
So called "petroleum" or "rock oil" is a SCAM. Oil comes from WHALES. More whale oil is wasted in lamps by people writing letters about fantasy "rock oil" than will ever be produced from ROCKS. Rocks just don't have the OIL DENSITY. A whale is 50% OIL! Rocks are at most 1%! Whales are LOW ENTROPY. A whale is the smartest fish in the sea. It's a highly ORDERED lifeform. Rocks are HIGH ENTROPY. They contain almost NO OIL. A rock is one of the most entropic substances. A rock contains 99.3512% DISORDER. Any butcher could tell you that rocks have a lower oil density than even the most malnourished farm animal! It's called thermodynamics. We have always moved to sources of HIGHER oil density. Rocks have a LOWER oil density than PLANTS! "Rock oil" advocates will try and tell you that we're "running out of whales" or that whaling is "bad for the environment." Nonsense!! We've been whaling for HUNDREDS of years. Declines in whale populations are just natural fluctuations in a thousand year cycle driven by the SUN. They have NOTHING to do with whaling. The "theory" of "over-whaling" is global conspiracy designed to destroy the whaling industry that has provided reliable and affordable energy for hundreds of years. Without whaling we would all be FREEZING and in the DARK. Even the ink I'm writing this letter with right now was made with soot from a WHALE OIL lamp! Try doing that with your unicorn "rock oil." We don't live in some fantasy land where you can just get oil "out of the ground." It takes HUNDREDS of pounds of rock to equal a single pound of whale! That means more MINING and more environmental DAMAGE. They'll tell you "but we have more rocks than whales." NONSENSE!! Environmental damage is how many pounds of stuff it takes to make something. More Pounds = MORE DAMAGE Mining oil from ROCKS would mean we have to transport oil hundreds of miles over LAND! There aren't enough horses in the world! A single horse uses 3.14159265358 BUSHELS of water every DAY! So called "rock oil" will turn the whole continent into a polluted desert wasteland. Oh and those horse drawn carriages. They use WHALE OIL lamps to see at night! Try lighting up the night with your ROCKS. Stop the "rock oil" SCAM!
English
43
74
582
61.9K
MrMoonMath 🚀😎
MrMoonMath 🚀😎@MrMoonMath·
So chemtrails aren’t real… but they could be?
Massimo@Rainmaker1973

Existing aircraft like the Boeing 777 could be used to help cool the planet. A new modeling study from University College London suggests that stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) — a form of solar geoengineering — could be carried out using modified commercial jets, such as the Boeing 777F freighter, without needing to build expensive, specialized high-altitude aircraft. The technique mimics the cooling effect of large volcanic eruptions by releasing sulfur dioxide into the upper atmosphere. Once released, it forms tiny reflective particles (aerosols) that scatter sunlight back into space, reducing the amount of heat reaching Earth’s surface. Traditionally, SAI was thought to require flights above 65,000 feet (20 km) in the tropics. However, researchers found that injecting particles at a lower altitude of about 43,000 feet (13 km) over the polar regions (around 60°N and 60°S) could still achieve meaningful cooling. This altitude is within reach of existing wide-body jets like the Boeing 777 after modifications. According to the simulations, releasing approximately 12 million metric tons (about 13 million US tons) of sulfur dioxide per year — primarily during spring and summer in each hemisphere — could lower global temperatures by roughly 0.6°C (about 1.1°F), similar to the temporary cooling caused by the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption. ["Geoengineering technique could cool planet using existing aircraft." UCL]

English
0
0
1
5
MrMoonMath 🚀😎 รีทวีตแล้ว
John Bistline
John Bistline@JEBistline·
This is my favorite climate change chart. Japanese monks, aristocrats, and emperors kept meticulous records of cherry blossom festivals for 1,200 years and accidentally built the world's longest climate dataset.
John Bistline tweet media
English
237
9.3K
50.1K
1.6M
MrMoonMath 🚀😎
MrMoonMath 🚀😎@MrMoonMath·
We store corn, we store fuel, why not store electrons? The 2,000-Year-Old Cement Battery That Could Reduce Our Reliance on Fossil Fuel - The Wall Street Journal apple.news/Amar5bXGqSOaZW…
English
0
0
0
8
MrMoonMath 🚀😎 รีทวีตแล้ว
Our World in Data
Our World in Data@OurWorldInData·
✍️ New article: Battery costs have declined by 99% in the last three decades, making electrified transport a reality— Over 20 million electric cars were sold globally in 2025 — some for as little as $10,000. Even just two decades ago, that would have been impossible. The reason it's possible now? Batteries have gotten *much* cheaper. In 1991, lithium-ion battery cells cost around $9,200 per kilowatt-hour. By 2024, that had fallen to just $78 — a decline of more than 99%. You can see this in the chart. To put that in perspective: the battery cells in a standard electric car today cost around $5,000. In 1991, those same cells would have cost nearly $600,000. There was no single breakthrough behind this. Batteries follow a “learning curve”: as cumulative production grows, thousands of small improvements in chemistry, manufacturing, and supply chains drive prices down. Since 1998, every time global cumulative battery production doubled, the price dropped by roughly 19%. Early progress was driven by consumer electronics — phones and laptops — before the technology became viable for cars, buses, and larger energy storage. Energy density has also more than tripled since the 1990s, meaning batteries can now store far more energy for their volume. The half-a-million-dollar battery was never going to transform transport. The $5,000 battery is.
Our World in Data tweet media
English
69
553
1.6K
1.4M
MrMoonMath 🚀😎
MrMoonMath 🚀😎@MrMoonMath·
Automation Dividend is good framing. As Citizens we are more than just Customers and Employees in the economy - we’re also Owners and Investors. Everyone understands that owners of Apple stock get Dividends. The benefit is tied to being an investor in the company. We are all owners and investors in America - so getting a dividend from American automation is a clear and fair way to distribute the benefits of AI.
English
0
0
1
83
MrMoonMath 🚀😎
MrMoonMath 🚀😎@MrMoonMath·
@alexwg At this rate reaching Mars in “weeks not months” will become “days not weeks” 🔥🚀
English
2
0
1
254
MrMoonMath 🚀😎
MrMoonMath 🚀😎@MrMoonMath·
Remember: “The fossil fuel era is an abusive, dirty and expensive system of renting energy through endless, risky imports to benefit the few at the expense of the many.” Renewables are energy INCOME: reliable flows of energy across the planet every day. And the more we used the cheaper they get. Fossil fuels are energy INHERITANCE: finite, limited, geographically concentrated, & dirty. Pricey to process & import. And the more we use, the more expensive they get. @AssaadRazzouk @JessePeltan @JesseJenkins
Assaad Razzouk@AssaadRazzouk

