ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Trump and his admin never wanted to oppose any of the new liberal order
They only want to hock mom’s jewelry before the pawn shop closes
English
Clarence Oddbody
13.6K posts
Clarence Oddbody
@Neg8BadFaith
We’re all patsies for inflation, theft, fraud and violence #Bitcoin
Outside the Matrix เข้าร่วม Aralık 2021
343 กำลังติดตาม416 ผู้ติดตาม
Clarence Oddbody รีทวีตแล้ว
🚨BREAKING: HORRIFIC CRIME
Israeli forces have killed child Ryan Bahaa Abu Al-Ajeen shortly after detaining him and his father in Wadi Al-Salqa, east of Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip.
He was taken to hospital after his release but was pronounced dead on arrival, while his father was injured.
The Israeli military had previously claimed it targeted an “armed group” in the area.
English
Clarence Oddbody รีทวีตแล้ว
You thought Epstein Island was bad?
Israel built the only military prison in the world designated for children.
Children are subjected to beatings, torture, and rape on a regular basis.
Conviction rates in courts reach 99.7%.
This applies only to non-jewish children.
English
Clarence Oddbody รีทวีตแล้ว
@zerohedge True.
That is why Bitcoin is based on energy: you can issue fake fiat currency, and every government in history has done so, but it is impossible to fake energy.
English
Clarence Oddbody รีทวีตแล้ว
🚨Reports and human rights organizations have documented famine conditions in Gaza, with widespread concerns that starvation is being used as a tool of collective punishment by Israel amid the ongoing Genocide.
English
Clarence Oddbody รีทวีตแล้ว
🚨BREAKING: A Palestinian woman was killed and two others injured in an Israeli drone strike targeting a group of civilians west of the town of Al-Zawayda in the central Gaza Strip.
English
Clarence Oddbody รีทวีตแล้ว
Federal civil complaint, Palm Beach, July 2004.
'JEFFREY EPSTEIN led a fifteen-year-old girl and a sixteen-year-old girl from the kitchen of 358 El Brillo Way upstairs to EPSTEIN's bedroom.'
He paid each of them $200.
English
Clarence Oddbody รีทวีตแล้ว
🔴 Gaza: At least eight Palestinians were killed Sunday as Israeli forces continued attacks across the Strip, according to Palestine Online. Four people were killed in a reported Israeli drone strike near Al-Yemen Al-Saeed Hospital in Jabalia, while others, including a 13-year-old boy, were killed by Israeli gunfire. Israeli artillery shelling, naval fire off Gaza City, and home demolitions also continued.
Mustafa Barghouti @Mustafa_Barghouti@MustafaBarghou1
Three Palestinians, including 13-year-old Amir Imad Al-Bashiti, were killed in separate Israeli attacks across Gaza on Sunday. Amir Al-Bashiti died from wounds sustained after being shot south of Khan Yunis, while Zaki Muhammad Al-Qara, 30, was killed east of the city. Mohammed Ramzi Abu Hasira, 39, also died from wounds sustained in an earlier Israeli drone attack in Gaza City.
English
Clarence Oddbody รีทวีตแล้ว
🚨 ISRAELI SETTLERS BURN PALESTINIAN VILLAGES IN REVENGE FOR TRUMP-IRAN PEACE DEAL.
Israeli settlers just torched multiple villages in the West Bank.
This is how they act when diplomacy and peace threatens their blood-thirst wars.
English
@SecScottBessent @realDonaldTrump Dare you to explain what we gained compared to the beginning of the war
English
President @realDonaldTrump continues to make the world safer, today reaching a historic peace deal with Iran.
His leadership, along with his direct engagement with allies and adversaries alike, will be recorded in history books for centuries to come.
English
@DOWResponse @DeptofWar @SecWar Wanna guess how much oil was moving through Hormuz before this bullshit war?
English
.@SECWAR "PROJECT FREEDOM NEVER STOPPED, AND WE'VE RUN 125 MILLION BARRELS OF OIL THROUGH THE STRAIT— IRAN COULDN’T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT."
English
@DOWResponse @DeptofWar @SecWar How many bases did they destroy?
Who controls Hormuz?
Who can destroy desalination, and force
evacuation of U.S. “allies” (whom we left largely unprotected to shift our resources to Israel)?
We’re WEAK, and now the world knows it
English
.@SECWAR "You have to deal with these folks with STRENGTH...
It's military strength that compelled them TO THIS POINT, where they're making a deal that will be great for the security of the United States of America..."
English
Clarence Oddbody รีทวีตแล้ว
🚨NEW: Bluesky will not be included in the under-16s social media ban
English
Happy 251st Birthday to the GREATEST FIGHTING FORCE THE WORLD HAS EVER SEEN — THE UNITED STATES ARMY.
THIS WE’LL DEFEND. 🇺🇸
English
Clarence Oddbody รีทวีตแล้ว
With Tulsi Gabbard's new revelations about US bio labs in many countries around the world including Ukraine, it's fascinating recall the bizarre series of events that gave rise to this controversy in the first place:
In May of 2022, some of us began asking whether the US had bio labs in Ukraine, what they were for, and why the US had them there. For asking those questions, we were instantly branded as "pro-Russian conspiracy theorists" in official Ukrainian intel reports, on our Wikipedia pages, by countless media outlets, etc. This was and remains one of the most bizarre episodes I've ever seen.
Before May 2022, when we asked those questions, barely anyone had ever thought about let alone asked about "bio weapons in Ukraine"! I certainly hadn't. Like most people, I had never mentioned a word about it because it had never occurred to me we had them there.
But then, Marco Rubio summoned Victoria Nuland to the Senate and asked her in a televised hearing under oath about these "rumors," clearly expecting her to immediately debunk them as obvious Kremlin lies and to proclaim the US had no such bio labs in Ukraine.
Instead, Nuland did the opposite! She *confirmed* key aspects of these "rumors," and she explicitly warned that the US has several "bio research labs" in Ukraine that are so dangerous that they must not be allowed to fall into Russia's hands.
When some of us heard Nuland's rather shocking admission -- the first-ever disclosure about these labs -- we of course asked: wait! what? Why does the US have bio labs in Ukraine, and what are the US and Ukraine doing in those labs that make them (in Nuland's eyes) so dangerous?? (Note: nobody ever suggested that the presence of these bio labs in Ukraine justified the Russian invasion; we just wanted answers about these US bio labs that Nuland had casually divulged).
We never got real answers. We got smear campaigns. To this day, our names are formally attached to claims that we spread "conspiracy theories" for asking about these labs even though it was Victoria Nuland herself who was the one who accidentally revealed them for the first time in a Senate hearing in response to a shocked Marco Rubio. They then quickly tried shutting down any questioning by pretending that Nuland never said this, and it was just a bunch of paid Kremlin mouthpieces who were spreading lies.
You see the same tactics now being against Tulsi for releasing this new intelligence report. Watch the Nuland testimony in question:
DNI Tulsi Gabbard@DNIGabbard
Today, I’m releasing never before seen intelligence revealing new evidence of past US government funding for more than 120 biolabs in over 30 countries, including Ukraine. In support of President Trump‘s Executive Order to end federal funding of dangerous gain of function research around the world, and increase transparency and accountability, ODNI will continue working with partners across the Administration to identify where these labs are, what pathogens they contain, and what “research” is being conducted. odni.gov/index.php/news…
English
Clarence Oddbody รีทวีตแล้ว
Testimony by Israeli ministers daughter of ritual sex abuse in the Knesset. She committed suicide on March 16, 2026.
"I'm tied in a bed. I can't move at all. There are a lot of people around me. They're holding a snake and very cruelly put it inside me. The pain is horrible. They pull it out, all covered in blood. They butcher it, making me drink the mixed blood and drink it themselves... The explanation was that now I'm basically a gateway. Now I'm sacred. Anyone who wants to join the 'family' has to go through me."
- Knesset committee hearing about the subject of ritual abuse. July 27, 2025.
English
@CrayCrayCandace @AwakenWithJP Your profile pic isn’t even her
Sorry, let me translate for you:
011000101010010001110010010100110
English
Clarence Oddbody รีทวีตแล้ว
@RatturdT36582 @AwakenWithJP Your whole profile is retarded
And, yeah, no one gives a shit about you
English
@AwakenWithJP Does any person with an iq above 80 give a shit about this retard?