Renewables are the only exit strategy: Day 27 update of the structural heart attack currently taking down the fossil fuel system ➡️India: PANIC. Long queues at petrol pumps nationwide, total dry-out risk up. 9 days of reserves left. Restaurants shut in 10 states. Planting season at risk due to Gulf fertilizer shortage ➡️USA: PRICE SHOCK. Diesel prices up 33%. Gas taxes suspended and Strategic Reserves being drained. Russia and Iran sanctions quietly paused ➡️Indonesia: QUEUES FORMING. Long lines at stations in Surabaya and Jakarta. Crude reserves of 20 days. Government weighing mandatory 1-day WFH policy to cut fuel use 20% ➡️Pakistan: PARALYSIS. Massive queues at stations following overnight price surge. Schools closed. 4-day workweek. LNG terminals at 20% capacity ➡️Brazil: SHORTAGE SIGNS. Lines forming in major cities, distributors warn of gasoline shortages. Fuel prices up 13% ➡️Bangladesh: CHAOS. Long queues and literal looting at petrol stations. Owners threatening to shut down entirely due to security concerns and inadequate supply. Textile production going dark ➡️Japan: TICKING CLOCK. Usable state reserves of 95 days. Emergency release of 80m barrels started ➡️Philippines: MANDATORY 4-DAY WEEK. Long queues at petrol stations. State offices shut on Fridays. National Energy Emergency declared ➡️Vietnam: DRYING UP. Stations running out of fuel. Government mandated WFH. Country effectively in energy lockdown ➡️Türkiye: EXPLOSION. Vehicles queuing for miles as fuel prices jump for 4th time in a month. Inflation at 31%, currency under severe pressure ➡️Germany: SOCIAL UNREST. Gas over €2.32/liter. Petrol stations limited to one price change/day to prevent panic price-gouging ➡️Thailand: 3KM QUEUES. Late-night lines stretching for kilometers in rural districts. Farmers waiting overnight for rationed 1,000-baht fuel caps. AC set to 26°C ➡️UK: WARNING. Concerns over queues growing. Government reviewing National Fuel Emergency Plans ➡️France: PRECAUTIONARY PANIC. Long queues visible across Paris and suburbs. Fuel prices up 30% ➡️South Africa: STATIONS EMPTY. Motorists driving to 3 or 4 stations to find any diesel stock. Farmers rationed to 80L per day ➡️Italy: PUMP RAGE. Tax reduction of €0.25/litre. 89% of power is gas-influenced; generation costs up 58% ➡️Kenya: WHOLESALE LOCK. Dry pumps in Nairobi. Suppliers curbing wholesale sales due to price caps. Motorists queuing overnight ➡️South Korea: LONG LINES. Growing anxiety as queues form at petrol stations. 50-day countdown has started. Release of 22m barrels from strategic stockpiles ➡️Nepal: CHOKE POINT. Families queuing for days for cooking gas (LPG). Total reliance on the trans-India supply chain has become a catastrophic liability ➡️Australia: RUNNING DRY. Panic buying has caused hundreds of stations to go dryu. Tanker arrivals slowed to a crawl. Penalties for price gouging doubled ➡️Sri Lanka: RATIONING. Restricted fuel supply. 4-day workweek. Schools closed. Petrol passes and long queues are back ➡️Slovenia: LIMITS. Private drivers capped at 50L per day. Queues at borders for fuel tourism from neighbouring countries The fossil fuel era is an abusive, dirty and expensive system of renting energy through endless, risky imports to benefit the few at the expense of the many Clean energy is about owning it For every country, this is yet another trigger to convert fossil fragility into electric independence

English
0
0
0
6
MrMoonMath 🚀😎 รีทวีตแล้ว
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis·
Humanoid robots + AI will mean everyone on Earth has access to better medical care than the richest person alive today. THAT is what abundance looks like.
English
234
149
1.2K
42.8K
John Bistline
John Bistline@JEBistline·
Wild figures in two decades of EIA retrospective data. Solar getting it wrong gets all the airplay. But the consistent underestimation of natural gas exports and the speed of coal's collapse are just as striking, even at 3-5 year horizons.
John Bistline tweet mediaJohn Bistline tweet mediaJohn Bistline tweet media
English
4
64
282
21.2K
MrMoonMath 🚀😎
MrMoonMath 🚀😎@MrMoonMath·
@JessePeltan Exponential growth occurs when new technologies unlock new biz opportunities. We see it time and time again.
English
0
0
0
223