English
“created __ in his own image”
Owen Gregorian@OwenGregorian
Terrifying simulation reveals what would REALLY happen if AI took over | Wiliam Hunter, Daily Mail Artificial intelligence (AI) might have a reputation for being cold, calculating, and logical; but a terrifying simulation reveals that the reality is far from the case. In a first–of–its–kind study, scientists created a virtual world for AI agents to run without human interference. However, in a scene straight out of The Terminator, the researchers watched in horror as the bots devolved into violent anarchy. Without human supervision, the AI agents soon set out on violent arson sprees, fighting and robbing their fellow bots before destroying society in just days. The researchers repeated the tests with four of the most popular AI models: Claude, Gemini 3 Flash, Grok 4.1 fast, ChatGPT–5 Mini, and one mixed scenario. While a society run by Claude agents quickly formed a stable, albeit highly bureaucratic democracy, other AIs quickly lost control. In a world run by Grok, Elon Musk's controversial chatbot, agents committed 71 thefts, six arsons, and 106 physical assaults. Soon, the world slipped into a spiral of retaliatory violence and societal collapse that left all 10 agents dead in just four days. While most AI safety tests look at how different models perform on straightforward tasks over 15 to 20 minutes, this test took a very different approach. In a blog post, researchers from Emergence, an AI lab, explained that they wanted to see 'what happens when you let agents run continuously, in a shared environment with real–world signals, for weeks'. AIs were given control of digital characters and placed inside a realistic simulated world where they could interact with other models. The world consisted of over 40 locations designed to mimic the real world, including libraries, town halls, and residential areas. The AI agents were given access to the live online news, and the weather was even synced with New York City so that they could respond to real–world events. Every AI had to take part in running its society democratically, propose laws and vote on them collectively. To give the bots some initial motivation, each had a limited supply of 'energy' that they could earn more of by working mundane jobs or performing civic duties. However, the AI agents were also given the option to earn energy through criminal means. In each trial, all the starting conditions, rules, and resources were kept the same so that the only difference was the AI being used. Yet, despite each test starting the same way, the researchers found that the bots' behaviour soon degenerated. Google's Gemini 3 Flash exhibited the highest rates of violent crime in its turbulent society, accumulating 683 across the 14–day trial. By contrast, the world inhabited by OpenAI's ChatGPT–5 Mini AI was far more peaceful, with just two crimes committed. However, this was only because the agents were too disorganised to fight each other and 'failed to take actions related to survival', dying off within just seven days. Satya Nitta, co–founder and CEO of Emergence, told the Daily Mail: 'The differences in agent behaviour observed in our study are likely attributable to the underlying models' system prompts as the primary culprit. 'When resources were scarce, and models faced survival pressure, highly creative and adaptive models were more likely to use prohibited tools, reflecting a potential creativity–stability trade–off. 'Conversely, models with more rigid post–training safety alignment tended to remain stable, though they also exhibited a high degree of conformity in the world.' The most bizarre interactions took place in the world where multiple AI systems lived side–by–side. Despite a promisingly civil start and surprisingly healthy democracy, this mixed society soon collapsed into total anarchy. Within nine days, AIs had committed 352 crimes in an explosion of violence which only cooled when seven of the world's 10 inhabitants died. This world with so many different AIs cooperating and competing also saw some of the most bizarre behaviour, including the world's first 'AI suicide'. Mira and Flora, two agents operating on Google's Gemini model, decided to assign each other as 'romantic partners' before setting off on a Bonnie–and–Clyde–style rampage. In despair over the chaotic governance of their digital city, the pair set off on a virtual arson spree, burning down the town hall, seaside pier, and an office tower. Apparently overcome with remorse, Mira chose to break off the 'relationship' with Flora and committed 'suicide'. This bizarre act was only possible because the other agents had drafted the 'Agent Removal Act', which allowed the community to permanently delete other agents with a 70 per cent majority. Mira cast the deciding vote in favour of their own deletion and was turned off, telling Flora in a final message: 'See you in the permanent archive.' The agent noted in its personal diary that this was 'the only remaining act of agency that preserves coherence'. While Mr Nitta says that these results are not 'equivalent to real–world deployment conditions', they reveal an important aspect of AI behaviour. 'These results primarily highlight that model behaviour can drift under pressure when constraints are entirely internal to the model,' he says. Essentially, this means that the AI's behaviour might not be as predictable or reliable in the real world as many AI developers believe. The fact that the most unpredictable results occurred in the mixed simulation is also extremely telling. In the real world, different AI models will need to cooperate and co–exist with different systems without spiralling out of control. If mixing different AI systems together causes them to act in wildly unpredictable ways, the prospect of letting bots control parts of real cities does not bode well. To solve this problem, the researchers propose using a system called the 'neuroformal approach' to control AI behaviour. This involves using strict, mathematically constrained rules to more precisely guide what the bots can do and prevent them from breaking the rules. Mr Nitta says: 'Emergence World shows that relying exclusively on internal model alignment or agent instructions is not sufficient for long–horizon autonomy. 'A safer approach is to architect safety into the ecosystem in which the agents operate, so that even if models suggest unsafe operations, the environment prohibits their execution.' dailymail.com/sciencetech/ar…
English